Policy Framework For The Development Of Intermodal Interfaces As Part .

Transcription

Policy Framework for the Development ofIntermodal Interfaces as part of an IntegratedTransport Network in Asia

ST/ESCAP/2556The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression ofany opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status ofany country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers orboundaries.Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of theUnited Nations.This publication has been issue without formal editing.

PROMOTING INTERMODAL TRANSPORT IN THE UNESCAP REGIONTABLE OF CONTENTSChapter 1INTRODUCTION .Page1Chapter 2FREIGHT INTERMODAL INTERFACES: DEFINITIONS .32.1 Trade growth and development of inland trade distributionsystems .2.2 Intermodal transfer terminals : descriptions of facilities andservices .3ROLE OF INTERMODAL TRANSPORT IN OPTIMIZING SUPPLYCHAIN COSTS IN THE UNESCAP REGION .3.1 Importance of enhanced logistics .3.2 Relationship of logistics, trade and incomes .3.3 Scope for improvement of logistics within the region .3.4 Exploiting modal complementarity for inland trade distribution 3.5 Importance of measuring logistics performance .1111111213Chapter 3Chapter 4Chapter 5Chapter 6Chapter 7415RECENT EXPERIENCE OF INTERMODAL FACILITIES ANDINTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT IN THEUNESCAP REGION .4.1 Northern corridor .4.2 TAR corridor through Southeast Asia .4.3 The North-South corridor 4.4 The Southern Corridor 17274048RELEVANT INTERMODAL FACILITIES AND INTERMODALFREIGHT TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE OF THEUNESCAP REGION .615.1 Europe .5.2 North America .GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN, FINANCING AND ESTABLISHMENTOF FREIGHT INTERMODAL FACILITIES .6.1 Location .6.2 Type 6.3 Layout and area .6.4 Equipment and staffing .6.5 ICD infrastructure investment costs .6.6 Summarized infrastructure and equipment investment costs .6.7 Ownership and method of financing .NET ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF FREIGHT INTERMODALINTERFACES .7.1 Measuring the economic benefits of freight intermodal interfaces7.2 Measuring the economic costs of freight intermodal interfaces .7.3 Establishing and evaluating indicators of economic worth i176167757576768385878789899495

Chapter 8DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS .8.1 Setting up a proper vehicle to promote the development ofintermodal interfaces .8.2 Initiatives to encourage private sector participation in thefinancing, ownership and operation of intermodal interfaces .8.3 Initiatives to remove institutional barriers to successful operationof intermodal interfaces .Page96969698ANNEXAnnex 1Busan Declaration on Transport Development in Asia and the Pacific100LIST OF MAPSMap 1Map 2Location of inland container handling facilities, Malaysia .Network of CONCOR’S terminals .3355LIST OF FIGURESFigure 2.1Figure 3.1Figure 3.2Figure 4.1Figure 4.2Figure 5.1Figure 6.1Figure 6.2Figure 6.3Figure 6.4Figure 7.1Inland trade distribution system .Road/rail container freight breakeven analysis - Low rail productivitycase Road/rail container freight breakeven analysis - High rail productivitycase Malaysia-Thailand container land bridge services, volume trend .Road and rail volumes at Lat Krabang ICD in total Laem Chabangthroughput .Distribution and Freight Network around Virginia Inland Port .Example of ICD Layout: reach-stacker served CY .Example of ICD Layout: RTG-served CY .Example of ICD Layout: RMG-served CY ICD areas and costs (examples from region) .Container transport cost between Rotterdam and Manheim (500 km)313143437737878798690LIST OF TABLESTable 1Table 2Table 4.1Table 4.2Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems .Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems(summary table) Intermodal transport capability of main TAR routes in China Double-stack container services operated by Chinese Railways(2007) .ii5101821

