WIXLIB

APPELLATE COURTMOTIONS HEARINGFORTHURSDAY, JULY 15, 2010AT 10:00 A.M.1. Cases are scheduled for aspecific time, not necessarily inthe order listed. Counsel mustidentify themselves to the Clerkin the Courtroom at least 15minutes before the scheduledtime of argument.COURTHOUSE75 Elm Street, Hartford, CT

23THURSDAY, JULY 15, 2010AT 10:00 A.M.IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELAND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIESARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEALFROM THE TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENTOF FORECLOSURE BY SALE SHOULDNOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT BECAUSETHE PLAINTIFF HAS FILED A SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AND, THEREFORE, THERE IS NO PRACTICAL RELIEFTHAT THIS COURT CAN GR ANT THEAPPELLANT. SEE NEW HARTFORD V.CONNECTICUT RESOURCES RECOVERYAUTHORIT Y, 291 CONN. 502, 506-507,(2009); MAZZIOTTI V. ALLSTATE INS. CO.,240 CONN. 799, 806-808 (1997).IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELAND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTYARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE APPEALSHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACKOF A F I NA L J U D GM E N T BECAUSE ,WHEN THE APPEAL WAS FILED, JUDGMENT HAD NOT BEEN RENDERED AS TOANY OF THE DEFENDANTS FOLLOWINGTHE TRIAL COURTS’ DECISIONS ON THEDEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE ANDOBJECTION TO THE A MENDED COMPLAINT. SEE PRACTICE BOOK §§ 10-44AND 61-2; HOMECOMINGS FINANCIALNETWORK, INC. V. STARBALA, 85 CONN.APP. 284, 285 N.1 (2004).(1)AC32013IAN N. WRIGHTIan Wright, self-represented partyv.OFFICER DEMIRAJ ET AL.Deann S. Varunes,Assistant Attorney General(2)AC32007WELLS FARGO BANK, NAHunt Leibert Jacobson, PCMcCarter & English, LLPv.FREDERICK CORNELIUS ET AL.Frederick Cornelius,self-represented partyJoseph Stafford,self-represented partyRome McGuigan, PCFor the CommitteeLawrence Stuart ShipmanCounsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.(continued)(continued)

45IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEALFROM THE TRIAL COURT’S DECISIONOVERRULING THE DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO THE PLAINTIFF’S AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE SHOULD NOTBE DISMISSED BECAUSE A N ORDERFOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN EXECUTIONIS NOT AN APPEALABLE FINAL JUDGMENT. SEE QUINLAN V. CITY NATIONALBANK, 105 CONN. 424, 429 (1926); IANNOTTI V. TURNER, 32 CONN. SUP. 573, CERT.DENIED, 169 CONN. 709 (1975).IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE APPEALAND CROSS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BEDISMISSED FOR LACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT BECAUSE THERE IS AN UNRESOLVED CLAIM FOR DISCRETIONARYPREJUDGMENT INTEREST PURSUANTTO GENERAL STATUTES § 37-3a. SEEBA LF CO. V. SPER A CONSTRUCTIONCO., 222 CONN. 211 (1992); GIANETTI V.MESZOROS, 268 CONN. 424 (2004).(3)AC32158ROGER PLOOF,ADMINISTRATOR, EXECUTOROF THE ESTATE OF FREDERICKPLOOFGreg Benoitv.VIRGINIA BERRY A/K/AVIRGINIA DECKERMatthew G. BergerIN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEALSHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOTDUE TO THE DEATH OF ROBERT M. SEESTATE V. TRA NTOLO, 209 CONN. 169(1988); SEE ALSO STATE V. BOSTWICK, 251CONN. 117 (1999).(4)AC31925STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.ROBERT M.Richard S. Cramer(5)AC31190JOHN HICKEYWilliam Meehanv.ALTERNATIVE INSURANCEWORKS, LLC, ET AL.Bloomenthal & Trow, LLCIN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELAND SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES AREORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEAL FROMTHE TRIAL COURT’S ORDER DENYINGT HE PL A I N T I F F ’ S MO T ION T O DIS QUALIFY SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSEDFOR LACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT. SEETAFF V. BETTCHER, 243 CONN. 380, 384N.2 (1997); STATE V. CURCIO, 191 CONN.27, 31 (1983).(6)AC32078STEPHEN J. BRUNOMarvin, Ferro, Barndollar & Roberts,LLCv.LISA BRUNOLisa Bruno, self-represented partyCounsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.(continued)(continued)

67IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELAND SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES AREORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEAL FROMTHE TRIAL COURT’S POSTJUDGMENTORDER PROVIDING THAT A CERTAINACCOUNT BE DIVIDED AS OF A SPECIFICDATE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FORLACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT BECAUSETHE COURT HAS YET TO DETERMINETHE ACCOUNT’S VALUE ON THE DATEOF DIVISION. SEE STATE V. CURCIO, 191CONN. 27, 31 (1983); SEE ALSO STROINEYV. CRESCENT LAKE TAX DISTRICT, 197CONN. 82, 84 (1985).IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSELAND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTYARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF AN Y, WHY THE PL AINTIFF’S APPEAL FROM THE ORDER DETERMINING THE PRIORITIES SHOULDNOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT BECAUSE, AT THE TIMETHE APPEAL WAS FILED, THE PREVIOUSJ U DGMEN T OF FORECLOSU RE H A DBEEN OPENED AND A NEW FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT HAD NOT YET BEENRENDERED. SEE ESSEX SAVINGS BANKV. FRIMBERGER, 26 CONN. APP. 80 (1991);SEE ALSO STATE V. CURCIO, 191 CONN.27, 31 (1983).(7)AC32079STEPHEN J. BRUNOMarvin, Ferro, Barndollar & Roberts,LLCv.LISA BRUNOLisa Bruno, self-represented party(8)AC31888DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONALTRUST COMPANYKrasow, Garlick & Hadley, LLCHunt Leibert Jacobson, PCv.FRANCIS DELMASTRO ET AL.Francis DelMastro,self-represented partyPolivy & Taschner, LLCSiegel, O’Connor, O’Donnell & Beck,PCCounsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.(continued)(continued)

