Transcription
Wednesday30 March 2022Session 2021-22No. 144PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES(HANSARD)HOUSE OF LORDSWRITTEN STATEMENTS ANDWRITTEN ANSWERSWritten Statements . 1Written Answers . 4
[I] indicates that the member concerned has a relevant registered interest. The full register of interests can be found /Members who want a printed copy of Written Answers and Written Statements should notify the Printed Paper Office.This printed edition is a reproduction of the original text of Answers and Statements, which can be found on the internetat http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/.Ministers and others who make Statements or answer Questions are referred to only by name, not their ministerial orother title. The current list of ministerial and other responsibilities is as follows.MinisterResponsibilitiesBaroness Evans of Bowes ParkLeader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy SealEarl HoweDeputy Leader of the House of LordsLord Ahmad of WimbledonMinister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeLord Ashton of HydeChief WhipBaroness BarranParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for EducationLord BenyonParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and RuralAffairsBaroness Bloomfield of HintonWaldristWhipLord CaineParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Northern Ireland OfficeLord CallananParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Energy and IndustrialStrategyBaroness Chisholm of OwlpenWhipEarl of CourtownDeputy Chief WhipBaroness GoldieMinister of State, Ministry of DefenceLord Goldsmith of Richmond ParkMinister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Foreign,Commonwealth and Development OfficeLord GreenhalghMinister of State, Home Office and Department for Levelling Up, Housing and CommunitiesLord Grimstone of BoscobelMinister of State, Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Departmentfor International TradeLord Harrington of WatfordMinister of State, Home OfficeLord KamallParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social CareLord Offord of GarvelParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Scotland OfficeLord Parkinson of Whitley BayParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and SportBaroness PennWhipBaroness Scott of BybrookWhipLord Sharpe of EpsomWhipBaroness Stedman-ScottParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Officeand Department for Work and PensionsLord Stewart of DirletonAdvocate-General for ScotlandLord TrueMinister of State, Cabinet OfficeBaroness Vere of NorbitonParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for TransportBaroness Williams of TraffordMinister of State, Home OfficeLord Wolfson of TredegarParliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of JusticeViscount Younger of LeckieWhip Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2022This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence,which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/
Written Statements30 March 2022Written StatementsWednesday, 30 March 2022Contingent Liability for the Ajax LessonsLearned Review[HLWS721]Baroness Goldie: My hon. Friend, the Minister forDefence Procurement (Jeremy Quin) has made thefollowing written ministerial statement:I wish to inform the House that I am today laying aDepartmental Minute to advise of a new contingentliability associated with the Ajax Lessons LearnedReview.Clive Sheldon QC has agreed to lead the review.Negotiations are ongoing and the contingent liability willcome into force on the formal appointment of the Chair.The Departmental Minute describes the contingentliability that the MOD will hold, which will provide anindemnity for conducting and reporting the review. Themaximum contingent liability held against the MOD isunquantifiable and will remain following publication ofthe report.It is usual to allow a period of 14 Sitting Days prior toaccepting a contingent liability, to provide Members ofParliament an opportunity to raise any objections.Exposure is limited to the contingent liability of anylegal action in the run up to and following the publicationof the Review’s report. It will not cover claims forliabilities: Arising from any fraud, wilful misconduct,dishonesty, or gross negligence on the part of a memberof the Review Team; and Arising from any wilful breach of any contract oragreement with the Ministry of Defence relating to theReview Team.It is the view of the Department that the likelihood ofany claim is remote.Domestic Abuse Plan[HLWS723]Baroness Williams of Trafford: My rt hon Friend theSecretary of State for the Home Department (Priti Patel)has today made the following