Transcription
ANS implementation in Asia‐Pacific as at 04 July 2018This document presents:Page 2the ten Asia‐Pacific Regional Priorities adopted by APANPIRG/25 in 2014Page 3the implementation status of those ten Regional PrioritiesPage 4the ASBU B0 modules and APAC Seamless ATM items acting as safety barriers to CFIT, RS and LOC‐I occurrencesPage 5the implementation status of ASBU B0 modules and APAC Seamless ATM items as safety barriers to CFIT, RS and LOC‐IoccurrencesPages 6 to 9the implementation status of the 45 objectives of the Seamless ATM plan v1 (target date of implementation for phase 1:November 15, target date of implementation for phase 2: November 19)APAC States/Administrations are presented in alphabetical order. The date of the latest report submitted is given in the secondcolumn to indicate the freshness of information (format Year‐Quarter).No dataNot yet analyzedNot applicable"No data" means that no data was provided by the reporting State/Administration about its progress."Not yet analyzed" means that the applicability of this specific seamless ATM item in the national context was not yet analyzed by thereporting State/Administration."Not applicable" means that the reporting State/Administration found this item not applicable in its national plans, as a result of itsgap analysis.The green colour reflects a change in the information submitted to ICAO since the previous version of the regional picture.Example: 2016‐1 means that a new report was submitted by the State in the first quarter of 20161 of 9
THE 10 ASIA‐PACIFIC REGIONAL PRIORITIES ADOPTED BY APANPIRG/25, 2014Related ASBUmoduleTargetB0‐NOPS1. All High Density FIRs supporting the busiest Asia/Pacific traffic flows and high‐density aerodromes should implement ATFMincorporating CDM using operational ATFM platform/s.Note: High Density FIRs are defined as:a) South Asia: Delhi, Mumbai;b) Southeast Asia: Bangkok, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, Sanya, Singapore, Vientiane; andc) East Asia: Beijing, Fukuoka, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Kunming, Incheon, Shanghai, Shenyang, Taibei, Wuhan.[APANPIRG Conclusion 22/8 and 23/5 refer]110 ‐ PBN ApproachB0‐APTA2. Approach: Where practicable, all high‐ density aerodromes with instrument runways serving aeroplanes should have precisionapproaches or APV or LNAV.Note 1: High density aerodrome is defined by Asia‐Pacific Seamless ATM Plan as aerodromes with scheduled operations in excess of100,000/year.Note 2: the Asia/Pacific PBN Plan Version 3 required RNP APCH with Baro‐VNAV or APV in 100% of instrument runways by 2016180 ‐ ATS SurveillanceB0‐ASUR3. All Category S upper controlled airspace and Category T airspace supporting high density aerodromes should be designated as non‐exclusive or exclusive as appropriate ADS‐B airspace requiring operation of ADS‐B.270 ‐ ATS surveillance with dataintegratedB0‐ASUR4. ADS‐B or MLAT or radar surveillance systems should be used to provide coverage of all Category S‐capable airspace as far as practicable,with data integrated into operational ATC aircraft situation displays.280 ‐ ADS‐C and CPDLCB0‐TBO5. Within Category R airspace, ADS‐C surveillance and CPDLC should be enabled to support PBN‐based separations.220 ‐ ATS Inter‐facility Data‐linkCommunications (AIDC)B0‐FICE6. All States between ATC units where transfers of control are conducted have implemented the messages ABI, EST, ACP, TOC, AOC as faras practicable.300 ‐ Aeronautical InformationManagementB0‐DATM7. ATM systems should be supported by digitally‐based AIM systems through implementation of Phase 1 and 2 of the AIS‐AIM Roadmap.360 ‐ Civil Military use of SUAB0‐FRTO8. Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories: All States should ensure that SUA are regularly reviewed by the appropriate Airspace Authority toassess the effect on civil air traffic and the activities affecting the airspace.Seamless Item80 ‐ Air Traffic Flow Management/Collaborative Decision‐Making(ATFM/CDM)370 ‐ Strategic Civil MilitarycoordinationStrategic Civil Military 9. Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories: All States should ensure that a national civil/military body coordinating strategic civil‐military activitiescoordination (Regional) is established.380 ‐ Tactical Civil MilitarycoordinationTactical Civil Military10. Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories: All States should ensure that formal civil military liaison for tactical response is established.coordination (Regional)2 of 9