Table 4.3Table 4.4Table 4.5Table 4.6Table 4.7Table 4.8Table 4.9Table 4.10Table 4.11Table 4.12Table 4.13Table 4.14Table 4.15Table 4.16Table 5.1Table 6.1Table 6.2Table 6.3Table 6.4Table 6.5Table 6.6Table 7.1Table 7.2Inland container handling facilities in the Republic of Korea .TEU throughput at major ports of the Russian Federation, 2003-2007Facilities and operations of four inland ports, Malaysia .Facilities and operations of ICDs in Myanmar .Facilities and operations of Lat Krabang Inland Container Depot Basic characteristics of Azerbaijan’s intermodal facilities .Basic characteristics of Tajikistan’s rail-served intermodal facilities Basic characteristics of Tajikistan’s road-served intermodal facilities .Basic characteristics of Turkmenistan’s inland container facilities .Basic characteristics of Turkey’s planned freight villages .Main characteristics of Tughlakabad ICD .CONCOR’s container traffic in TEUs, fiscal year 2003-04 to 2007-08Design characteristics and functions of planned ICDs in Sri Lanka .Design characteristics and functions of planned ICYs in Sri Lanka .Characteristics of freight intermodal interfaces in the United KingdomDetermination of CY area Determination of CFS area .ICD area requirements – summary Productivity factors and costs of container handling equipment .Unit cost of ICD development for selected projects in UNESCAPregion .ICD infrastructure investment cost .Economic benefits of investment in freight intermodal interfaces .Emissions other than CO2 for road and rail transport 992

Chapter 1.Introduction1.1There is wide consensus among transport policy-makers in the UNESCAP regionthat modern transport networks are a condition to political stability, economic growthand social development. Efficient road and rail networks and their connection tointernational ports are also a concern for industry to reach worldwide markets.Access to mobility also contributes to better quality of life for Asia’s growingpopulation. It is with these principles in mind that UNESCAP and its membercountries decided to identify the Asian Highway and Trans-Asian Railway networksas important tools for their economic integration and future prosperity. They carriedout related actions within the framework of the Asian Land transport InfrastructureDevelopment (ALTID) project launched in 1992 by the UNESCAP Commission at its48th session. The project also comprised a transport facilitation component.1.2As the networks were taking shape through a series of corridor studies, membercountries recognized the ALTID project as a flexible mechanism which stimulatedjoint and coordinated actions by governments of the region to improve conditions andprocedures for international trade and transport across its extensive land borders.This recognition led to the formalization of the networks through two relatedIntergovernmental Agreements, namely: the “Intergovernmental Agreement on theAsian Highway Network” which entered into force in July 2005 and the“Intergovernmental Agreement on the Trans-Asian Railway Network” which wasopened for signature in November 2006 during the Ministerial Conference onTransport held in Busan, Republic of Korea.1.3At the Conference, the Ministers acknowledged the progress made by UNESCAPand its member countries since the launch of ALTID and decided to use thepopularity of the project with member governments as a thrust towards newachievements. In particular, recognizing that the continuing evolution of logistics hadcaused transport to become an integral part of the production process of industry, theMinisters requested that the Asian Highway and Trans-Asian Railway networks beused as the two building blocks for an international integrated intermodal transportand logistic system covering the region. To this effect, on 11 November 2006, theyadopted the Busan Declaration on Transport Development in Asia and the Pacific(Annex 1).1.4The Busan declaration provides strong support for the development of dry ports andlogistical activities at intermodal interfaces, by resolving that:“ in order to meet the growing challenges of globalization effectively,respective government authorities will develop and implement transport policiesat the national, sub regional and regional levels in line with the followingprinciples:a)Formulating integrated policies and decision-making frameworksbased on strategic assessments of economic, environmental,social and poverty-related aspects;(b)Developing an international integrated intermodal transportand logistics system that contributes to the long-term objectiveof regional cooperation in support of production and distributionnetworks and of international trade;1