Written MinisterialStatement:Today, I am pleased to announce we are publishing thenew cross-Government Tackling Domestic Abuse Plan.The Plan sets out the Government’s vision to drivedown domestic abuse and domestic homicide cases. Andensure that those who experience domestic abuse get thesupport they need.It was developed using responses to the TacklingViolence Against Women and Girls Call for Evidence,Page 1which included the brave and harrowing testimonies ofdomestic abuse victims and survivors. These wereinvaluable in the development of the Plan. It is alsoclosely aligned with the Tackling Violence AgainstWomen and Girls Strategy and shares the same fourpillars: Prioritising Prevention – which includes measures toidentify and address the root causes of domestic abuse,including teaching children about healthy relationships. Supporting Victims – which sets out a wide-rangingpackage of support for victims and survivors, includinga minimum of 15.7 million per annum ringfenced forcommunity-based services supporting victims andsurvivors of domestic abuse and sexual violence, withthe offer of multi-year funding for providers to aiddelivery of high-quality support. In addition, there willbe a minimum of 81 million to fund 700 IndependentDomestic Violence Advocate and Independent SexualViolence Advocate roles, with more funding for anadditional 300 roles to be confirmed later this year. Thepillar also includes a commitment to review whether theexisting statutory leave provisions do enough to supportdomestic abuse victims and survivors. Pursuing Perpetrators – which, along with the widerplan, delivers the statutory requirement to produce astrategy for the prosecution and management ofdomestic abuse perpetrators. The approach it outlines isuncompromising and unrelenting. It involves electronicmonitoring, 75 million for perpetrator interventionsand research, as well as a commitment to exploretougher ways of managing perpetrators including thecreation of a register of domestic abusers. A Stronger System – which explains how we willidentify more cases, improve coordination andcollaboration between agencies, and improve our dataon and knowledge of domestic abuse. This will be donethrough up to a 7.5 million investment intointerventions in healthcare settings, trialling theinnovative Ask for ANI codeword scheme in JobcentrePlus offices and reforms to Domestic HomicideReviews (DHRs), including steps to increase thenumber of suicide cases referred for DHRs.Today, we are also publishing updated versions of theViolence Against Women and Girls National Statement ofExpectations and Violence Against Women and GirlsCommissioning Toolkit. These documents will supportlocal areas in commissioning effective support services.We are also publishing a Supporting Male Victimsdocument today in recognition of the specific challengeswhich may be faced by men and boys who experiencecrimes considered violence against women and girls,including domestic abuse.The Tackling Domestic Abuse Plan has been laidbefore Parliament as a Command Paper (CP 639). TheNational Statement of Expectations, the CommissioningToolkit and the Supporting Male Victims document willbe placed in the libraries of both Houses. All documentswill be made available on GOV.UK.
Page 230 March 2022Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal: UKJudges[HLWS722]Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: My Right HonourableFriend, the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealthand Development Affairs (Elizabeth Truss), has made thefollowing Written Ministerial Statement:British judges have played an important role insupporting the judiciary in Hong Kong for many years.Since 1997 judges from other common law jurisdictions,including the UK, have sat on the Hong Kong Court ofFinal Appeal as part of the continuing commitment tosafeguarding the rule of law.However, since Beijing's imposition of the NationalSecurity Law in 2020, our assessment of the legalenvironment in Hong Kong has been increasingly finelybalanced. China has continued to use the NationalSecurity Law and its related institutions to undermine thefundamental rights and freedoms promised in the JointDeclaration. As National Security Law cases proceedthrough the Courts, we are seeing the implications of thissweeping legislation, including the chilling effect onfreedom of expression, the stifling of opposition voices,and the criminalising of dissent.Given this concerning downward trajectory, the ForeignSecretary has agreed with the Deputy Prime Minister andLord Chancellor, and the President of the UK SupremeCourt Lord Reed, that the political and legal situation inHong Kong has reached the point at which it is no longertenable