Transcription
Calendar Year 2015 Report onLife-Cycle Cost AnalysisJanuary 2016
Prepared byThe Minnesota Department of Transportation395 John Ireland BoulevardSaint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899Phone: 651-296-3000Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529To request this document in an alternative formatPlease call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email toADArequest.dot@state.mn.us.The cost of preparing this report is under 5,000.2
ContentsContents . 3Legislative Request. 4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Report . 5Implementation. 5Results . 5Discussion. 6Conclusion . 6Appendix A: Summary of LCCA Results. 7-10Appendix B: Copies of LCCAs. 11-51Appendix C: Copies of LCCA Exceptions . 52-553
Legislative RequestThis report is required by Minn. Stat. 174.185, which requires a life-cycle cost analysis for everyproject in the reconditioning, resurfacing and road repair funding categories constructed after July 1,2011. The LCCA is a comparison of life-cycle costs among competing paving materials using equaldesign lives and equal comparison periods. Documentation required by the statute includes: Lowest life-cycle cost Alternatives considered Chosen strategy Documented justification, if the chosenstrategy is not the low cost174.185 PAVEMENT LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.Subd. 1. Definitions.For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply.(a) "Life-cycle cost" is the sum of the cost of the initial pavement project and all anticipated costs formaintenance, repair, and resurfacing over the life of the pavement. Anticipated costs must be basedon Minnesota's actual or reasonably projected maintenance, repair, and resurfacing schedules, andcosts determined by the Department of Transportation district personnel based upon recentlyawarded local projects and experience with local material costs.(b) "Life-cycle cost analysis" is a comparison of life-cycle costs among competing paving materialsusing equal design lives and equal comparison periods.Subd. 2. Required analysis.For each project in the reconditioning, resurfacing and road repair funding categories, thecommissioner shall perform a life-cycle cost analysis and shall document the lowest life-cycle costsand all alternatives considered. The commissioner shall document the chosen pavement strategyand, if the lowest life cycle is not selected, document the justification for the chosen strategy. A lifecycle cost analysis is required for projects to be constructed after July 1, 2011. For projects to beconstructed prior to July 1, 2011, when feasible, the department will use its best efforts to performlife-cycle cost analyses.Subd. 3. Report.The commissioner shall report annually to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senateand house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance beginning onJanuary 1, 2012, the results of the analyses required in subdivision 2.4
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ReportImplementationMinn. Stat. 174.185 requires a life-cycle cost analysis for every project in the reconditioning,resurfacing and road repair funding categories constructed after July 1, 2011.The Minnesota Department of Transportation first implemented a life-cycle cost analysis process forroadway rehabilitation projects in 1999. The LCCA process was modified in 2010 to meet thespecific requirements of legislation approved in 2008 and was presented in Technical Memorandum10-04-MAT-01. After the technical memorandum expired, the LCCA process, with somemodifications, was incorporated into the MnDOT Pavement Design Manual which went into effectOctober 31st, 2014.The LCCA process, which is consistent with Federal Highway Administration guidelines, isperformed