(c)Giving priority to investment in the Asian Highway and TransAsian Railway networks, including intermodal interfaces tolink them with water and air transport networks;(d)Promoting the development of economic and logisticalactivities at intermodal interfaces, particularly at productionand consumption centres, and around seaports and dryports;(e)Mobilizing financial resources for the development of the transportsystem, its maintenance and operation from all possible sources,including public private partnerships and other financialarrangements”.1.5Under the title of “Intermodal Interfaces – Focus for Development in the UNESCAPRegion” this study is part of a wider programme of action being carried out byUNESCAP to facilitate the development of intermodal transport and logistics in theregion under the mandate provided by the Busan Declaration. It has been initiated ata time when world trade volume is at its highest ever. However, the acceleration ofinternational trade in recent years and the globalization process has mainly benefitedthe coastal areas of the region, with trade to and from the landlocked countries andthe more remote hinterland areas of coastal countries trailing behind, due toexcessive transport and logistics costs.1.6The study examines the potential for alleviating the trade and transit costdisadvantages of landlocked countries and the remote hinterlands of coastalcountries by promoting the wider use of intermodal transport and the development ofsupporting infrastructure - in the form of freight intermodal interfaces and inlandports. Similarly, it considers the advantages of intermodal interface development interms of stimulating economic growth in regions and countries located far fromseaports.1.7In particular, the study:xxxxxxxidentifies and defines the most suitable forms of infrastructure for this purpose(Chapter 2);evaluates the role of intermodal transport in optimizing supply chain costs inthe region (Chapter 3);reviews progress in the development and application of intermodal transportand intermodal interfaces in the UNESCAP region (Chapter 4);reviews international best practices in the application of intermodal transport,intermodal interfaces and logistics management outside of the UNESCAPregion (Chapter 5);develops and recommends guidelines for the design, financing andestablishment of intermodal interfaces in inland areas (Chapter 6);recommends an approach to the measurement of the net economic benefitsof intermodal interfaces (Chapter 7); andrecommends policy initiatives and offers guidelines for consideration bygovernments of the region to formulate their own programmes of action forthe expanded application of intermodal transport practices and systems(Chapter 8).2

Chapter 2.2.1Freight intermodal interfaces: definitionsTrade growth and development of inland trade distribution systemsMany countries within the UNESCAP region depend on their hinterlands as a source offoreign trade. Rapidly increasing foreign trade in many of these countries, especially overthe past decade, has generated a requirement for long distance transport feeder servicesbetween major inland trade generating centres and the seaports. Further, the emergence ofthe landlocked economies of Central Asia after the break-up of the Soviet Union hasgenerated a requirement for the connection of the sources of trade within these countriesand seaports in neighbouring countries. Since the distances involved tend to be substantial,rail which can offer cost efficiency over distances greater than 300 km is assuming anincreasingly important role in trade feeder transport. It is being supported in this role bytruck transport which assumes a local feeder role, involving the local distribution of tradedcommodities between principal inland transfer stations and the trade originating andterminating locations, designated as Trade Generating Locations (TGL). Effectively thesefacilities operate respectively as “hub” and “spoke” facilities, as shown in Figure 2.1.Figure 2.1:Inland trade distribution systemTGL 1Note: TGL trade generatinglocationhanTGL 3TGL 2Principal inland transferand consolidation/de-consolidation stationRail or Inland WaterwayTransport (possibly also LongDistance Road Haulage):distance 300 kmSEAPORT3Local roadtransportdistance, nomore than 20-30km fromprincipal inlandtransfer station

It is important to note that inland distribution systems of the type illustrated in Figure 2.1 maybe, and are being, developed for the handling of all types of cargo, i.e. containerized, noncontainerized break-bulk and bulk cargoes – not just for containerized cargoes, althoughthese tend to dominate the composition of foreign trade.Different types of inland distribution facilities offering a range of different services will berequired depending on the type of cargo to be transported. However, all share the commoncharacteristic that their main functions are to complete customs formalities for traded cargoand to transfer this cargo between the different modes used for transportation between aport origin and an ultimate inland destination, or vice versa. The following section providesdescriptions of the facilities and services provided by the most commonly encountered intermodal transfer terminals which are being evaluated in this study.2.2Intermodal transfer terminals : descriptions of facilities and servicesThe focus of this study is on intermodal interface which process border crossing trade andwhich therefore provide full customs service (i.e. will be staffed by customs inspectionpersonnel on a full-time basis during the operating hours of the facility). Three types ofintermodal interface meet these criteria by providing comprehensive services for theprocessing and intermodal transfer of traded cargo: Dry Ports (DP); Inland Container Depots(ICD); and Freight Villages (FV). In addition to these comprehensive facilities, there aresmaller specialized service facilities, such as Container Yards (CY) and Container FreightStations (CFS) which may either operate as stand-alone facilities or as components of thelarger comprehensive facilities. If such facilities operate on a stand-alone basis it is likely thatthey will be located close to ports and will provide a means of relieving pressure on portfacilities. In such cases, it is most unlikely that they would have a permanent customspresence (since this function would be available from the ports).Dry Ports and ICDs are the most usually encountered facilities in the region which providecomprehensive services to foreign trade. They are distinguished by the fact that whereasICDs are restricted to processing container traffic, Dry Ports have facilities which allow themto process all forms of cargo.A third type of intermodal interface, the Freight Village, is gaining increasing acceptance inEurope under this appellation. It also provides comprehensive services related to customsclearance, modal transfer, container stuffing and destuffing, and container and cargostorage, but in addition provides added value logistics services, such as inventorymanagement, high density warehousing, and packaging on behalf of manufacturing, retailingand wholesaling customers. Necessarily, Freight Villages will be located in areas of highdemand and will be served by multiple transport modes.The characteristics of the various inland cargo distribution systems are described in Table 1and are summarized in Table 2 below.4

