Portsmouth Decontamination And Decommissioning (PORTS D&D)

Transcription

Portsmouth Decontamination andDecommissioning (PORTS D&D)Draft RFP Pre-Solicitation PresentationSOL No. 89303321REM000092Travis Marshall, Procuring Contracting OfficerOffice of Environmental Management (EM)EM Consolidated Business Center and Portsmouth/Paducah Project OfficeJanuary 4, 2022www.energy.gov/EM1

PORTS D&D Pre-Solicitation PresentationPurpose of Pre-Solicitation Presentation and Acquisition ProcessPORTS Overview & History, Regulatory/Stakeholder Overview, SiteIncumbent Contracts, Performance Work Statement (PWS)Overview of Draft RFP Sections L & MDraft RFP Section H, Contractor Human Resource Management (CHRM)RequirementsOverview of Other Draft RFP SectionsOne-on-One Sessions: Schedule SeparatelyVirtual Site Tour: Video on PORTS D&D Procurement Websitewww.energy.gov/EM2

Purpose of Pre-Solicitation Presentationand Acquisition Processwww.energy.gov/EM3

Logistics/Ground Rules Comments may be submitted to the procurement emailaddress at PortsDD@emcbc.doe.gov for consideration byDepartment of Energy (DOE) in preparing the Final RFP. Nothing stated in this presentation should be construed asa revision to the Draft RFP. The written terms and conditions of the Final RFP, oncereleased, will govern over information within thispresentation. Information provided is at a summary level and subject tochange.www.energy.gov/EM4

Purpose of Pre-Solicitation Presentation Early engagement with interested parties to highlightinformation regarding the Draft RFP, including: Terms and conditions of specific importance; Proposal instructions and evaluation criteria; and Availability of reference documents. Continue engagement to obtain feedback that will beutilized to aid the DOE in developing the resulting Final RFPwww.energy.gov/EM5

Procurement Websitewww.energy.gov/EM6

Acquisition Process Interested parties should submit questions, comments, input forDOE consideration to the following email address:PortsDD@emcbc.doe.gov by February 3, 2022. Comments shall be submitted in the Microsoft Excel formatprovided on the procurement website (please do not edit theformat with the exception of adding rows as needed). DOE will carefully consider comments/input received in responseto the Draft RFP in preparing the Final RFP. However, DOE is notrequired to officially respond to verbal or written questions orcomments pertaining to the Draft RFP.www.energy.gov/EM7

Acquisition Process The Final RFP is anticipated to be issued no sooner than March2022. Once the Final RFP is issued, interested parties should submitquestions/comments to email address:PortsDD@emcbc.doe.gov DOE will post Final RFP questions and answers, withoutattribution, to the procurement website y.gov/EM8

Acquisition Process DOE is envisioning a 45-day (calendar) proposal preparation periodfrom the date the Final RFP is released. The proposal shall consist of three separate volumes:Volume I – Offer and Other Documents.Volume II – Technical and Management Proposal.Volume III – Cost and Fee Proposal. The Offeror’s proposal shall be valid for 270 calendar days after duedate of receipt of proposals. Government intends to award a contract without discussions, as statedin Sections L and M of the RFP. Full and Open Competition under NAICS Code 562910, EnvironmentalRemediation Services.www.energy.gov/EM9

End State Contracting Model (ESCM) Concerted effort within EM to reinvigorate the nuclear waste cleanupcompletion mindset. ESCM employs a Two-Step Process:1. Competitive qualifications-based Single Award IndefiniteDelivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) RFP2. Post-award negotiation of discrete scopes of work through effectivepartnering on a Task Order (TO) basis (Cost Reimbursement or FixedPrice) Provides EM the ability to partner with industry and stakeholders at this criticaljuncture of the Program to openly negotiate the right, risk-based Interim andFinal End States to reach completion at many of our sites Developed with detailed consideration of industry feedback on the Draft andFinal RFPs issued for the Hanford Central Plateau Cleanup Contract (CPCC), theIdaho Cleanup Project (ICP), SRS Integrated Mission Completion (SRS IMCC),Oak Ridge Reservation Cleanup Contract (ORRCC), and Hanford Integrated TankDisposition Contract (ITDC)www.energy.gov/EM10

ESCM Step 1 Streamlined Source SelectionTechnical EvaluationFactors(Descending order ofimportance)Cost/PriceESCM Streamlined Source Selection:1. Key Personnel2. Past Performance3. Management Approach (Contract Transition Approach,Management Approach, Small Business Participation,Inclusion of Improvements) Contract Transition Task Order Key Personnel Costs (one year) Fee/Profit (one year)Basis for Award Fully burdened labor rates (excluding fee) for one year(multiplied by DOE-provided Direct Productive Labor Hours)The Technical Evaluation Factors, when combined, aresignificantly more important than the Total Evaluated PriceContract Transition120 DaysPeriod (TO 1)Implementation Period 180 Days(TO 2)www.energy.gov/EM11

