Transcription
Report LIMITED PHASE IIENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTSubject Property:Address:Report Date:Prepared for:Prepared by:Catalyst Oilfield Services Storage Yard906 South 14th StreetBrownfield, Terry County, Texas 79316August 17, 2016Canadian Energy ServicesSuite 1400; 700 4th Avenue SWCalgary, AB T2P 3J4Lakeland Environmental Inc.12 South Main Street, Suite 301Homer, NY 13077www.lakelandenvironmental.com
CONTENTS1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .32.INTRODUCTION .42.1. Purpose . 42.2. Scope of Services. 42.3. Special Terms and Conditions . 42.4. Limitations and Exceptions of Assessments . 52.5. Limiting Conditions and Methodologies Used . 53.BACKGROUND .63.1. Site Description and Features . 63.2. Physical Setting . 63.3. Site History and Land Use . 64.PHASE II ACTIVITIES .64.1. Scope of Assessment. 64.2. Field Explorations and Methods . 74.3. Sampling and Chemical Analyses . 85.EVALUATION AND PRESENTATION OF RESULTS .85.1. Subsurface Conditions . 85.2. Analytical Data . 96.DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS . 116.1. Analytical Findings and Regulatory Limits. 116.2. Affected Media . 116.3. Other Concerns . 117.RECOMMENDATIONS . 118.CLOSURE . 12REFERENCESFIGURESAPPENDIX A: LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTSAPPENDIX B: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATIONCES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48182
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYLakeland Environmental was retained by Canadian Energy Services (Client) to conduct aLimited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Catalyst Oilfield ServicesStorage Yard property located at 906 South 14th Street, Brownfield, Terry County, Texasand subsequently referred to in this report as "the property".A Phase I ESA of the property was conducted by Lakeland Environmental in July, 2016. ThePhase I investigation identified one recognized environmental condition relating to theproperty, as follows:Recognized Environmental Condition (REC)(1) According to the regulatory database, at least two circa-1974 underground gasolinestorage tanks (USTs) were filled in place at the subject property during the late1980s. A description of the tank closures, including information about tank integrity,was not identified as part of this assessment. As such, these tanks represent apotential source of subsurface contamination.A soil and groundwater investigation related to the above REC #1 was conducted at theproperty on July 29, 2016. This investigation included an underground facilities survey byground penetrating radar (GPR), subsurface sampling, field screening, and laboratoryanalytical testing. Chemicals of concern included volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and RCRA metals.Based on the results of this assessment, no contamination in excess of regulatoryguidelines was found.This section is a summary only. The report of this investigation, with appendices, ispresented herein.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48183
2. INTRODUCTIONLakeland Environmental was retained by Canadian Energy Services (Client) to conduct aLimited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Catalyst Oilfield ServicesStorage Yard property located at 906 South 14th Street, Brownfield, Terry County, Texas.2.1. PurposeThe purpose of this Limited Phase II ESA was to determine if the two closed-in-placeunderground storage tanks (USTs) had impacted the subsurface soil at the property.This study is not intended to be a comprehensive subsurface evaluation of the entireproperty.2.2. Scope of ServicesThis Phase II investigation was conducted in accordance with a work proposal preparedby Lakeland Environmental. The final work scope (field–adjusted) included thefollowing: A ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey of property was conducted in order tolocate the positions of two reputed closed-in-place underground gasoline tanks.Two suspected UST sites were located. These sites showed some evidence ofpast excavation in the approximate shape and size of a typical small UST. Theselocations are identified in Figure 2. A copy of the