Transcription
BSN Systematic Evaluation PlanStandard IV-A. A systematic evaluation plan is used to determine program effectivenessPlanningGoalFrequencyEvidence of Goal AchievementElaboration: The program uses a systematic process to obtain relevant AnnuallyContinuous use of SEP for programmatic improvement.data to determine program effectiveness. The process is written, ongoing,and exists to determine achievement of program outcomes.Implementation and EvaluationResults of DataAction PlanUNDEvaluationMeetingMinutesDateAlthough data has been collected on an ongoing basis, this is the firstyear (2015-2016) of a formal SEP review. The evaluation of thisoutcome will be ongoing.Pending data – Planned distribution of tools 5/2016.Student Evaluation of Clinical Experience BSN.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Student Evaluation ofClinical Experience--BSN--Approved 2-1-16--UND.docx11/30/15 evalteam minutes.\20152016\Minutes andattachments\November 30 2015minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes 11 3015.docxEval team minutes4/25/16.\20152016\Minutes andattachments\April252016\EvaluationTeam minutesApril 25 2016.docxOngoing review of dataAction Plan: Redesign following evaluation tools1.2.3.4.Graduate satisfaction survey tool for 6 and 12 months aftergraduation (qualitative and quantitative)Employer satisfaction survey at 6 and 12 months aftergraduation—both qualitative and quantitativeEvaluation of students and faculty by clinical site representativesEvaluation of clinical sites by students related to programoutcomesTool: Evaluation of clinical sites by students - Approved by UNDmeeting. Distribution by course coordinators to be dispersed 5/2016.
Pending data – Continuing revision of tools.Evaluation of student and faculty by clinical sites tools approved.Eval team minutes Continue on revising survey tool with recommended plan to go to UND in4/25/16May.Final approval of.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Staff nurse Evaluation of tools UNDFaculty--Undergrad Final 8-1-2016.docxFinal approval of tool via e-mail vote.8/10/2016.\.\UndergraduAction plan: Need to identify how distributed and where noted.ateNursing\Approv.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Staff nurse evaluation of edMinutes\8.10.2student--Undergrad--Final 8-1-2016.docx016meeting.docxUndergraduate Nursing approved the following revised tool.9/22/16 Eval team Tool approved. Beginning Dec. 2016 Program Coordinators will send outminutesProgram Completion survey & 1 year graduate Survey each Dec. and1 Year Graduate Nursing Survey approvedMay.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\1 Year Graduate Nurse.\2016Survey COMBINED.doc2017\Minutes andattachments\EvaluProgram Completion Survey approved.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\ASN Program Completion ation Teamminutes Sept 22Survey.docx2016.docxminutes note follow-up questions and answers per Amy Townsendregarding evaluations process. Discussion noted in minutes10/27/16.\20162017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Oct 272016.docxContinue to monitor
Discussion regarding how to improve survey response rate.12/1/2016 Evalteam minutesContinue to collect and tabulate data.Recommendations for program completion survey:.\2016Fall 2016 Clinical site evaluations from staff to evaluate faculty and2017\Minutes andstudents distributed with 20 returned already. Data to be tabulated and attachments\Evalupresented in future meeting.ation Team1.2.minutes Dec 12016.docxContinuing to review eval tools, reviewing SEP and discussion on howto enter data into the SEP for tracking.1/30/2017 EvalteamHave capstone/final professor collect this data or facilitatesurvey completion.Encourage capstone/final professor to give “heads up” tostudents that surveys are coming.Continue to review, refine and monitorAction Plan:.\20162017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Jan 302017.docxWith review of the new SEP program outcomes, it was identified that 2/6/2017 UND one item for evidence of goal achievement is to be tied to the newminutes Learning Management System (LMS). Full utilization of the LMS is not.\.\Undergraduatyet implemented and program outcome data not available. Discussionin UND meeting regarding plan and process of how to measure program eNursing\Approvedoutcomes with attaching course assignment in CANVAS (LMS).Minutes\2.6.17Meetingminutes.docx1.Chair and Program Coordinators will clarify and communicateprocess of distribution and dates surveys are sent out.Action Plan: For transitioning data collection with old curriculumplan prior to new curriculum implementation.Summary from UND 2/6/2017: Support courses—Must have at least one assignment that tiesto program outcomes. If no other assignment is applicable, usethe final exam. ON the final exam, label each questionaccording to the appropriate program outcome that it measures(i.e. decision making, discovery, etc.,). Then, on the itemanalysis, for whatever outcome you are measuring, add thepercentages that got it correct for every question that measuresthat outcome and then divide by the “n”. Use this as thepercentage able to .whatever outcome you aremeasuring. Support courses should address at least 2 of theprogram outcomes and should let the curriculum team knowwhich outcomes your course is measuring so they can be surethat all outcomes are being addressed. Major clinical courses—Each course should have at least 3-4tools/assignments that tie to program outcomes. These caninclude the final exam if desired although that is not arequirement. Again, each course coordinator should let thecurriculum team know which outcomes they are measuring intheir course.
