Code Of Practice For Open And Distance Learning

Transcription

DRAFTFirst Edition 2012Second Edition November 2019 Malaysian Qualifications Agency 2019Malaysian Qualifications AgencyMercu MQANo. 3539, Jalan Teknokrat 7, Cyber 563000 CyberjayaSelangor Darul EhsanTel 603-8688 1900Fax 603-8688 1911Websitewww.mqa.gov.my

ContentForewordiGlossaryiiAbbreviationsxList of TablesxiSection 1: IntroductionSection 2: Criteria and rogrammeINTRODUCTIONArea 1: Programme Development and Delivery1.1 Statement of Educational Objectives of Academic Programme and LearningOutcomes1.2 Programme Development: Process, Content, Structure and Learning-TeachingMethods1.3 Programme Delivery34678Area 2: Assessment of Student Learning2.1 Relationship between Assessment and Learning Outcomes2.2 Assessment Methods2.3 Management of Student Assessment9101011Area 3: Student Selection and Support Services3.1 Student Selection3.2 Articulation and Transfer3.3 Student Support Services3.4 Student Representation and Participation3.5 Alumni111314141515Area 4: Academic Staff4.1 Recruitment and Management4.2 Service and Development151618Area 5: Educational Resources5.1 Physical Facilities5.2 Research and Development5.3 Financial Resources18202021Area 6: Programme Management6.1 Programme Management6.2 Programme Leadership6.3 Administrative Staff6.4 Academic Records2122232424

Area 7: Programme Monitoring, Review and Continual Quality Improvement7.1Mechanisms for Programme Monitoring, Review and Continual Quality ImprovementSection 3: HEP: Submission for Open and Distance Learning Programme AccreditationINTRODUCTION3.1 Provisional and Full Accreditation3.1 3.1.1 The Documentation RequiredPart A: General Information on the Higher Education ProviderPart B: Programme DescriptionPart C: Programme Standards3.2 Compliance Evaluation of Full Accreditation Programme3.2.1 The Documentation Required3.3 Detailed Information of MQA-01-ODL and MQA-02-ODL2526282828303031Section 4: Programme AccreditationINTRODUCTION4.1 The Programme Self-Review4.2 The Program Self-Review Committee4.3 The External Programme Evaluation4.4 The Programme Evaluation Process4.5 Recommendations on the Programme Accreditation4.6 Appeal626365677374Section 5: The Panel of AssessorsINTRODUCTION5.1 Appointing Members of the Panel of Assessors5.2 Conflict of Interest5.3 Members of the Panel of Assessors5.4 The Roles and Responsibilities of the Panel of Assessors5.5 The Accreditation Report7578788085Section 6: Panel of Assessors: Guidelines for Preparing the Open and Distance LearningProgramme Accreditation Report1.2.3.INTRODUCTIONPrevious Quality Assessment of the Programme (if applicable)The Programme Self-Review Report (if applicable)Report on the Programme in Relation to the Criteria and Standards for ProgrammeAccreditation3.1 Evaluation on Area 1: Programme Development and Delivery3.2 Evaluation on Area 2: Assessment of Student Learning3.3 Evaluation on Area 3: Student Selection and Support Services3.4 Evaluation on Area 4: Academic Staff3.5 Evaluation on Area 5: Educational Resources8687878790929496

3.6 Evaluation on Area 6: Programme Management3.7 Evaluation on Area 7: Programme Monitoring, Review and Continual QualityImprovement4. Conclusion of the Report4.1 Full Accreditation4.2 Provisional Accreditation4.3 Compliance EvaluationAppendicesAppendix 1: Flow Chart for Provisional Accreditation ProcessAppendix 2: Flow Chart for Full Accreditation ProcessAppendix 3: Flow Chart for Compliance Evaluation ProcessAppendix 4: Panel Members98100102102103103104106108101

