Transcription
The Gospels1. The Gospel of Mark2. The Gospel of Matthew3. The Gospel of Luke & the Acts of the Apostles4. The Gospel of John1. THE GOSPEL OF MARKIntroductions & OverviewsDaniel J. Harrington, What Are They Saying About Mark? (New York: Paulist Press, 2005).The place to start to get the lay of the land.Ernest E. Best, Mark: The Gospel as Story, rev. ed. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Edwin K. Broadhead, Mark (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001)Christopher Bryan, A Preface to Mark: Notes on the Gospel in Its Literary and Cultural Settings(New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Timothy R. Carmody, The Gospel of Mark: Question by Question (New York: Paulist Press, 2010).J. Keith Elliott, eds., The Language and Style of the Gospel of Mark, New Testament Studies 71(Leiden: Brill, 1993).Robert M. Fowler, Let the Reader Understand. Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark(Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 1991).Joel B. Green, “The Gospel According to Mark,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Gospels, ed.Stephen C. Barton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 139-157.Richard A. Horsley, Hearing the Whole Story: The Politics of Plot in Mark’s Gospel (Louisville, KY:Westminster/ John Knox, 2001).Donald Juel, The Gospel of Mark, Interpreting Biblical Texts (Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1999).Sean P. Kealy, A History of the Interpretation of the Gospel of Mark (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen,2007).1
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Werner H. Kelber, Mark’s Story of Jesus (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1974).Werner H. Kelber, The Oral and Written Gospel (reprint: Indiana University Press, 1997).Eugene LaVerdiere, The Beginning of the Gospel: Introducing the Gospel According to Mark, 2 vol.(Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999).Amy-Jill Levine, A Feminist Companion to Mark, Feminist Companions to the New Testamentand Early Christian Writings 2 (Sheffield: Sheffield University Press, 2001).Francis J. Maloney, Mark: Storyteller, Interpreter, Evangelist (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004).Willi Marxsen, Der Evangelist Markus. Studien zur Redaktionsgeschichte des Evangeliums,Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 67 ( NS49) (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1956; 2nd ed., 1959).Ched Myers, Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus (1988; reprint:Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2008).John Painter, Mark’s Gospel: Worlds in Conflict, New Testament Readings (New York:Routledge, 1997).Hendrika Nicoline Roskam, The Purpose of the Gospel of Mark in its Historical and Social Context,Supplements to Novum Testamentum, vol. 114 (Leiden: Brill, 2004).David M. Rhoads, with Joanna Dewey and Donald Michie, Mark as Story: An Introduction tothe Narrative of A Gospel, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1999).Jens Schrörter, “The Gospel of Mark,” in The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, ed.David Aune (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 272-295.Whitney Taylor Shiner, Proclaiming the Gospel: First-Century Performance of Mark (Harrisburg:Trinity Press International, 2003).William R. Telford, The Theology of the Gospel of Mark, New Testament Theology (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1999).Mary Ann Tolbert, Sowing the Gospel: Mark’s World in a Literary-Historical Perspective(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989).CommentariesJohn R. Donahue & Daniel J. Harrington, Gospel of Mark, Sacra Pagina 2 (Collegeville:Liturgical Press, 2001). This up-to-date commentary, like others in the series, offers athorough but not overly technical examination of the text. It is a good place to startone’s study of what scholars believe is the earliest of the four gospels.M. Eugene Boring, Mark: A Commentary, New Testament Library (Louisville, KY:Westminster John Knox, 2006).Mary Ann Beavis, Mark, Paideia: Commentaries on the New Testament (Grand Rapids:Baker Academic, 2011).Journal of Religion & Society2Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Richard T. France, The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary on the Greek Text, New InternationalGreek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002).Robert A. Guelich, Mark 1:1-8:26 & Mark 8:27-16:20, Word Biblical Commentary 34A & B(Waco, TX: Word Books, 1989, 2001).Mary Healy, The