Ventilation For Enclosed Parking Garages - AIVC

Transcription

AIVC#13,671ASHRAE Journal'Ventilation for EnclosedParking GaragesBy Moncef Krartt, Ph.D., P.E., and Arselene Ayarl, Ph.D.Member ASHRAEindication of risks from exposurepen l:!arngs arA and g ncra l l d n t n·foh!c I.typically above-grade \Vith open sidesThi.: ventilation rate re4uireml.'nts rec other codes;ire in lq1endenr of the characteristics ofthe parking g arag e and do not cnnsiderthe \ arinus paramckrs that may affectindoor air gualit.y. sw:h as the ernis iongeneration rate and the acceptable pol l utan t level. A new design method isneeded to dctcm1inc the ventilation rated mechanical ventilation. However, follyommended by ASH RAE andenclosed parking garages arc usually underground and require mechanicalventilation. Indeed. in the absence ofventilation. cndoscJ parking facilitiespresent several indoor air qua I ity problems. The most serious is the emis sion of high levels ofcarbon monoxide ((0) by cars within the parkinggarages. Other concerns related to endoscd gar.iges arc the presence ofoiln.·quired for a wide nmgc ofcndoscd park fumes. and other contaminant-; such as oxides ofnitrogen(NO\ )and 1.rnsolinc-and smoke haze from diesel engines.To d t·t crm i nethe adequate ventilationfor garages, two factors arL' typically.:unsidereJ: the number of car in opera monituring of CO con the moni toring system being interlm:ked with theber of cars in operation depends on theccptahle kvel ufcontaminant rnnccntra garage and may varyconsensus on acceptahlc con taminant levels for enclosed parking ga rages is needed.Un fortunately. Standard 62- l 9X9 doesnot address the issue of \entilation con trol through contaminant monitoring forratetion and the emission quantities. The num type of thl! facility served by the parkingfrom3' ;, (in shop ping an.:as) up to 20' 'o (in sports stadi ums) of the total vchick capacity. Theemission of carbon monox idc depends onindividual cars including factors such asthe age of the car. the engine power. andthe levelof car maintenance.For enclosed parking facilities. ANSI!ASllRAE Standard 62-1989. 1;:111ilutio11/i1r Acceptahle Indoor Air ()uafi i· speci fics a fixed vcntih1tion rate of below 7.62L/s·m' ( 1.5 ct'rn/fl') of gr oss floor area.:Therefore, a ventilation flow of about11.25 air changes per hour is required forgarages with 2 5 m (8 ft) c eil i ng height.However. some of the model code au thorities speei ty an air change rate of fourto six air changes per hour. In addit ion .some of the modi:! code au1horities allowthe ventilation rat.: to \ary and be re duced to sa vc fan energy if CO-demandc on1 ro l l cd ventilation is pertl11mcd. that52ASHAAE Journalis.aing garages. Thi s design md h od slwuldbe llexiblc to accommodate rlllt on!;. thevarious CO cxpo ure lnnih defined by thestar11forJs but also the d1 .Jnging. emissioninventory from motor vehicle. .continuouscentrationsisconducrcJ. withField Testing Resultsmechanical exhaust equipment. The ac tions varies signi tirnntlycode. Afrom codeluenclosed garages. Thus. ASHRAE com missioned a rescard1 projeu (945-RP) toevaluate c ur r ent ventilation standardsand recommend rates appropri:1te to cur rent vehicle cmissions/usagt:.COforhmg-tcm1 CO cxposure would meet al most