WIXLIB

E/ESCAP/FSD(3)/4and respect for policy space and priorities while remaining consistent withrelevant international rules and commitments, and creating no additionalreporting requirements for Governments;(c) Member States are expected to identify priority areas ofcooperation and implementation of the 2030 Agenda for SustainableDevelopment in Asia and the Pacific, with particular emphasis on the practicalmeans of implementation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals;(d) Member States noted the support by the secretariat, within itsexisting resources and mandates, to:(i) Facilitate discussions among member States in the lead-up to itssession in 2017, by leveraging the conference structure of ESCAP andmaking full use of planned meetings for 2016 and 2017, including theseventh Ministerial Conference on Environment and Development inAsia and the Pacific, as well as expert group meetings and otherexisting meetings and activities planned under the Commission’sprogramme of work for 2016-2017;(ii) Promote multi-stakeholder engagement by facilitating inputsand views from various stakeholders as appropriate;(iii) Mobilize support from, among other sources, the agencies,funds and programmes of the United Nations by leveraging the AsiaPacific Regional Coordination Mechanism;(iv) Undertake a needs assessment and gap analysis.B.Timeline and milestones(a) Member States intend to continue consultations to definepriority areas, based on the following tentative timeline, which should beconsistent and synergetic with the global debate on implementation of the2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development:2016-2017: stocktaking A needs assessment and gap analysis will be conducted by thesecretariat in consultation with member States where necessary.2018-2030: implementation The areas of cooperation that have been identified will beimplemented;(b) Member States may continue consultations and discussionsregarding any possible specific areas for cooperation for implementation ofthe road map, as appropriate;(c) Member States may revise the above timeline and set of milestonesas appropriate at any given time as part of the process of assessment andupdate of the road map.17.The Forum concluded that the present report, including its annex,should be brought to the attention of the Commission at its seventy-secondsession, to be held from 15 to 19 May 2016, and to the global dialogues onsustainable development, including in particular, the fourth session of thehigh-level political forum convening under the auspices of the Economic andSocial Council from 11 to 15 July 2016 at United Nations Headquarters withthe theme “Ensuring that no one is left behind”.B16-003925

E/ESCAP/FSD(3)/4AnnexChair’s summary of discussions at the Asia-Pacific Forum onSustainable Development 20161.The third session of the Asia-Pacific Forum on SustainableDevelopment was the first regional meeting held after the adoption of the2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in September 2015, both in theAsia-Pacific region and the other regions, and has contributed to shaping theregional response to the 2030 Agenda. During the three-day meeting,participants discussed priorities for implementing the 2030 Agenda in Asiaand the Pacific. The Forum addressed the topic of social vulnerabilities andhighlighted the importance of data and the need for systematic analysis of theSustainable Development Goals. It addressed how science, technology andinnovation can be used to integrate the three dimensions of sustainabledevelopment, as well as the significance of building inclusive, safe, resilientand sustainable cities in the region. As mandated by the second session of theForum, proposals regarding the form, function and modalities of the Forumwere presented; member States made recommendations in that regard. Theprocess to develop a regional road map was initiated and the foundations of aroad map have been identified.I.Session 1. Regional priorities for implementation: overview2.In session 1, participants initiated a regional dialogue on priorities forimplementing the 2030 Agenda in Asia and the Pacific and presented apreliminary assessment of the status of implementation of the SustainableDevelopment Goals. Participants explored regional megatrends impacting theneeds and abilities of individual countries, as well as their developmentoutcomes, and highlighted priorities for regional action to support nationalGovernments.3.The session was chaired by Mr. Yuba Raj Khatiwada, Vice-Chair,National Planning Commission, Nepal, and moderated by Mr. Jonas Leones,Undersecretary for Environment and International Environmental Affairs,Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Philippines. Panellists inthe session included Mr. Battsereg Namdag, Minister of Environment, GreenDevelopment and Tourism, Mongolia; Mr. Gamini Jayawickrama Perera,Minister of Sustainable Development and Wildlife, Sri Lanka;Mr. Constâncio da Conceição Pinto, Minister of Commerce, Industry andEnvironment, Timor-Leste; Mr. Ilyosiddin Kamolitdinov, Deputy Minister ofEconomy, Tajikistan; and Mr. Saber Hossain Chowdhury, Member ofParliament and President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.4.Following the introduction to the session by the Chair, the ExecutiveSecretary opened the session by reflecting on megatrends affecting the regionand outlining priority areas for the secretariat’s support to member States toensure that the region shifted to the implementation of the SustainableDevelopment Goals in the shortest possible time frame.5.The moderator further highlighted economic, social andenvironmental megatrends in the Philippines. While challenging, he notedthat such trends also provided opportunities, including through thereformulation of policies and the forging of new partnerships. Panellistsreflected on regional megatrends and also identified national- andsubnational-specific trends, including vulnerability to natural disasters,isolation from markets, clean energy, food security and youthful populations.Speakers highlighted the need for immediate national responses based on6B16-00392