Gospel of Mark, Catholic Commentary on Scripture (Grand Rapids: BakerAcademic, 2008).Morna D. Hooker, ed., The Gospel According to Saint Mark, Black’s New TestamentCommentary 2 (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1993).Bas M.F. van Iersel, Mark: A Reader-Response Commentary, Journal for the Study of the NewTestament Supplementary series, vol. 164 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998).William L. Lane, The Gospel According to Mark: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition, andNotes, New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 1999).Bruce J. Malina & Richard L. Rohrbaugh, Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels, 2nded. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003).Francis J. Maloney, The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002).Joel Marcus, Mark 1-8, Anchor Bible 27A (New York: Doubleday, 2000).Joel Marcus, Mark 8-16, Anchor Yale Bible Commentary (New Haven: Yale University Press,2009).Jens Schröter, “The Gospel of Mark,” in The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament,Blackwell Companions to Religion, ed. David E. Aune (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell,2010), 272-296.Vincent Taylor, The Gospel According to St. Mark, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1966).Ben Witherington III, The Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI:Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2001).ChristologyErnest E. Best, The Temptation and the Passion: The Markan Soteriology, Society for NewTestament Studies Monograph Series 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990).Edwin K. Broadhead, Teaching with Authority: Miracles and Christology in the Gospel of Mark(Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992).Edwin K. Broadhead, Naming Jesus: Titular Christology in the Gospelof Mark (Sheffield: SheffieldAcademic Press, 1999).Adela Yabro Collins, “From Noble Death to Crucified Messiah,” New Testament Studies 40(1994): 481-503.Journal of Religion & Society3Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Paul L. Danove, The Rhetoric of the Characterization of God, Jesus, and Jesus’ Disciples in the Gospel ofMark, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplementary Series, vol. 290(New York: T&T Clark International, 2005).Peter M. Head, Christology and the Synoptic Problem: An Argument for Markan Priority, Society forNew Testament Studies Monograph Series 94 (New York: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1997).Suzanne Watts Henderson, Christology and Discipleship in the Gospel of Mark, Society for NewTestament Studies Monograph Series (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2006).Jack Dean Kingsbury, The Christology of Mark’s Gospel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989).Keikki Räisänen, The ‘Messianic Secret’ in Mark, trans. Christopher Tuckett (Edinburgh: T&TClark, 1990).Vernon K. Robbins, Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark (Minneapolis:Fortress Press, 1992).William R. Telford, “Mark’s Portrait of Jesus,” in The Blackwell Companion to Jesus, ed. DelbertBurkett (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 13-29.Michel Trimaille, Christologie de saint Marc (Paris: Desclée, 2001).Suzanne Watts, Christology and Discipleship in the Gospel of Mark, Society for New TestamentStudies Monograph Series (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).William Wrede, The Messianic Secret, trans. J.C.G. Greig (reprint: Greewood, SC: Attic Press,1971).Other StudiesStephen Ahearne-Kroll, The Psalms of Lament in Mark’s Passion, Society for New TestamentStudies Monograph series (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Robert R. Beck, Nonviolent Story: Narrative Conflict Resolution in the Gospel of Mark (Maryknoll,NY: Orbis, 1996).Jonathan A. Draper & John Miles Foley, eds., Performing the Gospel: Orality, Memory and Mark:Essays Dedicated to Werner Kelber (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006).J. Edwards, “Markan Sandwiches: The Significance of Interpolations in Markan Narratives,”Novum Testamentum 31 (1989): 193-216.J. Keith Elliott, eds., The Language and Style of the Gospel of Mark, New Testament Studies, vol.71 (Leiden: Brill, 1993).Susan R. Garrett, The Temptations of Jesus in Mark’s Gospel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998)Timothy C. Gray, The Temple in the Gospel of Mark: A Study in Its Narrative Role (Grand Rapids:Baker Academic, 2010).Journal of Religion & Society4Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Ferdinand