FOREWORDWith the advent of technology, higher education institutions no longer confined to thetraditional brick and mortar learning and teaching methods. Open and Distance Learning(ODL) is gaining its momentum and is the new frontier of learning which will revolutionise thelandscape of higher education. ODL presents a potpourri of benefits where it transformseducation to be more flexible and accessible to meet the needs of the 21st century learners.As the number of institutions that will be launching the ODL programmes is expected toincrease further in the future, quality assurance of ODL programmes is crucial. Hence tosafeguard the integrity and credibility of ODL, the Code of Practice for ProgrammeAccreditation: ODL (COPPA: ODL) has been developed specifically to meet the increasingdemand of ODL programmes offered by full-fledged open universities, traditional and dualmode institutions in Malaysia. The COPPA: ODL contains clear, specific indicators andbenchmark standards that will guide the institutions in the development, delivery,assessment as well as the monitoring and review of the ODL programme.I am sure that the COPPA: ODL will be discussed and deliberated by the stakeholders intheir respective contexts, and that the standards outlined in this document will reaffirm theQA in ODL provisions. Finally, it is hoped that this document will serve as another milestonein the collective effort to make Malaysia as a hub for excellence education in the region.The success of this publication is the result of the contribution, commitment and enthusiasmof the panel members and the MQA officers. My heartfelt gratitude goes to them and all therelevant stakeholders who have provided their constructive feedback and input.Thank you.Dato’ Dr. Rahmah MohamedChief Executive OfficerNovember 2019Updated: 12 April 2021ii

GLOSSARYNo.TermsDescription1.Academic StaffPersonnel engaged by Higher EducationProviders who are involved in teaching, trainingand supervision.2.AdequateSatisfactory or acceptable in quality or quantity.3.Administrative StaffNon-academic personnel engaged by HigherEducation Providers.4.AlumniGraduates of a Higher Education Provider.5.APELA systematic process that involves theidentification, documentation and assessment ofprior experiential learning, i.e. knowledge, skillsand attitudes, to determine the extent towhich an individualhasachievedthedesiredlearning outcomes for access to aprogramme of study and/or for the award ofcredit.6.Approving AuthorityMinistry/Organisation with legal authority toapprove the conduct of a programme.7.AssessmentA systematic mechanism to measure a student’sattainment of learning outcomes.8.Co-curricular ActivitiesActivities conducted outside the classroom thatmay or may not form part of the credits.9.Collaborative ProgrammeProgramme offered by a Higher EducationProvider but the curriculum is owned, and theaward is conferred, by its partner.10.Community ServicesServices volunteered by individualsorganisations to benefit a community.11.CompetencyA student’s knowledge, skills and attitude whichenable the student to successfully andmeaningfully complete a given task or role.12.ConduciveA favourable surrounding or condition orenvironment with a positive effect on thestudents – can determine how and what theperson is learning.13.Continuous AssessmentAssessments conducted throughout the durationof a course/module for the purpose ofdetermining student attainment.Updated: 12 April 2021iiior

No.TermsDescription14.Constructive AlignmentA principle used for devising learning andteaching activities and assessment task that arein line with the intended learning dingorganisation of different groups to work togetherto achieve the goals of a programme.16.CoursesComponents of a programme. The term coursesare used interchangeably with subjects, units ormodules.17.Course CoordinatorA full-time academic staff responsible for theindividual course content, delivery, assessment,selection of tutor/facilitator/instructor (if any),monitoring and review. Lecturer can also serveas course coordinator.18.Co-requisiteRefers to a formal course of study required to betaken simultaneously with another course(s).19.DepartmentThe entity of Higher Education Providersresponsible for the programme. Examples arecollege, faculty, school, institute, centre and unit.20.Education ExpertsSpecialised staff from various disciplines whohave been trained or who have methodologies and related matters of highereducation.21.e-LearningLearning facilitated and supported through theuse of information and communicationstechnology.22.Electronic Learning PlatformElectronic learning platform (e.g., LearningManagement System (LMS), Learning ContentManagements system (LCMS) or learningportals) serves as an online repository forvarious digital learning materials, tests,assignments and administrative information thatis accessible to instructors and learners. It alsoserves as an avenue for online interactionbetween the instructors/tutors and students/learners using various web tools. A standardLMS should have tools, i.e. user management,course management, communication andcollaborative learning tools, and reporting tools.23.EnrolmentRegistered and active students.Updated: 12 April 2021iv

