Transcription
The CAMLOG Implant System –Science and Practice An overview of System concept Long-term results Scientific studies Experience from clinical practiceyrammuS
The CAMLOG Implant System –Science and Practice (Summary) Within just a few years after entering the market, CAMLOG has become one of the leaders in implant systems in Germany. At CAMLOG,science has become more and more important in recent years. Alarge number of both young and established scientists are involvedwith the CAMLOG Implant System and document its clinical evidence and performance. On the other side stands confirmation frompractice.Characteristics of the CAMLOG Implant Systems are: Team approach – optimized interdisciplinary cooperation Backward planning – planning guided by prosthetic criteria Simple prosthetics – proficient handling Precision – of implant, abutment and their connection Choice and universal use Effective surgical proceeding Cost-effectiveness.Long-term resultsProspective clinical studies have been performed recently on thesurvival and success rates of the CAMLOG Implant System over aperiod of 5 years and more. Retrospective studies had as their focalpoint the success and/or survival rates of implants for different indications. At the 1st International CAMLOG Congress in May 2006,Drs Ackermann and Kirsch, Prof Babbush, Prof Lin, Prof Singer andProf Watanabe presented the results of their up to 7-year follow-upstudies. The cumulative number of implants was 8,251, and the survival rate was above 98.5%. The detailed study results can be gathered from the brochure “The CAMLOG Implant System – Scienceand Practice” in its long version.Scientific studiesThe Tube-in-Tube connection is the centerpiece of the CAMLOG Implant System. It ensures simple, secure chair-side and laboratoryhandling consistently over all four CAMLOG implant lines. The Tubein-Tube connection is an integrative factor for the team approachbetween oral surgeon, prosthetic dentist, and dental technician.On analyzing the scientific literature dealing with the design of implant-abutment connections (Steinebrunner et al. 2005a and 2005b;Reinert & Geis-Gerstorfer 2007; Edinger et al. 2007; Semper et al.,submitted), it becomes evident that, regarding leak-tightness, accuracy of fit, rotational stability, and fatigue strength, the patentedCAMLOG Tube-in-Tube connection ranks highly among all implant systems investigated into.Other scientific publications (Jansen et al. 1995 and 1997; Gross etal. 1999) show that two-part implants without micro-gaps andwithout micro-movements have not yet been developed. The researchers conclude in their reports that the implant systems currently onthe market are not capable of excluding bacterial penetration intothe implant-abutment section. (Complete references to be gatheredfrom the brochure “The CAMLOG Implant System – Science andPractice” in its long version.)The patented Tube-in-Tube connectionwith its distinctive groove (implant) cam (abutment) design is the centerpieceof the CAMLOG Implant System (PatentEP 851744 and corresponding trade markrights). The publications of Steinebrunner et al. (2005a, 2005b) in “Implantologie“ and the “Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants”support the high fatigue strength, stability, and measured leaktightness of the CAMLOG Tube-in-Tube connection.The Tube-in-Tube connection ensuresunambiguous and rapid positioning ofthe abutments. It safeguards straightforward and secure clinical prosthetical andlaboratory procedures.
.000200.0000043.20043.200NN 6677BrånemarkBrånemark aceReplaceSelectSelectCamlogCamlog66ScrewScrew VentVentSystemDieDie BoxenBoxen zeigenzeigen diedie erreichtenerreichten KauzyklenKauzyklen bisbis zurzur mikrobiellenmikrobiellen UndichtigkeitUndichtigkeit derder eineinImplantatsystem erreichteerreichte beibei denden getestetengetesteten SysteSystezelnenzelnen Systeme.Systeme. DasDas CAMLOGCAMLOG Implantatsystemmenmen imim MittelwertMittelwert deutlichdeutlich diedie höchstehöchste Zyklenzahl.Zyklenzahl. (Quelle:(Quelle: SteinebrunnerSteinebrunner 2006)2006)The boxes show the number of chewing cycles accomplished before microbial leakage occurred in the individual systems. The CAMLOG Implant System clearly reached thehighestmean numbercycles amongthe dentestedEinflusssystems (source:Steinebrunner2006).Schwarzet al.of(2008)habender rauenund glattenOberfläche am Hals von