Hahn, ed., Der Erzähler des Evagneliums: Methodische Nueansätze in der Markusforschung(Stuttgarter Bibelstudien, vol. 118/19 (Stuttgart: 1985).Robert G. Hammerton-Kelly, The Gospel and the Sacred: The Politics of Violence in Mark(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993).Richard A. Horsley, Performing the Gospel: Orality, Memory, and Mark (Minneapolis: FortressPress, 2006).Jack Dean Kingsbury, Conflict in Mark: Jesus, Authorities, Disciples (Minneapolis: Fortress Press,1989).Christopher D. Marshall, Faith as a Theme in Mark’s Narrative (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1989).Susan Miller, Women in Mark’s Gospel, Journal for the Study of the New TestamentSupplementary series 259 (London: T&T Clark, 2004).David B. Peabody, Lamar Cope, and Allan J. McNicol, eds., One Gospel from Two: Mark’s Useof Matthew and Luke: A Demonstration by the Research Team of the International Institute forRenewal of Gospel Studies (Harrisburg, PA: Trinit, 2002).John Kenneth Riches, Conflicting Mythologies: Identity Formation in the Gospels of Mark andMatthew (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000).Wolfgang Roth, Hebrew Gospel: Cracking the Code of Mark (Oak Park: IL : Meyer-Stone, 1988).Marie Noonan Sabin, Reopening the Word: Reading Mark as Theology in the Context of Early Judaism(New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Whitney Taylor Shiner, Proclaiming the Gospel: First-Century Performance of Mark (Harrisburg:Trinity Press International, 2003).Stephen H. Smith, A Lion With Wings: A Narrative-Critical Approach to Mark’s Gospel, TheBiblical Seminar 38 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996).William R. Telford, The Barren Temple and the Withered Tree: A Redaction-Critical Analysis of theCursing of the Fig-tree Pericope in Mark’s Gospel and Its Relation to the Cleansing of the TempleTradition (Sheffield: JSOT, 1980).William R. Telford, Writing on the Gospel of Mark (London: SCM-Canterbury, 2009).Bonnie B. Thurston, The Spiritual Landscape of Mark (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2008)Mary Ann Tolbert, Sowing the Gospel: Mark’s World in a Literary-Historical Perspective(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989).Michael E. Vines, The Problem of Markan Genre: The gospel of Mark and the Jewish Novel (Atlanta:Society of Biblical Literature, 2002)Rikki E. Watts, Isaiah’s New Exodus and Mark (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997).Journal of Religion & Society5Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.2. THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEWIntroductions & OverviewsDale C. Allison, Studies in Matthew: Interpretation Past and Present (Grand Rapids: BakerAcademic, 2005).Howard W. Clarke, The Gospel of Matthew and Its Readers: A Historical Introduction to the FirstGospel (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 2003).Dennis C. Duling, “The Gospel of Matthew,” in Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, ed.David Aune (Malden, MA / Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 296-318.Nicole Wilkinson Duran, Matthew, series: Texts @ Contexts (Minneapolis, MN: FortressPress, 2013) hardcover, 49. NEW.G.D. Kilpatrick, The Origin of the Gospel According to Matthew (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966).Jack Dean Kingsbury, Matthew: Structure, Christology, Kingdom (Minneapolis: Fortress Press,1989).Jack Dean Kingsbury, Matthew as Story,2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988).Amy-Jill Levine, with M. Bickerstaff, eds., A Feminist Companion to Matthew (Sheffield:Sheffield Academic Press, 2001).Ulrich Luz, The Theology of the Gospel of Matthew, New Testament Theology (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1995).J. Andrew Overman, Church and Community in Crisis: The Gospel According to Matthew, The NewTestament in Context (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996).Mark Allan Powell, God with Us: A Pastoral Theology of Matthew’s Gospel (Minneapolis: FortressPress, 1995).Donald Senior, What are they saying about Matthew?, rev. ed. (New York: Paulist Press, 1996).David C. Sim, Matthew and His Christian Contemporaries, Library of New Testament Studies 333(New York: T&T Clark, 2008).Krister Stendahl, The School of St. Matthew (Lund: Gleerup, 1968).Elaine M. Wainwright, Towards a Feminist Critical Reading of the Gospel According to Matthew(Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991).CommentariesDaniel J. Harrington, Gospel of Matthew, Sacra Pagina 1 