8IN THE FOLLOWING MATTERS, COUNSEL AND SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIESARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVEREASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE APPEALSSHOULD NOT BE DISPOSED OF, PRACTICE BOOK § 85-1, AND WHY SANCTIONSSHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED, PRACTICEBOOK § 85-2, FOR FAILURE TO FILE THEDOCUMENTS LISTED OR TO PURSUETHE APPEAL WITH DILIGENCE. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THIS HEARING ASORDERED WILL SUBJECT COUNSEL ANDSELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES TO THEIMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MONETARY SANCTIONS, FINES, AND/OR PROHIBITIONFROM APPEARING BEFORE THIS COURT.SEE GENERAL STATUTES § 51-84 ANDPRACTICE BOOK §§ 85-1, 85-2.(9)AC30717STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.DENNIS AARON LUZIETTINo appearanceDefendant-appellant’s appearance andbrief due on or before April 12, 2010.(10) AC31903STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.MARK CUGINIMark R. Cugini,self-represented partyDefendant-appellant’s preliminarystatement of issues, designation ofthe contents of the record, docketingstatement and certificate regarding thetranscript due on or before January 26,2010.9(11) AC32234IN RE: TREVOR R.For petitioner:Stephen G. Vitelli,Assistant Attorney GeneralFor respondent father:Donald R., self-represented partyFor respondent mother:Clarence E. Sawyer, Jr.Counsel for the minor child:Thomas F. MitolaGuardian ad litem:Not AppointedRespondent father-appellant’s preliminary statement of issues, designationof the contents of the record, a courtreporter’s transcript order acknowledgment with an estimated delivery dateor a certificate that no transcript isnecessary and docketing statement dueon or before May 17, 2010.(12) AC32221FELIPE DASILVADiane Polanv.COMMISSIONER OFCORRECTIONOffice of the Chief State’s AttorneyPetitioner-appellant’s amended courtreporter’s written acknowledgment ofthe transcript order with a revised estimated delivery date due May 31, 2010.(13) AC32020ADMINISTRATOR,UNEMPLOYMENTCOMPENSATION ACTThomas P. Clifford, III,Assistant Attorney Generalv.LIRI BELICALiri Belica, self-represented partyDefendant-appellee’s brief due May 14,2010.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.(continued)(continued)

10(14) AC31831DANIEL L. GELLATLYDaniel L. Gellatly,self-represented partyv.DEBORAH A. GELLATLYDeborah A. Procce,self-represented partyDefendant-appellee’s brief due May 10,2010.(15) AC29529DANIEL FIAMENGONo appearancev.COMMISSIONER OFCORRECTIONOffice of the Chief State’s AttorneyPetitioner-appellant’s brief due May 10,2010.(16) AC31854LEONARDO NOGUEIRALeonardo Nogueira,self-represented partyv.COMMISSIONER OFCORRECTIONRichard T. Biggar,Assistant Attorney GeneralNeil Parille,Assistant Attorney GeneralPetitioner-appellant’s court reporter’swritten acknowledgment of the transcript order with an estimated deliverydate due on or before February 3, 2010.(17) AC31941SHAUN ROWEW. Theodore Koch IIIv.COMMISSIONER OFCORRECTIONOffice of the Chief State’s Attorney11(18) AC30743STANLEY PETTITNon-Appearingv.COMMISSIONER OFCORRECTIONOffice of the Chief State’s AttorneyAnne E. Lynch,Assistant Attorney GeneralPetitioner-appellant’s brief due on orbefore March 29, 2010.(19) AC32058ANTHONY BRUNETTIBradford Buchtav.COMMISSIONER OFCORRECTIONOffice of the Chief State’s AttorneyPetitioner-appellant’s court reporter’swritten acknowledgment of the transcript order with an estimated deliverydate due on or before March 22, 2010.(20) AC32168STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.CLIFFORD MORSEThompson Legal ServicesDefendant-appellant’s preliminarystatement of issues, designation of thecontents of the record, a court reporter’s transcript order acknowledgmentwith an estimated delivery date or acertificate that no transcript is necessary and docketing statement due on orbefore April 8, 2010.Petitioner-appellant’s court reporter’swritten acknowledgment of the transcript order with an estimated deliverydate due on or before February 9, 2010.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.(continued)(continued)

1213(21) AC32067STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.PRESTON McRAEPreston McRae, self-represented partyDefendant-appellant’s preliminarystatement of issues, designation of thecontents of the record, court reporter’stranscript order acknowledgment withan estimated delivery date or a certificate that no transcript is necessary anddocketing statement due on or beforeMarch 29, 2010.(22) AC32097STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.MICHAEL BRAWLEYPaul BialobrzeskiDefendant-appellant’s brief due on orbefore May 3, 2010.(23) AC31895STATE OF CONNECTICUTOffice of the Chief State’s Attorneyv.GARY ROGERSPattis & Smith, LLCDefendant-appellant’s brief due on orbefore April 15, 2010.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.MICHÈLE T. ANGERSChief ClerkCounsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.Counsel must identify themselves to the Clerk in Court notlater than 15 minutes before the scheduled time of argument.(continued)(continued)

Diane Polan v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION Office of the Chief State’s Attorney Petitioner-appellant’s amended court reporter’s written acknowledgment of the transcript order with a revised esti-mated delivery date due May 31, 2010. (13) AC32020 ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT Thomas P. Clif