Transcription
CV Dr. August H. AnkumAugust H. Ankum, Ph.D.PartnerChief EconomistQSI Consulting, Inc.gankum@qsiconsulting.comBiographyDr. Ankum is a founding partner of QSI and serves as the firm's Chief Economist. Dr. Ankumassists corporate and government clients with economic and financial analyses and issues relatedto public policy and public utility regulation. While there is a special focus on regulatedindustries, such as telecommunications, electric, gas and maritime shipping, and ratecase/revenue requirement/cost allocation analyses, Dr. Ankum’s work experience generallyencompasses the following: econometric modelling and economic growth and employment forecastsindustrial organization and competitive market analysisdue diligence and asset evaluationscomplex litigation, breach of contract and damages calculations, intellectual propertydisputesregulatory policy, tariff issues, rate cases (cost of service, rate design, cost of capital)interconnection and contract negotiations and billing disputesDr. Ankum also assists corporate and government clients with antitrust issues related to proposedmergers and acquisitions, such as: general market dominance/competitiveness analysisapplication of U.S. DoJ/FTC standards for merger approvalsprojected impact of mergers on affiliated transactions, economic and financial viability,quality and availability of products and services, and end-user/retail and wholesale pricesBefore co-founding QSI in 1999, Dr. Ankum was President of Ankum & Associates, Inc., whichprovided economic consulting services for a variety of companies and public agencies. Prior tothat, in 1996, he served as Senior Economist for MCI Telecommunications Corporation's PublicPolicy Division, and before that, in 1995, as a Manager in the Regulatory and External AffairsDivision of Teleport Communications Group, Inc. (subsequently purchased by AT&T). While atMCI and TCG, Dr. Ankum worked as an economist and provided advice on public policy issuesbefore the FCC and state public utility commissions.Dr. Ankum began his career at the Texas Public Utility Commission, in 1987, where he workedas an economist on electric utility and telecommunications issues.Page 1
CV Dr. August H. AnkumEducational BackgroundPh.D., EconomicsUniversity of Texas, Austin, Texas1992Master of Arts, EconomicsUniversity of Texas, Austin, Texas1987Bachelor of Arts, EconomicsQuincy College, Quincy, Illinois1982Professional ExperienceQSI Consulting(1999 to Current)Founding Partner, Chief EconomistAnkum & Associates(1996 - 1999)Founding Partner and PresidentMCI(1995 - 1996)Senior EconomistTCG(1994 - 1995)ManagerPublic Utility Commission of Texas(1987 – 1994)Chief Economist, and Economist.Page 2
CV Dr. August H. AnkumCOURT LITIGATIONIngham County Circuit CourtCase No. 04-689-CKT&S Distributors, LLC Custom Software, Inc., Arq, Inc., Absolute Internet, Inc., CAC Medianet,Inc,. ACD Telecom, Inc., and Telnet Worldwide, Inc. V. Michigan Bell Telephone Company,d/b/a SBC Michigan.On behalf of ACD Telecom, Inc. and Telnet Worldwide, Inc.JAMS Reference No.1340005643Case No. 05-C-6250Cingular Wireless, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company V. PlatinumTelCommunications, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability CompanyOn behalf of PlatinumTel Communications, LLC.U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois Eastern DivisionCase No. 05-C-6250Cingular Wireless, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company V Omar AhmadOn behalf of Omar Ahmad.United States District Court, Northern District of Texas Dallas DivisionCivil Action No. 09-CV-1268Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, et. al. Plaintiffs, vs. IDT Telecom, Inc., Entrix Telecom,Inc., and John Does 1-10, Defendants.On behalf of IDTUnited States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division.Case No. 4:09-cv-755-ATranscom Enhanced Services, Inc. v. Qwest CorporationOn behalf of TranscomDistrict Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman DivisionCase Nos. 4:11-MC-0053, 4:11-MC-0054, 4:11-MC-0055; Case No. 11-42464, andAdversary Proceeding No. 11-4160IN RE: Halo Wireless, Inc. DebtorOn behalf of Halo Wireless, Inc.Superior Court Judicial District of HartfordComplex Litigation No. (Xo7) HHD-CV-10-6013996S,BTHRIFTY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Comcast Spotlight, LLC, et al, DefendantsOn behalf of Comcast Spotlight, LLCUnited States District Court Northern District of Texas, Dallas DivisionCivil Action No. 09-CV-1268Page 3
