Transcription
Red Light CameraSummar Summary ReportLeaders in Service Agents of Progress Champions for SafetyFiscal Year 2018–2019DECEMBER 20, 2019
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesIntroductionSection 316.0083(4)(b), Florida Statutes, directs the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (department) toprovide a summary report on the use and operation of traffic infraction detectors (red light cameras) in Florida. Thereport “must include a review of information submitted to the department by the counties and municipalities and mustdescribe the enhancement of the traffic safety and enforcement programs.”Section 316.0083, Florida Statutes, describes the process for violations of traffic infraction detectors. A traffic infractionenforcement officer issues a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the violator within 30 days of the violation. The violator maypay the notice or contest the violation through an appeals process within 60 days. If the violator fails to pay or appealthe notice, a local jurisdiction issues a Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) to the violator, with a copy to the Clerk of Courtfor adjudication.Part 1Survey MethodologyThe department created an online survey to gather information and data from counties and municipalities(jurisdictions) responsible for the administration of red light cameras (RLC) during Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2019. The 29question survey included topics such as procedures, NOVs and program size, and covered activity that occurred fromJuly 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. As there is no statewide oversight of red light camera programs, the departmentrelies on monies remitted to the Department of Revenue (DOR) to identify which jurisdictions potentially operated redlight cameras during the reporting period. Similar to the previous FY report, jurisdictions were asked to complete aspreadsheet regarding camera and intersection locations and dates of operation. With this self-reported information,the department independently collected crash data related to red light camera intersections throughout the state.Surveys were distributed to all jurisdictions who responded to previous red light camera surveys, and to those whoremitted red light camera monies to the DOR during the reporting period. In addition, the Florida Highway Patrol aidedin distributing surveys.Summary of Survey ResponsesIn total, 58 jurisdictions appeared on the DOR report for remittance of red light camera penalties during FY 2018-2019(see Supplemental Resources section). Of those, 12 jurisdictions either remitted no monies or monies were remittedafter the conclusion of their red light camera program (violations are sometimes paid late, which is why somejurisdictions remitted monies after the conclusion of their program). The survey portion of this report focuses on 46jurisdictions that indicated red light cameras were operational during the reporting period of July 1, 2018 – June 30,2019 (reference Appendix F for a list of the 46 jurisdictions and their responses).Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201921
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesCameras and Intersections (Data as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey) 509 RLCs active as of July 1, 2018 (629 as of July 1, 2017)508 RLCs active as of June 30, 2019 (508 as of June 30, 2018)o 32 jurisdictions with no change in number of RLCso 9 jurisdictions with increase in number of RLCso 5 jurisdictions with decrease in number of RLCs One jurisdiction reduced number of active RLCs to zero during reporting period (July 1, 2018 –June 30, 2019).314 intersections with active red light camera as of July 1, 2018 (409 as of July 1, 2017)307 intersections with active red light camera as of June 30, 2019 (310 as of June 30, 2018)o Reduction of 3 intersections compared to June 30, 2018o 37 jurisdictions with no change in number of intersections with RLCso 4 jurisdictions with increase in number of intersections with RLCso 5 jurisdictions with decrease in number of intersections with RLCsNotices of Violation (Data as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey) 1,054,234 NOVs issuedo 666,427 paido 6,726 contested and pendingo 4,143 contested and dismissedo 10,802 contested and upheldo 315,437 issued as UTCo 9,758 pending issuance as UTCo 40,941 unknown status (availability of NOV status varied by jurisdiction, leaving some in an unknown status)In FY 2018-2019, 134,801 NOVs were issued to repeat RLC violators(Figure 1)Red Light Camera Violations by Fiscal 0,000200,00020,00000FY 11/12FY 12/13FY 13/14FY 14/15Notices of Violation (left axis)FY 15/16FY 16/17FY 17/18FY 18/19In-Person Citations (right axis)Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201931
