NO FREE ATTENTION: How Women Use The Possibility Of Sex

Transcription

"No FREE Attention" is Book Authorand Professional Dating Coach AlanRoger Currie's updated and revisededition of his popular 2012 self-helpbook for men titled "The Possibility ofSex: How Naïve and Lustful Men areManipulated by Women Regularly".NO FREE ATTENTION:How Women use The Possibility of Sex toManipulate Naive and Lustful MenBy Alan Roger CurrieOrder the book from the publisher 1505.html?s pdfor from your favorite neighborhoodor online bookstore.

Copyright 2012, 2014, 2021 Mode One Multimedia, Inc.ISBN: 978-1-7361951-2-3All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored ina retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior writtenpermission of the author.Printed on acid-free paper.Mode One Multimedia, Inc.2021Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication DataCurrie, Alan RogerNo FREE Attention: How Women use The Possibility of Sexto Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Men by Alan Roger CurrieLibrary of Congress Control Number: 2020921939Website: http://directapproachdating.comCoaching: http://patreon.com/modeoneOther eBooks, paperbacks, and audiobooks publishedby Author Alan Roger Currie:Mode One: Let the Women Know What You’re REALLY ThinkingMode One – HARDCORE (eBook only)Upfront and Straightforward: Let the Manipulative Game PlayersKnow What You're REALLY ThinkingMode One – Semantics and Scenarios: Inside the Mind of theManipulative Game Player (eBook only)Oooooh . . . Say it Again: Mastering the Fine Art of VerbalSeduction and Aural SexThe Beta Male Revolution: Why Many Men Have Totally LostInterest in Marriage in Today's Society

Table of ContentsIntroduction & Acknowledgements . 1The Primary Basis for My MODE ONE Philosophy . 7PART ONE . 19Men Who Seek to Excessively Flatter Women in orderto Win Favor with Them . 21Men Who Seek to Entertain Women and/or Engage in VeryTrivial 'Small Talk' in order to Win Favor with Them . 31Men Who Offer Women Free Meals, Monetary Favors, andMaterialistic Gifts in order to Win Favor with Them . 47Men Who Pretend to be Only Interested in Being aWoman's Platonic Friend in order to Win Favorwith Them . 61Men Who Seek to Circumvent and/or CompromiseWomen's Ability to Provide Them with Verbal(Sexual) Consent . 73PART TWO . 95Women to Avoid as Long-Term Romantic Companions#1: Covert Gold Diggers . 97Women to Avoid as Long-Term Romantic Companions#2: Ambitious Side Chicks . 111Women to Avoid as Long-Term Romantic Companions#3: Spoiled Drama Queens . 129.Women to Avoid as Long-Term Romantic Companions#4: Closet Misandrists . 147Women to Avoid as Long-Term Romantic Companions#5: Lustful & Cheating Liars. 167Wrap Up & Closing Thoughts . 211

Introduction & AcknowledgementsOf my four major books that are now publishedeBooks and audiobooks, this book is the only onethat had not yet been published as a paperback.Also, if you noticed, I modified the title a bit. WhenI originally published this as an eBook in 2012, andlater as an audiobook in 2014, the title was ThePossibility of Sex: How Naïve and Lustful Men areManipulated by Women Regularly.If you currently own either my 2012 eBook and/ormy 2014 audiobook, you already know thatarguably the most popular concept that wasespoused in each of those two versions was mypersonal philosophy of "No Free Attention," whichrepresented my belief that no single heterosexualman should ever give a woman full and indefiniteaccess to his non-sexual time, attention, andcompanionship unless . . .A) He and his designated woman of interest arecurrently engaging in sexual relations;B) He is not yet engaging in sexual relationswith his designated woman of interest, butshe has made it crystal clear that she is verymuch interested in engaging in sexualrelations with him in the very near future;1

