The Book Of Pleasure - Libroesoterico

Transcription

The Book of Pleasure(self-love)The Psychology of EcstasyBy Austin Osman SpareAn iv12 Sol 15 Leo, Luna 6 Taurus Dies VenerisFriday, August 06, 2004 e.v.This digital edition was created especially for initiates of The Order of Phosphorus byFrater A.S.A. IVº, for the purpose of education and initiatory pursuits. This edition is notto be sold or spread further than to initiates of TOPH.In my own foundations of what became LUCIFERIAN WITCHCRAFT, the gnosis ofChaos and of Order may be found in the art and writings of Austin Osman Spare. Zos velThanatos, his name within the Witch Cult according to Kenneth Grant presents thesignificance Spare had on formulating a modern approach to magic and dream control.Within the Book of Pleasure you will find methods of achieving contact with your HolyGuardian Angel/Luciferian Angel which may further empower the Rites of Azal’ucel andRitual of the Adversary by Michael W. Ford.I have included the introduction by Kenneth Grant from the 93 Publishing edition of TheBook of Pleasure. This grimoire is a powerful tool to illuminate the torch of the witchesSabbat. For many years have I entered the gates of the Opposer to drink from the Graal ofthe Devil, the very cup of ensorcelled venom few may taste. Spare’s art holds a gatewayinto this primal gnosis, seek to drink from this cup as well.Become through Self-Love!Frater Akhtya Seker ArimaniusMagister, The Order of Phosphorus/Black Order of theDragon12received at the Sabbath; they were of a purely practical and magical nature. It was Sparewho wedded the practices of witchcraft to the doctrines of the Neither-Neither and theAtmospheric 'I', which he interpreted with fantastic manual dexterity. These doctrineswere inspired by his early studies, for Spare was an omnivorous reader, and some of hismore obvious influences - from Laotze to Aleister Crowley - are readily apparent.Introduction to The Book of PleasureBy Kenneth GrantFirst published in The Book of Pleasure, 1975Austin Osman Spare was born at Snowhill, London, in 1886. Apart from William Blake,John Martin, Aubrey Beardsley, Sidney Sime, and a mere handful of others, England hasproduced no artist to equal Spare for sheer ability and imaginative fecundity.Spare was not only a graphic artist; he wrote four books on what he described assymbolic sorcery - The Book of Pleasure (1909-1913), The Focus of Life (1918-1921),Anathema of Zos (1924) and The Book of the Living Word of Zos (1951-1956), acollection of aphorisms and magical formulae which remains unpublished to thisday.(note 1)Spare published some of his drawings in books such as Earth Inferno (1905), A Book ofSatyrs (1907), and in periodicals; he also illustrated a few books by other writers, but thefour works mentioned above are all that survives of his extensive occult researches. Theytrace the evolution and development of the curious system of sorcery with which he waspreoccupied until his death in 1956. They were, however, mere punctuation marks,pauses, between the steady outflow of graphic work which he produced almostcontinuously during an obscure, outwardly uneventful and impoverished existence.Although Spare had no specific teacher where his art was concerned, (note 2) he did havea teacher - or perhaps guru would be a more appropriate term - in a 'magical' sense.During his most impressionable years circumstances led him into the company of a selfconfessed witch, a mysterious Mrs. Paterson who befriended him and initiated him intothe mysteries of her craft. He was extremely reticent about Mrs Paterson. All that I wasable to elicit from him during the eight years of friendship was that she was very oldwhen he met her and that she claimed descent from a line of Salem (New England)witches that Cotton Mather had failed to eradicate.Spare did not get on with his mother and he looked upon Mrs Paterson as a 'secondmother'. What little he said about her explains much of his work and his life-longdevotion to the occult. She was able to transform herself on certain occasions into awoman of alluring loveliness: this she had done in his presence as a proof of her magicalpowers.(note 3) Furthermore, she gave him the keys whereby he gained access to theWitches' Sabbath, the genuine extra-terrestrial event of which the popular version is but adebased and grotesque parody. It was during his exultation to the dimension where thisevent occurs that he was taught how to explore the subconscious with the use of sentientsymbols and the alphabet of desire described in [The Book of Pleasure]. These methods,once demonstrated, had to be brought down and 'earthed', and it took several years forSpare to integrate them with his own creative techniques.The Book of Pleasure embodies the first vague searchings into the subconscious regionsthat he was to explore more fully in later books, for it should be understood that there wasno creed of the Zos and the Kia - the Imagination and the Will - in the teachings he3Spare was drawn to Crowley in 1910 when he