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press,1991). Harrington’s gift is to sort through a wide range of contemporaryinterpretations and highlight the best. This offers a good thorough introduction.M.E. Boring, “Matthew,” in New Interpreter’s Bible (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994).Journal of Religion & Society6Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.W.D. Davies and D.C. Allison, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According toSaint Matthew, New International Critical Commentary, 3 vols. (Edinburgh: T&TClark, 1988-1997).D.C. Duling, The Gospel According to Matthew, in The HarperCollins Study Bible: New RevisedStandard Version with the Apocryphal / Deuteronomical Books (San Francisco:HarperCollins, 1993).R.T. France, The Gospel of Matthew, New International Commentary on the New Testament(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007).David Garland, Reading Matthew: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the First Gospel, red.,Reading the New Testament series (Macon, GA: Smyth and Helwys, 1999).R.H Gundry, Matthew: A Commentary on His Handbook for a Mixed Church under Persecution, 2nded. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994).D.R.A. Hare, Matthew (Louisville: John Knox, 1993).Daniel J. Harrington, Gospel of Matthew, Sacra Pagina 1 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press,1991).Stanley Hauerwas, Matthew, Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids:Brazos, 2006).Ulrich Luz, Matthew: A Commentary, Hermeneia, 3 vol., trans. William C. Linss (Minneapolis:Fortress Press, 1989-2005).John P. Meier, The Vision of Matthew: Christ, Church, and Morality in the First Gospel (New York:Crossroad, 1991).Rudolf Schnackenburg, The Gospel of Matthew, trans. Robert R. Barr (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 2002).Donald Senior, Matthew, Abingdon New Testament Commentary (Nashville: Abingdon,1998).Charles H. Talbert, Matthew, series: Paideia (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010).ChristologyDale C. Allison, The New Moses: A Matthean Typology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993).Jack Dean Kingsbury, Matthew: Structure, Christology, Kingdom (Minneapolis: Fortress Press,1989).Elaine M. Wainwright, “Who Do You Say That I Am? A Matthean Response,” in TheBlackwell Companion to Jesus, ed. Delbert Burkett (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 3046.Journal of Religion & Society7Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Other StudiesJ. Capel Anderson, Matthew’s Narrative Web Over, and Over, and Over Again (Sheffield: JSOTPress, 1994).David E. Aune, ed., The Gospel of Matthew in Current Study: Studies in Honor of William G.Thompson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001).D.L. Balch, ed, Social History of the Matthean Community: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches(Minneapolis: Fotress Press, 1991).David R. Bauer, Mark Allan Powell, eds., Treasures Old and New: Recent Contributions to MattheanStudies, SBL Symposium Series 1 (Atlanta, GA: Scholar’s Press, 1996).Gunther Bornkamm, G. Barth, and H.J. Held, Tradition and Interpretation in Matthew(Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1963).Jeannine K. Brown, The Disciples in Narrative Perspective: The Portrayal and Function of the MattheanDisciples (Leiden: Brill, 2002).Warren Carter, What are they saying about Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount (New York: PaulistPress, 1994).W.C. Carter, Matthew and the Margins: A Sociopolitical and Religious Reading (Maryknoll, NY:Orbis Books, 2000).W.D. Davies, The Setting of the Sermon on the Mount (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1964).Dennis C. Duling, “Matthew as a Marginal Scribe in an Advanced Agrarian Society,”Hervormde Teologise Studies 58 (2002): 520-575.R.H. Gundry, The Use of the Old Testament in St. Matthew’s Gospel. With Special Reference ot theMessianic Hope (Leiden: Brill, 1975).Daniel M. Gurtner and John Nolland, eds., Built Upon the Rock: Studies in the Gospel of Matthew(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008).Thomas R. Hatina, ed., Biblical Interpretation in Early Christian Gospels, Vol. 2: The Gospel ofMatthew, series: Library of New Testament Studies 310 (London / New York: T&TClark [A Continuum Imprint], 2008).R.A. Horsley, The Liberation of Christmas: The Infancy Narratives in Social Context (New York:Crossroad, 1989).Bruce J. Malina and J.H. Neyrey, Calling Jesus Names: The Social Value of Labels in Matthew(Sonoma: Polebridge Press, 1988).D.E. Orton, The