Summary from UND 2/6/2017 Continued: Amy Townsend will pull all data off of Canvas at the end of eachsemester as requested. The above should be implemented Spring 2017 semester with atleast one item for support courses and at least 2 for majorclinical courses with all assessments to be fully implemented byfall.3/2017 Review of data from 2016 revised tool “Student Evaluation ofClinical Site Experience”First implemented Fall 2016 shows a couple of the items do not linkback to the program competencies that the student should be able toachieve.Eval team e-mail vote to forward recommendation to 4/3/17 UGNmeeting to revise tool.4/2017 Follow up on Process of communication and distribution ofsurveys.Document made by Program Chair and Coordinators for:“Creating and sending surveys 101 for Cox College ProgramCoordinators”4/2017 UNDminutes link.\20162017\Minutes and BSN Revised Student Evaluation of Clinical Experience tool approvedattachments\Evalu 4/2/2017.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Student Evaluationation Teamof Clinical Experience--BSN--Approved 4 2 2017.docxminutes April 102017.docx4/2017 Eval minItems in Red font are Evaluation team outstanding Agenda itemsto roll into the Fall 2017 Semester.Also includes: Faculty Evaluation of clinical sites/experiences Course Evaluation by Students Possible identification of additional itemsAction – implement attached plan.\2016“Creating and sending surveys 101 for Cox College Program2017\Minutes and Coordinators”attachments\Eval.\.\.\Program Coordinators\Creating and Sending Surveys101 for Cox College Program Coordinators.docxuation Teamminutes April 102017.docx4/2017 – Outstanding times to roll into Fall 2017 Semester4/2/17 Recommendation to UND for revision to the “Student Evaluationof Clinical Site Experience” tool to make verbiage more congruent withprogram competencies.
Fall 2017 Faculty Evaluation of clinical sites/experiencesAction – Implementation of online link for Nurse Managers and staff toevaluate Nursing Faculty and students.