Table 1:Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systemsType/Brief DescriptionLocationComponent FacilitiesTypes of cargohandledServed by ( mode)LinehaulLocalFeederServices provided1. Dry Port (DP).Usually remote fromseaport(s), but close totrade sources.xxx Rail(most)xAs the name implies, a“Dry Port” provides all ofthe services of a portexcept for the loading ofcargo to and fromseagoing ships. It maybe distinguished from anICD (below) in that it canaccommodate all typesof cargo, whereas anICD specializes in thehandling of containersand containerized cargoExamples:Malaysia Padang Besar (572 kmfrom Port Klang; 158 kmfrom Penang Port; 339km from Surat Thani);Ipoh, Nilai and SegamatPakistan – Lahore(1,220 km from Port ofKarachi);xxxxxxxxxxCY (with or withoutreefer points)CFSAccess roads,railway link andsidings, IWT berthsBreakbulkreceiving/storage area(open)Warehouses,bonded andunbonded (forstorage ofbreakbulk cargo)Bulk receiving andstorage areaAdministrativeoffice with spacefor banks,forwarders andcargo agentsCustoms officeContainer lightrepair facilitySecure fence andentry pointCargo handlingequipment(RTGs,RMGs,reach-stackers, emptylifters, forklifts,container chassis,prime movers)xxx5Containersinternational anddomestic (ISO andnon-ISO)Breakbulk freightfor unloading fromor loading intocontainersNon- containerizedbreakbulk freight(e.g. steel, generalmerchandise onpallets, baggedcement)Bulk freight *(constructionmaterials includingcement, coal,fertilizer, chemicalsetc)x IWT(some)x Roadxxx Road(some)xxxxxContainer handlingand storageContainer stuffingand destuffingBreakbulk cargohandling andstorageBulk cargohandling andstorageCustomsinspection andclearanceContainer lightrepairsFreight forwardingand ial services

Table 1:Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems (continued)Type/Brief DescriptionLocationComponent FacilitiesTypes of cargohandledServed by ( mode)Services provided2. Inland ContainerDepot (ICD)A container terminallocated inland fromseaport(s), which offersservices for the handling,temporary storage andcustoms clearance ofcontainers and generalcargo that enters orleaves the ICD incontainers. In essence anICD has the samefunctions as a portcontainer terminal exceptship to shore transfere.Usually remote fromseaport(s), but close totrade source(s).xxxxxxExamples:India - 34 rail servedand 4 road served inhinterland (largestTuklakabad in Delhi,which is 1,510 km fromMumbai area ports);Malaysia - Prai(Penang) and SeriSetia;Thailand - Lat Krabang(118 km from LaemChabang Port; 1,017 kmfrom Padang Besar);China - RussiaxxxxxxxxCY (with or withoutreefer points)CFSAccess roads,railway link andsidings, IWT berthsWarehouses,bonded andunbonded (for shortterm storage ofbreakbulk cargo)Administrative officewith space forbanks, forwardersand cargo agentsCustoms officeContainer light repairfacilitySecure fence andentry pointCargo handlingequipment(RTGs,RMGs,reachstackers, emptylifters, forklifts,container chassis,prime movers)xContainersinternational anddomestic (ISO andnon-ISO)Breakbulk freightfor unloading fromor loading intocontainersRoad (all)Rail (some)IWT (some)xxxxxx6Container handling andstorageContainer stuffing anddestuffingBreakbulk cargo handlingand storageCustoms inspection andclearanceContainer light repairsFreight forwarding andcargo rvices