Seamless ItemASBUAir Traffic /CDM)80B0‐NOPSPerformance‐basedNavigation (PBN)ApproachADS‐B airspaceATS surveillance withdata integratedADS‐C and CPDLCATS Inter‐facility Data‐link 220B0‐FICE300B0‐DATMCivil Military use of Strategic Civil Military Tactical Civil Regional380RegionalTargein t No 10v. 0%2015THE 10 ASIA‐PACIFIC REGIONAL PRIORITIES (APANPIRG/25, 2014)Australia2016 ‐ esh2018 ‐ 1Not applicable60%100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable61.50%No dataNo data100%Bhutan2018 ‐ 2Not applicable80%Not applicable10%Not applicableNo data23%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableCambodia2016 ‐ 3Not applicable100%100%100%Not applicable0%23%0%Not applicable100%China2018 ‐ emocratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2100%Not applicable100%100%Not applicable100%No data100%100%100%Fiji2017 ‐ 4100%70%100%100%100%100%38.50%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableFrench Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4Not g Kong, China2017 ‐ 2100%100%100%100%Not applicable100%84.60%100%100%100%India2017 ‐ 16 ‐ 3100%40%100%Not yet analysed100%50%23%0%0%0%Japan2017 ‐ 4100%0%0%100%100%100%84.60%100%100%100%Lao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 1100%20%100%30%Not applicable100%15.40%100%No dataNo dataMacao, China2017 ‐ 1Not applicable100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable38.50%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableMalaysia2016 ‐ 450%70%0%100%50%100%100%100%100%100%Maldives2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysed100%0%100%0%100%0%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedMongolia2016 ‐ 1100%Not applicable100%40%No data100%No dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNepal2016 ‐ 1Not yet analysedNo data100%No dataNot applicable100%Not yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNew Caledonia, France2015 ‐ 2Not applicable0%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNew Zealand2018 ‐ 7 ‐ 350%90%100%100%Not yet analysed100%69.20%100%Not yet analysedNo dataPapua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedPhilippines2016 ‐ 4100%100%100%50%100%0%46.20%100%100%0%Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 3100%70%No data100%Not applicable100%84.60%100%100%100%Singapore2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 2Not ailand2018 ‐ 10%100%0%100%Not applicable0%84.60%100%100%100%United States2017 ‐ 250%100%50%Not applicable100%100%No data100%100%100%Viet Nam2017 ‐ % of High Density FIRssupporting the busiestAsia/Pacific traffic flows andhigh density aerodromesusing operational ATFMplatforms incorporating CDM% of high density aerodromeswith precision approaches or % of of FIRs where Category Sairspace and Category TAPV or LNAV (High densityaerodrome is defined by Asia‐ airspace supporting highPacific Seamless ATM Plan as density aerodromes areaerodromes with scheduled designated as ADS‐Bairspace?operations in excess of100,000/year)% of ACCs with ATSSurveillance using ADS‐B,MLAT or radar in Category Sairspace, and having dataintegrated into the ATCsystem situation display% of FIRs within which allapplicable ACCs have% of FIRs utilising data link en‐implemented at least oneroute in applicable airspaceinterface to use AIDC / OLDIwith neighbouring ACCs% of Phase 1 and 2 AIS‐AIMelements completed (0‐13)% of FIRs in which FUA isimplementedHave you established aHave you established anational civil/military bodyformal civil military liaison forthat performs strategic civil‐tactical response?military coordination?Implementation status of the 10 Regional Priorities (APANPIRG)4‐Jul‐183 of 9