Alan Roger CurrieC) The woman has made it clear that she is notat all interested in engaging in sexualrelations with the man, but the man is moreso genuinely interested in socially interactingwith the woman in a purely platonic mannerand/or he is interacting with her in a mannerthat will prove to be beneficial to him careerwise, financially, or socially.Beginning with no later than 2015, I began toobserve a lot of other professional dating coaches,pickup artists (PUAs), and other assorted "selfimprovement gurus" adopting my concept of "NoFree Attention" without giving me my propercredit attribution for popularizing the concept.I have been operating with the No Free Attentionphilosophy since March 1988, which is before manyof the men who are currently active in what isknown as "The Manosphere" were even born.For example, just earlier this year, I had a youngPUA type who is based in Miami upload a video onYouTube titled "No Free Attention for Women!" Iwrote him and said, "FYI: You know I popularizedthe phrase 'No Free Attention' don't you? You didnot give me any credit for it in your video." Heinitially replied, "Well, with all due respect to youAlan, I have been using the phrase 'no freeattention' since like 2017. Maybe even 2016."2

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful MenI quickly let him know that I had been using thatphrase and philosophy since 1988, and then he waslike, "Holy shit! Wow! 1988?!?!? Wow! Sorry Alan.I had no idea that you had been using that phraseand philosophy for that long. If that is the case,then you are pretty much the originator of thatconcept then. You are indeed The Godfather!"Actually, one of my top two nicknames among menin what is known as The Manosphere is "TheGodfather of Direct (Verbal) Game Advice &Wisdom." I have literally lost count of the numberof other dating coaches, PUAs, and self-proclaimed"self-improvement gurus" or "seduction gurus" whohave borrowed talking points from one or more ofmy books without giving me what is known as"Proper Credit Attribution."For those who may not be aware of this longstanding tradition, anytime you repeat andregurgitate other published authors' unique terms,signature phrases, original concepts, and directquotes and personal philosophies, you are alwayssupposed to give proper credit attribution to theauthor(s) whose material and intellectual propertyyou are borrowing talking points and material from.If you fail to do this, then technically you are guiltyof plagiarism and/or copyright infringement.3

Alan Roger CurrieAll that to say, the main reason why I modified thetitle of this book from The Possibility of Sex to NoFree Attention is because I want all the men (andwomen) who read this book to know that I am thedating coach and author who first popularized thisconcept, signature phrase, and personal philosophy.Anytime you hear another dating coach, PUA, orself-improvement guru use the phrase "No FreeAttention," trust me they borrowed it (or flat-outSTOLE IT) from ME.Secondly, in full disclosure, this is not really a'stand-alone' book. This book is actually part ofwhat I would loosely refer to as a "trilogy" ofbooks. If I had to use the Star Wars movies as alighthearted analogy, the first book in the trilogy,Mode One, is like Star Wars, Episode IV; thesecond book in the trilogy, Oooooh Say it Again,is like Star Wars, Episode V; and this book, NoFree Attention / The Possibility of Sex, is like StarWars, Episode VI. Then, I would refer to my booktitled The Beta Male Revolution as "The Prequel"to my designated 'trilogy' (similar to Star Wars,Episodes I, II, and III).I do not really view Mode One, Oooooh Say itAgain, and No Free Attention / The Possibility ofSex as three (3) separate books. I more so view all4

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Menthree as ONE LONG BOOK divided into three (3)separate parts.Finally, I would like to offer an enthusiastic shoutout to my brother, Stephen Clarence Currie; mywife, Jameelah Currie; Alix Edouard Grand-Pierreand Alvin Hollinger III, who both first encouragedme to write and publish my 2012 eBook version ofthis book; Esther Vilar, whose popular best-sellingbook, The Manipulated Man was a partialinspiration and influence for my own book; and thelate, great adult film actor John Leslie, whosefictional character of the prolific womanizer "Jack"in the 1980 adult film, Talk Dirty to Me, was myfirst major inspiration for my entire Mode Onephilosophy.5

The Primary Basis forMy MODE ONE PhilosophyWhen it comes to single heterosexual menattempting to connect with women either for a)long-term, strictly monogamous sex, b) long-term,non-monogamous (i.e., polygamy or polyamory)sex, c) short-term, strictly monogamous sex (i.e.,"serial monogamy"), or d) short-term, nonmonogamous sex (i.e., promiscuous casual sex), Itend to place all women in five different 'archetypes'as far as their verbal communication style:Reciprocators – These are women that once a manverbally communicates his romantic or strictlysexual desires, interests, and intentions to a woman,this woman will quickly, straightforwardly, andenthusiastically reciprocate his desires & interests;Rejecters – These are women that once a manverbally communicates his romantic or strictlysexual desires, interests, and intentions to a woman,this woman will quickly and straightforwardlyconvey to the man that she has absolutely nointerest in sharing his company in any sort ofphysically intimate manner;Wholesome Pretenders – These are women thatonce a man verbally communicates his desire toengage in one or more episodes of short-term non7