Standard IV-B. Program completion rates demonstrate program effectiveness.PlanningGoalFrequencyElaboration: The completion rate for each of the three most recentAnnuallycalendar years is provided. The program specifies the entry point anddefines the time period to completion. The program describes the formulait uses to calculate the completion rate. The completion rate for the mostrecent calendar year is 70% or higher. The completion rate for the mostrecent calendar year is 70% or higher. However, if the completion rate forthe most recent calendar year is less than 70%, (1) the completion rate is70% or higher when the annual completion rates for the three most recentcalendar years are averaged or (2) the completion rate is 70% or higherwhen excluding students who have identified factors such as familyobligations, relocation, financial barriers, and decisions to change majoror to transfer to another institution of higher education.Results of DataEvidence of Goal AchievementAnnual program completion rates documented at 70% or higher.2/6/2017 UND approved revised:Goal of 70% graduate within 150% of the program length and with aTarget of 85% of graduates compete within 150% of program length.Implementation and EvaluationUND EvaluationMeeting MinutesAction PlanDateGoal AchievedProgram completion (graduation) rate\BSN Program completion(graduation rate)\BSN Graduation Rates graduation years 2012 to2015.pptx1/30/17 Eval team Goal for BSN Pre-licensure program met – Continue to monitorminutesRecommend to Undergraduate Nursing Department1. Standardize definition of student status for data collection as:.\2016(1) On track on time percentage - based upon the student developing2017\Minutes andan entry plan of study with their advisor and completing this plan ofattachments\Evalustudy on time with the initial program track cohort.ation Team(2) Delayed graduation (graduation completed within 150% ofminutes Jan 30program length) includes students that deviated from their plan of2017.docxstudy such as slowed progression, LOA, etc.(3) Withdrawal status includes students that did not complete theprogram due to family obligations, relocation, financial barriers orchange in track or major.(4) Dismissed students unable to complete program due to academicor disciplinary issues.2. Continue with Goal of 70% and add a Target of 85% within 150%of program length
Analysis of data of pre-licensure tracks BSN program Goal of 70% - Achieved for BSN program with combinedtracks Target of 85% - Achieved for BSN program with combinedtracks. Combined Dismissal rates have not exceeded 13%.Cox College BSN program graduation rates are consistent with MSBNgraduation rate for BSN programs in Missouri @89% for 2014.The dismissal rate 2012-2015 ranged from 0%-20% for all tracks in theBSN program.BSN-A track continues to maintain a higher graduation rate than theother BSN tracks.1/30/17 Eval teamminutes2/6/2017 UND Approval of Eval team recommendations.2/6/2017 UNDmeeting minutes1.2.Standardize definition of student status for data collection withcategories of: 1. On track/On time, 2. Delayed graduation, 3.Withdrawal, 4. Dismissed.Continue with Goal of 70% and add a Target of 85% within 150%of program length2/27/2017 RN-BSN Program completion rate data analysis.Recommendations forwarded to UND 2/6/2017 meeting for approval.\20162017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Jan 302017.docxNo further action. Continue to 6.17Meetingminutes.docx2/27/17 Eval team Action plan;minutesAwaiting final re-tabulation of RN-BSN data.Upon request of program completion data for the RN-BSN track fromthe RN-BSN coordinator found that data it was collected differently than .\2016outlined with the revised goal for 2/6/2017.2017\Minutes andattachments\EvaluData for the BSN completion program was done but tabulated ation Teamjust program completion not the 150% of program completion minutes Feb 27and using the data collection categories identified 1/2017. This 2017.docxdata is being re-tabulated to compare with the pre-licensuredata.
10/23/17 RN-BSN tabulation finalized and presented to eval team.Summary – Goal met for last 5 years and Target also met with 3%student dismissals.11/27/17 – Review of BSN program graduation rate through 2016.10/23/17 Evalteam meetingAction Plan:11/27/17 Evalteam meeting11/27/2017 - No ActionData will be combined with other BSN tracks for a BSN programgraduation rate summary for the SEP.\20172018\Report toUGN\Teamsummary report for10 2017 UNDMeeting.docx.\2017-2018\Minutesand Attachments\Nov27 2017\EvaluationTeam minutesNovember 27 2017UPDATED.docx12/4/17 UNDmeeting .4.17MeetingMinutes.docxRecommendation - Continue to monitor1. Continue with standardized definitions Standardize definition of student status for data collection as:1. On track on time percentage - based upon the studentdeveloping an entry plan of study with their advisor andcompleting this plan of study on time with the initialprogram track cohort.2. Delayed graduation (graduation completed with 150%of program length) includes students that deviated fromtheir plan of study such as slowed progression, LOA,etc.3. Withdrawal status includes students that did notcomplete the program due to family obligations,relocation, financial barriers or change in track or major,etc.4. Dismissed students unable to complete program due toacademic or disciplinary issues.2. Continue with Goal as 70% and Target of 85%
Cont. 11/27/17 – Review of BSN program graduation rateAnalysis: Goal of 70% - Achieved for BSN program with combinedtracks and by individual tracks Recommendation last AY was to add a Target of 85%– Target of 85% Achieved for BSN program withcombined tracks and individual tracks.– Combined Dismissal rates from 2013 to 2017 (2017data IP) have declined ranging from 9 to 5%. Cox College BSN program overall graduation rates areconsistent with/or higher than MSBN graduation rate for BSNprograms in Missouri.Copy of graduation rate presentation located on H:drive.Program completion (graduation) rate\BSN Program completion(graduation rate)\BSN Graduation Rates graduation years 2013 to2017.pptx3/26/18 – Preliminary report for Chief Nurse Administrator indicatingNCLEX first time pass rate is met. A few student results still pending butwith students that have passed the goal is met.
