Transcription
onbetween"responsible,"research- ‐based,evidence- eare2give- ‐aways:1. assumingthatDonald
. fmendacity”andtheplagiaristisa“two- h“tweedy,French- articles/204620/plagiarism- ‐rape/jonah- asedmuchoverthelast50 thatcouldhelp
rncultures(andinthepresentinmanynon- language,ideas,orotheroriginal(notcommon- inventions,statistical
oobroadlyasitsowndomain: a.edu/ wts/pamphlets/plagiarism.shtml). owl/resource/589/2/). mberhasthirty- ‐onedays,’andwell- in
asitsowndangers:1. nowledgeandwhatisn’t.2. ccessfulnon- stcopyrightinfringement,which
mPlagiarismcomesinmanyforms1: Word- ‐for- owledgingthesource.Puttingword- ‐for- itethesourceisstillplagiarism. ithoutacknowledgingthesource. lsourcetakenfromasecondarysourcewithoutdouble- thoutcitingthesecondarysource. ifferent. epresentedinadifferentformandwithdifferentwords. ��Plagiarism:AMisplacedEmphasis,”3.2 (Fall 1994): 36-47.Journal of Information Ethics
GeraldNelms,“PlagiarismOverview” intentionalplagiarismhasseveralcauses:1. rch,focusgroupresearch,andindividualstudentself- n- nductedfocusgroupswith31first- ‐andsecond- anddidnotconstituteplagiarism
rst- pplyingthatdefinitioninrealsituations”(650).2. uresandunderstandingsofwhatauthorshipisinnon- larlycontextswithinthesenon- othernon- ernon- requirements.
inesestudentsthatallowsusto
Gerald’Nelms,’“Plagiarism’Overview”’ 2’ McCabe'sfindingsaboutstudentcheating’inge