every co le and standard li ted inutomobile I arkin!!garage· an be partially open or fully enclosed.Partial Itoin parkin g garages. A I imit of 25 ppmAs part of an ASllRAE-sp1insorcdproject (945-RP}, ticld mea urcmcntsthe seven testedparkingforfacilities w.:rcpcrfonned. The air change rates are mea sured using the tracer gas technique. First.t hctr;1cer gas(SF,,l was injected in thebu ildi n g directly or through the supplyfans, Then. the concentration of the tracergas was monitored using a ficld-portabkeb:tron capture gas chromatograph. Fora more detailed description of the fiddmeasurements. sec Rd rcncc 4.About the AuthorsVentilation RegulationTab/ ! I pro\ i lcs a summary of exist ing codes and standard:-. for ventilatingMoncef Krartl, Ph.D., P.E., is anassociate professor in the Civil, Envi ronmental and Architectural Engineer enclosed parking garages in the Unitesing (CEAE) Department at the Univer States. and other selectedsity of Colorado at Boulder. He is ashown in Tahli! I.thew un tr ie s.Asrecommendationsfor the CO exposure limits arc not consis member of TC 6.9, Thermal Storage,and and TC 4.7, Energy Calculation.tent bi.:twccn various regulations withinArselene Ayarl, Ph.D., is a consuJt the United Stares and o t h er countries.Hm,\evcr. the recommendations offer anant engineer in indoor airwww.ashraej o urn al. orgcontrol systems.quality andFebruary 2001

THE BEST 111EAS HAE SIMPLE.flJIJK flHlllJNIJrR·OMNI .s lhe First r.e tti1ng to happen 10 round a1ffu decadei Deugneo for rctute nlill ce111ngs anriwuh oo}e(j auawoo. the R-OMNI pr a dean /and comp efy !tl'!-OOtnl profile for any builefillg styleThe -OMNI is con gured rOf use with or Mth ceilings. and 11 dd.JUSr.able for horizontal orvertical projection. Thai means 1ldeal111 VAV applicanons. ind equally as ellecnve forIlea ng and coo ngAfew well-rounded points:I flow aver I 000 cfm- juiettyI un 360 aegree air pauem offers excellen air d11tnbull00 performanceI Rem Neabe race for easy u 1r.allan damper adJU51mem ana cleaning.t Opuonal low-smudge outer cone.Put a fresh new faceFindon your air di.stribution design-the R-OMNI.your local Titus representative at www.tltus-hvac.com.

ASHRAE Journalfoh!e ] summarizes somi:: of th e resultsobtained during the field testing for sewngarages described in Ayari. ct al.TheACH(2000).Yalues present the range of theair changes per hnurmi::asurcd at va riou sFrom the licld study. thefollowing results weretained:ob i.:r exc ee ded 35 ppm even though the(1.5 cfm/ft')NIOSH/OSHA8Ceiling35200-stringent regulations (i.e. 25BOCA--6ACHeragi:: of CO concen1rntion).SBCCI--6-7 ACHgaragi::s were gencrJlly wellNFPA--6ACHACGIH825-Canada8taminan t kvds that are sig n:quiri.:dthan thoseby even the mostppm of8-hour weighted a\· ·2. The a tual ventilationrates supplied lo the tested ybi.:low 7.62Standard 62- I 9H9. The only garagea \ rnti lation rate ckit;e to 7 .62l. s·m: ( I . 5 c fm tF) is Garage E. whichserv .