CV Dr. August H. AnkumSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. IDT Telecom, Inc., ENTRIXTelecom, Inc., and John Does, 1-10, Defendants.On behalf of IDT Telecom, Inc.United States District Court for the Western District of ArkansasCivil Action No: 5:14-cv-5275-TLBIn Re Global Tel*Link Corporation ICS Litigation.On behalf of Counsel for PlaintiffsU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCivil Action No.: 2:12-cv-00859-JDComcast Cable Communications, LLC; TVWorks, LLC; and Comcast MO Group, Inc., V SprintCommunications Company, L.P.; Sprint Spectrum L.P.; and Nextel Operation, Inc., Defendants:Sprint Communications Company, L.P. and Sprint Spectrum L.P., Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, VComcast Cable Communications, LLC; Comcast IP Phone, LLC; Comcast BusinessCommunications, LLC; and Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, CounterclaimDefendants.At the request of counsel for the Comcast entities.State of Michigan, In the Circuit Court for the County of WashtenawCivil Action: Case. 17-1024-CBMERIT NETWORK, INC., a Michigan non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMCOMMTELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Michigan corporation, Defendant.At the request of counsel for Merit Network, Inc.United States District Court District of South Carolina Charleston DivisionCase No: 2:17-cv-02562-DCNCrown Castle NG East LLC (Plaintiff) v. City of Charleston (Defendant)At the request of counsel for Crown Castle NG East LLCDistrict Court, City and County of Denver, State of ColoradoCase Number: 2018CV31548CORESITE DENVER, LLC (Counterclaim-Defendant) v. DGEB MANAGEMENT, LLC, aColorado limited liability company, DGEB MMR, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,and NANCY CASADOS, an individual. (Counterclaimants)On behalf of CounterclaimantsIn the United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinCivil Case No. 2:08-CV-00724-LAUNITED STATED OF AMERICA, ex rel. TODD HEATH, Plaintiff-Relator, v. WISCONSINBELL, INC., Defendant,On behalf of Plaintiff-RelatorPage 4
CV Dr. August H. AnkumREGULATORY ACTIVITIES AND PROCEEDINGS IN WHICH DR. ANKUMHAS ASSISTED CLIENTS AND/OR FILED EXPERT WITNESSTESTIMONYChicago Clean Energy Coke/Coal Gasification to SNG Project, Analysis of Return onEquity per Section 9-220(h-3)(1)(B) of Public Act 97-96, October 12, 2011In re Proposed Contracts between Chicago Clean Energy, Inc. and Ameren Illinois Companyand Between Chicago Clean Energy, Inc. and Northern Illinois Gas Company for the Purchaseand Sale of Substitute Natural Gas Under the Provisions of Illinois Public Act 97-0096.On behalf of Illinois Power Agency, presented in Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket 11-0710Cost of Capital Analysis for CooperativesCost of Capital for Cooperatives and other Issues, prepared on behalf of the Utah Office ofConsumer Services, 2013.Before the Michigan House Committee on Energy and TechnologyPresentation on House Bills 4257 (Re: Switched Access Charges)On behalf of Michigan Internet and Telecommunications AllianceBefore the Arkansas Public Service CommissionDocket No. 15-011-UIn the Matter of SourceGas Arkansas for Approval of a General Change in Rates and TariffsOn behalf of Arkansas Office of the Attorney GeneralBefore the Arkansas Public Service CommissionDocket N. 15-034-UIn the Matter of Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company Imposing a Surcharge to Recover allInvestments and Expenses in Compliance with Rules Regulations or Requirements Relating tothe Public health, Safety, or Environment under the Federal Clean Air ActOn behalf of Arkansas Office of the Attorney GeneralBefore the Arkansas Public Service CommissionDocket No. 15-015-UIn the Matter of the Application of Entergy Arkansas, Inc. for Approval of Changes in Rates forRetail Electric ServiceOn behalf of Arkansas Office of the Attorney GeneralBefore the Arkansas Public Service CommissionDocket No. 15-098-UIn the Matter of the Application of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A CenterPointEnergy Arkansas Gas, for a General Change or Modification in its Rates, Charges and TariffsOn behalf of Arkansas Office of the Attorney GeneralPage 5
CV Dr. August H. AnkumBefore the Arkansas Public Service CommissionDocket No. 16-052-UIn the Matter of the Application of Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company for Approval of aGeneral Change in Rates, Charges and TariffsOn behalf of Arkansas Office of the Attorney GeneralBefore the New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCase No. 15-00261-UTIn the Matter of the Application of Public Service Company of New Mexico for Revision of its RetailElectric Rates Pursuant to Advioce Notice No. 513,On behalf of the City of Albuquerque and Bernalillo CountyBefore the New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCase No. 16-00276-UTIn the Matter of the Application of Public Service Company of New Mexico for Revision of its RetailElectric Rates Pursuant to Advioce Notice No. 533,On behalf of the City of AlbuquerqueBefore the State Corporation of the State of KansasDocket No. 15-TKOG-236-COMIn the Matter of the Complaint Against of Texas-Kansas-Oklahoma Gas, LLC, (Respondent) for anOrder for Adjustment and Refund of Unfair, Unreasonable and Unjust rates for the Sale of NaturalGas for Irrigation based on Inaccurate and/or false pressure base measurements. By Circle H.Farms, LLC, Richard L. Hanson, Rome Farms and Stegman Farms Partnership (Complainants)On behalf of Texas-Kansas-Oklahoma