Understanding Scribe: Matthew and the Apocalyptic Ideal (Sheffield: SheffieldAcademic Press, 1989).J.Andrew Overman, Matthew’s Gospel and Formative Judaism: The Social World of the MattheanCommunity (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1990).Journal of Religion & Society8Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.J. Andrew Overman, Church and Community in Crisis: The Gospel Accroding to Matthew, The NewTestament in Context (Valley Forge: Trinity International Press, 1996).J. Riches and D.C. Sim, eds., The Gospel of Matthew in its Roman Imperial Context (London: T&TClark, 2005).A.J. Saldarini, Matthew’s Christian-Jewish Community (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1994).Huub van de Sandt, ed., Matthew and the Didache: Two Documents from the Same Jewish ChristianMilieu?, Compendia rerum iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum (Minneapolis:Fortress Press, 2005).David C. Sim, Apocalyptic Eschatology in the Gospel of Matthew (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1996).Mitzi J. Smith, Teaching All Nations: Interrogating the Matthean Great Commission(Minneapolis,MN: Fortress Press, 2014) paperback, 49. NEW.G.N. Stanton, A Gospel for a New People: Studies in Matthew (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1992).G.N. Stanton, “The Origin and Purpose of Matthew’s Gospel: Matthean Scholarship from1945-1980,” Aufstieg und Nidergang der römischen Welt, II.25.3. 1890-1951 (1985).3. THE GOSPEL OF LUKE & THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLESLuke as Author & TheologianC.K. Barrett, Luke the Historian in Recent Study (London: Epworth, 1961).C.G. Bartholomew, J.B. Green, and A.C. Thiselton, eds., Reading Luke: Interpretation, Reflection,Formation (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005).Paul Borgman, The Way According to Luke: Hearing the Whole Story of Luke-Acts (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 2006).François Bovon, Luke the Theologian: Fifty-Five Years of Research (1950-2005), 2nd edition (Waco,TX: Baylor University Press, 2006).H.J. Cadbury, The Making of Luke-Acts (New York: Macmillan, 1927; repr. Peabody:Hendrickson, 1999).H.J. Cadbury, The Style and Method of St. Luke (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1920).Hans Conzelmann, The Theology of St. Luke (1961; repr.: Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981).J.A. Darr, On Character Building: The Reader and the Rhetoric of Characterization in Luke-Acts(Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1992).Craig A. Evans & James A. Sanders, Luke and Scripture: the Function of Sacred Tradition in LukeActs (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993).Journal of Religion & Society9Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Luke the Theologian: Aspects of His Theology (New York: Paulist Press, 1989).Joel B. Green, The Theology of the Gospel of Luke (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1995).J. Jervell, Luke and the People of God: A New Look at Luke-Acts (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1972).Luke Timothy Johnson, Prophetic Jesus, Prophetic Church: The Challenge of Luke-Acts toContemporary Christians (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011).Robert Karris, Luke: Artist and Theologian; Luke’s Passion Account as Literature (New York:Paulist Press, 1985).Karl Allen Kuhn, Luke: The Elite Evangelist, series: Paul’s Social Network (Collegeville, MN:Liturgical Press, 2010).Amy-Jill Levine, ed., A Feminist Companion to Luke (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press, 2001).R. Maddox, The Purpose of Luke-Acts, ed. J. Riches (Edinburgh: T&T Clark / Götting:Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1982).I.H. Marshall, Luke: Historian and Theologian (Exeter: Paternoster Press, 1970).R.F. O’Toole, The Unity of Luke’s Theology: An analysis of Luke-Acts, Good News Studies 9(Wilmington: Michael Glazier, 1984).Mikeal Parsons, Luke: Storyteller, Interpreter, Evangelist (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2007).M.C. Parsons and R.I. Pervo, Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts (Minneapolis: FortressPress, 1993).Mark Allan Powell, What Are They Saying About Luke? (New York: Paulist Press, 1989).V. George Shillington, An Introduction to the Study of Luke-Acts (Harrisburg: Trinity PressInternational, 2007).Charles H. Talbert, Literary Patterns: Theological Themes, and the Genre of Luke-Acts (Missoula:Scholars Press, 1974).Charles H. Talbert, ed., Perspectives in Luke-Acts (Danville, VA: Association of BaptistProfessors of Religion, 1978).Charles H. Talbert, ed., Luke-Acts: New Perspectives from the SBL Seminar (New York:Crossroads, 1984).Robert C. Tannehill, The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts: A Literary Interpretation, 2 vol.