E/ESCAP/FSD(3)/4national ownership and policy coherence with the 2030 Agenda, whileunderlining that the tasks ahead in implementing the SustainableDevelopment Goals would need strengthened regional cooperation andgreater capacity development, technical assistance and financial support.6.Member States highlighted current challenges to the realization ofsustainable development as well as the need to move away from theinefficient use of natural resources and address environmental degradation; toeffectively harness economic growth to eradicate poverty; to invest in socialpolicy, especially through comprehensive social protection policies, with afocus on youth; to address gaps in finance and capacity; to ensure access towater, food, education and energy for all; and to address the threats posed byclimate change and natural disasters. It was recognized that a regional,concerted and effective response should be made to ensure that no one wasleft behind in the implementation of the sustainable development agenda.While the 2030 Agenda was noted as ambitious, delegations highlighted thatit also provided an opportunity to shift away from “business as usual” and tomore effectively address the complex and multisectoral challenges. Moreholistic approaches that integrated the social, economic and environmentaldimensions of sustainable development were seen as indispensable to theachievement of the 2030 Agenda.7.Member States noted that the 2030 Agenda was complementary tonational priorities and visions, though its scope meant that some countrieswould need to prioritize in certain areas. Member States further sharedinitiatives already in place or being developed to support implementation ofthe 2030 Agenda. Some member States had adopted the SustainableDevelopment Goals as part of national development plans and incorporated theminto national legislation. National institutional set-ups were being established,including those led by Heads of State, as well as by national secretariats, whileengaging subnational governments and civil society. The 2030 Agenda was seenas highly compatible with national development philosophies and goals, butparticipants noted that more needed to be done to link the SustainableDevelopment Goals with specific programmes and strategies.8.Member States emphasized that regional processes should be alignedwith national and global priorities and commitments defined at the high-levelpolitical forum on sustainable development, should be voluntary and locallydefined, and should be clearly focused on socioeconomic issues as well asimplementation. While there were specific national priorities and reviewmodalities to be respected, regional cooperation was considered as essentialfor addressing national country priorities. Regional mechanisms couldsupport implementation through capacity development, financing,strengthening capacity in statistics and data through advisory services,training and technical assistance, South-South exchange and strengtheningeconomic cooperation.9.Civil society organizations called for regional action to ensure thatmember States’ commitments to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda andthe Sustainable Development Goals would be realized, including adherenceto human rights, ensuring social protection, providing universal access tohealth and education, shifting to sustainable agriculture to end hunger, endingall forms of marginalization and discrimination, and institutionalizedparticipation based on the principles set at the high-level political forum onsustainable development.B16-003927