Alan Roger Curriemonogamous 'casual' sex, this woman willINITIALLY behave as though she is 'turned off' orsimply 'not interested,' but in reality, this woman isopen to being persuaded and seduced into engagingin one or more episodes of casual sex with a man;Erotic Hypocrites – These are women that are amore pretentious, materialistic, and antagonistic &argumentative variation of a Wholesome Pretendertype. These are women who more or less operate as"covert Call Girls" who seek to receive monetaryfavors and materialistic gifts from men in directexchange for their (short-term, non-monogamous)sexual companionship;Manipulative Timewasters – These are womenthat once a man verbally communicates hisromantic or strictly sexual desires, interests, andintentions to a woman, this woman willTEMPORARILY or INDEFINITELY seek to givea man the very misleading impression that she isgenuinely interested in sharing his company in somesort of physically intimate manner, but in reality,this woman is just seeking to maintain a purelyplatonic friendship with a man and/or exploit a manfor his financial resources and material possessions.My book, Mode One, offers the basic frameworkfor explaining to men why direct verbalcommunication is much more effective toward the8

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Menobjective of quickly identifying WholesomePretender types, Erotic Hypocrite types, andManipulative Timewaster types compared to usingsome variation of indirect verbal communication(i.e., Mode Two and/or Mode Three verbalcommunication styles).My book, Oooooh Say it Again, is the book thatexclusively focuses on the two sexually duplicitousarchetypes of women, which would be theWholesome Pretender types and the EroticHypocrite types, and it explains how a man can usehis verbal seduction skills and his erotic dirty talktalents to charm and persuade these two types ofwomen into engaging in one or more episodes ofshort-term, non-monogamous 'casual' sex with him.Finally, this book No FREE Attention / ThePossibility of Sex centers on helping menquickly and effectively identify women who are acombinationofdishonest,disingenuous,misleading & manipulative, and generallymaterialistic. In other words, what I refer to as theManipulative Timewaster types of the world.Just months ago, I had a follower and supporter ofmine express to me that he viewed me as a one ofthe premiere thought leaders and pioneers of TheManosphere, and that my knowledge, wisdom,insight, and overall advice contributed to him9

Alan Roger Currieexperiencing a high number of personal epiphaniesand modifying a good number of his long-standingparadigms and beliefs regarding the general natureof socially interacting with women, and pursuingthem for romantic and/or strictly sexualcompanionship.I will refer to this follower and supporter as "Frank"(not his real first name), and Frank highlighted atleast three major areas where I helped him viewinteractions with women very differently:1) Frank said that before becoming familiarwith my books, he used to believe thatbringing up the subject of sex in your veryfirst conversation with a woman of interestwas a huge "No No." Frank had been taughtby his mother, his older brother, and variousfriends and social acquaintances thatdiscussing anything related to his sexualdesires, interests, and intentions with womenin his very first conversation with themwould cause a woman to feel disrespected,insulted, offended, and generally 'turned off.'Frank said that my books, Mode One andOooooh Say it Again totally changed hismind regarding his original belief andattitude about this;10

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Men2) Frank said that before he became familiarwith my books, he used to believe that themost effective way to motivate a woman toengage in one or more episodes of short-termand/or non-monogamous sex was to exhibitbehavior that is dishonest, disingenuous andmisleading, and generally manipulative (i.e.,this is what I refer to as Mode ThreeBehavior), or at bare minimum, engage in aconversation style with women that was ng, and vague & ambiguous (i.e.,this is what I refer to as Mode TwoBehavior). Frank said it was not until he readboth Mode One and Oooooh Say it Againthat he realized all of the major detriments,flaws, weaknesses, and general drawbacks toemploying either Mode Two and/or ModeThree Behavior with women, and thatexhibiting a Mode One direct verbalcommunication style with women was muchmore conducive to his needs and objectivesin the long-run;3) Finally, Frank expressed to me that becauseof many years of following the advice ofmultiple conventional PUAs and other datingcoaches, Frank had always believed that if awoman smiled at him, engaged in friendly11