(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1991-1994).Richard P. Thompson, “Luke-Acts: The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles,” inThe Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, ed. David E. Aune (Oxford: WileyBlackwell, 2010), 319-343.Christopher M. Tuckett, Luke, New Testament Guides (Sheffield Academic Press, 1996).Christopher M. Tuckett, Luke’s Literary Achievement: Collected Essays, Journal for the Study ofthe New Testament, Supplement 116 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995).Journal of Religion & Society10Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Commentaries: The Gospel of LukeLuke Timothy Johnson, Gospel of Luke, Sacra Pagina 3 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press [AMichael Glazier Book], 1991). Luke Timothy Johnson offers a good in-depth andlucid study of the rich theology of the Gospel of Luke. A good place to start.Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke, Anchor Bible 28-28A, 2 vol. (Garden City,NY: Doubleday, 1981-1985). One of the most exhaustive studies of Luke’s gospel.See especially the lengthy introduction.François Bovon, Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1-9:50, Hermeneia Series(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2002).Raymond E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1979) (includes acommentary of the infancy narrative of Luke).F.W. Danker, Jesus and the New Age: A Commentary on St. Luke’s Gospel, rev. ed. (Philadelphia:Fortress Press, 1988).E.E. Ellis, The Gospel of Luke, The New Century Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 1974).Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke, Anchor Bible 28-28A, 2 vol. (Garden City,NY: Doubleday, 1981-1985).Luke Timothy Johnson, Gospel of Luke, Sacra Pagina 3 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press [AMichael Glazier Book], 1991).I.H. Marshall, Commentary on Luke, New International Greek Testament Commentary (GrandRapids: Eerdmans, 1978).E. Schweizer, The Good News According to Luke, trans. D.E. Green (Atlanta: John Knox, 1984).Charles H. Talbert, Reading Luke: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel, rev.ed., Reading the New Testament Series (Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2002),Robert C. Tannehill, Luke, Abingdon New Testament Commentaries (Nashville: Abingdon,1996).Commentaries: Acts of the ApostlesHans Conzelmann, Acts of the Apostles, Hermeneia Series (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1987).Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Acts of the Apostles, Anchor Bible 31 (New York: Doubleday, 1998).Beverly Roberts Gaventa, The Acts of the Apostles, Abingdon New Testament Commentaries(Nashville: Abingdon, 2003)Luke Timothy Johnson, The Acts of the Apostles, Sacra Pagina 5 (Collegeville, MN: LiturgicalPress [A Michael Glazier Book], 1992).William S. Kurz, Acts of the Apostles, Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (GrandRapids: Baker Academic, 2014) paperback, 23. NEW.Journal of Religion & Society11Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.Bruce J. Malina, and John J. Pilch, Social-Science Commentary on the Book of Acts (Minneapolis:Fortress Press, 2008).Jaroslav Pelikan, Acts, Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI:Brazos, 2006).Charles H. Talbert, Reading Acts: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles,Reading the New Testament (New York: Crossroad, 1999).ChristologyH. Douglas Buckwalter, The Character and Purpose of Luke’s Christology (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1996).Delbert Burkett, “Jesus in Luke-Acts,” in The Blackwell Companion to Jesus, ed. Delbert Burkett(Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), 47-63.R. Cassidy, Jesus, Politics, and Society: A Study of Luke’s Gospel (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1978).James D.G. Dunn, “KURIOS in Acts,” in James D.G. Dunn, The Christ and the Spirit: CollectedEssays of James D.G. Dunn, Vol. 1: Christology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 241253.C. Kavin Rowe, Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke (Berlin: DeGruyter,2006).Mark L. Strauss, The Davidic Messiah in Luke-Acts: The Promise and Its Fulfillment in LukanChristology (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995).Christopher M. Tuckett, “The Person and Work of Jesus,” in Luke (Sheffield: SheffieldAcademic Press, 1996; repr.: New York: T&T Clark, 2004), 72-93.Christopher M. Tuckett, “The Christology of Luke-Acts,” in Joseph Verheyden, ed., The Unity ofLuke-Acts (Leuven: Leuven University Press / Peeters, 1999), 133-164.Christopher M. Tuckett, “Luke-Acts,” in Christology and the New Testament: Jeuss and His EarliestFollowers (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2001), 133-147.A.W. Zwiep, The Ascension of the Messiah in Lukan Christology (Leiden: Brill, 1997).Other Studies: Gospel of LukeC.G. Bartholomew, J.B. Green, and A.C. Thieselton, eds., Reading Luke: Interpretation,Reflection, Formation (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 2005).R.L. Brawley, Luke-Acts and the Jews: Conflict, Apology, and Conciliation, Society of BiblicalLiterature Monograph Series 33 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1987).Raymond E. Brown, ed., Mary in the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1978), 105134.S. Brown, Apostasy and Perseverance in the Theology of Luke, Analecta Biblica 36 (Rome:Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1969).Journal of Religion & Society12Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.J.T. Carroll, Response to the End of History: Eschatology and Salvation in Luke-acts (Atlanta:Scholars Press, 1988).R.J. Dillon, From Eyewitnesses to Ministers of the Word: Tradition and Composition in Luke 24,Analecta Biblica 82 (Rome: Biblical Institute, 1978).R.J. Dillon, “Previewing Luke’s Project from his Prologue,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 43(1981): 205-227.E.E. Ellis, Eschatology in Luke (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1972).Philip F. Esler, Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of LucanTheology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).C.A. Evans and J.A. Sanders, Luke and Scripture: The Function of Sacred Tradition in Luke-Acts(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993).Joseph A. Fitzmyer, “The Ascension of Christ and Pentecost,” Theological Studies 45 (1984);409-440.D.B. Gowler, Host, Guest, Enemy, and Friend: Portraits of the Pharisees in Luke and Acts (NewYork: Peter Lang, 1991).J.P. Heil, The Meal Scenes in Luke-Acts: An Audience-Oriented Approach (Atlanta: Scholars Press,1999).Luke Timothy Johnson, The Literary Function of Possessions in Luke-Acts, Society for BiblicalLiterature Dissertation series 39 (Missoula: Scholars Press, 1977).Luke Timothy Johnson, “On Finding the Lukan Community: A Cautious Cautionary Essay,”in 1979 SBL Seminar Papers, ed. Paul Achtemeir (Missoula: Scholars Press, 1978), 87100.Robert J. Karris, Eating Your Way Through Luke’s Gospel (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press,2006).Robert J. Karris, “Missionary Communities: A New Paradigm for the Study of Luke-Acts,”Catholic Biblical Quarterly 41 (1979): 80-97.Leander Keck and J.L. Martyn eds., Studies in Luke-Acts (Nashville: Abingdon, 1966).Sean P. Kealy, The Interpretation of the Gospel of Luke, 2 vol., Studies in the Bible and EarlyChristianity 63 & 64 (Edwin Mellen Press, 2005).Jack Dean Kingsbury, Conflict in Luke: Jesus, Authorities, Disciples (Minneapolis: Fortress Press,1991).K.D. Litwak, Echoes of Scripture in Luke-Acts: Telling the History of God’s People Intertextually(London: T&T Clark, 2005).P. Minear, To Heal and to Reveal: The Prophetic Vocation According to Luke (New York:Crossroads, 1976).D.P. Moessner, ed., Jesus and the Heritage of Israel (Harrisburg: Trinity Press International,1999).Journal of Religion & Society13Supplement 15
Bibliographies for Theology, compiled by William Harmless, S.J.D.P. Moessner, Lord of the Banquet: The Literary and Theological Significance of the Lukan TravelNarrative (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989).H. Moxnes, The Economy of the Kingdom: Social Conflict and Economic Relations in Luke’s Gospel(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988).D.A. Neale, None but the Sinners: Religious Categories in the Gospel of Luke (Sheffield: JSOT Press,1991).Jerome H. Neyrey, ed., The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation (Peabody:Hendrickson, 1991).Jerome H. Neyrey, The Passion According to Luke: A Redaction Stu
Joel Marcus, Mark 8-16, Anchor Yale Bible Commentary (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009). Jens Schröter, “The Gospel of Mark,” in The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament, Blackwell Companions to Religion, ed. Da