ASBU B0 MODULES AND APAC SEAMLESS ATM ITEMSAS SAFETY BARRIERS TO CFIT, RS AND LOC‐I OCCURRENCESCFITRSB0‐APTAOptimization of Approach ProceduresASBU Modules(B0)B0‐SNET Safety NetsLOC‐IB0‐ACASCollision Avoidance SystemsB0‐SURF Surface Operations‐ Nil ‐B0‐AMET ‐ Advanced Meteorological Information [1]APAC SeamlessATM items(Seamless ATMPlan v1)170 ‐ Airborne Safety Systems(TAWS)10 ‐ Apron Management170 ‐ Airborne Safety Systems(TCAS 7.1)‐ Nil ‐350 ‐ ATM Operators’Performance‐ Nil ‐340 ‐ Safety Assessment of Changes[1] Specifically for Runway safety: Aerodrome warnings4 of 9
Targein t No 10v . 0%2015Apron ManagementSafety and Efficiency ofSurface OperationsPerformance‐basedNavigation (PBN)ApproachSafety assessment ofchangesATM fety NetsAirborne Safety Systems170Seamless PTARegionalRegionalB0‐AMETB0‐SNETB0‐ACAS ‐ TCAS 7.1Regional ‐ TAWSRunway SafetyRunway SafetyPRIORITYCFIT and RSCFIT, RS and LOC‐IRunway SafetyCFIT, RS and LOC‐ICFITLOC‐ICFITAustralia2016 ‐ 8 ‐ 150%Not applicable60%100%Not applicable30%100%100%100%Bhutan2018 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicable80%No dataNo data60%Not applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedCambodia2016 ‐ 3Not applicableNot applicable100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot applicable100%Not applicableNot applicableChina2018 ‐ 120%70%100%100%100%100%Not yet analysed100%100%Democratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%100%100%Fiji2017 ‐ 480%70%70%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysed100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedFrench Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4Not applicableNot applicable100%100%100%Not applicable100%100%No dataHong Kong, China2017 ‐ 2100%90%100%100%100%100%100%0%0%India2017 ‐ 3100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Indonesia2016 ‐ 3Not yet analysedNot yet analysed40%No dataNo data100%100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedJapan2017 ‐ 4100%50%0%100%100%100%No data100%100%Lao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicable20%0%0%30%Not yet analysed100%100%Macao, China2017 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableMalaysia2016 ‐ 4100%100%70%100%100%100%100%100%No dataMaldives2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysed100%100%0%Not yet analysed100%100%100%Mongolia2016 ‐ 1Not applicableNo dataNot applicable100%100%90%100%Not applicableNot applicableNepal2016 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicableNo dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNo data100%No dataNew Caledonia, France2015 ‐ 2Not applicableNot yet analysed0%100%100%100%Not applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNew Zealand2018 ‐ 2100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%No dataPakistan2017 ‐ 380%Not applicable90%100%No data100%100%100%100%Papua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4Not applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedPhilippines2016 ‐ 4100%Not yet analysed100%100%100%100%100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedRepublic of Korea2016 ‐ 3100%100%70%100%100%100%Not applicable100%100%Singapore2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Thailand2018 ‐ 1100%30%100%100%100%100%0%100%0%United States2017 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%100%No data100%Viet Nam2017 ‐ 450%100%40%100%100%100%100%100%100%% of applicableinternationalaerodromes havingimplemented A‐SMGCSLevel 2% of high densityaerodromes withprecision approaches orAPV or LNAV (Highdensity aerodrome isdefined by Asia‐PacificSeamless ATM Plan asaerodromes withscheduled operations inexcess of 100,000/year)Do you have safetyteams comprisingmultidisciplinaryoperational staff andmanagers which reviewsafety performance andassess significantproposals for change toATM systems?Indicator% of high densityinternationalaerodromes (100,000scheduled movementsper annum or more)providing anappropriate apronmanagement service% of high densityDo you have humanaerodromes providingperformance‐basedmeteorologicaltraining and proceduresforecasts, aerodromefor staff providing ATS?warnings and alertsDoes your Stateimplement ground‐based safety‐nets(STCA, APW, MSAW,etc.)