on all pavement projects regardless of funding category, but only the results of projectsin the reconditioning, resurfacing and road repair funding categories are included in this report. TheLCCA process limits the requirement to perform a LCCA to projects with more than 60,000 squareyards of pavement (formerly 30,000 square yards in the technical memorandum) and to projects thatinclude placing more than two-inch thickness of pavement material. Thin overlays (two inches orless) are considered short-term preventive maintenance and do not have a viable concrete alternativewith an equal design life.The LCCA process requires the inclusion of at least one Portland cement concrete and one hot-mixasphalt alternate with equal design lives. To best determine the most cost effective design, the LCCAmay include additional alternatives with other design lives.Technical Memorandum 10-04-MAT-01 was superseded by the updated Pavement Design Manualwhen it was signed on October 31st, 2014; however, many LCCAs for projects constructed this yearwere already completed and this report will follow the LCCA procedure that was in-effect at thetime of the completion of each project’s LCCA.ResultsIn 2015, 33 construction projects were in the reconditioning, resurfacing and road repair fundingcategories and required an LCCA according to Technical Memorandum 10-04-MAT-01 or theMnDOT Pavement Design Manual. An LCCA was not submitted for one project (SP 3280-126). Itwas a special design-build project where the budget was fixed but the length was not. The LCCA ofanother project (SP 4812-86) did not have hot-mix asphalt and Portland cement concrete alternateswith equal design lives because minimum pavement thickness requirements did not allow designswith equal lives to be developed.The results of the 32 LCCAs are as follows: Hot-mix asphalt was the low-cost option for 26 construction projects.Portland cement concrete was the low-cost option for 6 construction projects.Four projects used the alternate bidding process to select the pavement option to construct.Twenty-five projects selected the low-cost option for construction.Three projects selected an option other than the low-cost option for construction. Documentedjustification for selecting other than the low-cost option is provided for these projects.5
A table of LCCA results and copies of the LCCAs submitted by MnDOT districts is attached inAppendix A and Appendix B.DiscussionHot-mix asphalt is most often the low-cost option in the submitted LCCAs. Portland cementconcrete options usually have a greater initial cost than hot-mix asphalt, but become competitive byhaving lower maintenance costs over the life of the pavement. However, the relatively short designlives of these rehabilitation-type projects do not allow Portland cement concrete options to exploitthis relative advantage. Portland cement concrete options with longer design lives than hot-mixasphalt alternates are more competitive than the Portland cement concrete options with the equaldesign lives required by the statute.Recently, procedures have been developed to implement two new Portland cement concretepavement design programs. These new programs have resulted in substantially thinner pavementdesigns which reduce the initial cost of constructing Portland cement concrete pavements andincrease competitiveness. In addition, a research project has been started to develop a newprocedure to design Portland cement concrete pavements that are built on top of existing Portlandcement concrete pavements.To create competition and to get the most cost-effective pavement, MnDOT continues to use thealternate bidding process on projects that are likely to have competitive hot-mix asphalt andPortland cement concrete options. A LCCA is still performed but the