Standard IV-C. Licensure and certification pass rates demonstrate program effectiveness.PlanningGoalFrequencyElaboration: The NCLEX-RN pass rate for each campus/site and track isAnnually80% or higher for first-time takers for the most recent calendar year.However, if the NCLEX-RN pass rate for any campus/site and track isless than 80% for first-time takers for the most recent calendar year, (1)the pass rate for that campus/site or track is 80% or higher for all takers(first-time and repeat) for the most recent calendar year, (2) the pass ratefor that campus/site or track is 80% or higher for first-time takers whenthe annual pass rates for the three most recent calendar years are averaged,or (3) the pass rate for that campus/site or track is 80% or higher for alltakers (first-time and repeat) when the annual pass rates for the three mostrecent calendar years are averaged.Results of DataEvidence of Goal AchievementAnnual pass rates for Springfield BSNE/BSNA and Cabool BSNE greaterthan 80%.Implementation and Evaluation2015 NCLEX first time pass rate of 91.14%See included documents; PDFs with exact numbers and detailed data.National mean is below 90% and Cox College rates are above 90% for2015BSN NCLEX Pass Rates\Criterion 6.4 2015 Q4 Report1 FirstTimeMB-EdResults USA NCLEXRN JAN 2016.pdfBSN NCLEX Pass Rates\Criterion 6.4 2015 Q4 Report4 ResultsByEdProgNCLEX-RN Missouri Board ofNursing JAN 2016.pdfUNDEvaluationMeetingMinutesEval team minutes No action required.and attachments2/29/16.\20152016\Minutes andattachments\February 29 2016Action Plan
2016 NCLEX first time pass rate of 79.57%See included documents; PDFs with exact numbers and detailed datafor both ASN and BSN.State to State comparison ASN/BSN dataASN NCLEX Pass Rates\2016 Q4 Report1 FirstTimeMBEdResults USA NCLEX-RN RollingQtr JAN 2017.pdf.pdfMissouri ASN/BSN data program comparisonASN NCLEX Pass Rates\2016 Q4 Report4 ResultsByEdProgNCLEXRN RollingQtr Missouri Board of Nursing JAN 2017.pdf.pdfTrended data for past 5 years all BSN pre-licensure tracks2012- 91.23%2013- 89.13%2014- 85.37%2015- 91.14%st2016- 79.57% (includes 1 Cabool Cohort)2/27/2017 evalminutes3 Year average goal met - Continue to monitor.Recommendation:.\2016Difficult to get a full assessment for each cohort pass rate.2017\Minutes andattachments\EvaluAction plan:ation Teamminutes Feb 27Dept. Chair is requesting actions and plans by course2017.docxcoordinators for improvement of pass rate.3/2017 MSBN action plan submitted by Amy Townsend.4/3/2017 UNDminutes addhyperlinkContinue with planned curriculum revision and monitorData analysis: Based on CCNE criteria the 3 year average met. This trended data is recorded by calendar year not brokenout but specific graduation semesters or cohorts.o There is increased difficulty with getting specificgraduate outcome results due to limited access tospecific students/cohorts and limited MSBN abilityto share specific graduate results.2017 NCLEX first time pass rate 80.37%3/26/18 EvalSee included documents; PDFs with exact numbers and detailed data minutesfor both ASN and BSN.NCLEX pass rates\2017 NCLEX pass rates ASN BSN\2017State to State comparison ASN BSN NCLEX pass rate data.pdfMissouri ASN/BSN data program comparisonNCLEX pass rates\2017 NCLEX pass rates ASN BSN\2017Missouri ASN BSN data program compairson Q4 Report 4.pdfGoal met: Continue to monitor
Standard IV-D. Employment rates demonstrate program tion: The program demonstrates achievement of requiredoutcomes regarding employment rates. Any program with anemployment rate less than 70% provides a written explanation/analysiswith documentation for the variance.Results of DataEvidence of Goal AchievementAnnual employment rates of greater than 70%Job Placement Graduate Survey – collected last semester at time ofgraduation – 70% employment rateJob Graduation Survey completed December, 2017 with 32 stating a jobat graduation and 4 stating no job at graduation. (89%). Survey doneprior to graduation.Implementation and EvaluationAction PlanUNDEvaluationMeetingMinutesUndergraduate Nursing approved the following revised tool.1 Year Graduate Nursing Survey approved.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\1 Year Graduate NurseSurvey COMBINED.docUGN minutes2/1/2016Tool approved.9/22/16 Eval teamBeginning Dec. 2016 Program Coordinators will send out ProgramminutesCompletion survey & 1 year graduate Survey each Dec. and May.\20162017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Sept 222016.docx