GPR report is in Appendix B. Soil sampling was conducted using a direct push (Geoprobe) MacroCore sampler.Two borings were advanced immediately adjacent to each suspected tanklocation. Soil profiles were screened for signs of contamination using aphotoionization detector (PID) as well as visual/olfactory observations. Thisscreening process did not identify any evidence of contamination at any of thesampling locations. One soil sample was obtained at each boring location, at depths ranging from 10to 16 feet below the ground surface (bgs). All samples were placed into method-specific containers, chilled, and submittedunder chain-of-custody documentation to a TX-certified laboratory for analysisfor TPH, Volatiles (8260), Semi-volatiles (8270), and RCRA metals.2.3. Special Terms and ConditionsThe findings and conclusions presented in this report apply only to the prescribedenvironmental conditions assessed.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48184
2.4. Limitations and Exceptions of AssessmentsThe report has been prepared in general accordance with the above referenced workplans and contains all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies. No otherwarranties, expressed or implied, are made as to the professional services providedunder the terms of the contract and included in this report.2.5. Limiting Conditions and Methodologies UsedNo ESA can eliminate all uncertainty. Any sample taken for chemical or physicalanalysis may or may not be representative of overall site conditions. Professionaljudgment and interpretation are inherent in the process and uncertainty is inevitable.Additional assessment may be able to reduce the uncertainty.Even when Phase II ESA work is executed with an appropriate site-specific standard ofcare, certain conditions can present difficult detection problems. Such conditions mayinclude, but are not limited to, complex geological settings, the fate and transportcharacteristics of certain contaminants, the distribution of existing contamination,physical limitations imposed by the location of buildings, utilities and other man-madeobjects, and the limitations of assessment technologies.This Phase II ESA is not an exhaustive assessment of environmental conditions at theproperty. There is a point at which the cost of information obtained and the timerequired to obtain it outweigh the usefulness of the information and, in fact, may be amaterial detriment to the orderly completion of transactions. If hazardous substancesor petroleum releases are confirmed on a parcel of property, the extent of furtherassessment is related to the degree of uncertainty that is acceptable to the user withrespect to the purpose of the assessment.Measurements and sampling data represent the site conditions at the time andlocation of data collection. As such, the usability of data collected as part of this PhaseII ESA may have a finite lifetime depending on the purpose of the study. The use ofdata generated herein may not be appropriate for any subsequent use beyond theoriginal purpose for which it was collected.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48185
3. BACKGROUND3.1. Site Description and FeaturesSubject Property DataProperty Name:Catalyst Oilfield Services Storage YardProperty Postal Address:906 South 14th StreetProperty City, County, State:Brownfield, Terry County, TexasProperty ID:BLK T - SEC 113 - TRACT 2Nearest Intersection:Approximately 0.26 miles north of the intersection of S.14th Street and Highway 450Property Coordinates:33.1699350 degrees (north) and -102.2907670 degrees(west)Elevation Above Mean Sea Level:3,323 feet3.2. Physical SettingThe subject property is situated approximately 0.26 miles north of the intersection of S.14th Street and Highway 450 in Brownfield, Texas in an area of primarily industrial andresidential land use.Based on field observations and the Brownfield West, Texas (2013) quadrangle, thegeneral topographic gradient in the vicinity of the subject site is westerly.3.3. Site History and Land UseThe property was vacant land prior to at least 1967. The current building wasconstructed in 1974. Two underground gasoline tanks were installed in 1974, andsubsequently closed in place in 1988. The property was used as a pipe storage yardfrom the 1970s through circa 2014. It has been used as a chemical storage yard since2015.4. PHASE II ACTIVITIES4.1. Scope of Assessment4.1.1. Supplemental Record ReviewPhase I ESA report for the subject property by Lakeland Environmental datedJuly, 2016.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48186