option constructed is selectedthrough the alternate bidding process.The alternate bidding process is similar to using a LCCA to determine the low-cost option.However, instead of using an estimate for the initial cost of an option, alternate bidding uses actualbid prices. The process is as follows:1. MnDOT lets a project with two options, one hot-mix asphalt and one Portland cementconcrete.2. MnDOT calculates a maintenance factor. This is the difference between the maintenancecosts of the two options.3. Each contractor bids on either of the two options.4. MnDOT adjusts the bids by adding the maintenance factor to the bids of the option withthe greater maintenance costs.5. MnDOT selects the bid with the lowest adjusted bid.ConclusionMnDOT implemented the requirements of Minn. Stat. 174.185 and has provided the requiredresults in this report. MnDOT will continue to work to ensure that all future projects meet therequirements of the legislation.In addition, MnDOT is innovating new methods to design and select the most cost-effectivepavement structure. Innovations include new pavement design procedures and refining the alternatebidding process to allow bidders of both pavement materials to bid on a project.6
Appendix A: Summary of LCCA Results7
State ProjectNumber (SP#)ExistingPavementTypeExceptionfor low-costoption?1002-101HMANoDesignLife (inyears)Option DescriptionPresent Worth / OptionalSelectedRoadway Mile Material (1) Option o152020Note: Present Worth is for the entire length of the projectPCC OverlayHMA on SFDRPCC OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA on FDRPCC OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayNew PCCNew HMAHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayNew HMANew PCCNew PCCHMA on FDRPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA OverlayNew PCCHMA on FDR 611,229.00 773,314.00 670,764.00 629,668.00 380,465.00 505,928.00 567,973.00 410,037.00 644,988.00 483,822.00 1,096,725.00 1,010,299.00 325,427.00 553,894.00 372,655.00 347,451.00 701,355.00 1,204,443.00 1,798,785.00 1,690,203.00 1,632,822.00 462,830.00 599,000.00 329,387.00 4,893,566.00 11,517,529.00 20202035142020New PCCNew HMAHMA OverlayNew PCCHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA Overlay 463,863.00 482,232.00 382,915.00 445,661.00 466,348.00 413,494.00 739,134.00PCCHMAHMAPCCHMAPCCHMA20HMA Overlay 474,540.00HMA20New HMA 797,265.00HMA20PCC Overlay 540,497.00PCC35New PCC 1,029,378.00PCC2020203535HMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA on FDRPCC OverlayPCC on FDR 446,917.00 611,699.00 396,250.00 483,016.00 XNoXNoNoXXNoNoXXNoXNoYesXX
State ProjectNumber (SP#)ExistingPavementTypeExceptionfor low-costoption?DesignLife (inyears)Option Description4812-84HMANo132020HMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA on FDR 6,229,904.00 8,075,567.00 35202035New HMANew PCCNew PCCHMA OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayNew HMAPCC OverlayHMA on FDRNew HMAPCC OverlayNew PCCPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA on FDRPCC OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA on SFDRPCC OverlayNew PCCHMA OverlayNew PCCPCC OverlayNew HMAPCC OverlayPCC OverlayHMA on FDRPCC OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayPCC OverlayPCC OverlayHMA on FDRPCC Overlay 1,104,002.00 1,107,241.00 1,183,868.00 441,579.00 502,180.00 548,609.00 422,610.00 594,769.00 848,255.00 698,608.00 837,524.00 1,269,705.00 681,791.00 1,227,032.00 619,356.00 596,121.00 554,589.00 473,413.00 584,745.00 400,293.00 405,702.00 506,648.00 325,427.00 553,894.00 372,655.00 581,001.00 665,264.00 731,563.00 297,144.00 653,766.00 686,483.00 945,169.00 863,234.00 630,881.00 642,132.00 786,692.00 286,122.00 993,930.00 711,019.00 1,020,790.00 665,596.00 sent Worth / OptionalSelectedRoadway Mile Material (1) Option (2)AlternateBid?(3)Note: Present Worth is for the entire length of the 27HMANoNoXYesXXXNoXNoXNoXNoNoXXNoNoX