became a member of the ArgenteumAstrum, (note 4) shortly after contributing some of his drawings to Crowley's periodical,The Equinox. (note 5)Spare claimed to be one of the first surrealists. He had visualized the irrational andtranscribed his vision directly from subconscious strata of the psyche; he was also able togalvanise primal centres of awareness by a formula of atavistic resurgence that few artists- and fewer occultists - have succeeded in re-activating with impunity to their work or tothemselves.The Book of Pleasure contains a unique method of obtaining control of the subconsciousenergies latent in the human mind in the form of primal atavisms. It is evident that if suchenergy can be tapped and channelled, it can be directed to creative or destructive ends ona scale infinitely beyond anything achievable by the mind in the more limited state thatcharacterizes 'waking' consciousness. But the subconscious does not yield to conscioussuggestion for it is founded on sensation, not upon thought, hence a tactual and visualmeans must be employed if it is to be penetrated and permeated with the vitalizingcurrent of will or desire. The process must be symbolically enacted, and its intent notconsciously formulated, for "unless desire is subconscious, it is not fulfilled.". Amethod had to be found of by-passing the conscious mind and planting the desire directlyin the soil of the subconsciousness. To this end Spare evolved his own system of sentientsymbols which took on a secret meaning and which constituted a 'sacred' alphabet ofdesire of which "each letter in its pictorial aspect relates to a Sex principle.". From thisalphabet it is possible to construct the words of a mysterious language of sensation thatreifies the imagery of appetence.Spare believed that the hieroglyphics of ancient peoples such as the Egyptian andAmerindian are the remains of an occult language. That the Egyptians practised a form ofsorcery involving a process similar to that of Spare's formula of atavistic resurgence issuggested by the fact that the hieroglyphics are usually in zoomorphic form.It is known that the priests of antiquity assumed animal-headed masks when performingrituals designed to produce magical effects; also, that when dormant forces wereawakened, the magician was shaken to the very depths of his being as he manifested theatavisms that his spells had invoked. The convulsions of Tibetan 'oracles'; the strangephenomena of spirit possession common to most peoples of antiquity are proof of Spare'stheory; proof also that some cosmic forces then possesses the human vehicle and enablesthe magician to perform superhuman feats.The mainspring of the formula of atavistic resurgence is - as one might suppose - a formof sexual sorcery. The Adepts of old concealed the process from the eyes of the profane(i.e. those whose ineptitude would destroy them), for once these atavisms are unleashed,magical obsession occurs and there is no reversing the course of events any more than4

one can reverse the flow of semen on the point of its leaping forth. If the magician isunable to control the power he has invoked, or if he is unable to permit its unhinderedmovement as it wells into consciousness, then he is literally blasted into death or insanity.Whatever the value of Spare's contribution to art and psychology, his contribution toexperimental occultism is supreme, for he discovered a method of reifying the dreamworld under the controlling aegis of the fully conscious will.The secret of this sorcery is analogous to that taught by Crowley in his Ordo TempliOrientis (O.T.O.) where it was - and still is - the fulcrum of magical power and the meansof gaining access to trans-human dimensions and of communicating with the denizens ofother worlds.KENNETHWinter Solstice 1974 e.v.Spare maintained that he was in communication with extra-terrestrial Intelligences andconscious forces possessed of superhuman power and knowledge. He referred frequentlyto Black Eagle,(note 6) who inspired many of his 'magical' drawings. Black Eagle seemsto have been a concentration of sinister trans-cosmic current which, according to H.P.Lovecraft (note 7), had been tapped in its primordial phase by the witch cults of NewEngland. Perhaps Black Eagle was the alter ego of Mrs Paterson, for it was not long afterher death that this current began to manifest in Spare's work.Whatever the identity of Spare's genius - Mrs Paterson, Black Eagle, or one of the 'host offamiliars' by which he was habitually surrounded - the fact remains that Spare produced alarge amount of work during abnormal states of consciousness or self-induced trance. Hewas not mediumistic in the usual sense of the term, nor did he produce automaticdrawings in the way that spirit mediums produce automatic texts. Rather, Sparetransmitted his work in much the same way that The Book of the Law and other magicalwritings were transmitted by Aleister Crowley,(note 8) i.e. he entered consciously andmagically into communication with superhuman Intelligences.Towards the end of