4.1.2. Conceptual Site Model and Sampling PlanA basic and cost-effective sampling plan was devised by Lakeland in order toassess the subsurface contamination status at portions of the Catalyst OilfieldServices Storage Yard property.A sampling diagram is attached, as Figure 2.4.1.3. Chemical Testing PlanThe chemical testing plan was designed to screen for chemicals of concern thatare normally associated with a site of this type, including organic contaminantsand certain metals.Refer to Section 2.2.4.1.4. Deviations from the Work PlanThe sampling plan followed the original work scope.4.2. Field Explorations and Methods4.2.1. Test PitsNo test pits were excavated as part of this Phase II ESA.4.2.2. Test BoringsSoil sampling was conducted at four locations using a direct push (Geoprobe)MacroCore sampler.Boring logs are presented in Appendix B.Disposable liners and sampling gloves were used to minimize crosscontamination.Some soil samples were temporarily placed into sealed (Zip-Lock type) plasticbags in order to conduct headspace screening for VOCs by PID.All samples were containerized, labeled, and cooled as required by laboratorymethods. Samples were delivered to the laboratory within the appropriatesample holding time under chain-of-custody documentation.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48187
4.2.3. Monitoring Well InstallationsNo monitoring wells were installed as part of this assessment.Ground water elevation measurementGroundwater was not encountered during this investigation.Ground water flow directionNot determined, presumed westerly based on topography.4.2.4. OtherNo other assessment activities were conducted.4.3. Sampling and Chemical Analyses4.3.1. SoilAll borings were through a surficial gravel layer into fairly uniform brown sandyloam.No chemical odors were observed.Soil samples were submitted to Spectrum Analytical Inc. of Agawam, MA foranalyses.4.3.2. Ground waterGroundwater sampling was not conducted.4.3.3. OtherN/A5. EVALUATION AND PRESENTATION OF RESULTS5.1. Subsurface Conditions5.1.1. Geologic SettingCES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48188
Information provided by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)indicates the following soil types in the vicinity of the work area:Patricia and Amarillo loamy fine sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, welldrained. Parent material is loamy eolian deposits from the BlackwaterDraw formation of pleistocene age. Depth to restrictive feature (if any) ismore than 80 inches. Depth to groundwater (if any) is more than 80inches. Frequency of flooding: none; frequency of ponding: none.5.1.2. Hydrogeologic ConditionsOther than groundwater depth, no other hydrogeologic data was collected.5.2. Analytical DataScreening and analytical results are summarized below in Tables 1 and 2.Soil analytical results were compared against guideline values listed in Texas RiskReduction Program (TRRP) Table 1 - Tier 1 Residential Soil Protective ConcentrationLevels (PCLs) dated March 2016.Analytical values which exceed guideline values (if any) are highlighted in bold red type.Laboratory data are provided in Appendix A.Boring logs are presented in Appendix B.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-48189
Table 1. Summary of Soil Testing ResultsDetected AnalytesLocation &Sampling DepthPID Screening(ppm)B-1Soil14’-16’ bgs0' - 4': 0.04' - 8': 0.08' - 12': 0.012' - 16': 0.0B-2Soil8’-12’ bgs0' - 4': 0.04' - 8': 0.08' - 12': 0.012' - 16': 0.0B-3Soil14’-16’ bgsB-4Soil10’-12’ bgsVolatile Organics(mg/kg)Semi-volatileOrganics (mg/kg)RCRA Metals(mg/kg)TPH(mg/kg)ND532 (Barium)6.54 (Chromium)ND0.0327 (methylene chloride)*ND2.30 (Arsenic)455 (Barium)7.59 (Chromium)ND0' - 4': 0.04' - 8': 0.08' - 12': 0.012' - 16': 0.00.0336 (methylene chloride)*ND122 (Barium)5.27 (Chromium)ND0' - 4': 0.04' - 8': 0.08' - 12': 0.012' - 16': 0.00.0429 (methylene chloride)*ND236 (Barium)6.18 (Chromium)ND0.0345 (methylene chloride)*ND Not Detected *Lab contaminant; not significant