2014 Graduate employment rate: BSN program 71%1/30/2017 Evalteam minutes2014 graduate Goal met.Action plan:This data was collected at graduation time. This is less than past yearsand the majority of graduates not employed gave a reason of moving to .\20161. Working to collect 2015 graduate data.another state and they not applying yet for a job.2017\Minutes and2. Distribute revised tool to collect dataFall 2014 69% of respondents (9/13)attachments\EvaluSpring 2014 72% (36/50 respondents)ation Teamminutes Jan 302017.docxAttempting to collect additional data.Goal achieved based on data from different sources. Tool source notEval team minutes Goal met based on data noted.specified.2/27/2017Recommendation:Data from graduation semester reported at time of graduation. 2012-92%.\2016 Use data from last semester at time of graduation to allow for 2013-83%larger response rate. (Program completion survey) 2014 – 71% (45/63 nursing graduates for 2014) Major reason 2017\Minutes andstated for not having employment was moving out of state.attachments\Evalu Use Program completion survey metric for data collection foration Teamgoal.Data from 1 Year Graduate Survey – graduate response rate low.minutes Feb 27 2014 – 90% (9/10 BSN respondents)2017.docx 2015 - 100% (5 BSN respondents) 2016 – 100% (3 BSN respondents)Employment rates of 1 year graduate survey respondents remainhigh with 90% of respondents’ report working as a RN. 28-64% report employment with CoxHealth, 23-27%with Mercy, 9-68% other sites.
2/26/2018 Analysis of data Prior recommendation was to use data from last semester attime of graduation so, Fall 2017 data based on data fromgraduation survey completed 12/2017. Using Graduationsurvey data resulted in a much higher response rate. (N 85 forall cohorts Fall 2017 prior ranged 1-10 respondents)Data before Fall 2017 is from the “1 year Graduate Survey”data to use as comparison.Fall 2017 - Missing data for other cohorts (BSN-A, RN-BSN, andCabool cohorts) some cohorts may only graduate in the springsemester.Goal of 70% met for ASN, BSN and LPN Bridge programranging 80-89%.70% for all cohorts combined report job placement withCoxHealth. Majority of job placement was with CoxHealth. Mercy22% job placement.No Target identified for this StandardEval team minutes Recommendation:2/26/2018Goal met:.\2017 Continue with collecting data each semester with the “Graduate2018\Minutes andJob survey” to maintain higher response rates.Attachments\Evalu Need a distinctive title for the survey tool used to collect thisation Teamdata “graduation survey of Job placement at time ofminutes Februarygraduation” Continue with differentiation of cohort and include Cabool.26 2018.docx ASN, ASN-LPN, BSN-E, BSN-A, BSN Cabool, RN-BSN Add last semester survey for all cohorts4/1/18 UND Continuewith current goalminutes Continue to analyze the 1 year graduate survey job placementdata as well.H:\COLLSHARED\DEPT nutes andAttachments\EvalTeam MinutesApril 23 2018