· a large :,hopping mall with hca\ ythat hasusage throughout t he day.It should benoted t h a t all the garages ari.:continuously except G a ra ge B.sensors were usedwntilati.:dwhcri.: COto control theopera-S t an dardbyctin- n: n.62 - I 9 Q ( i .e ,Us·m' [1.53. When it isus.:d. d.: mand .:ontrnlli.:d vi.:ntilationwas ahk Ill ma intain ac u:ptable indoo r air qual itywithin the IL' s ted enclosedparking facilities. .The location of sup plyandexhaust\'Cills. trafficflow pattern, thi.: number ofm o v i ng cars. and traveltime , ·ere important factorsthat affect thi.:effectivenessof the ventilation system inmaintaining acceptable CO(orNO)levels with in en closed ' p ar k ing garages.Any des ign guiddinesshould account forthi.:scl u:tors to determineventilation requirementstheforenclosed parking facilities.cwM:-ITY1nSTU/IHoo·o816rwe500/o RH75 0 2 5 W89J'l!,RHIt is clear from the resultsFinland2.7 Us m:(0.53 ctmift')Ceiling165 Us· car-(0.66 .815 minutes300Korea503.3 Us· m'6 35-7.62 Lis·m1(1 25-1.5 cfmfft")0.91 Us· m2(0.18cfm/ft'-")6-10 ACHTable 1: Summary of U.S. and international stan dards tor ventilation requirements of enclosed park ing garages.vidc th e minimum ventilation mle requiredmaintain contaminant concentrationsin fan energyuse. Guidelines should ac co unt for vari ability in the parking garage traffic flow.car emissions. tra v el time, and number ofmov ing cars.Journal3075-ties without large penaltiesASHRAE815 minutesGermanylevels set by the relevant health authori 54-(350 cfm/car)New design guidelines are needed to pro Based on the results, 1 /13200100within parking facilities at the acceptable53 on Reader S.rvlce Card)25/3020 minutesoutdated for endosed parking garages.Design Approach1Franceof th.: fi eld study that the current ventila tion rate specified i n Standard 62-1989 isto(Circle No.7.6 Us· m'(1.5 cim!W)7.6 Us· m'wntilation rates in all c;iscs is well belowclin:tl') rewrrnrn:ndcd950below lhosi.: rccorrnm:ndedthe 7.62 L 's·m: ( 1.5351200values provide the total ventilation rate.ne\Ventllatlon,niticantly IO\verTI1e maximum and the avernge ('()con centrntions measured d uri ng the day oftesting arc listed in Tl.Ihle] to character ize the indoor quality within the testedpar k i ng facility. As indicated in fohlc ],the CO fcvd w ithin all the parking garngcsPPM8locations of the facility using the t racers·m' (ctinilF)8ASHRAE(hrs)ICBOI. All the tcskd enclo se dparking garages had Clln·gas technique, whik the Lnmetion of thi.: supply fans.metric analyses,' a simple design mi.:thodwas dev eloped lo detcnni n e the entila t io n flow rate required 10 mainta in aeccpt able CO level within endosed parking fa cilities . Ventilation rates fi.ir cndoscd park ing garages can be i.:xprcsscd in terms ofeithe r flow rate per unit floor area (L/s·m:or air volume changes per unittime (ACH). The design ventilation rati.:required for an enclosed parking facilitydepends on four factors:I. Contaminant kvcl acccptahk withinor cfmlff)the parking facility:2. Number of carspeak conditions:of scveral para-www.as h raejo u rna I. o rgin operation du r ing3. Le ngt h oftnwe! and operationFebruarytime2001