Table 1:Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems (continued)Type/Brief DescriptionLocationComponent FacilitiesTypes of cargohandledServed by ( mode)Services provided3. Freight VillageDepot (FV)An area within a secureperimeter in which allactivities relating totransport, logistics anddistribution of goods,both for national andinternational transit, arecarried out by variousoperators.In the heart of majormanufacturing and tradegenerating cities. Can beon the coast or in theinland, but usually closeto major highway/railwayintersections and often onthe perimeter of airports.xxxxxxxxxxExamples:None in Asia, but some40 throughout westernand southern Europe.Multimodal InternationalHub with road rail and airtransport connections atNagpur, India haspotential to be developedas Freight VillagexxxxxxCY (usually withreefer points)CFSAccess roads,railway link andsidings, IWT berthsWarehouses, bondedand unbonded (forshort term storage ofbreakbulk cargo)High densitywarehouses forlonger term storage ofcargo on behalf ofmanufacturing,retailing orwholesalingcustomersAdministrative officeswith space for banks,forwarders and cargoagentsCustoms officeContainer light repairfacilitySecure fence andentry pointCargo handlingequipment(RTGs,RMGs,reachstackers, emptylifters, forklifts,container chassis,prime movers)xx7Containersinternational anddomestic (ISO andnon-ISO)Breakbulk freightfor unloading fromor loading intocontainersNon-containerizedbreakbulk freight(usually carried onpallets in swapbodies or highcube vans)RoadRailAirIWT (some)xxxxxxxContainer handling andstorageContainer stuffing anddestuffingBreakbulk cargo handlingand storageCustoms inspection andclearanceContainer light repairsFreight forwarding and cargoconsolidation servicesBanking/insurance/financialservicesValue added warehousing,inventory management andpackaging/materialshandling services

Table 1:Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems (continued)TypeLocationComponent FacilitiesTypes of cargo handledServed by ( mode)Services provided4. Container Yard(CY)May be stand alonefacility, usually closeto seaport(s) orcomponent facility ofDPs or ICDs whichare usually remotefrom seaport(s).xPaved containerstorage area (withor without reeferpoints)xxxxExamples of standalone facilities:Access roads, railaccess lines andsidings, or IWTberths asappropriatexThailand – some 15road served facilitiesin BangkokAdministrativeoffice for standalone CY facilityxSecure fence andentry pointAn open paved areafor the storage ofladen and emptycontainers.Empty and loadedcontainers8One or moremodesContainer handling,storage and inter-modaltransfer-bonded cargo

Table 1:Characteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems (continued)TypeLocationComponent FacilitiesTypes of cargohandledServed by ( mode)Services provided5. ContainerFreightStation (CFS)May be stand alonefacility, usuallyclose to seaport(s)or componentfacility of DPs orICDs which areusually remote fromseaport(s).xUnder coverfacility forstuffing/destuffingof containersxxxStuffing and destuffingof international anddomestic ISO.and nonISO containersxAccess roads,xxBondedwarehouse forcargo in transit orawaiting clearanceCargo customsinspection andclearancexShort term storage ofbonded cargo (unlikelyif stand alone facility)xShort term storage ofun-bonded cargoxLimited freightforwarding, cargoconsolidation andbanking servicesA common userfacility providingservices for thestuffing anddestuffing,transshipment andtemporary storage ofcontainer cargoes.Examples of standalone facilities:Thailand – some 15road servedfacilities in BangkokxxBreakbulk freightfor unloadingfrom or loadinginto containersUnbondedwarehouse forshort term storageof breakbulk cargoAdministrativeoffice for standalone CFS facility(unlikely to providespace for banks,forwarders andcargo agents)9Road

Table 2:TypeCharacteristics of different inland cargo distribution systems (summary table)Proximity toseaport(s)RemoteNearComponent facilitiesDPICDFVCY (standalone)CFS (standalone) TypeServed by (mode)RailIWT CFSB/bulkstorage(open) RoadDPICDFVCY(standalone)CFS(standalone)CY AirContainerhandling andstorage BondedStorage(b/bulk)UnbondedStorage(b/bulk) Containerstuffing anddestuffing Types of cargo handledBulkstorageAdminoffice Customsoffice Cont.lightrepairfacil. Cont.Int’llCont.Dom. B/bulkcont. Bulk cargohandling andstorageNoncontainerizedbreakbulkcargohandling andstorage 10Bulk Services providedCustomsContainer lightinspection and repairsclearance Freightforwardingand cargoconsolidation (limited)B/bulkNoncont.Banking/financial services HD storage,inventorymanagementand materialshandling