State ProjectNumber (SP#)ExistingPavementTypeExceptionfor low-costoption?DesignLife (inyears)Option Description6910-89HMANo15202035HMA OverlayNew PCCHMA on FDRNew PCC 976,850.00 2,029,798.00 1,942,330.00 02015202035HMA OverlayHMA on FDRPCC OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayHMA on FDRNew PCCHMA overlayPCC OverlayHMA OverlayHMA OverlayHMA on CIRPCC OverlayHMA OverlayPCC OverlayNew HMANew PCC 355,172.00 452,188.00 528,830.00 297,144.00 599,000.00 462,830.00 760,314.00 595,560.00 614,272.00 565,356.00 997,532.00 1,665,189.00 783,155.00 415,633.00 444,516.00 812,403.00 MAPCCHMAPCCXNoXNoPresent Worth / OptionalSelectedRoadway Mile Material (1) Option (2)AlternateBid?(3)Note: Present Worth is for the entire length of the 17HMAYes8706-23HMANo(1) Option material - The pavement material that each option utilizes.(2) Selected Option- This is marked (X) if the pavement option was selected to be constructed.If the project uses alternate bidding, more than one option will be marked andand the constructed option will be the low-cost option as determined by alternate bidding.(3) Alternate Bidding? - 'Yes' if the project used alternate bidding to select which option to construct.Definitions:HMA Hot-Mix AsphaltPCC Portland Cement ConcreteFDR Full-Depth Reclamation (recycle existing HMA and Base to use as a new base)CIR Cold-in-Place Recycling (Recycle a layer of existing HMA with Cold-Mix AsphaltCPR Concrete Pavement RepairRubblize Break the existing PCC into pieces to act as the new base for HMA pavementCrack & Seat Crack and compact the existing PCC pavement ot delay reflective cracking in an HMA overlayNoXNoXXNo
Appendix B: Copies of LCCAs
DistrictPerformed ByAnalysis PeriodDiscount RateMetroTRC/DFN352.2OPTION #1DESCRIPTIONMill 5" 7" PCC (conc shlds)DESIGN LIFEProject NumberDate1002-1011/6/2014DistrictPerformed ByFunding CategoryLow Cost Option #Chosen Option #RS41,3 Alt BidAnalysis PeriodDiscount RateOPTION #2DESCRIPTIONMill 5" 7" PCC (bit shlds)TYPEDESIGN LIFE35 YearsPCC35 YearsYear # LifeDescriptionCost/MileYear # LifeDescription0Mill 5" 7" PCC (conc shlds) 569,4330Mill 5" 7" PCC (bit shlds)1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 910 1011 1112 1213 1314 1415 1516 1617 AOReseal Joints (15') 30,67917 BKReseal Joints (design #2)18 1819 1920 2021 2122 2223 2324 2425 25 262627 AQMinor CPR (15') 103,80727 BLMinor CPR (design #2) 2828 29293030 31 3132 3233 3334 3435Remaining Service Life Value** (39,926) 35Remaining Service Life Value**36 3637 3738 3839 3940 4041 4142 4243 4344 4445 4546 4647 4748 4849 4950 50Total Present Worth 629,668Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost* 25,985Eq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost103%% of Low Cost* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for information only.**Remaining Service Life Value is reported as a negative value.OPTION #3DESCRIPTIONSFDR 2.0" Bituminous UTBWCTYPEDESIGN LIFEPCC20 YearsCost/MileYear # LifeDescription 573,3280SFDR 2.0" Bit UTBWC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BCLight Crack Treatment 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 30,67917 18 19 20 BN 15 2.5" Mill & 3" OL 21 22 23 AACrack Treatment 24 2526 202,71727 ABSurface Treatment 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 (77,968) 35Remaining Service Life Value** 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 670,764Total Present Worth 27,681Eq. Annual Cost*110%% of Low CostTYPEHMACost/Mile 571,833 3,500 265,902 7,000 40,000 773,314 31,913127%MetroTRC/DFN352.2OPTION #4DESCRIPTIONMill 5" 5" PCC (BCOA-ME)DESIGN LIFETYPE20 YearsPCCYear # LifeDescriptionCost/Mile0Mill 5" 5" PCC (BCOA-ME) 413,6351 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 BH 35 R & R with 35 yr 7" PCC 519,54821 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2930 31 32 33 34 35Remaining Service Life Value** (296,884)36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Total Present Worth 611,229Eq. Annual Cost* 25,224% of Low Cost100%* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for informatio