?Does yourState/Administrationrequire the carriage ofACAS (with TCAS 7.1evolution) ?Does yourState/Administrationrequire the carriage ofTAWS?Implementation status of ASBU B0 modules andAPAC Seamless ATM items as safety barriers toCFIT, RS and LOC‐I occurrences4‐Jul‐185 of 9
Air Traffic FlowManagement/Collaborative Decision‐Making (ATFM/CDM)Targein t No 10v. 0%2015Aerodrome capacitySafety and Efficiency ofSurface OperationsATM‐AerodromeCoordinationAirport /DepartureManagement(AMAN/DMAN)ATC HorizontalseparationATC Sector CapacityAutomated Transfer ofControl in an ATSUOptimized waketurbulence separationSeamless lRegionalRegionalB0‐WAKEPRIORITYPRIORITY 1Australia2016 ‐ 3100%100%100%100%50%Bangladesh2018 ‐ 1Not applicable50%Not applicableNot applicable50%Not applicableNot applicable100%Not applicableBhutan2018 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedCambodia2016 ‐ 3Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%China2018 ‐ 155.50%20%100%70%100%70%50%100%90%Democratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%Fiji2017 ‐ 4100%80%80%70%80%Not yet analysedNot yet analysed100%100%French Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable30%Not applicable100%100%Hong Kong, China2017 ‐ 2100%100%100%90%100%80%100%100%80%India2017 ‐ 3100%100%100%100%100%100%70%100%100%Indonesia2016 ‐ 3100%Not yet analysed40%Not yet analysed80%Not yet analysed0%Not yet analysed50%Japan2017 ‐ 4100%40%50%100%20%10%Lao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 1100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%10%Macao, China2017 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableMalaysia2016 ‐ 450%100%100%100%90%10%20%100%Maldives2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot applicable100%100%Mongolia2016 ‐ 1100%Not applicableNot applicableNo dataNot applicable0%Not applicable100%No dataNepal2016 ‐ 1Not yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNew Caledonia, France2015 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%Not applicableNew Zealand2018 ‐ 250%100%100%100%100%80%100%100%Pakistan2017 ‐ 350%80%Not applicableNot applicable100%Not yet analysedNot applicable100%100%Papua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedPhilippines2016 ‐ 4100%100%100%Not yet analysed100%0%0%100%30%Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 3100%100%100%100%100%No dataNo data100%100%Singapore2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%Thailand2018 ‐ 10%100%100%30%100%10%30%100%100%United States2017 ‐ 250%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%Viet Nam2017 ‐ 4100%50%100%100%80%30%40%100%80%% of applicableinternationalaerodromes havingimplemented improvedairport operationsthrough airport‐CDM(applicable high density)% of applicableinternationalaerodromes havingimplemented AMAN /DMAN (applicable highdensity)Does your AIP authorisethe use of the horizontalseparation minimastated in ICAO Doc 4444(PANS ATM), or as closeto the separation minimaas practicable ?