CAMLOG SCREW-LINE Promote und SCREW-LINEplusinImplantatenauf diekrestale Knochenre Schwarz etPromoteal. (2008),a study in iethe effectimof Rahmenrough andsmoothsurfaces onhistologischthe neck ofuntersucht.CAMLOG Durcheine ewebigeand ndlicher Zelleinlagerungenund tissueder Höhedescrestal bone resorption.Froman intact connectivezone , dassandMicrotween the apicalextension of theinflammatorycelletinfiltratetheleakagein beidenkeinenetBeitragzur marginalenKnochenlevel of thealveolarGruppencrest, Schwarzal. concludedthat micro-leakagedid not contributeresorptionleistete.to marginal bone resorption in the two groups.Eine Möglichkeit, die Spaltbildung einer Implantat-AbutmentVerbindung zu untersuchen, besteht in der Finite-Elemente-Analysemithilfedes Abaqus-Softwareprogramms.EineinmöglicheUrsache, An optionin the study of gap developmentan Implantatsystemekeinenment interface is the use of finite element analysis with the aidofSpaltausweisen,bestehtdarin,Adassmit ssiblecausewhy Zipprichet al.logischenMethodeein Spaltin inderconicalKonusverbindungnur isschwer(2007)do notdemonstratea gapimplant systemsthatschwerzu vermessenist. to be shown and to beadarstellbargap in a undconicalconnectionis difficultmeasured with the radiographic method they applied.Reinert & Geis-Gerstorfer (2007) untersuchten die omponentenverschiedener and Geis-Gerstorfer (2007)studied theprecision ofImplanfit of tatsysteme.Dabei componentskonnte ral implantsystems. InintheMessreihe serieszur Präzisionder thePassungdes Abutmentsdem Origimeasuringexaminingprecisionof fit of theaufabutmentonnalimplantatkeine nal implant,no dislocation of desthe abutmentbe foundwerden.inthe CAMLOG Implant System.maximum imprecision in µm1.200.0001.200.000ICMeasuring range per system, measuring series 1ErgebnisseErgebnisse derder MessreiheMessreihe 1,1, WiederbefestigenWiederbefestigen derder AbutmentsAbutments aufauf demdem TitanmodellTitanmodellResults of measuring series 1, re-attachment of the abutments on the titanium model(Reinert(Reinert && Geis-GerstorferGeis-Gerstorfer 2007,2007, mitmit freundlicherfreundlicher Genehmigung:Genehmigung: DeutscherDeutscher ÄrzteÄrzte(Reinert and Geis-Gerstorfer 2007, reproduced with kind permission of DeutscherVerlag)Verlag)Ärzte-Verlag).aICTab HistologischeHistologischeBilderBilder eilungvonvon (a)(a) PromotePromoteundund (b)(b)PromotePromoteHistological pictureshealingof (a) Promoteand (b) PromoteplusCAM SCREW-LINESCREW-LINEImplantateninin lants inImplantaten200x magnificationwith toluidin-bluestain.apicalLOG ale ndundextensionof the Dieinflammatorycell infiltrate(aICT) and thelevel of the chdurch ereclearlyfrom Alveolarfortsatzeseach other by an intactzone arallelverlaufendenKollagenfasernundund resanda few verlaufendenformedblood Kollagenfasernvessels;IC nt;ICIC produziertvonvonInc.,SchwarzSchwarzetSchwarzal. 2008; withkind permissionof QuintessencePublishing Co.USA).etal.al. 2008;2008; mitmit freundlicherfreundlicher GenehmigungGenehmigung vonvon QuintessenceQuintessence PublishingPublishing Co,Co, Inc,Inc, USA).USA). JansenJansen etet al.thatthe implant systemsal. (1995,(1995, 1997)1997) concludeziehen cludingconicalsystems)arenotcapableofderzeit auf dem Markt befindlichen Implantatsysteme (auch mentarea.Thenische) nicht in der Lage sind, das Eindringen von Bakterien in densame result was found by Gross et al. (1999).They state -abutmentinterfaceisameasurchen Ergebnis kommen Gross et al. (1999). Sie resümieren unteranable phenomenonwith differencesin systems, samples, and inserderem,dass Microleakageam Implantat-Abutment-Interfaceeintion torques.messbaresPhänomen mit Unterschieden bei den Systemen, Probenund Anzugsmomenten darstellt.Semper et al. (2008) untersuchten in vitro die Positionsstabilität Semperet al. (2008) performed an in-vitrostudy on the positionalvon steme stems(Strau(Straumann, Steri-Oss , CAMLOG, Astra Tech, ReplaceSelect)nach owingmanueller De- und Remontage. Bei den rotatorischen s.wies CAMLOGeineandsignifikantgeringereRotationsfreiheit auf als TheCAMLOGImplantSystemshowedsignificantlyless derrotationalalle anderen untersuchten Systeme (P ems(p 0.001).Regardingverticallen Lageänderungen existierten statistisch signifikante Unterschiededislocations,statistically mitsignificantdifferencesexistedbetweenzwischen VerbindungenhorizontalemAnschlagund plant-abutmentinImplantat-Abutment-Verbindungen (P 0,001).terfaces (p 0.001).