Standard IV-E. Program Competency #1 Decision MakingPlanningGoalFrequencyAnnuallyUtilize information management skills as a means of competent decisionmaking and critical thinking to enhance nursing practice, clienteducation, and personal lifelong learning.Evidence of Goal AchievementProgram completion Survey: 90% of survey respondents will answerstrongly agree or agree on questions related to program competency:Decision MakingFaculty to attach appropriate programmatic outcome to designatedassignments in Canvas. Goal is for 95% of students to achieve a 3/5, or“meets expectations”.Students demonstrate an increase in critical thinking abilities from pre topost programmatic critical thinking HESI exams. 11/2017 omitted fromevidence for this item.1 Year Graduate Survey 90% of survey respondents will answer stronglyagree or agree on questions related to program competency: DecisionMaking – Added 3/2017Results of DataImplementation and EvaluationAmy Townsend shared the evaluation results and comments from theprogram completion and clinical evaluation surveys (commentsmentioning specific names were removed). Amy will send these toeveryone in the UND and asked that Evaluation team will review &bring recommendations.UNDEvaluationMeetingMinutesAction Plan1/11/2016 UND Evaluation team will review data and bring cuments for Feb MeetingMinutes.docx
Evaluation team reviewing data.1/25/16Continue to work on revision of evaluation tools to better measure and.\2015meet program needs.2016\Minutes andattachments\January 25 2016minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Jan 252016.docxCurrent evaluation metrics/tools do not address the revised evaluation 10/27/20161.plan to adequately measure achievement of ASN program outcome.\20162.goal.2017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Oct 272016.docxRevised tool presented to eval team and eval team approved10/27/2016Approved BSN Program Completion survey.\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\BSN ProgramCompletion Survey.docx.\20162017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Oct 272016.docx1/30/2017 Continue to review, refine and monitor data.1/30/2017 EvalteamTool update taken to UND as informational and will continue withdistribution utilizing reviewed tool first time for Fall 2016 graduatesAction Plan: .\20162017\Minutes andattachments\Evaluation Teamminutes Jan 302017.docxDevelop tools to more accurately measure the Program outcomewhere the metric will measure achievement of goal.Develop tools to be specific to ASN program outcomes and furtherbreak out cohorts if needed for further analysis.Chair and Program Coordinators will clarify and communicate processof distribution and dates surveys are sent out.
1/30/2017 HESI data collection continuing. Question related to bestway to break this data out based on goal.1/30/2017 Evalteam4/7/17 Program completion data Summary –Eval minutes3/27/17Action Plan: Eval team needs to continue to monitor critical thinking datafor SEP.Q: What is the purpose of us collecting this?.\2016A: Per Dept. Chair, Most of the HESI data is used for internal review 2017\Minutes and Recommendation:rather than SEP for accreditation. This data is used by curriculum for attachments\Evalu Evaluation team recommends to switch other data HESIevaluation (internal review items rather than SEP forrevision, and to see where the gaps are. For the Critical Thinkingation Teamaccreditation) to curriculum team to assist with curriculumexam we should compare scores of incoming students to thoseminutes Jan 30revisions.same students’ scores as they exit.Q: Does the HESI data for internal review need to fall to curriculum 2017.docxteam?A: Probably1/30/2017 No CANVAS data to evaluate programmatic outcomes with 2/6/2017 UNDAction Plan: Amy Townsend will pull all data off of Canvas at the end of eachassignment as noted in the “Evidence of Goal Achievement” Column. minutessemester as requested.Need to determine process for use of program outcome links in Nursing courses should implement rubric/outcome ties in Canvas.\.\UndergraduatCANVAS.Spring 2017 semester with at least one item for support courseseand at least 2 for major clinical courses with all assessments to2/6/2017 Initiated discussion in UND meeting for starting process. Nursing\Approvedbe fully implemented by fall.Minutes\2.6.17Meetingminutes.docxFall 2015—BSN-E and RN to BSN data were combined. There were 15responses total. The question regarding decision making was not.\2016worded exactly as our BSN competency. However, 100% of respondents 2017\Minutes andagreed or strongly agreed that they could make decisions effectively in attachments\Evaluproviding care.ation Teamminutes March 27Spring 2016—Again, BSN-E, BSN-A and RN to BSN cohorts were 2017.docxcombined. There were 13 responses total. Again, the questionregarding decision making was not worded exactly as our BSNcompetency. However, 100% of respondents agreed or stronglyagreed that they could make decisions effectively in providingcare.Continue to monitorAction plan- None needed