% of ATC sectors withautomated hand‐offprocedures in accordancewith Seamless ATM PlanPhase 1IndicatorTargein t No 10v. 0%2019Apron Management100%% of High Density FIRssupporting the busiestAsia/Pacific traffic flowsand high densityaerodromes usingoperational ATFMplatforms incorporatingCDM100%% of high densityinternationalaerodromes (100,000scheduled movementsper annum or more)providing an appropriateapron managementserviceNo data% of high densityinternationalaerodromes havingdeclared capacity inaccordance with theSeamless ATM PlanPhase 1% of applicableinternationalaerodromes havingimplemented A‐SMGCSLevel 2100%% of high densityinternationalaerodromes havingappropriate ATMcoordination inaccordance with theSeamless ATM Plan100%100%100%100%60%100%Australia2016 ‐ 3100%100%20%70%Bangladesh2018 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableBhutan2018 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot applicableCambodia2016 ‐ 3Not applicableNo dataNot applicableNot yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedChina2018 ‐ 1100%50%50%100%70%No dataDemocratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2100%Not applicable100%50%100%Not yet analysedFiji2017 ‐ 4100%80%Not yet analysedNot yet analysed90%French Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable70%Not applicableHong Kong, China2017 ‐ 2No dataNo dataNo data100%0%Not yet analysedIndia100%Not yet analysedNot applicable100%2017 ‐ 3100%100%0%100%0%Indonesia2016 ‐ 3No dataNo dataNo dataNo dataNo dataNo dataJapan2017 ‐ 4100%80%No data100%100%Not yet analysedLao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 1100%Not applicableNot applicable10%10%Not yet analysedMacao, China2017 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedMalaysia2016 ‐ 4100%No data100%100%90%Not yet analysedMaldives2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot applicableNot yet analysed0%Not yet analysedMongolia2016 ‐ 1No dataNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNo data0%Nepal2016 ‐ 1Not yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNew Caledonia, France2015 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%New Zealand2018 ‐ 2100%50%80%30%100%No dataNot yet analysedPakistan2017 ‐ 3No dataNot applicableNot applicable80%100%Not yet analysedPapua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedPhilippines2016 ‐ 4100%100%0%0%0%Not yet analysedRepublic of Korea2016 ‐ 3No dataNo dataNo dataNot yet analysedSingapore2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%0%20%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%Thailand2018 ‐ 10%100%0%0%0%Not yet analysedUnited States2017 ‐ 250%Not applicableNot applicable100%No dataNot applicableViet Nam2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%100%100%Indicator100%% of FIRs supportingMajor Traffic Flowsshould implement ATFMincorporating CDM toenhance capacity, usingbi‐lateral and multi‐lateral agreementsNo data% of high densityaerodromes havingdeclared capacity inaccordance with theSeamless ATM PlanPhase 2% of applicableinternationalaerodromes havingimplemented AMAN /DMAN (applicable highdensity)0%% of applicable% of ATC sectors withinternational% of ATC sectors withautomated hand‐offaerodromes havingcapacity figures inprocedures in accordance implemented increasedaccordance withwith Seamless ATM Plan runway throughputSeamless ATM Phase 2Phase 2through optimized waketurbulence separationImplementation status of Seamless ATM items relating to Optimal capacity4‐Jul‐186 of 9
Performance‐basedNavigation (PBN) RoutesPerformance‐basedNavigation (PBN)AirspaceContinuous DescentOperations (CDO)Continuous ClimbOperations (CCO)Seamless ‐CDOB0‐CCOPRIORITYPRIORITY 1Not applicableNot applicableATM systems enablingoptimal PBN/ATCoperationsUPR and PTAB0‐FRTOB0‐OPFLStandard TerminalArrivals (STAR)Australia2016 ‐ 3100%90%100%2018 ‐ 160%10%100%40%40%40%0%Not applicableNot applicableBhutan2018 ‐ 280%10%No dataNot applicableNot applicable100%70%Not applicableNot applicable100%Not yet analysed100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysed100%100%100%Not applicable100%100%100%100%Cambodia2016 ‐ 3China2018 ‐ 1100%40%100%10%0%80%100%70%Not applicableDemocratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%100%Not applicableFiji2017 ‐ 470%100%100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedFrench Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4100%80%Not applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysed100%80%100%100%Hong Kong, China2017 ‐ 