5.2.1. OtherThere was no other analytical data obtained during this investigation.6. DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS6.1. Analytical Findings and Regulatory LimitsVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)No VOCs were detected. Refer to Table 1.Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds SVOCs)No SVOCs were detected. Refer to Table 2.MetalsLow levels of arsenic, barium, and chromium were found variously in all four soilsamples but none exceeded published limits.NOTE: TRRP residential soil guidance levels (0.5-acre source area, combined pathway)for these metals are as follows:Arsenic: 24 mg/kgBarium: 8,100 mg/kgChromium: 33,000 mg/kg6.2. Affected MediaNone.6.3. Other ConcernsN/A7. RECOMMENDATIONSNo further action is recommended.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-481811
8. CLOSUREThis report has been prepared for the sole benefit of Canadian Energy Services. The reportmay not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the express written consentof Lakeland Environmental and Canadian Energy Services.Respectfully submitted,Stephen Major, EPREFERENCESPhase I Environmental Site Assessment, Subject Property: Catalyst Oilfield ServicesStorage Yard, 906 South 14th Street, Brownfield, Terry County, Texas 79316 byLakeland Environmental, July, 2016.Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Table 1 - Tier 1 Residential Soil ProtectiveConcentration Levels (PCLs) dated March 2016.CES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-481812
FIGURESCES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-481813
SubjectPropertyUSGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLELimited Phase II ESA906 South 14th StreetBrownfield, TexasQuad Name:Brownfield West, Texas (2016)Property Boundaries areApproximate
SAMPLE B-3N. 14TH STREETSAMPLE B-4SUBJECTBUILDINGSAMPLE B-1SAMPLE B-2Suspected UST locationsidentified by GPR surveySAMPLING LOCATIONSLimited Phase II ESA906 South 14th StreetBrownfield, TexasImage Source: Google Earth 2014Property Boundariesare Approximate
APPENDIX ALABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTSCES2016-1031-05Lakeland Environmental, Inc. 12 South Main Street Suite 301 Homer, NY 13077 607-299-481814
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: http://www.settek.comAugust 17, 2016Steve MajorLakeland Environmental12 S Main StHomer, NY 13077TEL: 607-299-4818FAX: 866-636-2528RE:BROWNFIELD,TXDear Steve Major:Order No.: 16080004Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 4 sample(s) on 7/30/2016 for theanalyses presented in the following report.There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless notedin the Case Narrative.Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limitsexcept where noted.If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call thelaboratory.Sincerely,Holly FloreaProject Manager3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223Alabama 41600, Arkansas 88-0735, California 07256CA, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0105, Delaware, Florida NELAC E87688, Georgia E87688 and 943,Idaho OH00923, Illinois 200061 and Reg.5, Indiana C-OH-13, Kansas E-10347, Kentucky (Underground Storage Tank) 3, Kentucky 90146, Louisiana04061 and LA12004, Maine 2012015, Maryland 339, Massachusetts M-OPH923, Minnesota 409711, Montana CERT0099, New Hampshire 2996, NewJersey OH006, New York 11777, North Carolina 39705 and 631, Ohio Drinking Water 4170, Ohio VAP CL0052, Oklahoma 9940, Oregon OH200001,Rhode Island LA000317, South Carolina 92016001, Texas T104704466-11-5, Region 8 8TMS-L, USDA/APHIS P330-11-00244, Utah OH009232011-1,Vermont VT-87688, Virginia 00440 and 1581, Washington C891, West Virginia 248 and 9957C and E87688, Wisconsin 399013010Page 1 of 43Page 1 of 45