ESCM Step 2 Post Award Task Orders Up to 10-year Ordering Period with Minimum Guaranteeestablished During Implementation Period, negotiate TO 3 for near termscope(s) of work (not evaluated during pre-award) Partner with contractor to negotiate More realistic, reliable pricing of higher fidelity scope Appropriate incentive structure with balanced risk/reward Improved contractor accountability “Off Ramp” - If cannot agree on reasonable prices and/orcontractor performance is subpar, the contract can beended with no termination liability after minimum orderingguarantee is satisfied.www.energy.gov/EM12

Portsmouth (PORTS) Overview &History, Regulatory/StakeholderOverview, Site Incumbent Contracts,Performance Work Statement (PWS)www.energy.gov/EM13

DOE’s Gaseous Diffusion Plants 3 Uranium Enrichment Plants Oak Ridge, Tennessee Originally named the K-25 Site and now known as theEast Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP). Oak Ridge is where the nation’s first gaseous diffusionplant (GDP) for enriching uranium, as part of theManhattan Project, was located. In post-war years, additional enrichment facilities were built to form the Oak Ridge GDP, whichenriched uranium until 1987. Paducah, Kentucky (Constructed: 1952) Purpose: Produced enriched uranium, initially for the nation’s nuclear weapons program andlater for nuclear fuel for commercial power plants. In May 2013, the leased facilities were returned to DOE and enrichment operations ceased. Portsmouth, Ohio (Constructed: Between 1952-56 as the last of the 3 plants) Purpose: Enriched uranium for the nation’s nuclear defense program and later forcommercial nuclear reactors. Highly enriched uranium was suspended in 1991 as a result of the end of the Cold War. The plant operated to produce low-enriched uranium for use in commercial nuclear powerplants until May 11, 2001, when enrichment operations ceased.www.energy.gov/EM14

PORTSMOUTHSITE

History The Portsmouth GDP was constructed from 1952-1956 The Portsmouth Site was the last of the nation’s three GDPs to be built Enriched uranium for the nation’s nuclear weapons program and later forcommercial nuclear reactorsCOLD WARPOST COLD WARNuclear DefenseCommercialNuclear Power1954-19891989-2001CLEANUP2001-Current Environmental Cleanup Decontamination &Decommissioning Reusewww.energy.gov/EM16

1952-2001UraniumEnrichmentwww.energy.gov/EM17

1952-2001: Enrichment Operations August 1952 – U.S. Government selects Pike County asthe site for new uranium enrichment plant. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Corp. is plant’s first operator. September 1954 – First production cells go on stream. March 1956 – Contractors complete entire plant 6 monthsahead of schedule and full production begins. Mid-1960s – Plant begins shifting from military missionto commercial focus, supplying enriched uranium toelectric utilities operating nuclear power plants. October 1977 – Government transfers functions ofEnergy Research and Development Agency (ERDA) to newly-createdDOE.www.energy.gov/EM18

1952-2001: Enrichment Operations October 1992 – Energy Policy Act createsUnited States Enrichment Corporation(USEC) to manage Government’s uraniumenrichment enterprise. In July 1993, USEC assumes responsibility forPaducah and Portsmouth uraniumenrichment plants. March 1997 – Regulatory oversight ofenrichment plants officially transfers fromDOE to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 2000 – USEC announces plans to consolidate all enrichment activities atPaducah by June 2001. May 2001 – USEC ceases enrichment activities at Piketon plant. The plant isplaced into Cold Standby with the potential to restart, if needed.www.energy.gov/EM19

GDP Cleanup ApproachEnergy Policy Act 1992 Privatized enrichment operations Portsmouth and Paducah GDPscontinue operations Oak Ridge GDP remains shutdown Established the UED&D Fund Creates funding specifically for theGDPs Commercial utilities contribute tothe fundwww.energy.gov/EM20

D&D Deactivation and demolition of buildings and structures, 1.3M yd3 of debris Removal of infrastructure not needed for future useEnvironmental Remediation Excavation of 6 land disposal units and 5 plumes to be usedas On-Site Waste Disposal Facility (OSWDF) engineered fill, 3M yd3 Monitored natural attenuation post-D&DWaste Disposition Installation and operation of OSWDF for process buildingwaste, 5M yd3 capacity Offsite disposal of all waste that does not meet OSWDFWaste Acceptance Criteria (WAC)Processing Legacy Nuclear Inventory Disposition of 22,000 DUF6 cylindersProperty Transfer Reduction of federal site footprint from 3,777 acres to 400acresAT COMPLETION CURRENT STATEPORTS EM Missionwww.energy.gov/EM21

