Transcription
Organizational Structure& SWOT AnalysisARP 813Summer 2010Glyn Bongolan
PalomarCollegeGovernanceStructure
History of an idea/problem fromconception to solution/decision/action
SWOT ANALYSISStrengthsCurrent strengthsAdditional strengths Diversity of services and students Comprehensive programs Competence of faculty andstaff/accreditation SLO technologyonline Focus on Students Diversity of class offerings (time,method of delivery, fast track) EAP – Early Acceptance Program Proximity to CSUSM Strong strategic planning Web site New buildings Escondido Teaching and LearningCenter (TLC) Number of satellite locations
SWOT ANALYSISWeaknessesCurrent weaknessesAdditional weaknesses Retention Engagement Student preparedness Staffing and growing/aging of staff Addressing relationship of cc withstudent Paradigm of hand-holding Lack of engaging teachingstrategies Lack of student-faculty interactionoutside of class Challenge in changing culture ofcampus to initiate interaction withstudents Lack of workshops and fairs forstudents Cut back of class sections Student access Faculty /staff diversity Diversity training College attitude of blaming thestudent
SWOT ANALYSISOpportunitiesCurrent opportunitiesAdditional opportunities Technology when usedappropriately/effectively Local K-12 and universitypartnerships Interested in faculty to facultyinteraction Budget and accreditation requiresus to think and do things differently Growth Putting better technology in theclassrooms Restructuring opportunity duringbudget crises Partnering with local companies,business, City of San Marcos, Cityof Escondido. Strengthen service learningopportunities Community building andcommunity volunteering More grant writing To do more with military, veterans,Camp Pendleton
SWOT ANALYSISThreatsCurrent threatsAdditional threats Accreditation Transfer constriction State and federal economy Middle class squeeze Proprietary university competition Competition of online programs Larger Generation Y influx tocampus State legislation (50%, 2/3 vote,etc.)
OPPORTUNITY OR THREATIncrease StudentEngagementIncreasepositive studentoutcomesIncrease studentfaculty interactionin and out ofclass.
INTERVENTIONLower levels ofengagement Collaborative learning:3.7 below average Student-faculty interact.:3.9 below averageBSI/HSI Grants FYE learningcommunities Little support forcollaborative ideas &syllabiLearningCommunities-Puente-STEMLaird & Cruce, 2010For many students and faculty,viewing the classroom in this waymay represent a radicalshift in thought and practice that willrequire substantial support frompeers and colleagues as well aschanges in campus practices andpolicies.Goals and missions Our mission is to providean engaging teaching andlearning environment forstudents of diverseorigins, experiences,needs, abilities, and goals
ASSESSMENT OF GOALSObjective 1HowMeasurementChange the way facultymembers interact withstudents.Professional developmenton how they interact;Change the amount oftime they interact.Pre and post assessments.Objective 2HowMeasurementProvide faculty withadditional resources inteaching, collaborationand interaction.Hook up with Puente;attend Puenteconferences; attend OnCourse; prov ide incentiveOpen endedquestionnaire asking, “Didyou learn anything new?”Objective 3HowMeasurementIncrease use of tutors,counselors, and mentors.Incorporate embeddedtutors and counselors.Initiate mentor program.Track number of time ofcontact before and afterintervention.
QUESTIONS?
Organizational Structure & SWOT Analysis ARP 813 Summer 2010 Glyn Bongolan. Palomar College Governance Structure. History of an idea/problem from conception to