Alan Roger Currieand flirtatious conversations with him, andshe agreed to join him on a number of lunchdates, dinner dates, movie dates, and othertypes of 'dates,' that this meant that 90 - 99%chance, the woman was genuinely interestedin sharing his company at some point in thefuture in a romantic or strictly sexualmanner. It was not until Frank a) foundhimself wasting a lot of time and money ona high number of women without any of hisinvestments of both ever leading to sexualintimacy with these women and b) read mybook, The Possibility of Sex that he fullyrealized that not every woman who appearsto give a man "indicators of interests" (IOIs)and/or "choosing signals" (both of these areconventional PUA terms) is genuinelyinterested in engaging in sexual relationswith that man. In a nutshell, Frank said thatbefore coming across my material, he hadNO IDEA that women who operate asManipulative Timewasters even existed.Frank said that none of the conventional PUAs thathe followed ever even remotely mentioned anarchetype of women similar to ManipulativeTimewasters. This does not surprise me even onebit.12

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful MenFrom a strictly business standpoint, I totallyunderstand why the vast majority of conventionalPUAs do not want men to know about the archetypeof women who I refer to as ManipulativeTimewasters.You see, conventional PUAs earn money fromclients by giving (naïve and impressionable) menthe misleading impression that their advice will leadto their clients a) becoming some sort of 'overnightladies' man' and 'overnight womanizer,' andsecondly, b) that their advice will directly lead tomen being able to significantly diminish theirinstances of quick, abrupt, straightforward, andharsh rejection from women.One of ways that conventional PUAs accomplishthe "b" objective is by giving men the very invalidand misleading impression that if the man is able to1) prevent and avoid any and all negative reactionsand responses from women and 2) provoke awoman to interact with him in a very enthusiastic,friendly, and more so flirtatious manner, that ninetimes out of ten, he will eventually get that womanto agree to engage in sexual relations with him.In reality, nothing could be further from the truth.Think about it. If all a man had to do in order to geta woman to agree to have sex with him is to13

Alan Roger Curriemaintain a conversation style that was "pleasant,""polite," "friendly," flattering & entertaining, andgenerally representative of a well-mannered'innocent flirt,' then every man who fancies himselfa "classy gentleman" and the proverbial "nice guy"would never, ever experience any challenges orproblems getting women in bed.Here is the hardcore truth about women:1) Not all women who are interested inengaging in sexual relations with a man (andparticularly, some form of short-term and/ornon-monogamous sex) are going to verballycommunicate those desires to men in anupfront, genuine, and straightforwardlyhonest manner. Among other reasons, thevast majority of women are too paranoidabout anything that is going to negativelyaffect their public image and socialreputation (in blunt terms, no woman wantsto develop a reputation for being a 'whore'and/or a 'slut'). This is why you have the twoarchetypes of women that I refer to asWholesomePretendersandEroticHypocrites (I discuss these archetypes inmore specific detail in my book titledOooooh Say it Again)14

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Men2) Similar to #1, not all women who are NOTINTERESTED in either dating a man longterm or engaging in 'casual' sexual relationswith a man short-term are going to verballycommunicate their lack of interest to men inanupfront,unapologetic,andstraightforwardly honest manner. Why not?For starters, many women are afraid ofbeing physically assaulted by men as adirect result of abruptly or harshly rejecting aman. I have had literally hundreds of womenconvey this sentiment to me over the lastthirty-five years. Just last year, there was acollege student in Chicago who wasmurdered because a man became angry whenshe rebuffed his sexual advances. Secondly,many women want to exploit men who theyknow have a strong desire to engage insexual relations with them so that they can a)gain full and indefinite access to that man'snon-sexualtime,attention,andcompanionship and/or b) take advantage ofthat man's financial resources and overallsense of financial & materialistic generosity.The latter part of #2, in simple terms, is why youhave women who operate as ManipulativeTimewasters. These women have absolutely nointerestinyoursexualattentionand15