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesNOV data self-reported by jurisdictions. Citation data collected from department database as of December 5, 2019.Figure 1 shows the number of NOVs issued for red light camera violations over the past eight fiscal years (July 1 – June30). The graph also depicts the number of citations for running a red light issued in-person by law enforcement. Thenumber of NOVs issued for red light camera violations increased to its highest peak during the 2015-2016 fiscal year.The number of in-person citations reached its lowest point during the 2016-2017 fiscal year. During this reporting period(July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2019), NOVs fell 9 percent, while in-person traffic control device related citations rose threepercent. As previously stated, the department must rely on self-reported information for the number of NOVs issuedeach year. Nearly 41,000 NOVs from FY 2018-2019 have an unknown status. In-person citations issued by lawenforcement are submitted by the local jurisdiction through their respective county clerk and those citations are thenremitted to the department as required by statute.(Figure 2)Unpaid Red Light Camera Violations Issued as 35300,224FY 13/14FY 14/15359,289352,539325,195250,000200,000150,000FY 11/12FY 12/13FY 15/16FY 16/17FY 17/18FY 18/19Citation data collected from department database as of December 5, 2019.Figure 2 shows the number of unpaid red light camera violations resulting in a UTC. Similar to the number of NOVsissued, the number of NOVs issued as UTCs fell, but at a lower rate of nearly six percent during FY 2018-2019.PersonnelJurisdictions were requested to identify who reviews the camera images before issuing NOVs, who reviews contestedNOVs and who ultimately issues UTCs. Personnel categories included law enforcement officer, non-sworn governmentemployee, non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) and other. Figure 3 reflects responses.(Figure 3)Review CameraImagesReview ContestedNotices of ViolationIssue UniformTraffic CitationsLaw Enforcement Officer373337Non-Sworn Government Employee252120Non-sworn Contractor Employee (Vendor)310Personnel151Other (see Appendix F)Note: Jurisdictions could select multiple options for each question so numbers do not sum to the total number ofrespondents. Data as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey.Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201941
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesRight-Hand TurnsIssue Violations for RightHand TurnPursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes: A NOV and UTC may not be issued for failure to stopat a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turnin a careful and prudent manner at an intersectionwhere right-hand turns are permissible.A NOV and UTC may not be issued under this sectionif the driver of the vehicle came to a complete stopafter crossing the stop line and before turning right ifpermissible at a red light but failed to stop beforecrossing over the stop line or other point at which astop is required.No39%Yes61%(Figure 4)Data as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey.The terms in this section of statute are left to the interpretation of each respective jurisdiction (see Appendix G for rightturn definitions provided to the department). For FY 2018-2019, 61 percent (28 of 46) of the responding jurisdictionsissued NOVs for persons making right turns on red signals. Six jurisdictions indicated that they do not track the numberof violations issued for right turns on red.Alternative Safety MeasuresThe department also requested what other actions jurisdictions had taken to improve safety measures at intersectionsduring the reporting period. Sixty five percent (30 of 46) of the jurisdictions indicated they had implemented at leastone action, 48 percent (22 of 46) indicated they had implemented more than one action and no jurisdictions indicatedthey had implemented Intelligent Collision Prevention Systems. The results of this question are shown below in Figure5 (see Appendix F for other responses).(Figure 5)Alternative Safety Measures7Lighting6Increased other type of signageIncreased RLC-related signage14111EngineeringRestripingIntersections Without Red Light Cameras179141019Intersections With Red Light CamerasData as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey.Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201951
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesOther Survey Results (Data as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey)Slightly less than half of the jurisdictions (19 of 46) reported court cases have impacted their red light camera program.Seven jurisdictions indicated they have conducted an independent red light camera analysis. Forty-five jurisdictionsresponded they are continuing their program in FY 2019-2020. Thirty-six jurisdictions responded they report crasheselectronically, three report via paper, and seven submit both.(Figure 6)Number ofJurisdictionsRed Light Camera VendorAmerican Traffic Solutions30Redflex5Sensys Gatso Group6Conduent2RedSpeed USA2Verra Mobility3Figure 6 shows red light camera vendors used by jurisdictions. Two jurisdictions reported having both American TrafficSolutions and another vendor; Verra Mobility or RedSpeed USA.Figure 7 shows factors used to determine the success or failure of red light camera locations as reported by jurisdictions.Figure 8 shows other uses of red light camera footage reported by jurisdictions.(Figure 7)(Figure 8)Factors Used to DetermineSuccess/Failure of RLC location100%Jurisdiction use of RLC hange inNumber ofCrashesChange inPedestrianSafetyChange inRevenueOther (seeappendix F)0%CrashCriminalinvestigation investigationRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019MissingpersonOther (seeappendix F)61