his life, when Spare lived more or less reclusively in a DickensianSouth London slum, he was asked whether he regretted his lonely existence. "Lonely!" heexclaimed, and with a sweep of his arm he indicated the host of unseen elementals andfamiliar spirits that were his constant companions; he had but to turn his head to catch afleeting glimpse of their subtle presences.GRANTNOTES1. Subtitled The Zoetic Grimoire of Zos. Zos was Spare's 'magical' name. A selectionof these aphorisms, together with an introduction to Spare and his work is to bepublished shortly by Frederick Muller Ltd., London, under the title Images andOracles of Austin Osman Spare, by Kenneth Grant.2. He was a student at the Royal College of Art in Kensington, London.3. A similar phenomenon occurred in the presence of Aleister Crowley when anageing sorceress transformed herself into a "young woman of bewitching beauty",for purposes of vampirism. See The Confessions of Aleister Crowley (ed.Symonds and Grant), chapter 42, Jonathan Cape, London, 19694. The Order of the Silver Star.5. The Equinox, "The Encyclopaedia of Initiation", appeared in eleven numbers, tenof which were published between the years 1909 and 1913. Two only of Spare'sdrawings were reproduced. See The Equinox, vol. 1, number 2, pages 140 and161.6. See The Magical Revival (Frederick Muller Ltd. 1972), plate facing page 149, fora reproduction of Spare's impression of Black Eagle, painted in 1946.7. Howard Phillips Lovecraft (1890-1937). The New England writer whose tales ofterror involve traffic with extra-terrestrial entities.8. See Crowley's Confessions.I have described some of Spare's transactions with his 'host of familiars' in The MagicalRevival, but the reader of The Book of Pleasure will have little difficulty in imaginingwhat these creatures were like. Imagination is the operative word, for Spare's sorcery is aform of veritable imagination or image-making; of 'dreaming true'. He exalted theimagination above every other faculty and claimed that "dreams shall flesh" if therequisite ability to reify them has been absolutely mastered. Herein lies the key to hissorcery; the ability to 'visualise sensation' and to convey a world of imaginative reality tothe observer.Augustus John regarded Spare as one of the great graphic artists of his time, and manyyears earlier John Singer Sargent, G.F. Watts, George Bernard Shaw, and others praisedhim in similar terms.Spare sent a copy of The Book of Pleasure to Sigmund Freud who described it as one ofthe most significant revelations of subconscious mechanisms that had appeared inmodern times.56DefinitionsThe words God, religions, faith, morals, woman, etc. (they being forms of belief), areused as expressing different "means" as controlling and expressing desire: an idea ofunity by fear in some form or another which must spell bondage-the imagined limits;extended by science which adds a dearly paid inch to our height: no more.Kia: The absolute freedom which being free is mighty enough to be "reality" and free atany time: therefore is not potential or manifest (except as it's instant possibility) by ideasof freedom or "means," but by the Ego being free to recieve it, by being free of ideasabout it and by not believing. The less said of it (Kia) the less obscure is it. Rememberevolution teaches by terrible punishments-that conception is ultimate reality but notultimate freedom from evolution.Virtue: Pure ArtVice: Fear, belief, faith, control, science, and the like.Self-Love: A mental state, mood or condition caused by the emotion of laughterbecoming the principle that allows the Ego appreciation or universal association inpermitting inclusion before conception.Exhaustion: That state of vacuity brought by exhausting a desire by some means ofdissipation when the mood corresponds to the nature of the desire, i.e., when the mind isworried because of the non-fulfilment of such desire and seeks relief. By seizing thismood and living, the resultant vacuity is sensitive to the subtle suggestion of the Sigil.Different Religions and Doctrines as Means to Pleasure, Freedom and Power.What is there to believe, but in Self? And Self is the negation of completeness as reality.No man has seen self at any time. We are what we believe and what it implies by aprocess of time in the conception; creation is caused by this bondage to formula.Actions are the expressions of ideas bound up in the belief; they being inherent areobscure, their operation indirect, easily they deceive introspection. Fruits of action aretwo-fold, Heaven or Hell, their Unity or Nothingness (Purgatory or Indifference). InHeaven there is desire for Women. Hell the desire intense. Purgatory is expectationdelayed. Indifference but disappointment till recovery. Then verily they are one and thesame. The wise pleasure seeker, having realised they are "different degrees of desire" andnever desirable, gives up both Virtue and Vice and becomes a Kiaist. Riding the Shark ofhis desire he crosses the ocean of the dual principle and engages himself in self-love.Religions are the projection of incapacity, the imaginations of fear, the veneer ofsuperstition, that paradox is truth, 0 while ofttimes the ornamentation of imbecility. As a78