for serving UK judges to participate on the Courtof Final Appeal. As such Lord Reed and Lord Hodgesubmitted their resignations to the Hong Kong authoritiestoday. We are grateful for their service, and that of theirpredecessors.The UK remains committed to stand up for the peopleof Hong Kong, to call out the violation of their rights andfreedoms, and to hold China to their internationalobligations.Parole System: Public Protection[HLWS724]Lord Wolfson of Tredegar: My right honourablefriend the Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor andSecretary of State for Justice (Dominic Raab) has madethe following Written Statement:"Today, the Government is publishing the ‘Root andBranch Review of the Parole System: The Future of theParole System in England and Wales’.As Secretary of State for Justice, I am committed toprotecting the public and improving victims’ experienceof the Criminal Justice System. The parole system has acritical part to play in ensuring both aims are met – itprevents criminals that continue to pose a threat fromleaving prison and helps victims to feel they have theinformation they need and a voice in the process. So, it isparamount to maintaining public confidence that ourWritten Statementsparole process functions effectively. In recent years, anumber of decisions to release offenders who havecommitted heinous crimes have led to a loss of publicconfidence in the parole system. People have questionedhow safe it really is to release certain offenders and whythose recalled to prison were allowed to leave in the firstplace. I share these concerns, which is why I amdetermined to re-focus the system to put public protectionat the forefront of all parole decisions.I want to see the parole process take a moreprecautionary approach when it comes to decisionsaffecting public protection. In particular, in cases whichinvolve those who have committed the most seriouscrimes, it is right that Ministers should provide a measureof oversight and be able to intervene more directly indecisions on release. The key proposed reforms set out inthis review will ensure public protection is the overridingconsideration for release decisions.The current release test used by the Parole Board hasmoved away from Parliament’s original intention. A courtjudgment in the case of Bradley in 1991 stated that therole of the Board is to “carry out a balancing exercisebetween the legitimate conflicting interests of bothprisoner and public”. The statutory test has thereforechanged over time to become a ‘balancing exercise’between public protection and the rights of the prisoner.We will revise the test to reinforce it, so its overridingfocus is on public protection.At present, 5% of all Parole Board members come froma law enforcement background. We will increasesubstantially that number, because those with operationallaw enforcement experience have greater first-handexperience in dealing with serious offenders and the riskthey present. This will ensure a greater focus on publicprotection.The review also announces our intention to introduceMinisterial oversight over parole decisions to releaseserious offenders in the top-tier of higher risk cases. Thattop-tier will be defined as offenders serving sentences formurder, rape, terrorism and causing or allowing the deathof a child. Where the Parole Board has directed release,the Secretary of State will be able to review the releasedecision of any ‘top-tier’ cohort offender. We will furtherconsider the details of the procedural mechanism and setout two options in this review for how this power couldoperate in practice.Alongside this is the Government’s commitment toincrease victim participation in the parole process. For thefirst time, we will allow victims to attend a parole hearingin full should they wish to do so. In addition, we willrequire the Board to take account of submissions made byvictims and allow for victims to ask questions in thosesubmissions.The review also outlines the new process on the transferof life and other indeterminate sentenced prisoners toopen prison conditions. Similar considerations of risk andpublic concern arise here, and in December 2021, Ichanged the process to introduce a Ministerial check on
Written Statements30 March 2022such decisions, delivering greater oversight to the processin the interests of public protection and public confidence.Protecting the public is this Government’s top priorityand the proposals in this review will reinforce publicsafety and increase confidence in our justice system. AsPage 3we continue to develop policy and begin legislating, wewill consider fully the impact of the proposals and havedue regard to the requirements of s149 of the Equality Act2010."