Alan Roger Curriecompanionship, but they are extremely interested insome specific aspect of your non-sexual time,attention, and companionship.You see, most of these women are very savvy.Manipulative Timewasters know that if they let youknow too quickly and/or too straightforwardly thatthey have zero interest in engaging in sexualrelations with you, that you are never going toinvest any significant amount of time and/or moneypursuing their romantic or strictly sexualcompanionship.This is why a man's verbal communication style isso important. When a man verbally communicateshis romantic or strictly sexual desires, interests, andintentions to a woman in a highly self-assured,upfront, very specific, and straightforwardly honestmanner (i.e., he exhibits what I refer to as ModeOne Behavior with women), then he places awoman in a position where she only has one of twooptions: either a) fully reciprocate the man's desires& interests, or b) straightforwardly reject the man'sdesires & interests.The problem with the vast majority of men is thatthey LOVE reaction "a," but they HATE receiving a"b" response.16

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful MenThe vast majority of men cannot handle beingabruptly and straightforwardly rejected by a womanwho they find very physically attractive andsexually appealing. Most men will attempt to dodamn near anything to prevent themselves frombeing rejected by a woman of interest.Many men will excessively flatter women in anattempt to avoid being rejected.Many men will go out of their way to entertainwomen and make them smile, giggle, and/orlaugh in an attempt to avoid being rejected.Many men will offer women free meals, monetaryfavors, and materialistic gifts in an attempt toavoid being rejected.Many men will temporarily or indefinitely pretendas though they are content with being a woman'spurely platonic friend in an attempt to avoid beingrejected.And in a worst-case scenario, some men will resortto raping or date-raping a woman to avoid beingdenied the opportunity to engage in sexual relationswith a woman.In the next five chapters, I going to cover each ofthose five attempts to prevent and avoid rejectionone by one in more specific detail.17

Alan Roger CurrieHere is the bottom line, that most men do notrealize: When you resort to the first four of thosefive attempts to prevent and avoid rejection (i.e.,flattering women regularly and excessively,providing women with humorous and highlyentertaining conversation, offering women freemeals, monetary favors, and materialistic gifts, andpretending to be content with being a woman'spurely platonic male friend), you very much openyourself up to being easily and frequentlymanipulated by women who are ManipulativeTimewaster types.Even worse, if you resort to some form of sexualassault (e.g., groping women, forcing yourself onwomen, date-raping or raping women, et al), youwill soon be looking to enter into prison at somepoint in the very near future, and gain theopportunity to share a cell with "Big Bubba" wholoves man butt.Continue reading my friend.18

Men Who Seek to Excessively FlatterWomen in order to Win Favor with ThemThe first of the 5 types of men who I am going todiscuss who go out of their way to prevent andavoid being rejected by women and hopefullyprevent and avoid any and all forms of 'negative'reactions and responses from women are men whoresort to regularly and/or excessively flatteringwomen. I generally refer to these types of men asEgo Boosters & Self-Esteem Boosters for women.I have never met a woman in my life who does notenjoy being complimented. Women love receivingflattering comments from men that validate theirsense of beauty and physical sex appeal as well as anumber of their non-physical and non-sexualattributes and qualities.There are some women who literally become'addicted' to flattering attention from men. I amtalking, they cannot live without it. Flatteringattention becomes as desirable to them as oxygen,food and water, and/or money.Put bluntly, many women place the same value onflattering attention and entertaining conversation(which I will cover in the very next chapter) thatmany men place on sexual enjoyment andsatisfaction.21

Alan Roger CurrieFor example, many women who post photos ofthemselves on social media (such as Instagram) ofthem adorned in swimwear or lingerie. Thesewomen just want a heavy dose of flattering attentionfrom (horny) men.I remember back in the 1980s, I used tocommuter train from the Millerneighborhood of Gary, Indiana to Chicagomorning and then back from Chicago toBeach in late afternoon or early evening.ride aBeachin theMillerDuring one stretch of a few months, there was thisone particular African American woman who wouldalways choose to sit next to me. One time she cameand took a seat next to me while I was reading anewspaper. Within minutes, she became highlyagitated. I asked, "What is wrong with you? Iseverything okay?" Initially she responded, "Oh,nothing. I am fine." Then she kept behaving moreand more as if she was really irritated aboutsomething. She kept fidgeting in her seat in a veryblatant manner. So again, I asked her, "Is everythingalright?" For the second time, she said that she wasfine.Finally, after approximately ten minutes had passed,she said, "Okay Alan, I am going to be very, veryhonest with you." I replied, "Okay what is on22