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesJurisdictions were asked to rank the importance of various factors when selecting intersections to install red lightcameras. The results are shown in Figure 9.(Figure 9)Importance of Factors When selecting Intersections for RLCsPedestrian Safety0021Traffic VolumeLaw Enforcement Officer ObservationsCitizen ComplaintsTraffic Citation DataN/A211323004412311204255Not Important12Somewhat Important25Very ImportantData as reported by local jurisdictions in RLC survey.Part 2Crash AnalysisSimilar to the previous fiscal year report, jurisdictions self-reported the dates of operation and locations of intersectionswith red light cameras. Intersections were selected to be included in the crash analysis based on their dates ofoperation, as the Florida Traffic Crash Report was changed in 2012. Taking input from jurisdictions who operate redlight camera programs, the department refined its methodology to only include crashes that occurred on or after July1, 2012. Therefore, intersections were only included if the activation date was between January 2013 and May 2019,allowing at least six months before and after the date the camera was activated. In total, 170 intersections wereincluded in the crash analysis from 32 jurisdictions.Crashes occurring within 250 feet of the center of the intersection were analyzed before and after the installation ofcamera(s) at each intersection. Figure 10 shows the breakdown of crashes analyzed based on their distance from thecenter of the intersection.Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201971
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles(Figure 10)Feet from Intersection01-10051-100101-150151-200201-250Grand totalNumber of Crashes7,6928,0123,5291,0241,72463922,620Percent of ng Total34.01%69.43%85.03%89.55%97.18%100.00%Measures were taken to exclude crashes that occurred anywhere other than the roadway, such as parking lots. Thebefore and after periods used for analysis were unique to each intersection based on the dates of operation, with anequal number of days within each window. Crashes were broken down by manner of collision (angle or rear-end), injuryseverity, inclusion of a non-motorist (see Appendix D for definition), and whether the crash report indicated a driver rana red light.(Figure 11)Total CrashesAngle CrashesRear-End CrashesCrashes Involving Non-MotoristsCrash Report Indicated a Driver Ran a Red LightNon-Injury CrashesInjury CrashesFatal CrashesBefore RLC Installed10,4102,1755,5502793427,4932,88928After RLC Installed12,2112,5686,3932533409,2662,92124Data as provided by Signal Four Analytics using intersection location information reported by local jurisdictions.Figure 11 shows the breakdown of crashes that occurred before and after the activation of red light cameras atintersections included in the analysis. Similar to last year, the department excludes crashes that occurred outside ofthe roadway. Reference Appendix A for a more detailed breakdown of crashes by reporting jurisdiction. Appendix B isspecific to crashes where the officer indicated a driver ran a red light, and Appendix C is specific to crashes involvingnon-motorists.In 2017, the department expanded its partnership with local jurisdictions to improve the completeness and accuracyof crash report data. The crash analysis should be put into context of the overall complexity of the issue at hand, asmany factors may contribute to the change in number of crashes outlined in this report.One such factor is the increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The probability of a crash occurring increases as peopledrive more, and VMT in Florida increased 16.23 percent from calendar years 2012 to 2018 (see Supplemental Resources).Another factor is the fluctuation in crash reports with accurate location information (latitude and longitude). In orderto analyze crashes that occurred at certain intersections, it is necessary to know both the location of the intersectionand the location of the crashes. Intersection locations (latitude and longitude) were submitted along with the survey;however, latitude and longitude are not included in every crash report.Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201981
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesPart 3RecommendationsThe following recommendations would allow for more accurate reporting of information that cannot currently betracked through existing systems.