Life Cycle Cost AnalysisDistrictPerformed ByAnalysis PeriodDescriptionDesign 262728293031323334352KO35Option 11.5: mill, 3" overlay15DescriptionInitial CostCrack TreatmentChip SealMill & Overlay (2nd Overlay)Crack TreatmentChip SealMill & Overlay (3rd Overlay)Crack TreatmentRemaining Service Life Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost% of Low Cost Total Project Cost .0815,700.89100%7,670,175.98Project NumberDateDiscount RateDescriptionDesign 262728293031323334351120-559/17/20142.2Option 24.5" thin concrete20DescriptionInitial CostRemove and replace concreteRemaining Service Life DescriptionDesign 8,369.00)35Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost% of Low Cost 567,973.3223,438.91149%Total Project Cost 11,450,342.09Funding CategoryLow Cost OptionChosen Option1Option 3Reclaim20DescriptionInitial CostLight Crack TreatmentChip SealMill & Overlay (1st Overlay)Crack TreatmentChip SealRemaining Service Life 0.0019,000.00-Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost% of Low Cost 505,928.3420,878.46133%Total Project Cost 10,199,515.32
AT LEAST ONE BITUMINOUS & ONE PCC OPTION WITH EQUAL DESIGN LIVES IS REQUIREDDistrictD4Project Number1404-17Performed ByKnopfDate3/20/2013DistrictPerformed ByAnalysis PeriodDiscount RateAnalysis PeriodDiscount Rate352.5Funding CategoryLow Cost Option #Chosen Option #OPTION #1DESCRIPTION4.5" HMA Overlay & 3" MillDESIGN # LifeAA3AB8BB 15AA3AB8BB 13AA15Description41OPTION #2DESCRIPTIONMill 4" w/6" WhitetoppingTYPEDESIGN LIFE1OPTION #3DESCRIPTIONTYPE15DescriptionCost/MileYear # Life 214,5970 1 2Crack Treatment 3,0003 4 5 6Surface Treatment 20,0007 8 9 10 11 12 BD 8 12 YR PCC Maint 13 142" Mill & 3.5" HMA Overlay 168,99915 16 17Crack Treatment 3,00018 19 20 BE 10 20 YR PCC Maint 21Surface Treatment 20,00022 2324 25 26 27 282" Mill & 3.5" HMA Overlay 168,99929 30 BF30 YR PCC Reconstruct 31 3,00032Crack Treatment 33 34Remaining Service Life Value** (90,999)35Remaining Service Life Value** 36 37 38 3940 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50Total Present Worth 410,037Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost* 17,716Eq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost100%% of Low Cost* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for information only.**Remaining Service Life Value is reported as a negative value.DESIGN LIFE 352.5OPTION #4DESCRIPTIONTYPEDESIGN LIFE2Cost/MileYear # 34(373,253)35Remaining Service Life Value**363738394041424344454647484950644,988Total Present Worth 27,867Eq. Annual Cost*157%% of Low CostD4Knopf2Cost/Mile -Project NumberDate1404-173/20/2013Funding CategoryLow Cost Option #Chosen Option #31/1/1900OPTION #5DESCRIPTIONTYPEDESIGN LIFEOPTION #6DESCRIPTIONTYPEDESIGN LIFE2Year # LifeDescriptionCost/MileYear # LifeDescription001 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 910 1011 1112 1213 1314 1415 1516 1617 1718 1819 1920 2021 2122 2223 2324 2425 2526 2627 2728 2829 2930 3031 3132 3233 3334 3435Remaining Service Life Value** 35Remaining Service Life Value**36 3637 3738 3839 3940 4041 4142 4243 4344 4445 4546 4647 4748 4849 4950 50Total Present WorthTotal Present WorthEq. Annual Cost*Eq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost% of Low Cost* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for information only.TYPE1Cost/Mile -2Year # 223242526272829303132333435Remaining Service Life Value**363738394041424344454647484950Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost*% of Low CostCost/Mile - -