E/ESCAP/FSD(3)/4II.Session 2. Regional priorities for implementation: statistics andmainstreaming of the Sustainable Development Goals to address vulnerability10.This session focused on social vulnerabilities faced by the region andthe role of integrated analysis to identify priorities in implementing theSustainable Development Goals in national contexts, as well as theimportance of high-quality disaggregated data and statistics to supportrigorous and evidence-based follow-up and review.11.The session was chaired by Mr. Ahsan Iqbal, Minister of Planning,Development and Reform, Pakistan, who also moderated a panel discussionconsisting of Mr. Yuba Raj Khatiwada, Vice-Chair, National PlanningCommission, Nepal; Mr. Emmanuel F. Esguerra, Secretary, SocioeconomicPlanning, Philippines; Mr. Sonam Wangchuk, Secretary, Gross NationalHappiness Commission, Bhutan; Mr. Sefuiva Reupena Muagututia,Government Statistician, Samoa Bureau of Statistics, Samoa; Mr. PanmaoZhai, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, working group 1Co-Chair; Mr. Santosh Mehrotra, Professor of Economics, Centre forInformal Sector and Labour Studies, School of Social Sciences, JawaharlalNehru University, India.12.The Forum emphasized that the successful implementation of theSustainable Development Goals should not result in islands of prosperity andislands of poverty, but should rather bridge various communities byaddressing vulnerabilities. Vulnerable groups included women, indigenouspeoples, older persons, persons with disabilities, migrants, agriculturalworkers, youth and informal sector workers, as they are without socialprotection. It was noted that developing countries in Asia and the Pacific, inparticular least developed countries and small island developing States, werealso vulnerable to the impact of climate change and natural disasters, such assea level rise, cyclones, landslides, flooding and drought. In this regard, thepanel called for a holistic approach to sustainable development that addressedthe Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 and the ParisAgreement. In this connection, the Forum recommended that a regional roadmap for implementing the 2030 Agenda must address these vulnerabilities.13.The Forum highlighted the need to adapt the global SustainableDevelopment Goal indicators to the specific conditions of each country andthat national and regional review processes could help to focus policies toallocate resources and identify areas where assistance was needed. TheForum noted that review processes should complement existing processesand that outcomes of regional and national reviews could provide feedbackand support advocacy for the political commitment to achieve the Goals, aswell as provide an opportunity for learning and sharing of best practices.14.The Forum noted the importance of high-quality, timely, accessible,reliable, relevant data and statistics disaggregated by income, sex, age, race,ethnicity, migration status, disability and geographical location and othercharacteristics relevant to national context. The Forum highlighted that datawas needed for evidence-based interventions. In particular, a statisticalframework that captured vulnerabilities was needed to direct resourcestowards addressing inequalities.15.Recognizing the gaps in data availability, the quality required for theimplementation of the Sustainable Development Goals and the constraints innational statistical capacity, the Forum highlighted that a data revolution andtransformative action, as well as a revision of data ecosystems and strongpartnerships with development partners, were needed to respond to the need8B16-00392