virtue in the Idea to maximize pleasure cheaply, remit your sins and excuse them-is butceremonial, the expression of puppetry to the governing fear. Yes! What you haveordained in your religiousness, is your very rack, imagined though it be! The prospect isnot pleasant; you have taught yourself! It has become inborn and your body is sensitive.0: That God is always in Heaven or that the Almighty inconceivable emanates itsconception or negation-commits suicide, etc.Some praise the idea of Faith. To believe that they are Gods (or anything else) wouldmake them such-proving by all they do, to be full of its non-belief. Better is it to admitincapacity or insignificance, than reinforce it by faith; since the superficial "protects" butdoes not change the vital. Therefore reject the former for the latter. Their formula isdeception and they are deceived, the negation of their purpose. Faith is denial, or themetaphor Idiotcy, hence it always fails. To make their bondage more secure Governmentsforce religion down the throats of their slaves, and it always suceeds; those who escape itare but few, therefore their honour is the greater. When faith perishes, the "Self" shallcome into its own. Others less foolish, obscure the memory that God is a conception ofthemselves, and as much subject to law. Then, this ambition of faith, is it so verydesirable? Myself, I have not yet seen a man who is not God already.Others again, and those who have much knowledge, cannot tell you exactly what "belief"is, or how to believe in what defies natural laws and existing belief. Surely it is not bysaying "I believe"; that art has long been lost. They are even more subject tobewilderment and distraction directly they open their mouths full of argument; withoutpower and unhappy unless spreading their own confusion, to gain cogency they mustadopt dogma and mannerism that excludes possibility . . . . . . By the illumination of theirknowledge they deteriorate in accomplishment. Have we not watched them decay inration to their expoundings? Verily, man cannot believe by faith or gain, neither can heexplain his knowledge unless born of a new law. We being everything, wherefore thenecessity of imagining we are not?Be ye mystic.Others believe in prayer . . . . have not all yet learnt, that to ask it to be denied? Let it bethe root of your Gospel. Oh, ye who are living other peoples lives! Unless desire issubconscious, it is not fulfilled, no, not in this life. Then verily sleep is better than prayer.Quiescence is hidden desire, a form of "not asking"; by it the female obtains much fromman. Utilize prayer (if you must pray) as a means of exhaustion, and by that you willobtain your desire.to know that various means; is not their object to deceive and govern? Surely then, for theattainment of the transcendental, God and religion should have no place.Some praise truth so-called, but give it many containers; forgetting its dependence theyprove its relationship and paradox, the song of experience and illusion. Paradox is not"truth", but the truth that anything can be true for a time. What supersedes paradox and itsimplicit ("not necessary"), I will make the foundation of my teaching. Let us determinethe deliberative, "the truth" cannot be divided. Self-love only cannot be denied and isSelf-love as such when paradoxical, under any condition, hence it alone is truth, withoutaccessories complete.Others praise ceremonial Magic, and are supposed to suffer much Ecstasy! Our asylumsare crowded, the stage is over-run! Is it by symbolizing we become the symbolized?Were I to crown myself King, should I be King? Rather should I be an object of disgustor pity. These Magicians, whose insincerity is their safety, are but the unemployeddandies of the Brothels. Magic is but one's natural ability to attract without asking;ceremony what is unaffected, its doctrine the negation of theirs. I know them well andtheir creed of learning that teaches the fear of their own light. Vampires, they are as thevery lice in attraction. Their practices prove their incapacity, they have no magic tointensify the normal, the joy of a child or healthy person, none to evoke their pleasure orwisdom from themselves. Their methods depending on a morass of the imagination and achaos of conditions, their knowledge obtained with less decency than the hyena his food,I say they are less free and do not obtain the satisfaction of the meanest among animals.Self condemned in their disgusting fatness, their emptiness of power, without even themagic of personal charm or beauty, they are offensive in their bad taste and mongeringfor advertisement. The freedom of energy is not obtained by its bondage, great power notby disintegration. Is it not because our energy (or mind stuff) is already over bound anddivided, that we are not capable, let alone magical?Some believe any and every