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Require jurisdictions to track camera information including location (GPS coordinates) and dates ofoperation.To ensure the ability to reconcile NOVs issued with monies remitted and UTC counts, require jurisdictionsthat end their red light camera operations to maintain all data regarding the program for a minimum oftwo years.Require jurisdictions to track the issuance of NOVs, including the status of those violations (paid,contested, issued as UTC).Require jurisdictions to track the issuance of NOVs for right-hand turns.Require jurisdictions to report alternative safety countermeasures taken prior to and after the installationof red light cameras.In accordance with Florida Statutes, the department will continue to review and report on the status andtrends of the use and operation of red light cameras. To determine the enhancement of traffic safety, thedepartment recommends a more thorough analysis be conducted by an independent organization usingappropriate local and state agency resources.Create a standard for administering violations for right-hand turns on red signals. Define “careful andprudent manner” to allow for a uniform procedure statewide.Supplemental Resources Department of Revenue’s Tax Collections and DistributionsDepartment of Transportation’s Traffic Infraction Detector Placement and Installation SpecificationsDepartment of Transportation’s Florida Highway Mileage Reports (VMT)Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201991
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by JurisdictionJurisdiction# IntersectionsAventura1Boynton Beach7Coral Gables4Crestview2Davie1Doral4Edgewood2Gulf Breeze1Kissimmee1Lakeland6Maitland1Manatee County5Medley4Miami Springs1Midway2Milton2New Port Richey1North Miami Beach5Ocoee1Orange County29Orange Park3Orlando29Osceola County7Pembroke Pines6Pinecrest6Sarasota10South Miami4Sunrise7Sweetwater3Tamarac7Tampa7West Miami1Grand 93,794111,492796435408311590501128581432812,211Ran Red Light Ran Red 42340Rear 0137483292903061791961194520015315,550Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019Rear 88323340151503974101114308710822,568101
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by JurisdictionJurisdiction# Intersections Non-Injury BeforeAventura127Boynton Beach7232Coral Gulf Breeze11Kissimmee182Lakeland665Maitland129Manatee County5334Medley455Miami Springs13Midway218Milton266New Port Richey16North Miami Beach5197Ocoee19Orange County292,565Orange Park311Orlando29999Osceola County7377Pembroke Pines6365Pinecrest6378Sarasota10208South 7117West Miami13Grand Total1707,493Non-Injury After Injury 809,2662,889Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019Injury After Fatal Before Fatal 410110830013121203416800162000002,9212824111
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix B: Crashes Involving Running Red LightJurisdiction# IntersectionsAventura1Boynton Beach7Coral Gables4Crestview2Davie1Doral4Edgewood2Gulf Breeze1Kissimmee1Lakeland6Maitland1Manatee County5Medley4Miami Springs1Midway2Milton2New Port Richey1North Miami Beach5Ocoee1Orange County29Orange Park3Orlando29Osceola County7Pembroke Pines6Pinecrest6Sarasota10South Miami4Sunrise7Sweetwater3Tamarac7Tampa7West Miami1Grand 14211340Non-Motorist Non-MotoristFront toFront toAngleBeforeAfterRear Before Rear After 501110000011000017000002679249Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 160263121
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix B: Crashes Involving Running Red LightJurisdiction# Intersections Non-Injury BeforeNon-Injury After Injury Before Injury After Fatal Before Fatal AfterAventura1123100Boynton Beach7864510Coral 300Edgewood2102000Gulf nd1010001Manatee County58191100Medley4200200Miami Springs1200000Midway2001000Milton2010100New Port Richey1101000North Miami Beach5232100Ocoee1000100Orange County294540396010Orange Park3003100Orlando293530453300Osceola County785111300Pembroke Pines6635600Pinecrest6746401Sarasota10155300South 711481000Tampa755151400West Miami1010000Grand Total17015814118219524Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019131
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix C: Crashes Involving Non-MotoristsJurisdiction# IntersectionsAventura1Boynton Beach7Coral Gables4Crestview2Davie1Doral4Edgewood2Gulf Breeze1Kissimmee1Lakeland6Maitland1Manatee County5Medley4Miami Springs1Midway2Milton2New Port Richey1North Miami Beach5Ocoee1Orange County29Orange Park3Orlando29Osceola County7Pembroke Pines6Pinecrest6Sarasota10South Miami4Sunrise7Sweetwater3Tamarac7Tampa7West Miami1Grand Total170Non-Motorist on-Motorist ed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019141
Appendix D: Glossary of TermsAngle CrashA crash where two vehicles impact at an angle. For example, the left front of onevehicle impacts the side of another vehicle.Rear-End CrashA crash where the front of one vehicle impacts the back of another vehicle.Non-Injury CrashA crash where no persons involved were injured.Injury CrashA crash where any person involved complained of or showed any visible signsof injury.Fatal CrashNon-MotoristA crash where any person involved dies within a 30-day period after the crashoccurred.Any person other than an occupant of a motor vehicle in transport. Thisincludes pedestrians, occupants of other motor vehicles not in transport andoccupants o f transport vehicles other than motor vehicles.Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019151
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019161
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019171
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019181
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019191
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019201
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019211
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019221
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019231
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019241