No.TermsDescription24.External AdvisorAn acknowledged expert in the relevant field ofstudy external to the Higher EducationProviders, tasked to assist in reviewing theprogramme.25.External ExaminerAn acknowledged expert in the relevant field ofstudy external to the Higher EducationProviders, tasked to evaluate the programme’sassessment system and the candidates.26.External ProgrammeProgramme developed and/or qualificationawarded by a certification body, e.g. ACCA,CIMA, external University of London.27.External StakeholdersParties external to the Higher EducationProviders who have interest in the programme.Examples are alumni, industries, parents,collaborators, fund providers and ce refers to the actual physicalinteraction or other electronically mediatedcommunication that displays the learner(s) andtutor/facilitator/instructor in real time enablingimmediate response.29.Formative AssessmentThe assessment of student’s progressthroughout a course, in which the feedback fromthe learning activities are used to improvestudent attainment.30.Formative GuidanceContinuous guidance, which has an importantinfluence on the development of an academicstaff.31.Full-time EquivalentA measure to convert part-time staff workload tofull-time equivalent using a normal full-time staffworkload. This is only used for the purpose ofcomputing staff-student ratio.32.Full-time StaffStaff with permanent appointment or contractappointment (minimum one year) who worksexclusively for a Higher Education Provider.33.Good PracticesA set of internationally accepted norms which isexpected to be fulfilled to maintain high quality.34.GovernanceDescribes the organisational structure used toensure that its constituent parts followestablished policies, processes and procedures.Updated: 12 April 2021v

No.TermsDescription35.Higher Education ProviderA body corporate, organisation or other body ofpersons which conducts higher education ortraining programmes leading to the award of ahigher education qualification.36.Home-grown ProgrammeProgramme awardedEducation Provider.37.Industrial/Practical TrainingAn activity within the programme where studentsare required to be placed in the workplace toexperience the real working environment.38.Internal Quality AuditA self-review exercise conducted internally by aHigher Education Provider to determine whetherit is achieving its goals, to identify strengths andareas of concern, and to enhance quality. Theinternal quality audit generates a self-reviewreport.39.Longitudinal StudyA study which involves repeated observations ofthe same variables or phenomena over a longperiod of time.40.Malaysian QualificationsFrameworkAn instrument that classifies qualifications basedon a set of criteria that are approved nationallyand benchmarked against international bestpractices.41.MalaysianQualifications A qualification level described with genericFramework Levellearning outcomes and descriptors.42.ModeratorIn the context of ODL, a moderator is anacademic staff from the HEP or appointed fromany other recognised institution/organization/industry responsible for moderating, and refiningexamination questions or assignments.43.Modules/Content WritersA member of academic staff from the universityor appointed from any other recognisedinstitution/organization/industry, responsible fordeveloping the content of the learning materials.44.Needs AssessmentAn analysis carried out to identify needs (e.g.,the training needs of staff and the marketdemand of a programme).45.Open and Distance Learning(ODL)a) The term open and distance learning (ODL)reflects both the fact that all or most of theteaching is conducted by someone removedin time and space from the learner, and thatthe mission aims to include greaterdimensions of openness and flexibility,whether in terms of access, curriculum orbyMalaysianUpdated: 12 April 2021Highervi

No.TermsDescriptionother elements of structure (UNESCO, 2002).b) Most definitions of open and distancelearning pay attention to the followingcharacteristics: separation of teacher andlearner in time and place; are,involvestwo-waycommunication, possibility of face-to-facemeetings and use of industrialised processes(Commonwealth of Learning, 1999).c) Open distance learning refers to educationand training in which using the learningresources, rather than attending classroomsessions, is the central feature of the learningexperience (Commonwealth of Learning,2003).46.Part-time StaffStaff with temporary or short-term appointmentwith less than normal hours of work and may notwork exclusively for a Higher EducationProvider.47.Pre-requisiteA course or other requirement that a studentmust have taken prior to enrolling in a specificcourse or programme.48.Professional BodyA body established under a written law (or anyother body recognised by the Government) forpurposes of regulating a profession and itsqualifications.49.ProgrammeAn arrangement of courses/subjects/modulesthat is structured for a specified duration andlearning volume to achieve the stated learningoutcomes, which usually leads to an award of aqualification.50.Programme AccreditationAn assessment exercise to determine whether aprogramme has met the quality standards and isin compliance with the Malaysian QualificationsFramework. There are three stages ofprogramme accreditation:Provisional Accreditation is an accreditationexercise to determine whether a proposedprogramme meets the minimum qualitystandards prior to its launch.Full Accreditation is an accreditation exerciseto ascertain that the teaching, learning and allUpdated: 12 April 2021vii