Cost Analysis SP 2404-41/ TH 65 From I-35 to T.H. 13Givens:Length Width of Road 1" Bituminous Interest Rate Inflation Rate 7.05241132.20milesfeet(Conc.)lbs/SY%%24 feet(Bit.)3/31/14-TRMMILL 3" & 3" Bituminous Overlay(15 Year Fix)Item3" MILL BITUMINOUSPATCHTACK COAT3" L 1.00TON65.00Total Cost:Cost/Mile:Total Cost 101,249.28 28,200.00 19,852.80 1,093,641.12 1,242,943 176,304StrategyInitial CostRout & sealChipsealMill 3" & 3" OverlayRout & sealChipsealMill 3" & 3" OverlayRout & sealChipsealMill 3" & 3" OverlayRemaining Life ValueYearCost/Mile0 176,3042 5,0004 25,00015 176,30417 5,00019 25,00030 176,30432 5,00034 25,00045 176,30450( 118,124)Total Present Worth:Equivalent Annual 4770.3760.337Present Worth 176,304 4,787 22,916 127,203 3,454 16,534 91,777 2,492 11,929 66,217- 39,792 483,822 19,966Annual Cost 7,276 198 946 5,249 143 682 3,787 103 492 2,733- 1,642 19,966 19,966P/F1.000Present Worth 689,876Annual Cost 28,470Reconstruct-7.5" Concrete -Select Granular(20 Year Fix)Item12" Select Granular Mod.CourseUnitCYPrice/Unit11.86Total Cost 392,423.68StrategyInitial CostYear0Cost/Mile 4,863,629
Cost Analysis/ S.P. 2505-53-T.H. 52 SB From Pine Island to ZumbrotaGivens:Length Width of Road 1" Bituminous Interest Rate Inflation Rate 7.7592411320milesfeet(Conc.)lbs/SY%%24 feet(Bit.)7/17/14-TRMMILL 1.5" & 3.0" min. Bituminous Overlay(17 Year Fix)Item1.5" MILL BITUMINOUSPATCHTACK COAT3.0" SPWEB440ECourseWearPrice/UnitUnitSY 0.80Ton 100.00GAL 1.00TON 60.00Total Cost:Cost/Mile:Total Cost 87,397.38 31,036.00 21,849.34 1,111,039.14 1,251,322 161,274StrategyInitial CostRout & sealChipsealMill & 3" OverlayRout & sealChipsealMill & 3" OverlayRemaining Life ValueYearCost/Mile0 161,2742 2,0004 20,00017 161,27419 2,00021 20,00033 161,27435( 139,771)Total Present Worth:Equivalent Annual esent Worth 161,274 1,922 18,477 115,176 1,373 13,196 83,899- 69,889 325,427 13,018Annual Cost 6,451 77 739 4,607 55 528 3,356- 2,796 13,018 13,018Total Cost 131,096.06 31,036.00 32,774.02 1,666,558.71 1,861,465 239,910StrategyInitial CostRout & sealChipsealMill & 3" OverlayRout & sealChipsealRemaining Life ValueYearCost/Mile0 239,9103 2,0005 20,00020 161,27422 2,00024 20,00035( 19,030)Total Present Worth:Equivalent Annual Cost:P/F1.0000.9420.9060.6730.6470.6220.500Present Worth 239,910 1,885 18,115 108,533 1,294 12,434- 9,516 372,655 14,907Annual Cost 9,597 75 725 4,342 52 497- 381 14,907 14,907Total Cost 202,106.43 453,303.44 411,860.13 1,244,320.14 38,608.78 435,238.93 2,785,438 358,994StrategyInitial CostReseal JointsMajor CPRRemaining Life ValueYearCost/Mile0 358,99413 55,00025 250,00035 0Total Present Worth:Equivalent Annual Cost:P/F1.0000.7730.6100.500Present Worth 358,994 42,517 152,383 0 553,894 22,157Annual Cost 14,361 1,701 6,096 0 22,157 22,157MILL 3" & 4.5" min. Bituminous Overlay(20 Year Fix)Item3" MILL BITUMINOUSPATCHTACK COAT4.5" SPWEB440ECourseWearUnitPrice/UnitSY 1.20Ton 100.00GAL 1.00TON 60.00Total Cost:Cost/Mile:7.5" Unbonded Overlay(20 Year Fix)Item4.5" MILL BITUMINOUSPASSRCPlace Conc. Pvmt. 7.5"Structural ConcreteReinforcement BarsDowel BarsCourseUnitSYTonSYCYEpoxylbEpoxyeachTotal Cost:Cost/Mile:Price/Unit 1.85 58.54 3.77 68.34 0.80 6.641. Preventive Maintenance adds 1 year of life to thin overlays and 2 years to medium overlays and Reclaimed pavements.2. Each successive overlay has 1 year less life than previous one on a section.3. Medium overlay-17 years, heavy bit. overlay-20 years, reclamation overlay-20 years, CIR-20 years, unbonded overlay-20 years.4. Aggregate and shoulder quantities were not included in each option.5. Calculations are based on 35 year life cycle.6. Costs are based upon recent district project costs.