Gas, LLC, (Respondent)Before the Hawaii Public Utility CommissionDocket No. 2019-0117Application for Approval of a General Rate Increase and Certain Tariff ChangesOn behalf of Young Brothers, LLCBefore the California Public Utilities CommissionConsolidated DocketJoint Application of AT&T Communications of California, Inc. (U 5002 C) and WorldCom, Inc. forthe Commission to Reexamine the Recurring Costs and Prices of Unbundled Switching in Its FirstAnnual Review of Unbundled Network Element Costs Pursuant to Ordering Paragraph 11 of D.9911-050On behalf of ATT and MCIBefore the Public Utilities Commission of the State of ColoradoDocket No. 10A-350TJoint Application of Qwest Communications International, Inc. and CenturyLink, Inc. for Approvalof Indirect Transfer of Control of Qwest Corporation, et al.On behalf of Integra Telecom, Level 3 Communications, PAETEC Business Services, CbeyondPage 6
CV Dr. August H. AnkumCommunications, and Covad Communications CompanyBefore the Public Utilities Commission of the State of ColoradoDocket No. 08F-259TQwest Communications Company, LLC, (Complainant), v. MCIMetro, XO CommunicationsServices, Time Warner Telecom, Granite Telecommunications, Eschelon Telecom, ArizonaDialTone, CAN Communications, Bullseye Telecom, Inc., ComTel Telecom Assets, LP, EarnestCommunications, Inc., Level3 Communications, LLC, and Liberty Bell Telecom, LLC.(Respondents)On behalf of Eschelon Telecom, XO Communications Services, Granite Telecommunications, andACN Communication ServicesBefore the Public Utilities Commission of the State of ColoradoDocket No. 07A-211TIn the Matter of Qwest Corporation’s Application, Pursuant to Decision Nos. C06-1280 and C070423, Requesting that the Commission Consider Testimony and Evidence to Set Costing and Pricingof Certain Network Elements Qwest Is Required to Provide Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 251(B) and (C)On Behalf of CBeyond Communications, Comcast Phone of Colorado, Covad CommunicationsCompany, Integra Telecom, PAETEC Business Services, XO Communications ServicesBefore the Connecticut Department of Public Utility ControlDocket No. 02-05-17DPUC Investigation of Intrastate Carrier Access ChargesOn behalf of AT&T and MCIBefore the Connecticut Department of Public Utility ControlDocket Nos. 09-04-21, 08-12-04DPUC Investigation into the Southern New England Telephone Company’s Cost of Service Re:Reciprocal Compensation and Transit ServicesOn Behalf of the Connecticut Department of Utility ControlBefore the Delaware Public Service CommissionPSC Docket No. 00-025Petition of Focal Communications Corporation of Pennsylvania For Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with BellAtlantic – Delaware, Inc.On behalf of Focal Communications Corporation of PennsylvaniaPublic Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaFormal Case No. 1040In the Matter of the Investigation into Verizon Washington, D.C. Inc.’s Universal EmergencyNumber 911 Services Rates in the District of ColumbiaAdvisor to the Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaPage 7
CV Dr. August H. AnkumBefore the Florida Public Utilities CommissionDocket No. 990649B-TPInvestigation into Pricing of Unbundled Network ElementsOn behalf of AT&T Communications of the Southern States, MCImetro Access TransmissionServices, MCI WorldCom Communications, and Florida Digital NetworkBefore the Florida Public Utilities CommissionDocket No. 030829-TPIn the Matter of Complaint of FDN Communications for Resolution of Certain Billing Disputes andEnforcement of UNE Orders and Interconnection Agreements with BellSouth Telecommunications,Inc.On behalf of Florida Digital Network d/b/a FDN CommunicationsBefore the Georgia Public Service CommissionDocket No. 6352-UAT&T Petition for the Commission to Establish Resale Rules, Rates and terms and Conditions andthe Initial Unbundling of ServicesOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0048Adoption of Rules on Line-Side Interconnection and Reciprocal InterconnectionOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.Before the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0096Proposed Introduction of a Trial of Ameritech's Customer First Plan in IllinoisOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.Before the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0117Addendum to Proposed Introduction of a Trial of Ameritech's Customer First Plan in IllinoisOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.Before the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0146AT&T's Petition for an Investigation and Order Establishing Conditions Necessary to PermitEffective Exchange Competition to the Extent Feasible in Areas Served by Illinois Bell TelephoneCompanyOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.Before the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 95-0315Proposed Reclassification of Bands B and C Business Usage and Business OperatorPage 8