4/7/17 Program completion data Summary –ContinuedFall 2016—There were no BSN-A graduates during the fall 2016semester, but the BSN-E and RN to BSN cohorts were separatedfor this survey. In addition, survey tools have been revised asindicated above to more accurately reflect the exact programcompetency being measured. In fall 2016 there were 5 BSN-Erespondents and 8 RN to BSN respondents. For both cohorts,100% agreed or strongly agreed that they were able to “utilizeinformation management skills as a means of competentdecision making and critical thinking to enhance nursing practice,client education, and personal lifelong learning.3/27/17 1 Year Graduate Survey Data SummaryEval minutesRecommendation:Analysis of 2014-2016 1 Year Graduate Survey data. No further action with 2012-2014 results reviewed.3/27/17 The vice president of student services (VPSS) sent out an annual Continue with planned curriculum revision.survey to graduates of the nursing programs until 2015. Review of .\2016 Formulate consistent plan in distribution of survey data andthe evaluation data shows gaps in implementation and collection 2017\Minutes andcollection with revised tool from 2016 and continue to collect 3of data.data points for analysis.attachments\Evalu 2015 data shown, used the 4/2016 collected data for 2015 1 year Differentiation of cohort and include Cabool.ation Teamdata for the ASN and BSN pre-licensure programs ASN, ASN-LPN, BSN-E, BSN-A, BSN Cabool, RN-BSNminutes March 27 2015 & 2016 BSN pre-licensure data does not differentiate Identify goal and target for data results with new tool.responses by program cohort for further data analysis. Also some 2017.docx Brainstorm on methods to increase response rate.of the data items are hard to compare with past surveys due toAdded Goal 3/2017 :1 Year Graduate Survey 90% of surveychanges in collection responses of data. Survey tool revised 2016.respondents will answer strongly agree or agree on questions related to Return rates are very low with approximate return rate of 5%-25%.program competency: Decision Making 20-65% of respondents 2012-2014 report taking classes towardcertification or another degree where as 2015-2016 showincreased responses ( 60%) with taking additional classes postgraduation. 67-100% of Respondents 2012-2015 answering Very Satisfied toAdequately Satisfied with their education at Cox College. 2016 BSNpre-licensure data dropped to 33% satisfaction with only 3respondents. All programs 2012-2014 indicated a 100% of respondents indicatedthey were Very Satisfied to Adequately Satisfied with the programpreparation for the following areas of nursing practice: Decision Making
4/2017 HESI BSN Program Pre/Post Critical Thinking Scores AnalysisDue to dynamics of fluctuating national average scores therefore CoxCollege BSN program achieved an improvement in Critical Thinkingscores at end of curriculum4/10/17 Eval min Goal MetContinue to monitor.\20162017\Minutes and Recommendation: Continue with process to identify cohort in HESI to more easilyattachments\Evaluidentify various cohorts.a
Cox College BSN program graduation rates are consistent with MSBN graduation rate for BSN programs in Missouri @89% for 2014. The dismissal rate 2012-2015 ranged from 0%-20% for all tracks in the BSN program. BSN-A track continues to maintain a higher graduation rate than the other BSN tracks. 1/30/17 Eval team minutes .\2016-2017\Minutes and