AT LEAST ONE BITUMINOUS & ONE PCC OPTION WITH EQUAL DESIGN LIVES IS REQUIREDDistrict4Project Number2613-18Performed BySJDate12/31/2013DistrictPerformed By4SJProject NumberDateAnalysis PeriodDiscount RateAnalysis PeriodDiscount Rate352.2Funding CategoryLow Cost Option #Chosen Option #352.2Funding CategoryLow Cost Option #Chosen Option #OPTION #1DESCRIPTION2" Mill and 3.5" Bituminous OverlayDESIGN # LifeAA3AB 11AK 14AA3AB8AK 1317Description211OPTION #2DESCRIPTION6" Concrete ReconstructTYPEDESIGN LIFE1OPTION #3DESCRIPTIONTYPE17DescriptionCost/MileYear # LifeInitial Cost 177,0780Initial Cost 1 2Crack Treatment 2,0003 4 5Surface Treatment 20,0006 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 163" Mill & 3" Overlay 157,00017 BA 10 Jt Reseal & Partial Depth Repair 18 19Crack Treatment 2,00020 21 22Surface Treatment 20,0002324 25 26 27 BB 8 Partial Depth Repairs & Some Fu 28 29 303" Mill & 3" Overlay 157,00031 32 33 34Remaining Service Life Value** (109,000.00)35Remaining Service Life Value** 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50Total Present Worth 347,451Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost* 14,338Eq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost100%% of Low Cost* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for information only.**Remaining Service Life Value is reported as a negative value.DESIGN LIFEOPTION #4DESCRIPTIONTYPEDESIGN LIFE1 Cost/MileYear # 4344454647484950701,355 28,943202%Cost/Mile Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost-31/1/19001/1/1900OPTION #5DESCRIPTIONTYPEDESIGN LIFE2Description2613-1812/31/2013OPTION #6DESCRIPTIONTYPEDESIGN LIFE2Year # riptionCost/Mile -TYPE1Year # l Present WorthEq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for information only.DescriptionCost/Mile Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost-2Year # riptionTotal Present WorthEq. Annual Cost*% of Low CostCost/Mile - -
AT LEAST ONE BITUMINOUS & ONE PCC OPTION WITH EQUAL DESIGN LIVES IS REQUIREDDistrictMetroProject NumberPerformed ByTC / HDDateAnalysis PeriodDiscount Rate352OPTION #1DESCRIPTION4" Bit OverlayDESIGN LIFE2733-899/16/2014Funding CategoryLow Cost Option #Chosen Option #RD1OPTION #2DESCRIPTIONBituminous ReconstructionTYPEDESIGN LIFE14 YearsHMA20 YearsDescriptionCost/MileYear # LifeDescriptionYear # Life04" Bit Overlay 533,5310New Bit Pavement1 12 23 AACrack Treatment 10,50034 45 56 67 ABSurface Treatment 67,50078 8 BCLight Crack Treatment9 910 1011 1112 12 ABSurface Treatment13 1314 BA3.5" M&O 417,6841415 1516 1617 AACrack Treatment 10,5001718 1819 1920 20 BD3.0" M&O21 ABSurface Treatment 67,5002122 2223 23 AACrack Treatment24 2425 2526 2627 BB4.0" M&O 461,47827 ABSurface Treatment28 2829 2930 AACrack Treatment 10,5003031 3132 3233 3334 ABSurface Treatment 67,5003435Remaining Service Life Value** (153,826.04)35Remaining Service Life Value**36 3637 3738 383939 40 4041 4142 4243 4344 4445 4546 4647 4748 4849 4950 50Total Present Worth 1,204,443Total Present WorthEq. Annual Cost* 48,180Eq. Annual Cost*% of Low Cost100%% of Low Cost* Equivalent Annual Cost is included for information only.**Remaining Service Life Value is reported as a negative value.DistrictPerformed ByAnalysis PeriodDiscount RateOPTION #3DESCRIPTION20-Yr Concrete ReconstructionTYPEMetroTC / HDDESIGN LIFEHMA20 YearsCost/MileYear # LifeDescription 1,456,7110New 20-yr Concrete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5,2508 9 10 11 67,50012 13 BFMinor CPR (20-yr) 14 15 16 17 18 19 353,90120 21 22 10,50023 24 25 BGMajor CPR (20-yr) 26 67,50027 28 29 3031 32 33 34 35Remaining Service Life Value** 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1,798,785Total Present Worth 71,955Eq. Annual Cost*149%% of Low Cost352OPTION #4DESCRIPTION35-Yr Concrete ReconstructionTYPEPCCCost/Mile 1,496,681 73,510 224,265 1,690,203 67,612140%DESIGN LIFEProject NumberDate2733-899/16/2014Funding
Calendar Year 2015 Report on . Life-Cycle Cost Analysis January 2016 . Prepared by . The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 . Phone: 651-296-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 .