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019251
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019261
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix E: 2019 Red Light Camera SurveyRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019271
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix F: Jurisdiction Responses to SurveyProvide the contact information of the person completing the surveyName of Jurisdiction (City or County)Has your jurisdiction operated redlight cameras within the reportingperiod (July 1, 2018 - June 30,2019)?What Department oversees the red light cameraprogram in your jurisdiction?NameAgencyEmail AddressPhone NumberCity of Florida CityFlorida City Police DepartmentOfc J. HoyteFlorida City Police DepartmentJhoyte@flcitypd.comCity of Miami GardensTraffic UnitOfficer Brian O'MalleyMiami Gardens Police oral GablesCoral Gables Police DepartmentOmar GarciaCoral Gables Police ty of DoralTraffic SectionCarlos F.AlvarezCity of Doralcarlos.alvarez@doralpd.com3035936699YesNorth Miami Beach Police DepartmentCommunity AffairsSergeant David FoyNorth Miami Beach Police ER POLICE DEPARTMENTSUPPORT SERVICESSTEVEN LOPEZSWEETWATER POLICE y of SunriseTrafficSergeant Jeremy CopasSunrise Police Departmentjcopas@sunrisefl.gov954-746-3342YesCity of Clearwater, FLClearwater Police Department / Traffic / Spec Ops Sgt. Steve BaginskiClearwater Police 7264YesKissimmee Police DepartmentTraffic Enforcement UnitSgt. Omar BerrioKissimmee Police Departmentoberrio@kissimmee.org407-847-0176 x3128YesMidwayMidway Police DepartmentChief Deric MordicaMidway Police YesWEST MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENTWEST MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENTRUBEN YEROWEST MIAMI 30YesBal Harbour VillagePolice DepartmentPamela Flanders-AlvinBal Harbour Police sCity of AventuraCommunity Development DepartmentJoanne CarrCity of Aventuracarrj@cityofaventura.comCity of Boynton BeachTraffic UnitCSO A. Petriello #072Boynton Beach Police Dept.petrielloa@bbfl.usRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 201930524782233054668943561-742-6114YesYesYes281
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix F: Jurisdiction Responses to SurveyWhat red light camera vendor(s) does your jurisdiction use?Name of Jurisdiction (City or County)American TrafficSolutions (ATS)RedflexXeroxOther (pleasespecify)As of June 30,As of July 1,As of June 30,As of July 1, 2018,2019, at how2018, how many 2019, how many Difference in #at how manyDifference in # ofmany intersectionsRLCs wereRLCs wereof RLCsintersections wereIntersectionswere RLCsoperational?operational?RLCs operational?operational?Please provide the following information regarding Notices of Violation issued for red light cameraviolations in your jurisdiction between July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019Total ## Paid# Contested # Contested # Contested # Issued as& pending & dismissed& upheldUTC# Pendingissuance asUTCCity of Florida CityX76-154-140,71421,59030828242915,487 UnknownCity of Miami GardensX1922315150118,22253,9644111,9081,88428,326 UnknownCoral GablesX91016604,0875,9956711912,433 UnknownCity of DoralX1111044024,01415,21222282017,926 UnknownNorth Miami Beach Police DepartmentX55055025,86712,693 UnknownSWEETWATER POLICE DEPARTMENTX66043-135,00321,734City of SunriseX131301010026,083Red Speed13237310,661 Unknown14,846 Unknown892982,645 ownX33033017,36511,845 UnknownKissimmee Police wnSensys America24,888 Unknown97City of Clearwater, FLMidway475 Unknown32UnknownUnknownWEST MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENTX46266015,20411,430122264425,578 UnknownBal Harbour VillageX55035213,3598,1234210724,627 UnknownCity of AventuraX1515066040,58824,2458014540214,045 UnknownCity of Boynton BeachX1515077028,59318,65654132838,678 UnknownRed Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019291
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesAppendix F: Jurisdiction Responses to SurveyName of Jurisdiction (City or County)How many registration holds did your respectivejurisdiction request as a result of red light cameraviolations during the reporting period of July 1,2018 - June 30, 2019?How does yourrespective jurisdictionsubmit traffic crashdata to theDepartment?In order to identify the number of repeat offenders,please provide the number of unique vehicle ownersissued Notices of Violation for multiple red-lightcamera violations.Have court cases impacted your respective jurisdiction's red lightcamera program?ResponseDetailsCity of Florida CityUnknownBothUnknownNoI only answered no due to not knowing is it hasimpacted our respective jurisdiction.City of Miami GardensUnknownAll ElectronicallyUnknownYesWe have experienced higher level of hearings due toinaccurate reporting of information by the media; statingthat the cameras were taken down and ruled by thecourts to be illegal.Coral GablesUnknownAll Electronically560YesDrivers are more cautiousCity of Doral0 BothUnkno
Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2018 – 2019 – December 20, 2019 21 Introduction Section 316.0083(4)(b), Florida Statutes, directs the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (department) to provide a summary report on the use and operation of traffic infraction detectors (red light cameras) in Florida. The