c cus@ . c@ususLISTEDLISTEDLISTEDa step ahead of t'1e restbridge. UK is a leisure center withcThe Chimes Shopping Center ocated Jn'oreo ot 1 oo.ooom . The main contracfoo gross floorotoverseeing consultants are Ove ArupPartners. The requir ed 0 s a n -Skanska .N and theose levels ot thesiteboundary were partlculorly stringent and could not be ochievthe' llh commerclalfyavailable products In the ndustry. TokiInto considerationof thisand other UK proj ec ts . Petropepackaged rooftop air conditioningPetro manufactures a wide range ofcomponents and equipment. Petra'sthe world reno\'meooped their newrange.oducts u i ngnet lownoise requirements0 suPer silent chillers andworld tarnouoducls range from mini . s s PPllets of materials,Chillers, Air Handlets, Packaged Air CJti on lng Units, an d rn Piii units to large Waterrange of high quality standard products, as well as off ering h'provides a "Y(dePile engineered custommode products. Petra's superior product quality, competltidhave enabled I to meet specific market demmarkets easily. Petra has gained the trust and c Petrods and sewhich hove adopted 11s units as standard In t elrPEPetro Engineering Industries Co.PO.Box 141351Amman 11 81 4 - JORDA1'jTel [9626) 55.31508 Fox -eng.corndeen:: and short delivery 1imes.-.,,., ntty growing overseasn VCOfporattons.w omfiiillde:d lndustrfolp(

ASHRAE Journal2. Nomiali/.: th e value llf generation rut.: using aof c;:irs in the pa rki ng garage: and.t. EmissiLln rate of a typical car under varitius conditions.Data for these factors shoulJ be a v ai la bk to deten11i111.: a 'Cu ratdy the design \ entilation ratetl r enclosedp arking gamges.A s imple Jesi gn approach is pn: scnteJ in thi.: fol l O \v i ng section\Va ubta'i'ncd u;ing thc wor t c111is ion conditions (cold .:mis sio ns in win ti.:r season)Srcp 3.General Procedure for the Design MethodTodctcrminc the required design flow r ate to ventilatean e n closedparkinggar.1ge, the following prucc lurcfollowed:can befor anactual i.:ncloscd parking facility:",\ IR ---(,Rto detcnni ne the requireJ ventilation ra t e tllr existing and nt. wlyconstrncted enclosed pa rking garages.rcforencc 2 . . .' gr'hr·tf). TI1is rctcrencc value 'alue GR 26.8 l.!Fhr·m: (CiR(2).1,fktcnnine chc required \entilation ratepi.:r unit floorarea ( t:s·nr· or cfm · ti·') chc correlation presented by Equation 3level of acceptable CO concentra depending on the maximumtion COfl\,I\(3)St p I. Col!l.'.ct the folllming data:I. Number of cars operating during the hour of pcak use . .\' ( ::of cars ) . The ITE Trip Generation 1 landhook' i s a goodto cstimatc the\ ::dueor .v.soun:.:2. A\ cragc CO cmission r.1tc for a typical car p.:r hr. ER. (gr'lir).TheCO emission rat.:for a c ir depends on sc \ cra l foc1ors suchas vehicle diarncll!ristics. fud typl.'.s. 'chicle oper.1tion condi tions. and environment conditions.' D:i taAS II RAE I land hook' andprov i ded in th.:rcproduccJ in ,7;1/ /e 3 i.:;inbi.: uscJ to\Vhi.:rc. th.: corrclation Clletlicicnt. C is gi\'en hclov.:1.204x IoC 0.692xl0 'L'rn:·s: (I J63xlO cfin,tf·s) for CO""" 25 ppmO -ll'\2x I0 'L '111:.s: (0.9. Xx I 0 "cli11second .facilitic:s where cars park during long periods such as otliceExamplebuildings.J.Avcragclengt h of opcrntionanJ travdtime foratypil·JIcar, T (seconds). Thi.: ASHRAF Handbook gives aver.igl· en tr.111cc·exit times for vehicles. flighcr valw: may he used forWl)r:;t case st:en a ri os such JS during rush hours l r spcci;ilcv.:nts. - The l c \' cl of CO concentration acceptable within the ga rage, co,,, ,, (ppm).5. TotalI. Dctcrn1inc the peak gener.itiLm rate. GR (gr hr m : [gd1r·tF ]),for nthc garage inConsider a two-le\'cl cnc l nsed parking gari. gc with a totalcapacity of450 