Page 430 March 2022Written AnswersWednesday, 30 March 2022Written Answersuphold that right in Hong Kong in accordance withinternational commitments, including the JointDeclaration. Attempting to silence voices globally thatspeak up for freedom and democracy is unacceptable andwill never succeed.Belarus: SanctionsAsked by Lord TyrieTo ask Her Majesty's Government what considerationthey have given to imposing sanctions on Belarus.[HL7074]Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: Under our Belarussanctions regime, which was in place prior to the Russianinvasion of Ukraine, we have imposed sanctions onPresident Lukashenko and 117 other individuals andentities as well as trade, financial and aviation sanctions.In addition, on 1 March, the UK announced a first trancheof sanctions against Belarusian individuals andorganisations in response to the role the country is playingin Russia's invasion of Ukraine, including facilitating theinvasion from within its borders. The Foreign Secretaryhas committed to going further and our intention is toextend recent Russia sanctions to Belarus in due course.Asked by Lord TyrieTo ask Her Majesty's Government what assessmentthey have made of any sanctions imposed on Belarus byother countries. [HL7075]Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: The UK continues towork in lockstep with international partners to coordinatesanctions as necessary, including on Belarus. As with allannouncements on sanctions, the ultimate objective is toensure that Putin fails in Ukraine. The whole of the UKGovernment, along with our international allies, isworking to ensure that happens. The Lukashenko regimeis being made to feel the economic consequences for itssupport for Putin.Benedict RogersAsked by The Lord Bishop of St AlbansTo ask Her Majesty's Government whatrepresentations they have made to the government ofHong Kong following reports of threats andintimidation of Benedict Rogers, a UK citizen andChief Executive of Hong Kong Watch. [HL7070]Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: As stated by the ForeignSecretary on 14 March, the unjustifiable action takenagainst the UK-based NGO Hong Kong Watch is clearlyan attempt to silence those who stand up for human rightsin Hong Kong. In parallel, our officials have raised ourconcerns in the strongest terms about this issue directlywith the Hong Kong and Chinese authorities in London,Hong Kong and Beijing. We also continue to make clearour wider concerns about the National Security Law andthe targeting of pro-democracy activists and groups.The Chinese Government and Hong Kong authoritiesmust respect the universal right to freedom of speech, andBiofuels: IndustryAsked by Baroness RandersonTo ask Her Majesty's Government what assessmentthey have made of the possible environmental, strategicand economic benefits of retaining a strong domesticbiodiesel industry; and what proportion of biodieselused in the UK is produced in this country. [HL7219]Baroness Vere of Norbiton: Biodiesel is supported inthe UK under the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation(RTFO) certificate trading scheme. The scheme is subjectto regular review and has been successfully supporting aUK biodiesel market for nearly 14 years. In recognition ofthe carbon reduction and wider environmental benefits,the scheme provides twice the level of reward forbiodiesel produced from wastes as compared to biodieselmade from crop feedstocks. Consequently, biodieselsupplied under the RTFO is largely made from wastefeedstocks, many of which are sourced in the UK.Biodiesel made from wastes generally delivers highercarbon savings.The Department publishes statistics on renewable fuelssupplied under the RTFO and the origin of feedstocksused to produce them. The latest verified data in theRenewable Fuel Statistics 2020 final report suggests thatin 2020 1.62 billion litres of biodiesel was supplied foruse in transport the UK, of which 142 million litres wasproduced from UK-origin feedstocks. In 2020 the mostcommon source of biodiesel from UK feedstocks wasused cooking oil, which contributed 50% of the totalamount of biodiesel made from UK feedstocks. The UKcurrently has biodiesel production capacity of 660 millionlitres per year which equates to approximately 41% ofbiodiesel supply under the RTFO.The RTFO scheme does not gather data on whetherbiodiesel is produced in the UK. According to the Digestof UK Energy Statistics 2021 published by theDepartment for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy,in 2020 the UK produced 558 million litres of biodiesel.In the same statistics in 2020 overall the UK consumed atotal of 1,584 million litres of biodiesel.Breast Cancer: ScreeningAsked by Baroness Masham of IltonTo ask Her Majesty's Government what plans theyhave to encourage breast screening units to work withtheir communities to (1) design, and (2) deliver, anequitable recovery of the programme. [HL6915]Lord Kamall: Breast cancer screening providers arebeing encouraged to work with Cancer Alliances, PrimaryCare Networks and National Health Service regional