No.TermsDescriptionother related activitiesaccredited programmestandards.of a provisionallymeet the qualityCompliance Evaluation is an exercise tomonitor and ensure the maintenance andenhancement of accredited programmes.51.ProgrammeObjectivesEducational Broad statements that describe the career andprofessionalaccomplishmentsthattheprogramme is preparing graduates to achieveafter they graduated.52.Programme Leader/CoordinatorA full-time academic staff responsible for theoverall implementation and management of theprogramme from the development of thecurriculum content, delivery, assessment,delegation of academic staff to manage theindividual courses, monitoring and review of theprogramme.53.Programme Learning OutcomesStatements that describe the specific andgeneral knowledge, skills, attitude and e upon graduation. The graduatesare expected to acquire the outcomes uponcompletion of all the courses in their programme.54.Programme Self-Review ReportA report submitted by a Higher EducationProvider to demonstrate whether it has achievedthe quality standards for purposes of a fullaccreditation exercise.55.Programme StandardsRefers to programme standards approved byMalaysian Qualifications Agency.56.QualificationAn affirmation of achievement which is awardedby a Higher Education Provider or any party thatis authorised to confer it.57.Quality AssuranceA planned and systematic process to ensure thatacceptable standards of education, scholarshipand infrastructure are being met, maintained andenhanced.58.Quality EnhancementA process where steps are taken to bring aboutcontinual improvement in quality.59.Quality PartnersQuality partners are usually better establisheduniversities which attest to the quality of aprogramme through the involvement or oversightof curriculum design, learning and teaching, orUpdated: 12 April 2021viii

No.TermsDescriptionassessment.60.Regional CentreA centre established by the main campus toreach out to learners at different regions or evencountries. This centre serves as a support centrefor learners where various learning and teachingactivities take place. Sometimes, the regionalcentre is also referred to as learning centre. Aregional centre would have a minimumrequirement in terms of infrastructure that has tobe approved by MOE.61.Quality AssuranceA planned and systematic process to ensure thatacceptable standards of education, scholarshipand infrastructure are being met, maintained andenhanced.62.Relevant StakeholdersThe parties (individuals and organisations)involved in assisting and complementing thedevelopmentandimprovementoftheprogramme. The key relevant stakeholders arestudents, alumni, academic staff, professionalbodies, the industry, parents, support staff, thegovernment and funding agencies, and civilsociety organisations.63.Scholarly ActivitiesActivities that apply systematic approaches tothe development of knowledge throughintellectual inquiry and scholarly communication(e.g., learning and teaching, research,publications, and creative and tudent Learning TimeThe amount of time that a student is expected tospend on the learning-teaching activities,including assessment to achieve specifiedlearning outcomes.66.Summative AssessmentThe assessment of learning which summarisesthe student progress at a particular time and isMaterials Aneducationalmaterialthatfacilitatepersonalised learning. SIM is developed basedon sound instructional design principles (namelyit should be learner-friendly, written inconversational writing style and use simplelanguage, include learning activities, selfassessment and feedback). The material maybe in various forms; print-based, web-based,multimedia, etc. Study guide can be an integralpart of SIM.Updated: 12 April 2021ix

No.TermsDescriptionused to assign the student a course grade.67.Synchronous & Asynchronous Synchronous learning is learning that happens inLearningreal-time, where a group of learners arecollectively engaged in learning process.Learning can occur through physical or virtualsession.Asynchronous learning is learner-centric whichfrees the learners from the constraints of timeand space. Usually, this form of asynchronousinteraction occurs in delayed electronic mode.68.Tutor/Facilitator/InstructorAn academic staff from the HEP or ation/industry responsible for the learningand teaching process, and conducts physical orvirtual face-to-face sessions.Updated: 12 April 2021x