thing is symbolic, and can be transcribed, and explain theoccult, but of what they do not know. (Great spiritual truths?) So argument a metaphor,cautiously confusing the obvious which developes the hidden virtue. This unnecessarycorpulency, however impressive, is it not disgusting? (The Elephant is exceeding largebut extremely powerful, the swine though odious does not breed the contempt of ourgood taste.) If a man is no hero to his servant, much less can he remain a mystic in theeyes of the curious; similarity educates mimicry. Decorate your meaning, howeverobjectionable (as fact), after you have shown your honesty. Truth, though simple, neverneeds the argument of confusion for obscurity; its own pure symbolism embraces allpossibilities as mystic design. Take your stand in commonsense and you include the truthwhich cannot lie; no argument has yet prevailed. Perfect proportion suggest no alteration,and what is useless decays.Some do much to show the similarity of different religions; certainly by it I prove thepossibility of a fundamental illusion, but that they never realise-or this Ukase they are themockery, for how much they regret! They suffer more conflict than the unenlightened.With what they can identify their own delusion of fear they call truth. They never see thissimilarity and the quintessence of religions, their own poverty of imagination andreligion's palliation. Better is it to show the essential difference of religions. It is as wellThey reject all the modern symbolism 1 and reach an absurd limit very early. Notcounting on change 2 and (at times) the arbitrary nature of symbolism or the chance of apreserved folly, by their adoption of the traditional without a Science, as having readingto the present, their symbolism is chaotic and meaningless. Not knowing the early910rendering, they succeed in projecting their own meagreness by this confusion, asexplaining the ancient symbols. Children are more wise. This conglomeration of antiquitydecayed, collected with the disease of greed-is surely the chance for charity? Forgettingtrumpery ideas, learn the best tradition by seeing you own functions and the modernunbiassed. Some praise the belief in a moral doctrinal code, which they naturally andcontinually transgress, and never obtain their purpose. Given the right nature, theysucceed fairly in their own governing, and are those most healthy, sane and self-pleased.It may be called the negation of my doctrine, they obtain tolerable satisfaction, whereasmine is complete. Let him tarry here, who is not strong for the great work. In freedom hemight be lost. So fledge your wings fearlessly, ye humble ones!1: All means of locomotion, machinery, governments, institutions, and everythingessentially modern, is vital symbolism of the workings of our mind, etc.2: The symbol of justice known to the Romans is not symbolic of Divine, or our justice, atleast not necessarily or usually. The vitality is not exactly like water-nor are we trees;more like ourselves, which might incidentally include trees somewhere unlearnt-muchmore obvious in our workings at present.Others say knowledge only is eternal, it is the eternal illusion of learning-the Ukase oflearning what we already know. Directly we ask ourselves "how" we induce stupidity;without this conception what is there we could not know and accomplish? Others forconcentration, it will not free you, the mind conceiving the law is bondage. Arrived atthat, you will want deconcentration. Dissociation from all ideas but one is not release butimaginative fulfilment, or the fury of creation. Others again, that all things areemanations of the Divine Spirit, as rays from the Sun, hence the need of emancipation?Verily, things are of necessity through their conception and belief. Then let us destroy orchange conception, and empty the belief.These and many other doctrines, are declared by me as the perpetuators of sin andillusion. Each and all depending on a muddled implication, obscuring, yet evolved fromthe duality of the consciousness for their enjoyment. In fear they would vomit hot bloodwere they to see the fruits of their actions and pleasures. Thus believing in widelydifferent doctrines, they are of the dual principle, necessary parasites on each other. Likedrugs and the surgeon's knife, they only annul or at best remove an effect. They do notchange or remove the fundamental cause (the law). "Oh, God, thou art the stagnantenvironment." All is quackery: these religions whose very existence depend on theirfailure, are so full of misery and confusion, have only multiplied arguments, as full ofargument as they are evil, so crowded with non-essentials, being so barren of any freepleasure in this life or another, I cannot uphold their doctrines. Their criterion forenjoyment-death! Better it were a man renounce them all, and embrace his owninvincible purpose. He cannot go further, and this is his only release. By it he may put hispleasure where he will, and find satisfaction.1112

