Safety And Asset Management (data) A Natural Symbiosis

Transcription

Safety and Asset Management (data):A Natural SymbiosisHeather Rothenberg, PhD FHWA Office of SafetyConference on Transportation Asset ManagementSan Diego, CAApril 2012

We 3 data.So we all want more!

More data is always good.Right?

If we can’t afford to maintain the data, isit worth collecting at all?Attendee at GIS Peer Exchange, 2011

Share data.Leverage limited resources.

FHWA Office of Safety Data ProgramsRoadway Safety Data Program (RSDP): CapabilitiesAssessmentsModel Inventory Roadway ElementsValue of Investment in Data

Model Inventory Roadway Elements(MIRE)andMIRE Management Information Systems (MIRE-MIS)

MIRE: What and Why? Listing of roadway and traffic elements critical tosafety management Provides data dictionary – definition, attributes,etc. Enable user to merge roadway and traffic datawith crash data to enhance data analysiscapabilities.www.mireinfo.org

Data Element Example129. Intersecting AngleDefinition: The measurement indegrees of the smallest anglebetween any two legs of theintersection. This value willalways be within a range of 0 to90 degrees.Attributes: DegreesPriority: CriticalHPMS/Tool Requirements:HSM/IHSDM (Required)

Supplemental Data Sets Roadside fixed objectsSignsSpeed dataAutomated enforcement devicesLand use elements related to safetyBridge descriptorsRailroad grade-crossing descriptorsSafety improvements

MIRE-MIS Data management systemMechanisms for data collectionProcess for data handling and storageLinkage among filesPerformance metrics Lead Agency ProgramDetermine feasibility of collecting MIRE data,developing MIS (NH, WA)

Roadway Safety Data Partnership:Capabilities Assessment

RSDP: Capabilities AssessmentTexas has n Analysis Management Expandability

RSDP: Capabilities Assessment Assess all States Capability maturity model levels– Current State-identified desired Develop Action Plan FrameworkLevel 1CapabilityInitial /Ad-hocLevel 2RepeatableLevel 3Level 4Level 5DefinedManagedOptimizing

RSDP Capabilities AssessmentMidpoint Report Findings: Organizational structures impede data integrationIncludes challenges with decentralized systems Data management is difficultNo platform for discussing across DOTNeed better communication with IT Interest on improved data integration for localroad data

Benefits of investing in Datafor Data Driven Safety Programs

Benefits of Investing in Data for DataDriven Safety ProgramsPrinciples oftransportationeconomicsFHWA MarketAnalysisDetailed literaturereviewDiscussions withStatesDevelopmethodologiesthat can beapplied todetermine thebenefits ofinvesting in data

Questions?heather.rothenberg2@dot.gov

A Natural Symbiosis Heather Rothenberg, PhD FHWA Office of Safety . We 3 data. So we all want more! More data is always good. Right? If we can’t afford to maintain the data, is it worth collecting at all? Attendee at GIS Peer Exchange, 2011 . . Ad-hoc Repeatable