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: http://www.settek.comCLIENT:Project:Case NarrativeWO#:16080004Date:8/17/2016Lakeland EnvironmentalBROWNFIELD,TXThis report in its entirety consists of the documents listed below. All documents contain the SummitEnvironmental Technologies, Inc., Work Order Number assigned to this report.Paginated Report including Cover Letter, Case Narrative, Analytical Results, Applicable QualityControl Summary Reports, and copies of the Chain of Custody Documents are supplied with thissample set.Concentrations reported with a J-Flag in the Qualifier Field are values below the Limit of Quantitation(LOQ) but greater than the established Method Detection Limit (MDL).Method numbers, unless specified as SM (Standard Methods) or ASTM, are EPA methods.Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request.Analysis performed by DBM, VRM, or SFG were performed at Summit Labs 2704 Eatonton HighwayHaddock, GA 31033All results for Solid Samples are reported on an "as received" or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as"dry weight" using the "-dry" designation on the reporting units.Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., holds the accreditations/certifications listed at the bottom ofthe cover letter that may or may not pertain to this report.The information contained in this analytical report is the sole property of Summit EnvironmentalTechnologies, Inc. and that of the customer. It cannot be reproduced in any form without the consent ofSummit Environmental Technologies, Inc. or the customer for which this report was issued. The resultscontained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions can vary at differenttimes and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not responsiblefor use or interpretation of the data included herein.This report is believed to meet all of the requirements of NELAC or the accrediting / certifying agency.Any comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below.Analytical Comments for voc-mstr s(8260), Sample ccv 50ppb ccv072, Batch ID R57276 : The VOCRevision v1Page 2 of 43Page 2 of 45
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: http://www.settek.comCLIENT:Project:Case NarrativeWO#:16080004Date:8/17/2016Lakeland EnvironmentalBROWNFIELD,TXCCV (Batch R57276) exhibited high recovery for Bromomethane ; All samples were ND for . AllMethod-Specified CCCs and SPCCs exhibited control.Analytical Comments for TPH-SV(C10-C34) NPW(8015), Sample DRO ICAL 5000, Batch IDR57830 : The SVOA CCV (Batch R57830) exhibited slightly low recovery for surrogate p-Terphenyl;Hydrocarbons C10-C20 and Hydrocarbons C20-C34 meet acceptable Method 8015 criteria.Analytical Comments for TPH-SV(C10-C34) NPW(8015), Sample DRO ICAL 5000, Batch IDR57830 : The SVOA CCV (Batch R57830) exhibited slightly low recovery for surrogate p-Terphenyl;Hydrocarbons C10-C20 and Hydrocarbons C20-C34 meet acceptable Method 8015 criteria.Analytical Comments for TPH-SV(C10-C34) S(8015), Sample DRO ICAL 5000, Batch ID R57830 :The SVOA CCV (Batch R57830) exhibited slightly low recovery for surrogate p-Terphenyl;Hydrocarbons C10-C20 and Hydrocarbons C20-C34 meet acceptable Method 8015 criteria.Analytical Comments for SVOC-MSTR NPW(8270), Sample 40ng CAL STD, Batch ID R57624 : TheSVOC CCV (Analytical Run 57624) exhibited low recovery for Benzidine. The method exhibitedcontrol as demonstrated by Method Specified CCCs meeting Acceptance Criteria.Analytical Comments for SVOC-MSTR S(8270), Sample LCS-21996, Batch ID 21996 : The SVOCLCS (Batch 21996) exhibited poor recoveries for Pyridine and Benzidine; The MS/MSD exhibitedcontrol for Pyridine. Benzidine did not recover in the MS/MSD; Associated Benzidine results may bebiased low.Analytical Comments for SVOC-MSTR NPW(8270), Sample 40ng CAL STD, Batch ID R57624 : TheSVOC CCV (Analytical Run 57624) exhibited low recovery for Benzidine. The method exhibitedcontrol as demonstrated by Method Specified CCCs meeting Acceptance Criteria.Analytical Comments for SVOC-MSTR S(8270), Sample LCS-21996, Batch ID 21996 : The SVOCLCS (Batch 21996) exhibited poor recoveries for Pyridine and Benzidine; The MS/MSD exhibitedcontrol for Pyridine. Benzidine did not recover in the MS/MSD; Associated Benzidine results may bebiased low.Revision v1Page 3 of 43Page 3 of 45