The Consumer of ReligionKia, in its Transcendental and Conceivable Manifestation.Of name it has no name, to designate. I call it Kia I dare not claim it as myself. The Kiawhich can be expressed by conceivable ideas, is not the eternal Kia, which burns up allbelief but is the archetype of "self," the slavery of mortality. Endeavouring to describe"it," I write what may be but not usually-called the "book of lies". 3 The unorthodox ofthe originable-a volant "sight," that conveys somehow by the incidental, that truth issomewhere. The Kia which can be vaguely expressed in words is the "Neither-Neither,"the unmodified "I" in the sensation of omnipresence, the illumination symbolicallytranscribed in the sacred alphabet, and of which I am about to write. Its emanation is itsown intensity, but not necessariness, it has and ever will exist, the virgin quantum-by itsexuberance we have gained existence. Who dare say where, why and how it is related?By the labour of time the doubter inhabits his limit. Not related to, but permitting allthings, it eludes conception, yet is the quintessence of conception as permeating pleasurein meaning. Anterior to Heaven and Earth, in its aspect that transcends these, but notintelligence, it may be regarded as the primordial sexual principle, the idea of pleasure inself-love. Only he who has attained the death posture can apprehend this new sexuality,and its almighty love satisfied. He that is ever servile to belief, clogged by desire, isidentified with such and can see but its infinite ramifications in dissatisfaction.4 Theprogenitor of itself and all things, but resembling nothing, this sexuality in its earlysimplicity, embodies the everlasting. Time has not changed it, hence I call it new. Thisancestral sex principle, and the idea of self, are one and the same, this sameness itsexaction and infinite possibilities, the early duality, the mystery of mysteries, the Sphinxat the gates of all spirituality. All conceivable ideas begin and end as light in its emotion,the ecstasy which the creation of the idea of self induces. The idea is unity by the formulaof self, its necessary reality as continuity, the question of all things, all this universevisible and invisible has come out of it. As unity conceived duality, it begot trinity, begottetragrammaton. Duality being unity, is time, the complex of conception, the eternalrefluctuation to the primeval reality in freedom-being trinity of dualities, is the six senses,the five facets of sex-projecting as environment for self-assimilation in denial, as acomplete sexuality. Being tetragrammaton of dualities is twelvefold by arrangement, thehuman complex, and may be called the twelve commandments of the believer. Itimagines the eternal decimal, its multiplicity embracing eternity, from which spring themanifold forms, which constitute existence. Vitalized by the breath of self-love, life isconscious of one. Self being its opposing force, is alternately conflict, harmony, life anddeath. These four principles are one and the same-the conception considered as thecomplete "self" or consciousness-hence they may be blended into unity and Symbolized.One form made by two, that is three-fold and having four directions.Of name it has no name, to designate. I call it Kia I dare not claim it as myself. The Kiawhich can be expressed by conceivable ideas, is not the eternal Kia, which burns up allbelief but is the archetype of "self," the slavery of mortality. Endeavouring to describe"it," I write what may be but not usually-called the "book of lies". 3 The unorthodox ofthe originable-a volant "sight," that conveys somehow by the incidental, that truth is1314somewhere. The Kia which can be vaguely expressed in words is the "Neither-Neither,"the unmodified "I" in the sensation of omnipresence, the illumination symbolicallytranscribed in the sacred alphabet, and of which I am about to write. Its emanation is itsown intensity, but not necessariness, it has and ever will exist, the virgin quantum-by itsexuberance we have gained existence. Who dare say where, why and how it is related?By the labour of time the doubter inhabits his limit. Not related to, but permitting allthings, it eludes conception, yet is the quintessence of conception as permeating pleasurein meaning. Anterior to Heaven and Earth, in its aspect that transcends these, but notintelligence, it may be regarded as the primordial sexual principle, the idea of pleasure inself-love. Only he who has attained the death posture can apprehend this new sexuality,and its almighty love satisfied. He that is ever servile to belief, clogged by desire, isidentified with such and can see but its infinite ramifications in dissatisfaction.4 Theprogenitor of itself and all things, but resembling nothing, this sexuality in its earlysimplicity

Introduction to The Book of Pleasure By Kenneth Grant First published in The Book of Pleasure, 1975 Austin Osman Spare was born at Snowhill, London, in 1886. Apart from William Blake, John Martin, Aubrey Beardsley, Sidney Sime, and a mere handful of others, England has produced no artist to