1989-2010 : Environmental CleanupEnvironmental Management Program at PORTS Officially begins in 1989 U.S. DOE signs a Consent Decree with the State of Ohio and anAdministrative Consent Order with the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency. Consent Decree requires DOE to: Complete investigations to determine the nature and extent ofany environmental contamination that exists at PORTS; Complete alternative studies; and Implement corrective actions as needed. RCRA Major cleanup actions are performed under requirements ofthe Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 10 Decision Documents issued by regulatory agencies All major cleanup actions implemented except units agreedby DOE and Ohio EPA to be deferred until plant D&Dwww.energy.gov/EM22

Plume RemediationNWESMid 1990’s - Completed SiteInvestigation Studies Nearly 1,000 groundwatermonitoring wells installed inand around the 3,777-acreplant site Tens of thousands of soilsamples taken at variousdepths 5 groundwater contaminationareas, or plumes, identifiedfrom sampling results Treatments in place at eachplume; additional cleanupactions still being takenwww.energy.gov/EM23

Environmental CleanupEnvironmental Management Program Between 2006 and 2011, 25 inactive facilitieswere removed to eliminate surveillance andmaintenance costs. In mid-2009, the cleanup program wasallotted 118.2 million under AmericanRecovery and Reinvestment Act, with five“shovel-ready” projects identified foraccelerated cleanup.X-633 Recirculating Cooling Water TowerComplex removal ( 9.9M)X-533 Electrical Switchyard ( 24M)X-760 Chemical Engineering Building ( 12M)Repackaging & Disposition ofexcess uranium materials ( 23.3M)X-701B groundwater plumesource removal ( 40.5M)www.energy.gov/EM24

D&D Regulatory Approach2010: Director’s Final Findings and Orders(DFF&O)The (CERLCA-like) agreement between Ohio EPAand DOE was signed in 2010 and which coversthe decisions for D&D of the GDP buildings anddisposal of the D&D waste.2015: Record of Decision - Portsmouth SiteDecontamination and Decommissioning OhioEPA and DOE signed a Record of Decision (ROD)to demolish the large process buildings and otherfacilities undergoing D&D at Portsmouth.2015: Record of Decision - Portsmouth Site Waste DispositionOhio EPA and DOE signed a ROD for the disposition of waste that would be generated fromD&D at Portsmouth. The plan calls for a combination of on-site and off-site waste disposal andthe construction of an OSWDF in the northeast corner of the site.www.energy.gov/EM25

Decontamination and Decommissioning DFF&O for Removal Action and Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study(RI/FS) and Remedial Design and Remedial Action (RD/RA) Defines the steps for identifying a range of technical alternatives for the D&Dand waste disposition components of the project, and reaching formal decisionson how best to proceed using a CERCLA framework Steps included: Developing viable alternatives, then evaluating and comparing them Gaining public feedback on the range of alternatives Selecting a final approach Formalizing the decisions Defining the regulatory requirements for successful implementation of theD&D and waste disposition remedial actions.www.energy.gov/EM26

PORTS D&D X-326 Process BuildingFast Facts: Top end of the cascade,enrichment assay 11% - 98% Produced weapons grade andNuclear Navy enriched uranium 2,300 stages, 15 to 250 HorsePower (HP) process motors,smallest equipment Deactivation began in FY 2012 Deactivation completed in 2021 Demolition began in 2021 Demolition projectedcompletion in 2023 7,000 Process Gas Equipmentcomponents removed andshipped off-site for disposalwww.energy.gov/EM27

PORTSX-333D&D ProcessX-333 ProcessBuildingBuildingFast Facts: Low end (start of cascade), enrichment assay natural to 3% 640 stages, 3,300 HP motors, largest components Deactivation on-going Demolition projected start 2023 Demolition projected completion 2027www.energy.gov/EM28

PORTSX-333D&D ProcessX-330 ProcessBuildingBuildingFast Facts: Middle of cascade, enrichment assay 3% to 10% 1,100 stages, 1,700 HP motors, intermediate size equipment First building of GDP operational with first cell on-line in September 1954www.energy.gov/EM29

Landfills and Plumes Excavation 5 landfills and plumesclosed withinPerimeter Road Excavated soils usedas engineered fill forOSWDF Consolidates3M yd3 of soils andwaste into one site Establishedregulatorycommitment tied toOSWDF Offers largecontiguous site forreusewww.energy.gov/EM30