E/ESCAP/FSD(3)/4for data. In this connection, the Forum commended the leadership of theCommittee on Statistics in enhancing capacity-building support to increasethe availability of high-quality, timely, reliable data.16.The Forum expressed support for developing multi-stakeholderplatforms to enhance participation and accountability in the monitoring andreview of progress. It further highlighted the need for supporting regionalknowledge exchange for follow-up and review.17.Civil society highlighted the need for the regional road map toincorporate indicators and disaggregation of the data most relevant to theregion and emphasized the need for targeted and sustained action plans withallocated budgets, including data collection, analysis and reporting, to ensurethe effective participation of marginalized groups in the implementation ofthe Sustainable Development Goals.III. Session 3. Regional road map for implementing the 2030 Agendafor Sustainable Development and the form and function of the AsiaPacific Forum on Sustainable Development18.The second session of the Forum requested that the third session ofthe Forum, in 2016, initiate and define a regional roadmap and decide on theform, function and modalities of the Forum by means of an intergovernmentalconsultative process. Session 3 of the Forum discussed proposals in this regard.19.The session was chaired by Mr. Constâncio da Conceição Pinto,Minister of Commerce, Industry and Environment, Timor-Leste. Mr. JonasLeones, Undersecretary for Environment and International EnvironmentalAffairs, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Philippines,reported as Chair of the preparatory meeting of senior officials on theregional road map for implementing the 2030 Agenda in Asia and the Pacificand the form and function of the Asia-Pacific Forum for SustainableDevelopment, which was held on 2 April 2016. The preparatory meeting wasattended by representatives of 28 ESCAP member States, one non-memberState and representatives of civil society. The Chair reflected on the supportfor the Forum expressed at the preparatory meeting and shared an overviewof the areas in which there had been a convergence of views with respect tothe form and function of the Forum and the regional road map.20.Statements by Governments acknowledged that while many decisionshad yet to be taken at the global level, there was strong support for the Forumas a regional platform to facilitate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda forSustainable Development. Recognizing that there was a need for morediscussion, the Forum convened an informal working group. The workinggroup developed two documents, one on the form, function and modalities ofthe Forum and the other on a regional road map.21.Following further review in the plenary, the first document on theform and function of the Forum, as an annual intergovernmental forum,received the support of participants. The second document constituted thefoundation of a road map, on which further consultations towards itsfinalization have been requested. The conclusions of the working groupaddressed many of the shared aspirations for the Forum and for the regionalroad map, as reflected in many of the statements by member States and bycivil society organizations. Those statements also provided many suggestionsfor further discussion and follow-up on the organization of future sessions ofthe Forum. It was noted that the Forum should be a part of the ESCAPconference structure.B16-003929

E/ESCAP/FSD(3)/422.It was proposed that following the third session of the Forum, aworking committee/task group be established together with a process andclear provisions for defining the key priorities and pathways, stakeholderconsultations and timelines for negotiations and agreements. Such acommittee/task group should work towards building a regional sustainabledevelopment road map coherent with national sustainable developmentchallenges, needs and aspirations and generate collective ownership andinspire partnerships for implementation.23.Follow-up and review was also addressed through many statements.The role of the Forum and ESCAP in bringing the regional perspective to theglobal discussion was underlined. The work of the Secretariat of the PacificCommunity to develop a draft set of Pacific regional headline indicators wasnoted. Other organizations, such as the South Asia Cooperative EnvironmentProgramme, offered support for developing baseline data and other supportrelevant to follow-up and review, as well as the wider implementation of theagenda. The principle of common but differentiated responsibility in regionalcooperation in relation to the 2030 Agenda was emphasized by some memberStates.24.Governments shared their preparation and implementation efforts,both under existing efforts and future plans, and in relation to support to othercountries. Those efforts included new institutions, including the first Ministryof Sustainable Development and Wildlife in Sri Lanka, a youth-focusednational consultation in Azerbaijan and the incorporation of the SustainableDevelopment Goals into national development planning frameworks inseveral countries. Subregional organizations and United Nations entities alsodescribed the extensive support that was available to member States.25.Civil society organizations called for involvement both in the Forum –as a multi-stakeholder, inclusive space for engagement, respecting thecommitments made by the General Assembly in its resolution 67/290 on theformat and organizational aspects of the high-level political forum onsustainable development – and in the development and implementation of anambitious regional road map. A time-bound and expeditious process ofdevelopment and a Forum that created regional coherence was urged. Inaddition, a focus on new and emerging issues, particularly those requiringregional cooperation, was underlined as being of particular value. Privatesector representatives proposed that the Forum should reflect good practicesin public-private partnership to inform regional norms, standards andpolicies.26.Before the adoption of the draft report, one member State expressedconcerns over possible financial implications and the last minute explanationprovided in that regard. The member State pointed out that additionalresource requirements can and should be managed within the resourcesavailable for the biennium 2016-2017 and reserved the right to express itsviews in the future.27.The secretariat c

agreement in the General Assembly and will be further discussed; (b) The Forum may be convened annually as an inclusive intergovernmental forum preparatory to the high-level political forum and the theme of the Forum should be consistent with that of the high-level political forum; (c) The current format, including the election of the bureau .