Experience from clinical practice(Excerpts from the original statements in the brochure “The CAMLOG ImplantSystem – Science and Practice” in its long version.)Dr Karl-Ludwig Ackermann,Dr Axel Kirsch andGerhard Neuendorff, MDTFilderstadt, Germany The CAMLOG Implant System used in our practice since 1996has met the new challenges right from the start. The interface between practice and dental laboratory, between oral surgeon, dentaltechnician, and prosthetic dentist, has been newly defined and ithas guaranteed more reliability and long-term stability throughbeing simpler than before. The discovered solutions have been success-oriented and have produced the effect that not only many ofour colleagues have been impressed by the results and the clinicalsuitability of the CAMLOG Implant System, but also that the undoubted benefits have been taken over across different implantsystems.Dr Claudio Cacaci,Munich, Germany In summary, it can be said that the most importantcriteria for an implant system are patient safety and the quality offunctional and esthetical long-term results. Both are beyond reproach with the CAMLOG Implant System. Dr Gerhard Iglhaut,Memmingen, Germany The CAMLOG Implant System offers optimum hand-ling in implant surgery and prosthetics. The Promote plus surface extendsalmost completely over the parallel implant neck and holds the boneat a specified height. Thereby, the risk of soft-tissue recession isminimized . The Tube-in-Tube connection provides a simple andsecure attachment of the abutments, absolute rotational stability,an exact transfer from the model to the patient’s mouth, and highstability because of favorable force transfer and transmission. Andeas Kunz, MDT,Dr Detlef HildebrandBerlin, Germany Due to the basic construction principle, the CAMLOG ImplantSystem has succeeded in minimizing rotational play and this hasgreatly simplified its application in practice. Retrospectivelyviewed, we have completely changed our prosthetics constructionprinciple in response to positive experience. Reduction in rotationalplay represents an important basis of our ”Berlin concept“. Dr Ralf Masur,Dr Andreas Kraus,Jan Märkle, dentistBad Wörishofen, GermanyFrom a clinician’s perspective, a system must first of all function in aflawless manner – this is true for the CAMLOG Implant System. Insurgical and prosthetic handling, it is simple, time-saving, and reliable. The catchphrase “from the practice, for the practice“ is fullyjustified. The CAMLOG Implant System allows the treatment teamto keep all surgical and prosthetic options open to achieve goodhard- and soft-tissue esthetics.Dr Sebastian Schmidinger,Seefeld, Germany At the present time, I mostly use CAMLOG implants because theyoffer an excellent selection of shapes as well as optimal inner workings and very simple abutment procedures. Handling is very userfriendly with the Tube-in-Tube connection, the abutments can beinserted without direct view and without X-ray control since lockingin the final position is clearly detectable. Gerhard Stachulla, MDTAugsburg-Mühlhausen, Germany Particularly with respect to connection geometry, the CAMLOG Tube-in-Tube connection is both a very precise and also a verysimple abutment-implant connection to handle. Design and achoice of abutment options are important criteria, which contributesubstantially to the prosthetic success of a project. In the CAMLOG Implant System, we find a range of different abutments for almostevery restoration situation.
Interested in finding out more about Science and Practice and the CAMLOG Implant System?Order the complete 44-page brochure free of charge!Please,send me the free brochure“The CAMLOG Implant System –Science and Practice”SenderDate, Signature
Headquarters:Subject to change · X.J5520.12/2008CAMLOG Biotechnologies AGMargarethenstrasse 38CH-4053 BaselTel. 41 (0) 61/565 41 00Fax 41 (0) 61/565 41 01info@camlog.comwww.camlog.comVisit us at www.camlog.comManufacturer of CAMLOG products: ALTATEC GmbH, Maybachstraße 5, D-71299 Wimsheim, Germany
The cumulative number of implants was 8,251, and the sur-vival rate was above 98.5%. The detailed study results can be ga- thered from the brochure "The CAMLOG Implant System - Science and Practice" in its long version. Scientific studies The Tube-in-Tube connection is the centerpiece of the CAMLOG Implant System. It ensures simple, secure chair-side and laboratory handling .