2100%100%0%100%Not yet analysed100%100%100%Not applicableIndia2017 ‐ 3100%60%0%100%100%100%100%100%25%Indonesia2016 ‐ 340%40%100%20%60%No data20%Not yet analysed0%2017 ‐ 40%100%100%30%Not yet analysed100%100%100%100%Lao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 120%10%100%Not applicableNot applicable50%50%10%Not applicable2017 ‐ 1100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%Not applicableNot applicableMalaysia2016 ‐ 470%50%100%100%100%100%100%100%Not applicableMaldives2017 ‐ 4100%60%Not yet analysed100%100%100%100%100%Mongolia2016 ‐ 1Not applicable0%Not applicable10%10%0%0%10%100%Nepal2016 ‐ 1No data20%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable20%Not applicableNot yet analysedNot applicable100%New Caledonia, France2015 ‐ 20%Not yet analysedNot applicableNo data100%New Zealand2018 ‐ 2100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%50%Pakistan2017 ‐ 390%70%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysed70%30%100%Not yet analysedPapua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataPhilippines2016 ‐ 4100%30%0%50%50%60%100%20%0%Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 370%70%No data30%0%100%60%100%Not applicableSingaporeNot applicableNot applicable2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%0%100%100%100%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 2100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Thailand2018 ‐ 1100%100%0%30%0%60%100%100%Not applicableUnited States2017 ‐ 2100%100%100%Not applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%Viet Nam2017 ‐ 440%50%100%30%30%100%100%80%100%% of high densityaerodromes withprecision approaches orAPV or LNAV (Highdensity aerodrome isdefined by Asia‐PacificSeamless ATM Plan asaerodromes withscheduled operations inexcess of 100,000/year)% of ATS routesdesignated as PBNroutes in accordancewith Seamless ATMPhase 1Are all your Category Rand S upper controlledairspace, and Category Tairspace supporting high% of international% of internationaldensity aerodromesaerodromes/TMA where aerodromes where CCOdesignated as non‐CDO is implementedis implementedexclusive or exclusivePBN airspace asappropriate.? (1‐ yes, 0‐no)% of international% of internationalaerodromes / TMAs with aerodromes / TMAs withPBN STAR implementedPBN SID implementedIn‐trail procedures100%JapanIndicatorNot applicable% of ATC units with ATM% of FIRs using UPR andsystems enablingDARP within R airspaceoptimal PBN operationsAustralia2016 ‐ 3100%30%90%Not yet analysedBangladesh2018 ‐ 140%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableBhutan2018 ‐ 2100%Not applicableNot applicableCambodia2016 ‐ 3Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNot applicableChina2018 ‐ 1100%10%100%Not yet analysedDemocratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2Not applicable100%100%Not yet analysedFiji2017 ‐ 4100%50%Not yet analysed100%French Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4100%Not applicableNo dataNot applicableHong Kong, China2017 ‐ 2No dataNot applicableNo dataNot applicableIndiaTargein t No 10v. 0%2019PBN Visual Departureand Arrival ProceduresStandard InstrumentDepartures (SID)BangladeshMacao, ChinaTargein t No 10v. 0%2015Performance‐basedNavigation (PBN)ApproachNot applicable2017 ‐ 3100%0%0%Indonesia2016 ‐ 3No dataNo dataNot yet analysedNo dataJapan2017 ‐ 40%0%100%Not yet analysedLao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 110%Not applicable10%Not yet analysedMacao, China2017 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableMalaysia2016 ‐ 4100%100%100%Not yet analysedMaldives2017 ‐ 4100%Not applicable100%25%Not applicableMongolia2016 ‐ 1No data0%No data100%Nepal2016 ‐ 10%Not yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedNew Caledonia, France2015 ‐ 2Not yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNew Zealand2018 ‐ 2100%100%100%Not yet analysedPakistan2017 ‐ 380%Not applicable100%Not applicablePapua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedPhilippines2016 ‐ 40%Not yet analysed0%Not yet analysedRepublic of Korea2016 ‐ 3100%Not yet analysed100%No dataSingapore2017 ‐ 40%Not applicable70%0%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 2100%100%100%Not yet analysedThailand2018 ‐ 10%Not applicable0%Not applicableUnited States2017 ‐ 2100%Not applicable100%50%Viet Nam2017 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%Indicator% of ATS routesdesignated as PBNroutes in accordancewith Seamless ATMPhase 2% of high densityaerodromes with PBNprocedures that overlayvisual arrival anddeparture procedures% of ATC units with ATMsystems supportingoptimal aerodromecapacity and usingelectronic fight progressstrips% of FIRs havingimplemented in‐trailproceduresImplementation status of Seamless ATM items relating to Optimal trajectories4‐Jul‐187 of 9
Airspace classificationFlight Level OrientationSchemes (FLOS)Flight Level AllocationStrategic Civil MilitaryCivil Military use of SUASchemes (FLAS)coordinationTargein t No 10v. 0%2015Civil Military systemintegrationCivil Military navaidsjoint provisionCivil Military commontrainingCivil Military commonproceduresATM Managers’PerformanceATC simulatorsperformanceSafety assessment ofchangesATM Operators’performanceSeamless ionalRegionalPRIORITY 1PRIORITY 1PRIORITY 1PRIORITYAustralia2016 ‐ 8 ‐ 1100%100%Not applicableNo dataNo data100%Not applicable100%No data100%Not applicable100%100%Not applicableBhutan2018 ‐ 2Not yet analysedNo dataNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot applicableNo dataNot applicableNo dataNo data100%Not yet analysed100%100%100%100%100%Cambodia2016 ‐ 3100%Not applicable0%Not applicable100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedChina2018 ‐ 1Not applicable100%100%100%100%100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysed100%No data100%Democratic People's Republic of Korea2016 ‐ 2No dataNo dataNo ji2017 ‐ 4Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedFrench Polynesia, France2017 ‐ 4100%100%Not applicable100%100%100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%100%Hong Kong, China2017 ‐ 2100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%100%India2017 ‐ %100%No data100%Indonesia2016 ‐ 3100%100%0%0%0%0%0%100%Not applicable100%Not yet analysed100%No dataJapan2017 ‐ 00%Lao People's Democratic Republic2017 ‐ 1100%100%100%100%No dataNo dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysed100%100%100%0%0%0%Macao, China2017 ‐ 1Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNo data100%100%100%Malaysia2016 ‐ 4100%100%No 0%Maldives2017 ‐ 4100%100%Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableMongolia2016 ‐ 1100%Not yet analysed100%Not yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedNo dataNo dataNo data100%100%100%Nepal2016 ‐ 1Not applicable100%Not yet analysedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNew Caledonia, FranceNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable100%100%100%Not applicableNot applicable0%100%100%0%2015 ‐ 2100%100%Not applicableNot applicableNew Zealand2018 ‐ 00%100%Pakistan2017 ‐ 3100%100%100%100%Not yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysed100%100%Not applicable100%100%100%No dataPapua New Guinea2017 ‐ 4No dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNot yet analysedNo dataNot yet analysedNot yet analysedPhilippines2016 ‐ 4100%100%100%100%100%0%Not yet analysed100%100%100%Not yet analysed100%100%100%Republic of Korea2016 ‐ %Singapore2017 ‐ 00%100%Sri Lanka2018 ‐ 00%Thailand2018 ‐ nited States2017 ‐ 2Not applicable100%Not applicable100%100%100
This document presents: Page 2 the ten Asia‐Pacific Regional Priorities adopted by APANPIRG/25 in 2014 Page 3 the implementation status of those ten Regional Priorities Page 4 the ASBU B0 modules and APAC Seamless ATM items acting as safety barriers to CFIT, RS and LOC‐I occurrences Page 5 the implementation status of ASBU B0 modules and APAC Seamless ATM items as safety barriers to CFIT .