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: e SummaryWO#:1608000417-Aug-16Lakeland EnvironmentalBROWNFIELD,TXTag NoDate CollectedDate ReceivedMatrix16080004-001B-17/29/2016 9:30:00 AM7/30/2016 10:30:00 AMSolid16080004-002B-27/29/2016 10:00:00 AM7/30/2016 10:30:00 AMSolid16080004-003B-37/29/2016 10:45:00 AM7/30/2016 10:30:00 AMSolid16080004-004B-47/29/2016 11:25:00 AM7/30/2016 10:30:00 AMSolidLab SampleID Client Sample IDPage 4 of 43Page 4 of 45
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: http://www.settek.comCLIENT:Lakeland EnvironmentalMatrix:SOLIDAnalytical Report(base report)WO#:16080004Date Reported:8/17/2016Tag Number:Collection Date: 7/29/2016 9:30:00 AM16080004-001ALab ID:BROWNFIELD,TXProject:Client Sample ID B-1AnalysesResultRL Qual UnitsRCRA METALS (SW6010/SW7471)MERCURY ANALYSIS (7471)MercurySW7471AND0.179mg/KgRCRA METALS (SW6010/SW7471)METALS ANALYSIS Lead(Pb)Selenium(Se)Silver(Ag)DFDate AnalyzedSW7471A1SW6010CAnalyst: ALJ8/1/2016 1:57:31 PMSW3050BAnalyst: /Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg1111118/2/2016 12:18:30 PM8/2/2016 12:18:30 PM8/2/2016 12:18:30 PM8/2/2016 12:18:30 PM8/2/2016 12:18:30 PM8/2/2016 12:18:30 PMND2.31mg/Kg18/2/2016 12:18:30 PMSVOC-SOLID-8270C-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS (SW8270C)SW8270CSW3550CAnalyst: 500.1500.150mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg11118/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 g/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg1111111118/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 lene2-Nitrophenol3,3 mg/Kgmg/Kg1111118/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PMQualifiers:HNDRHolding times for preparation or analysis exceededNot Detected at the Reporting LimitRPD outside accepted recovery limitsWSample container temperature is out of limit as specified at testcodeMPLRLManual Integration used to determine area responsePermit LimitReporting Detection LimitRevision v1Page 5 of 43Page 5 of 45
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: http://www.settek.comCLIENT:Lakeland EnvironmentalMatrix:SOLIDAnalytical Report(base report)WO#:16080004Date Reported:8/17/2016Tag Number:Collection Date: 7/29/2016 9:30:00 AM16080004-001ALab ID:BROWNFIELD,TXProject:Client Sample ID B-1AnalysesResultRL Qual UnitsSVOC-SOLID-8270C-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS (SW8270C)DFSW8270CDate AnalyzedSW3550CAnalyst: CxA4-Bromophenyl phenyl etherND0.150mg/Kg18/9/2016 2:49:00 PM4-Chlorophenyl phenyl 016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 s(2-chloroethyl) etherBis(2-chloroisopropyl) etherBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalateButyl benzyl phthalateChryseneDi-n-butyl phthalateDi-n-octyl /Kgmg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg1111111118/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PMDibenzo (a,h) anthraceneDiethyl phthalateDimethyl 016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 mg/Kgmg/Kgmg/Kg11111118/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PM8/9/2016 2:49:00 PMQualifiers:HNDRHolding times for preparation or analysis exceededNot Detected at the Reporting LimitRPD outside accepted recovery limitsWSample container temperature is out of limit as specified at testcodeMPLRLManual Integration used to determine area responsePermit LimitReporting Detection LimitRevision v1Page 6 of 43Page 6 of 45
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.3310 Win St.Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489Website: http://www.settek.comCLIENT:Lakeland EnvironmentalMatrix:SOLIDAnalytical Report(base report)WO#:16080004Date Reported:8/17/2016Tag Number:Collection Date: 7/29/2016 9:30:00 AM16080004-001ALab ID:BROWNFIELD,TXProject:Client Sample ID B-1AnalysesResultRL Qual UnitsSVOC-SOLID-8270C-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS (SW8270C)DFSW8270CDate AnalyzedSW3550CAnalyst: CxANitrobenzene
Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Catalyst Oilfield Services Storage Yard property located at 906 South 14th Street, Brownfield, Terry County, Texas and subsequently referred to in this report as "the property". A Phase I ESA of the property was conducted by Lakeland Environmental in July, 2016. The