ABBREVIATIONSAPELAccreditation of Prior Experiential LearningCOPPACode of Practice for Programme AccreditationCPDContinuous Professional DevelopmentHEPHigher Education ProviderLCMSLearning Content Management SystemLMSLearning Management SystemMOEMinistry of EducationMQAMalaysian Qualifications AgencyMQFMalaysian Qualifications FrameworkODLOpen and Distance LearningRCRegional CentreUpdated: 12 April 2021xi

LIST OF TABLES1.Table 1:Matrix of programme learning outcomes against theprogramme educational objectives392.Table 2:Components of the programme and its credit value413.Table 3:Brief description of courses offered in the programme414.Table 4:Course information425.Table 5:Summary information on academiccoordinator) involved in the programme(course516.Table 6:List of physical and virtual facilities required for theprogramme547.Table 7:Reference materials supporting the programme558.Table afffortheUpdated: 12 April 202158xii

Section 1IntroductionThis document is intended to serve as a guideline for Higher Education Providers (HEPs)that offer programmes via Open and Distance Learning (ODL) for accreditation andprogramme audit purposes.ODL refers to the provision of flexible educational opportunities in terms of access andmultiple modes of knowledge acquisition. Flexible means the availability of choices for educational endeavours anywhere,anytime and anyhow. Access means opportunity made available to all, freeing them from constraints oftime and place. Multiple modes mean the use of various delivery systems and learning resources.ODL is becoming an accepted and indispensable part of mainstream education prompted bythe need to make learning more flexible and accessible to a wider population, the growingneed for continual skills upgrading and reskilling; and advances in technology that havemade it possible for teaching to be conducted at a distance. The government is cognisant ofthe potential of ODL in fulfilling the fundamental rights of all people to learning and the needto incorporate it within the framework of human capital development. To produce goodlearning outcomes and graduate competencies, student engagement is the key element inthe design of ODL programmes.The terms and language used to describe ODL may vary across geographical divide.Among the more commonly used terms related to ODL are the following: correspondenceeducation, home study, independent study, external studies, continuing education, distanceteaching, adult education, technology-based or mediated education, e-learning, mobilelearning, learner-centered education, open learning, open access, flexible learning anddistributed learning.Advances in the information and communication technology (ICT) have opened up newpossibilities and opportunities in ODL. The number of established open universitiesworldwide is indicative of this trend. Similarly, more and more traditional universities areUpdated: 12 April 20211

transforming from single mode to dual mode universities, recognising the importance ofdistance education in providing greater flexibility, accessibility and up-to-date educationalresources. Through ODL we are witnessing the mushrooming of Massive Open OnlineCourses (MOOCs), modular short courses and customized company training. Worldwide,there is an increase in the number of students enrolling into ODL programmesSCOPE OF THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION-OPENAND DISTANCE LEARNINGA programme of study is deemed as an ODL programme if more than 60% of the coursesoffered in the programme are conducted via open and distance learning. In order for acourse to be considered as an ODL course, at least 80%1 of the student learning time(SLT) must be delivered via open and distance mode. This must be supported throughregular and substantive interaction between the learner and the instructor synchronously orasynchronously via an electronic learning platform, the provision of self-instructional learningmaterials and other learning support services. The face to face contact sessions betweenthe learner and instructor can be conducted in various modalities which may include physicalor virtual sessions.The HEPs that intend to offer ODL programmes must adhere strictly to the standardsoutlined in the COPPA: ODL as well as relevant programme standards, where appropriate.In discipline where a programme standards exists, specific requirements stipulated inprogramme standards will take precedence. The seven areas of the COPPA: ODL will serveas the guidelines for the HEPs and the Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA) in assuringthe quality of the ODL programmes.The code of practice serves many parties namely dedicated ODL HEPs; dual mode HEPs offering both conventional and distance learning programmes; and conventional HEPs offering individual distance learning programmes.1Courses with specific or regulatory requirements to fulfil certain quantum of physical face to face contact hourscan be exempted from the 80% ODL component ruling at the course level.Updated: 12 April 20212