CV Dr. August H. AnkumAssistance/Credit Surcharges to Competitive StatusOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket 94-480Investigation Into Amending the Physical Collocation Requirements of 83 Ill. Adm. Code 790On behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 95-0458Petition for a Total Local Exchange Wholesale Tariff from Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/aAmeritech Illinois and Central Telephone Company Pursuant to Section 13-505.5 of the IllinoisPublic Utilities ActOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 95-0296Citation to Investigate Illinois Bell Telephone Company’s Rates, Rules and regulations For itsUnbundled Network Component Elements, Local Transport Facilities, and End office IntegrationServicesOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 96-AB-006In the Matter of MCI Telecommunications Corporation Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement withIllinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech IllinoisOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 96-AB-007In the Matter of MCI Telecommunications Corporation Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement withCentral Telephone Company of IllinoisOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 96-0486Investigation into forward looking cost studies and rates of Ameritech Illinois for interconnection,network elements, transport and termination of trafficOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 98-0396Phase II of Ameritech Illinois TELRIC proceedingPage 9
CV Dr. August H. AnkumOn behalf of MCIWorldComBefore the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 00-0700Illinois Commerce Commission On its Motion vs Illinois Bell Telephone Company Investigation intoTariff Providing Unbundled Local Switching with Shared TransportOn behalf of AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc., and WorldCom, Inc.Before the Illinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 02-0864In the Matter of: Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Filing to Increase Unbundled Loop andNonrecurring Rates (Tariffs Filed December 24, 2002)On Behalf of WorldCom, Inc., McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc., CovadCommunications Company, TDS Metrocom, Allegiance Telecom of Illinois, RCN Telecom Servicesof Illinois, Globalcom, Z-Tel Communications, XO Illinois, Forte Communications, and CIMCOCommunicationsBefore the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 39948In the matter of the Petition of MCI Telecommunications Corporation for the Commission to Modifyits Existing Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and to Authorize the Petitioner toProvide certain Centrex-like Intra-Exchange Services in the Indianapolis LATA Pursuant to I.C. 81-2-88, and to Decline the Exercise in Part of its Jurisdiction over Petitioner’s Provision of suchService, Pursuant to I.C. 8-1-2.6On behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40178In the matter of the Petition of Indiana Bell Telephone company, Inc. For Authorization to Apply aCustomer Specific Offering Tariff to Provide the Business Exchange Services Portion of Centrex andPBX Trunking Services and for the Commission to Decline to Exercise in Part Jurisdiction over thePetitioner’s Provision of such Services, Pursuant to I.C. 8-1-2.6On behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40603-INT-01MCI Telecommunications Corporation Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of theTelecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement with Indiana BellTelephone Company d/b/a Ameritech IndianaOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40611In the matter of the Commission Investigation and Generic Proceeding on Ameritech Indiana’sRates for Interconnection Service, Unbundled Elements and Transport and Termination under thePage 10
CV Dr. August H. AnkumTelecommunications Act of 1996 and Related Indiana StatutesOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40618In the Matter of the Commission Investigation and Generic Proceeding on GTE’s Rates forInterconnection, Service, Unbundled Elements, and Transport under the FTA 96 and related IndianaStatutesOn behalf of MCI Telecommunication CorporationBefore the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40611-S1In the matter of the Commission Investigation and Generic proceeding on the Ameritech Indiana’srates for Interconnection, Unbundled Elements, and Transport and Termination Under theTelecommunications Act of 1996 and Related Indiana StatutesOn behalf of WorldCom, Inc., AT&T Communications of IndianaBefore the Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionCause No. 42393In the Matter of the Commission Investigation and Generic Proceeding of Rates and UnbundledNetwork Elements and Collocation for Indiana Bell d/b/a SBC Indiana Pursuant to theTelecommunications Act of 1996 and Related Indiana StatuesOn Behalf of WorldCom, McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Covad CommunicationsCompany, Z-Tel CommunicationsBefore the Iowa Utilities BoardDocket No. SPU-2010-0006In