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Menyour mind? Be real. Be one-hundred percent honestwith me."She said, "Alan, I don't like it when you sit next tome and you don't say anything to me. I hate it whenyou are consumed with reading newspapers andmagazines while I am seated next to you." Half ofme was somewhat surprised to hear her say that, butknowing female nature the way I do, I was nottotally surprised.She continued with, "Being blunt, I hate to beignored by men. I hate it when men are silent fortoo long when they are in my presence. I want aman to talk to me, flatter me, and entertain me. Iwant him to share with me how attractive he thinks Iam and how sexy he feels I am. If a man goes toolong without doing those things, I become irritated.Is that honest enough for you?"Not only do many women who are single andunattached frequently fall into this category, butmany women who are married, engaged to bemarried, or otherwise romantically involved with aman seek to be flattered and entertained by menwho they have no interest in dating or engaging incasual sex with.As you continue with your life as a man, the onething you need to always keep in mind about23

Alan Roger Curriewomen is that women live to be flattered andentertained, and made to feel as though they arephysically attractive, sexually desirable, andgenerally enjoyable to be around.You see, men - generally speaking - are different.Men are wired differently than women are. Men donot get off on receiving compliments about theirphysical appearance or live to receive egotisticalflattery and engage in entertaining conversationswith women.The main thing most men want from women(assuming they are heterosexual, or at leastbisexual) is the opportunity to be physicallyintimate with them. Kiss them, make out with them,and eventually engage in oral sex and/or vaginalintercourse with them.I want to make something very clear: All womenwho are Manipulative Timewaster types love andseek out flattering attention, but not all women wholove and seek out flattering attention from men areManipulative Timewasters.In other words, if a woman makes it known to youfrom the beginning of your social interactions withher that she has absolutely no interest in becomingyour future wife, your next long-term girlfriend, oryour next brand new casual sex lover, then that24

No FREE Attention:How Women use The Possibility of Sex to Manipulate Naïve and Lustful Menwoman cannot be branded as or validly categorizedas a Manipulative Timewaster.To reiterate, a Manipulative Timewaster is a womanthat will mislead a man into believing that if hecontinues to behave in a manner that is pleasing toher, and he continues to perform financial and nonfinancial favors for her, that she will ultimately'reward' him with one or more opportunities toengage in sexual relations with her even thoughshe knows deep down that she will NEVER, EVERallow that man to engage in sexual relations withher.A man who is not afraid of being rejected by awoman will have no problem verballycommunicating his romantic or strictly sexualdesires, interests, and intentions to a woman in aMode One manner. This type of man will usually beable to quickly identify and effectively weed outwomen who are Manipulative Timewaster typeswithin the first ten-to-fifteen minutes of their veryfirst conversation with a woman.On the other hand, if you are a man who hates theidea of being abruptly and straightforwardlyrejected by a woman, or similarly, you hate beingharshly criticized and insulted by women inresponse to the things you say and do, then you will25

Alan Roger Curriealways be ideal prey for a woman who is aManipulative Timewaster. Always.Many men foolishly believe that if they regularly orsemi-regularly flatter women to the highest degree,and generally operate as a woman's personal EgoBooster & Self-Esteem Booster, they are going toearn some sort of valuable "Brownie Points" thatthey will be able to cash in at a later date for anopportunity to engage in sexual relations with awoman.Any woman who is a Manipulative Timewaster typethat specifically seeks out men to become herpersonal Ego Booster & Self-Esteem Booster for aperiod of days, weeks, months, or even years isgenerally known in society as a "Whore forFlattering Attention," or for short, simply anAttention Whore.As I alluded to already, various social mediaplatforms (e.g., Instagram, Facebook, etc.) are fullof women who are Attention Whore types. Manywomen know that if they upload a photo and/orvideo of th

Mode One – HARDCORE (eBook only) Upfront and Straightforward: Let the Manipulative Game Players Know What You're REALLY Thinking Mode One – Semantics and Scenarios: Inside the Mind of the Manipulative Game Player (eBook only) Oooooh . . . Say it Again: Mastering the Fine Art