cars,atotaltlt'l\)r :irea of K9.300ff ( 300 rn'). andan a\erage height of9 n !2.75 ml. The total length of time for atypic1lcaropcration is two minutes ( 120s). Dct.:rrninethe re quired\ cnti lation rat.: for th.: enclosed parking garage in L's·m:and inACHsosume t hat thethat the COnumhcrnever exceeds 25 ppm. As lcvdsof cars in operation is . O';'n of the Cota Ivd1iclc capacity (a shopping mall fat:ility).Step I. Garage data: .V 450 x 0.4 180 cars, ER 11.66 gnnin(averag1: emi ssion rate for a winter day u s ing the data fromfohle 3). T 120 s, CO.,., 25 ppm.usingStep 2.(a)/' xlOONEW. tloor area llfthe parking area. A, (rn:).Step2.f(·s) f(.ir co ,., 35 ppmand Tis the average tra\ cl timi.: of c:irs.:stimat.: ('()emission ratcs for a typii.:al car. Ty pii.:;illy. hot tartsarc common in facilities when: cars arc rarked for shl)rt rcrindssuch as shupping mal l s. \kanwhilc. cold starts eharactc1izc'L:m:-s: (2J70x 1 O "cfnvtF·s) for CO'"" 15 ppmC alcu l ati.: CO generation rate:(.,1,, .·-(I)180 11.66gr min()( ) n in h------ '----.,.----- lOOO 111Automated Commercial HVAC DesignJ(b)Step.3. 15.17--x26.815.1 i gr/h,111100 056.6Di.:tennin.: the ventilation re Drawing: Right-CommDrawDf & drop s.rNrt HVAC \h.ape1 fot tan de1 1gn e.id.MlnteAutoCADtm DWG .:ind OXF hh.'1 tor eouy 1ntir:rf equirement:loads:for CO.,,, 25Using the corrcbtion of EquationRlght-CommloadASHRAE 14 hour method, H;ant:lbook of F\md.am""ntJJ\ppm. thetion r.1h: in Us·m2can3design ven tila be calculated:Ducts: Right-CommDuctASHRAf Duct F1nin9 Oat. B e 'lllo1th tal1C Regam, Equ.ti Frictionwnghtsoft""Proposal: Right-CommProposalMa:i1m1zt prof1t,,bil1ry b 9ent-t'1t1n9 1tli t .tnd d tu-ratt !O-b C:O\Ul 56IItDIKI IL:s·m: 0.692x 10Also f,.m Wrightsoft! Rlght·Suit Resldent1.1dl.ryout. MlRoldId hlillowww.wrlghtsoft.com1-800·225·8697JO·Day Money Back Guarantee on all soltw 1eUnlimited Technical Suppa rt.ASHRAE(Circle No. 54 on Reader Service Cilrd)Journalwww.ashraejournaI.orgOr.·\!'IIin tenns 'x56.6x l :!Os 4.7uf air changi.: per hour:L Ill'': to . 75I.IllIllI,,, )hFebruary 2001ti.!

VentilationGarageLocationCapAJcltys m ACHj 4cfmlft21Mulmu(Tracer] (Trncor] [TrocerJ !CO (ppm(# CllrS)GarageDenver1,700AGarageDenver250BG nJQO West Plains,1,000cN GaraQe West Plains.138DNYG IJO West Plains.258EN.Y.G Aodlesier,448FMinn.Garage Mahtomedi.81 111uci s)GMinn1 762.2-4 2035164570.9020400 2.61110 2240153.6--4.53000.5919l25-B-8-85681.1225141n5-281 041090.90-1.022 43048121Cold Emlulons,Hot EmissionsgramsJm n(SI blll2c0d), gramsJmlnSeason75.0-7.0Igo01.,,\Summer(32'C- (90'FJ)Winter(O'C 741896Table 3: Typical CO emissions within parking ga rages.1Project 945-RP. The authorsport.thank ASllRA F for its sup Table 2: Summary of field testing results for seven U.S. parkinggarages.Notes I femission rate was based on ER 6.6 gr:min (which corre sponds tu 80 ;, hot emissions and 20 " clild emissionsbascd on Jata prn' idcd entilatil)n rJte will'heba::um.Hinbt: 3.5'Tahle 3), thc r.:4uired minimumACI I (i.e. . 2.fii L s·m'.),·d travel time is higher rhan any' ah1c prm idcd\ E 1 and is used to representa''orstcasescenario (Christmas evening or an unusual e ve nt)If a longer travel time of 3 minutes isvcntibtion rate will.used. the designbe 7.05 L!s·mc or9.2 ACll (dose to theReferencesI. I 9lJlJ. ISllR IF lla111lh11uA /(ir 111 AC .tppli.