Written Answers30 March 2022teams to promote the uptake of breast screening servicesand ensure local populations can access services. NHSEngland and NHS Improvement have allocated 22million for replacement mobile breast screening units and 50 million to increase capacity and activity in England.Care Homes: VisitsAsked by Lord Hunt of Kings HeathTo ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they aretaking to strengthen the role of the Care QualityCommission in addressing (1) residential care homevisits being blocked following a complaint being raised,and (2) evictions from residential care homes followinga complaint being raised. [HL6972]Lord Kamall: Blocking visits or evicting a patientfollowing a complaint being raised would be a breach ofexisting regulations and the Care Quality Commission(CQC) is clear that appropriate action will be taken if itfinds a provider has failed in its responsibilities. Any suchcases shared with the CQC will be investigated as part ofits ongoing monitoring of providers. The CQC reinforcesthe principle that care homes must enable, rather thanrestrict, visiting and blanket bans on visiting areunacceptable. The CQC seeks assurances from care homeproviders on how visits are enabled and verifies thisinformation during inspections.Although the CQC is not able to address individualcomplaints, it can direct people to the Local Governmentand Social Care Ombudsman, which can investigate suchcomplaints in all adult care services.China General Nuclear Power CorporationAsked by Lord Alton of LiverpoolTo ask Her Majesty's Government, further to theWritten Answer by Lord Callanan on 15 March(HL6519), why no minute was kept of the meetingbetween a Minister and the China General NuclearPower Group. [HL7006]Lord Callanan: The meeting was declared as perstandard government processes and was attended byofficials alongside the Minister. Relevant officials werealso made aware of developments following the meeting.Consumer Goods: Origin MarkingAsked by Lord Alton of LiverpoolTo ask Her Majesty's Government what plans theyhave to require internet retailers to declare countries oforigin of items to purchasers in advance of their sale.[HL7007]Lord Callanan: Aside from certain specified productssuch as food there is no requirement for goods to belabelled with their country of origin.Page 5Under the Consumer Protection from Unfair TradingRegulations 2008 (CPRs), traders are banned from usingmisleading statements about the geographical orcommercial origin of products including in response torequests for information by consumers.As with other elements of goods, the Governmentencourages consumers who are interested in a particularproperty of goods, including their origin, to ask the seller.If they are not happy with the reply, then they can shopelsewhere. If they suspect that the reply is not truthful,then they can take the matter up with their local authorityTrading Standards Officers who enforce the CPRs.Coronavirus: Medical TreatmentsAsked by Baroness RawlingsTo ask Her Majesty's Government how many Covid19 patients are currently in hospital; whether thosepatients are being given antiviral treatments to aid theirrecovery; and if so, what is the average length of time ittakes patients receiving such treatments to be cured.[HL7339]Lord Kamall: As of 28 March 2022, the number ofpatients currently in hospital with Covid-19 is 17,685. Arange of treatments are available to these patients,including antivirals. Eligible patients admitted to hospitalfor reasons not related to Covid-19 and subsequently testpositive are able to access nirmatrelvir ritonavir(Paxlovid), an oral antiviral treatment or remdesivir, anintravenous antiviral. For patients whose immune systemmeans they are at higher risk of Covid-19, the antiviraltreatments molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir ritonavir andremdesivir are available in the community to reduce therisk of hospitalisation and death.Approximately 120,000 treatments have been providedin England, of which 53,000 were antivirals administeredto hospitalised patients. The data requested on the averagetime for patients receiving antivirals to be cured is notheld centrally.Coronavirus: Prescription DrugsAsked by Baroness RawlingsTo ask Her Majesty's Government, further to theWritten Answer by Lord Kamall on 24 March(HL7023), why they are retaining stocks of Covid-19antiviral treatments. [HL7340]Lord Kamall: The Government has secured 4.98million patient courses of oral antiviral treatments. As aresult, there are supplies of oral antivirals molnupiravirand nirmatrelvir ritonavir held in the United Kingdomwith regular deliveries to ensure sufficient treatment forpatients. These are available to eligible patients in thecommunity at highest risk of developing severe diseasethrough Covid Medicines Delivery Units in England andequivalent arrangements in Scotland, Wales and Northern