Chapter 3.3.1Role of intermodal transport in optimizing supplychain costs in the UNESCAP regionImportance of enhanced logisticsWhile most countries of the UNESCAP region have experienced a rapid growth in theirforeign trade in recent years (especially within the past decade), maintenance of a robusttrade performance in future will rely more heavily on the availability of adequate logisticsinfrastructure and on the adoption of modern systematic approaches to logisticsmanagement.The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport has defined logistics management as:Getting the right product to the right place in the right quantity at the right time, in thebest condition and at an acceptable cost It's an area that embraces purchasing andsupplier management, materials management and manufacturing, inventorymanagement and warehousing, distribution and transport, and customer service.1The objective of logistics management is therefore to optimize the costs of the supply chain,which includes storage, inventory control, distribution and transport. Assertive measures toimprove the quality of a country’s logistics system will usually be rewarded with improvedaccess to international markets and increased foreign trade, as well as to higher incomesand poverty reduction.3.2Relationship of logistics, trade and incomesThere is a wide body of research which has succeeded in establishing a relationshipbetween reduced logistics costs and trade growth. For example, Hummels (1999) estimatedthat exporters in East Asia who were able to achieve a one per cent reduction in theirshipping costs could realize a 5-8 per cent increase in their market shares.2 Almostidentically, a recent study of operational efficiency in the South Asia Subregional EconomicCooperation (SASEC) Corridor used a gravity model based on tariff reduction to estimatethat a 1 per cent reduction in transport costs would produce a 5 per cent expansion in trade.3On the other hand, Limao and Venables (2001) concluded that differences in infrastructurequality account for 40 per cent of the variation in transport costs for coastal countries, but upto 60 per cent for landlocked countries.The relationship between improved access to international markets and higher incomes wasaddressed by Redding and Venables (2002) who concluded that 70 per cent of the variationin per capita income across countries can be explained by the geography of the market andsupplier access to this market. Better access to coasts alone was found to increase incomesby 20 per cent.In another highly significant study which compared several regions of China, Wei and Yi(2001) showed that trade levels, trade growth and income growth all decline as distance from123Website of the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport: www.ciltuk.org.uk/pages/whatlogistics.Carruthers, Bajpai and Hummels, Trade and Logistics: An East Asian Perspective in East Asia Integrates: ATrade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth, World Bank, 2005.Padeco Consultants, TA No 6112-REG: South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC): SubregionalCorridor Operational Efficiency Study, Draft Final Report Volume III, July 2004.11

coastal areas increases. The results of this study demonstrate above all the importance ofgood access to international markets for inland regions.3.3Scope for improvement of logistics within the regionThe exceptionally high rates of economic growth fuelled by trade growth in China and Indiawithin the past decade have emphasized the weaknesses in both the quality andgeographical coverage of the logistics services and facilities of the UNESCAP region’s twolargest countries. This is not to say that other countries are not also facing deficiencies intheir logistics systems and indeed such deficiencies exist throughout every sub-region.However, the problems are accentuated in China and India as a result of their sheergeographical size and their burgeoning economies.It has been estimated that in China logistics costs account for as much as 21 per cent ofnational GDP, which is about twice their share of GDP in the United States, Japan and mostEuropean countries.4 A recent study for the World Bank concluded, that, on the basis ofinterviews with freight forwarders in the interior of China, inland transport costs can accountfor nearly two thirds of the total transport costs from Chinese producers to overseasmarkets.5 Similarly, in India the average land freight cost has been estimated at more thandouble that in some developed countries, with an average rate for India at US 0.07 pertonne-km, as compared with only US 0.02 in Canada, US 0.037 in Japan and US 0.055in France.6The comparative disability experienced by China and India in terms of their high logisticscosts is largely

countries by promoting the wider use of intermodal transport and the development of supporting infrastructure - in the form of freight intermodal interfaces and inland ports. Similarly, it considers the advantages of intermodal interface development in terms of stimulating economic growth in regions and countries located far from seaports.