-atio11,·. Clu11 laT /:}.: .·I VS/ . IS/ IR I {Stum/ard f :}-f'J89, I i'11ttl.11i1111 /i1r. lcn:p1aN1· In door .·1ir Q11a!itl'.3. 1\yari. :\ . IL\ Grot. \1. Kr;ini. 2000. "Field cvaluatit'n llf h'll ulation -,ystcm rx·rformancc· in cncl11 cd rari.ing garngcs,"' :ISf/R IfTums1w1io111·. I 06( I). . Krarti. M . :\ Ayari. .llld R.A. (inll. J 999 ·[ aluation llf 1l'(l'dmd vari 1bk rmc \cntil:i1ioi1 y:;t.·m n:q111rcmi:nls for cm;loscd park in!,!f ·ilitics:· Fino! rc1 rt for \ llRAE l'roj1.-'Cl t)45-RP.) IT!:. 199 . Trip Gi:n1.:ra1ion I landhook. /11stit111e o( Tra11.11wrlil1w11 /:'11g1m·ers, Washington, D.C.e.cu1Ten1 ventilation rJte rernmmend.:d by Standurd 62-1989).Summary and ConclusionsIn this anide, u new Jesign mdh o d is presentcd to d.:1ern1incthe m in i m um ventilation 1:it.: for .:ncloseJ parking garages. Thenew design procedure is tlexibh: Jlld can account for se\.eralfactors including the maximum acccptable CO level. the numberVibration & NoiseC on t ro I P rod uctsAthattime within the parking garagc.various U.S. location:\field testing study intheactual ventilationra tes rages an: significantly lower than the rJtStandard 62-1989 (i.e., 7.62 has showedused in enclosed parking ga L's m' 1.5sn:commendcJ byldin tt:) A m 1 rc dct il cddescription of the results for this field stud y is provided in thearticle in Refon:ncc 3. With the continual decrease in averagechicullir C()ntaminant mi:si n rate. it ililation rtllc requirementr r ncl :cdreduced. Thcl''forc. the initial co ·1·cpected that th1.: vcn parking g,:iragc' ill beror the m ·cha11ical v ·ntilu Elastomer Isolators0Prassure GaugesMiscAccessCoot Lod sTnlplllvl Aull milflClUN-Syph wllUQO codtsVIBRATION MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONVIMCOvent ii al ion r::llcs.February 2001Anti-Vibration PadsThQITTiiOn'IOlflf"S .;,., ,.,.,.,.Tt\SHRAE-.ln trument31 on pt bk ontaminant le els it h i n parking gar.1gc ·du.:to b ih car cmis i nS. l!a· lint' fume , and oil vap( -In. ddi ti n, more !kid te ting and ·imulntion a nal -is ar.: required tevaluate th e effocts of poor mixing conditions (due for instanceto poor ·y ·1 ·m design ) in determining the minimum requiredof the work perfom1ed for thc·"·: :· -t.mum aceThis article is part ,t l! i. .However. further research i s nccdcd to detennine the maxi AcknowledgmentsWT]['·Floating Floors. Air Mounts. Inertia Bases . .be reduced. Moreover. the use of contamin mt ba i;:c.J venlilation contn ls will achieve signili ·ant sa\'ings inoperating co t of the ventilation · tern in parking g.urages.1tion system can--Lu3- -for lmJustridl HVAC clnd Ac,)u 11c Appl1cat1onsof moving cars, the average vehicular CO emission rate. and theaverage trnvel-:- c;".SllhC3532-A East TC JesterHouston· Texas 77018, USA'-"·'1 ,-.!,: 1 (713)263-8181-,F: 1·,:-1· .;,i '\o"!VIVJ , v in1 0 . or!J(7131263 -1133(Circle No. 48 on Reodor S.niice Card)ASHRAE Journal57

ASHRAE Journal AIVC #13,671 ' Ventilation for Enclosed Parking Garages By Moncef Krartt, Ph.D., P.E., and Arselene Ayarl, Ph.D. Member ASHRAE A utomobile I arkin!!garage· an be partially open or fully enclosed. Partial I pen l:!arng s ar typically above-grade \Vith open sides and g ncral ld n t n · d mechanical ventilation.However, folly