Page 630 March 2022Ireland. In addition, nirmatrelvir ritonavir is available toeligible patients who contract Covid-19 whilst in hospital.We continue to monitor clinical trial results tounderstand which patient cohorts may benefit from oralantivirals, including the PANORAMIC national study.The results will inform our understanding of theperformance of oral antivirals where the majority of thepopulation is vaccinated and future decisions on patientaccess in the UK.CurriculumAsked by Lord Watson of InvergowrieTo ask Her Majesty's Government what steps theywill take to ensure that greater focus within the schoolcurriculum is placed on the teaching of creative andpractical subjects. [HL7037]Baroness Barran: The government believes in a highquality education for all pupils, and integral to this iscultural education, including music and the wider arts andcreative subjects. Art and design, design and technology,and music are compulsory in all maintained schools fromthe age of 5 to the age of 14. Post-14, all pupils inmaintained schools must be offered the opportunity tostudy at least one subject in the arts.All schools are required to teach a broad and balancedcurriculum, promoting pupils' cultural development. Thedepartment’s knowledge-based curriculum allows pupilsto develop disciplinary skills and creativity, which arebest taught in the context of solid subject content.The department will continue to invest around 115million per annum in cultural education over the nextthree years, through our music, arts and heritageprogrammes, including music education hubs, the Musicand Dance Scheme and a set of cultural educationprogrammes such as Saturday Art and Design Clubs, theNational Youth Dance Company and the British FilmInstitute’s Film Academy programme, and others. Wehave also published the Model Music Curriculum whichsupports teachers in delivering high-quality musiceducation.Our 15,000 financial incentive for design andtechnology initial teacher trainees will help attract the bestand brightest to teach this important subject. Thedepartment has also committed to go further in theLevelling Up White Paper, through our planned 5million investment to launch the school cookingrevolution, which will include brand new curriculumcontent and bursaries for teacher training and leadership.With the real terms per pupil increases to core schoolfunding, and the additional 1 billion new fundingannounced specifically for recovery, schools will continueto have the flexibility to deliver a broad and ambitiouscurriculum and enrichment activities, including in culturaleducation.Written AnswersDriver and Vehicle Licensing AgencyAsked by Baroness RandersonTo ask Her Majesty's Government when they firstbecame aware of alleged problems with theemployment terms and conditions at the Driver andVehicle Licensing Agency; what steps they took toimprove the level of service by that body; and whenthose steps were taken. [HL7222]Baroness Vere of Norbiton: The Government is notaware of any issues with the employment terms andconditions at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency(DVLA) which are in line with the rest of the CivilService.The quickest and easiest way to transact with theDVLA is by using its extensive suite of online services.There are no delays in successful online applications andcustomers should receive their documents within a fewdays.However, many people still choose or have to make apaper application and the DVLA receives around 60,000items of mail every day. The Government understands theimpact that delays in processing paper applications canhave on the daily lives of individuals and the DVLA isworking hard to reduce waiting times. The DVLA hasintroduced additional online services, recruited more staff,increased overtime working and has opened newcustomer service centres in Swansea and Birmingham toreduce backlogs and provide future resilience. Thesemeasures are having a positive impact and customersshould continue to see an improving picture in terms ofwaiting times for paper applications.The DVLA also prioritised vocational licenceapplications to support the Government’s response to thedriver shortage, and there have been no delays instraightforward applications for vocational licences,including renewals, since November 2021. Theapplications are being processed within normalturnaround times of five working days.There may be additional delays in processing morecomplex transactions, for example if medicalinvestigations are needed but the large majority ofapplicants will be able to continue driving while theirapplication is being processed. The latest information onturnaround times for paper driving licence applicationscan be found here.Electric VehiclesAsked by Lord Bourne of AberystwythTo ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they aretaking to incentivise the increased use of electricvehicles. [HL7117]
Written Answers30 March 2022Baroness Vere of Norbiton: Government hascommitted 2.5 billion since 2020 to support thetransition to zero emission vehicles, with funding to offsettheir higher upfront cost, and to accelerate the rollout ofchargepoint infrastructure.Alongside grants for plug-in vehicles, there are also taxbenefits in place such as zero road tax, and company cartax rates, which can save drivers over 2,000 a year. Oncefuel costs and tax incentives are factored in, we expect thetotal cost of ownership to reach parity during the 2020s,compared to petrol and diesel cars.On 25 March, we published our electric vehicleinfrastructure strategy. This strategy sets out our visionand commitments to make EV charging cheaper and moreconvenient than refuelling at a petrol station so that alldrivers can transition with confidence.Electric Vehicles: Charging PointsAsked by Baroness RandersonTo ask Her M
Mar 30, 2022