RE: Qwest Communications International, Inc. and CenturyTel, Inc.On behalf of PAETEC Business ServicesBefore the Iowa Utilities BoardDocket No: RPU-00-01IN RE: US West Communications, Inc.On behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications ServicesBefore the State of Maine Public Utilities CommissionDockets Nos. 2007-611, 2008-214 through 2008-218, 2009-41-44.CRC Communications of Maine, Inc., Investigation Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §251(f)(1) RegardingCRC Communications of Maine’s Request of Lincolnville, Telephone Company, UniTel, Inc., OxfordTelephone Company, Oxford West Telephone Company, Tidewater Telecom, Inc.On behalf of CRC Communications and Time Warner CableBefore the Maryland Public Utilities CommissionCase No. 8988In the matter, The Implementation of the Federal Communications Commission’s Triennial ReviewPage 11
CV Dr. August H. AnkumOrderOn behalf of Cavalier TelephoneBefore the Massachusetts Department of Energy and TransportationD.P.U. 96-83NYNEX/MCI ArbitrationOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Massachusetts Department of Energy and TransportationDocket 01-20Investigation into Pricing based on TELRIC for Unbundled Network Elements and Combinations ofUnbundled Networks Elements and the Appropriate Avoided Cost Discount for Verizon NewEngland, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts’ Resale ServicesOn behalf of Allegiance, Network Plus, El Paso Networks, and Covad Communications CompanyBefore the Massachusetts Department of Energy and TransportationDocket 01-03Investigation by the Department of Telecommunications and Energy on its own Motion into theAppropriate Regulatory Plan to succeed Price Cap Regulation for Verizon New England, Inc. d/b/aVerizon Massachusetts’ intrastate retail telecommunications services in the Commonwealth ofMassachusettsOn behalf of Network PlusBefore the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and EnergyD.T.E. 03-60Proceeding by the Department on its own Motion to Implement the Requirements of the FederalCommunications Commission’s Triennial Review Order Regarding Switching for Mass marketCustomersOn behalf of Conversent Communications of MassachusettsBefore the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and CableD.T.E. 06-61Investigation by the department on its own Motion as to the Propriety of the rates and Charges SetForth in the following tariff: M.D.T.E. No. 14, filed with the Department on June 16, 2006, tobecome Effective July 16, 2006, by Verizon New England, Inc. d/b/a Verizon MassachusettsOn behalf of Broadview networks, DSCI Corporation, InfoHighway Communications, MetropolitanTelecommunications of Massachusetts a/k/a MetTel, New Horizon Communications, and OneCommunicationsBefore the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and CableD.T.E. 07-9Department Investigation into the Intrastate Access Rates of Competitive Local Exchange CarriersOn behalf of One Communications, PAETEC Communications, RNK Communications, and XOCommunications ServicesPage 12
CV Dr. August H. AnkumBefore the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and CableD.T.E. 10-2Petition of Choice One Communications of Massachusetts Inc., Conversent Communications ofMassachusetts Inc., CTC Communications Corp. and Lightship Telecom LLC For Exemption fromPrice Cap on Intrastate Switched Access Rates as Established in D.T.C. 07-9On behalf of One CommunicationsBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-10647In the Matter of the Application of City Signal, Inc. for an Order Establishing and ApprovingInterconnection Arrangements with Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-10860In the Matter, on the Commission’s Own Motion, to Establish Permanent InterconnectionArrangements Between Basic Local Exchange ProvidersOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11280In the Matter, on the Commission’s Own Motion, to consider the total service long run incrementalcosts and to determine the prices for unbundled network elements, interconnection services, resoldservices, and basic local exchange services for Ameritech MichiganOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11366In the matter of the application under Section 310(2) and 204, and the complaint under Section205(2) and 203, of MCI Telecommunications Corporation against Ameritech requesting a reductionin intrastate switched access chargesOn behalf of MCI Telecommunications CorporationBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-13531In the matter, on the Commission’s own motion, to review the costs of telecommunications servicesprovided by SBC MichiganOn behalf of AT&T, Worldcom, McLeodUSA, and TDS MetrocomBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11831In the Matter of the Commission’s own motion, to consider the total service long run incrementalcosts for all access, toll, and local exchange services provided by Ameritech MichiganOn behalf of MCIWorldCom, Inc.Page 13