Section 2Criteria and Standards forOpen and Distance Learning (ODL)Programme AccreditationINTRODUCTIONThis Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation-Open and Distance Learning (COPPA:ODL) which has seven areas of evaluation for quality assurance guides the HigherEducation Providers (HEPs) and the Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) in assuring thequality of educational programmes. The HEP is responsible for designing and deliveringprogrammes that are appropriate to its educational purpose.The seven areas of evaluation for quality assurance will be adjusted accordingly to fit theirdistinct purposes in the provision of ODL programmes. For example, while the item on visionis crucial at the institutional level, its relevance at the programme level is more directed tosee how a specific programme supports the larger institutional vision of providing qualityODL programmes. In short, COPPA: ODL outlines the descriptions, content and delivery of aparticular programme.This section discusses guidelines on criteria and standards for ODL programmeaccreditation. It outlines practices that are in line with internationally recognised goodpractices. These guidelines on criteria and standards are aimed to assist HEPs achieve thestandards in each of the seven areas of evaluation and stimulate the HEPs to continuallyimprove the quality of their ODL programmes. All these are in support of the aspiration tomake Malaysia a centre of educational excellence through globalised online learning inwidening access and meeting the manpower needs of a high-income nation.The document defines standards for higher education in broad terms, within which anindividual HEP can creatively design its ODL programme of study and appropriately allocateresources in accordance with its stated educational purpose and learning outcomes.Updated: 12 April 20213

The seven areas of evaluation for ODL programme accreditation are:i.Programme Development and Delivery;ii.Assessment of Student Learning;iii.Student Selection and Support Services;iv.Academic Staff;v.Educational Resources;vi.Programme Management; andvii.Programme Monitoring, Review and Continual Quality Improvement.The criteria and standards define the expected level of attainment of each criterion and serveas performance indicators.These standards, which are benchmarked against international good practices, are theminimum requirements that must be met and compliance must be demonstrated during aODL programme accreditation exercise. In principle, the HEP must establish that it has metall the standards for its ODL programme to be fully accredited, taking into account flexibilityand recognition of diversity to facilitate the creative growth of education through ODL.In the remaining pages of this section, the standards are spelt out for each of the sevenareas of evaluation. These serve, and are defined, as indicators of quality.AREA 1: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY2The vision, mission and goals of the HEP guide its academic planning and implementationas well as bring together its members to strive towards a tradition of excellence. The generalgoal of higher education is to produce broadly educated graduates ready for the world ofwork and active citizenship through the:i.provision of knowledge and practical skills based on scientific principles;ii.inculcation of attitudes, ethics, sense of professionalism and leadership skills forsocietal advancement within the framework of the national aspiration;iii.nurturing of the ability to analyse and solve problems as well as to evaluate andmake decisions critically and creatively based on evidence and experience;2For the purpose of this Code of Practice, the term ‘programme development and delivery’ is usedinterchangeably with the term ‘curriculum design and delivery’. This area is best read together with Guidelinesto Good Practices: Curriculum Design and Delivery, which is available on the MQA Portal: www.mqa.gov.my.Updated: 12 April 20214

iv.development of the quest for knowledge and lifelong learning skills that are essentialfor continuous upgrading of knowledge and skills that are parallel to the rapidadvancement in global knowledge; andv.consideration of other imperatives that are needed by society and the marketplace aswell as those relevant to the local, national and international contexts.Academic programmes are the building blocks that support the larger institutional purpose ofthe HEP. Hence, it must take into consideration these larger goals when designingprogrammes to ensure that one complements the other.Outcome-Based Education (OBE) specifies the desirable outcomes or abilities whichstudents should be able to demonstrate upon completion of an educational programme. Thefive clusters of learning outcomes cover knowledge and understanding, cognitive skills,functional work skills, personal and entrepreneurial skills, and ethics and professionalism.The quality of a programme is ultimately assessed by the ability of its graduates to carry outtheir expected roles and responsibilities in society. In order to fulfil this, a clear statement ofthe competencies and outcomes that are expected to be achieved by the student at the endof the programme should be spelt out. The level descriptors of these learning outcomes aredefined in the Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF).Learning and teaching can only be effective when the curriculum content and theprogramme structure are kept abreast. Intended outcomes should be achieved by the end ofthe programme and supported by appropriate instructional approaches and assessmentmechanisms (constructive alignment). Information on the programme has to be made up todate and available to all

21. e-Learning Learning facilitated and supported through the use of information and communications technology. 22. Electronic Learning Platform Electronic learning platform (e.g., Learning Management System (LMS), Learning Content Managements system (LCMS) or learning portals) serves as an online repository for