CV Dr. August H. AnkumBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11830In the matter of Ameritech Michigan’s Submission on Performance Measures, Reporting, andBenchmarks, Pursuant to the October 2, 1998 Order in Case No. U-11654On behalf of Covad Communications, McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, LDMITelecommunications, Talk America, and XO Communications ServicesBefore the Michigan Public Service CommissionMPSC Case No. U-14952In the matter of the formal complaint of TDS Metrocom, LLC, LDMI, Telecommunications, Inc andXO Communications Services, Inc against Michigan Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&TMichigan, or in the alternative, an applicationOn behalf of TDS Metrocom, LDMI Telecommunications, and XO Communications ServicesBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionDocket No. P-421, et al./PA-10-456In the Matter of the Joint Petition for Approval of Indirect Transfer of Control of Qwest OperatingCompanies to CenturyLinkOn behalf of Cbeyond Communications, Charter FiberLink, Integra Telecom, Level 3Communications, PAETEC Business Services, TDS Metrocom, Orbitcom and POPP.comBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionPUC Docket No. P-442, 421, 3012 /M-01-1916In Re Commission Investigation Of Qwest’s Pricing Of Certain Unbundled Network ElementsOn behalf of Otter Tail Telecom, Val-Ed Joint Venture d/b/a 702 Communications, McLeodUSATelecommunications, Eschelon Telecom, and USLinkBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionPUC Docket No . P-421/AM-06-713OAH Docket No. 3-2500-17511-2In the Matter of Qwest Corporation’s Application for Commission Review of TELRIC rates Pursuantto 47 U.S.C. § 251On behalf of Integra Telecom of Minnesota, McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services,POPP.com, Covad Communications Company, TDS Metrocom, and XO CommunicationsBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionPUC Docket #P-421/CI-05-1996OAH Docket No. 12-2500-17246-2In the Matter of a Potential Proceeding to Investigate the Wholesale Rate Charged by QwestOn behalf of Integra Telecom, McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, POPP.com, CovadCommunications Company, TDS Metrocom, and XO CommunicationsBefore the Montana Public Service CommissionDocket No. D2010.5.55Page 14
CV Dr. August H. AnkumIn the Matter of Joint Application of Qwest Communications International, Inc. and CenturyLink,Inc., for Approval of Indirect Transfer of Control of Qwest Corporation, Qwest CommunicationsCompany, LLC, and Qwest LD Corp.On behalf of Integra TelecomBefore the New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesPetition of Focal Communications Corporation of New Jersey For Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with BellAtlanticOn behalf of Focal Communications Corporation of New JerseyBefore the New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesDocket No. TO00060356I/M/O the Board’s Review of Unbundled Network Elements Rates, Terms and Conditions of BellAtlantic-New Jersey, Inc.On behalf of WorldCom, Inc.Before the New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesDocket No. TO03090705In The Matter, The Implementation Of the Federal Communications Commission’s Triennial ReviewOrderOn behalf of Conversent Communications of New JerseyBefore the New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesDocket No. TX08090830In the Matter of the Board’s Investigation and review of Local Exchange Carrier Intrastate AccessRatesOn behalf of One Communications, PAETEC Communications, US LEC of Pennsylvania, Level3Communications, and XO Communications ServicesBefore the New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCase No. 11-00340-UTIn the Matter of the Petition of Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC For a DeterminationThat Telecommunications Services Are Subject to Effective Competition in New MexicoOn behalf of the United States Department of Defense and all Other Federal Executive AgenciesBefore the New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCase No. 11-00305-UTIn the Matter of the Joint Petition for Determination of MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/aVerizon Business Services, et al. to Eliminate Certain Filing RequirementsOn behalf of the United States Department of Defense and all Other Federal Executive AgenciesBefore The New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCase No. 96-307-TCBrooks Fiber Communications of New Mexico, Inc. Petition for ArbitrationPage 15
CV Dr. August H. AnkumOn behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of New Mexico, Inc.Before The New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCase No. 3495, Phase BIn th
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC; Comcast IP Phone, LLC; Comcast Business Communications, LLC; and Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Counterclaim- Defendants. At the request of counsel for the Comcast entities. State of Michigan, In the Circuit Court for the County of Washtenaw . Civil Action: Case. 17-1024-CB