Parcel Turnover and Site Reuse Public stakeholders in the region have clearly statedthe Site, post-cleanup, should be reindustrialized tocreate jobs to sustain the local economy. DOE is systematically turning over parcels of Site tothe community to begin the process. The first 80-acre parcel was transferred to thecommunity in 2018. The transfer of the second parcel, approximately200 acres, is on-going. Parcels are transferred to the Southern OhioDiversification Initiative (SODI), DOE’s localCommunity Reuse Organization.www.energy.gov/EM31

Other Site Contractor Activities:Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Plants Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) resulted from the uranium enrichmentprocess at three GDPs: Portsmouth, Paducah, and Oak Ridge. Oak Ridge cylinderswere transferred to Portsmouth in 2005. Cylinders from gaseous diffusion process accumulated from the 1950s to 2001(Portsmouth) and 2013 (Paducah). Facilities commissioned in 2010 and 2011 at Portsmouth and Paducah, respectively,to convert DUF6 products.www.energy.gov/EM32

DUF6 Project MissionDUF6 MissionOperate conversion facilities to safely convert DUF6 into a more stablechemical form (oxide) for beneficial reuse or disposal, thus reducingimmediate and future risk to workers and surrounding community.Two conversionproducts: Uranium Oxide Aqueous HydrofluoricAcid (HF)www.energy.gov/EM33

Portsmouth Incumbent PrimeContractorsFluor-BWXTPortsmouth Project management Facility modification Infrastructureoptimization Decontamination/demolition Environmentalremediation 1,885 employeesPortsmouth MissionAlliance, LLC Infrastructure (facility androad operations,maintenance) Security (classification) Records management Property & fleetmanagement Information technology 160 employeesMid-AmericaConversionServices DUF6 plant constructionDUF6 plant operationCylinder management 470 employees (3locations)Enterprise TechnicalAdvisory Services DOE support andoversight Project management Project control Regulatory support Technical support Strategy and planning 5-year contract; exp.March 2024 140 employees (3locations)www.energy.gov/EM34

Portsmouth Future PrimeContractorsOperations and SiteMission SupportContractorPortsmouth D&DContractor Project management Decontamination/demolition Environmentalremediation OSWDF Construction OSWDF Operations Waste disposition EnvironmentalMonitoringNorth WindDynamics Infrastructure (facility androad operations,maintenance) Security (Programmatic) Records management Property & fleetmanagement Information technology DUF6 plant constructionDUF6 plant operationCylinder managementSite utilities (electricaldistribution, water, sewer,steam) Emergency Services(Emergency Management,FireDepartment/Protection) Security (Pro Force) Uranium TransferEnterprise TechnicalAdvisory Services DOE support andoversight Project management Project control Regulatory support Technical support Strategy and planning 5-year contract; exp.March 2024www.energy.gov/EM35

Portsmouth D&D Scope of WorkC.1Contract TransitionC.2Post-Retirement Medical Benefits and Pension ContributionC.3CleanupC.3.1 CharacterizationC.3.2 Preparation for DemolitionC.3.3 DemolitionC.3.4 Environmental RemediationC.4CERCLA OSWDF Design and ConstructionC.4.1 OSWDF DesignC.4.2 OSWDF ConstructionC.5Mission Support ActivitiesC.5.1 Surveillance and Maintenance of FacilitiesC.5.2 Operate and Maintain D&D FacilitiesC.5.3 Waste OperationsC.5.4 Portsmouth Environmental Monitoring and ReportingC.5.5 OSWDF Management, Waste Acceptance Criteria Attainment, and OperationsC.6Core Functionswww.energy.gov/EM36

C.1 Contract Transition Transition Plan due 15 days after Notice To Proceed Transition Complete 120 days after Notice To Proceed37www.energy.gov/EM37

C.2 Post-Retirement Medical Benefitsand Pension ContributionParticipate and fund the following benefit plans: East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) Multi-Employer Pension Plan (MEPP)for Grandfathered Employees ETTP Health & Welfare Benefits Plan (Active and Retired), United Steelworkers (USW) Career Pension Plan for Appendix A USWRepresented Employees, and USW Career Health Reimbursement Account for Appendix A USWRepresented Employees.The requirements associated with this responsibility are set forth in the SectionH clause entitled, Employee Compensation: Pay and Benefits. This scope is in aseparate CLIN (at the Task Order level) and is not fee bearing.www.energy.gov/EM38

C.3 CleanupCompletion of the D&D and remediation of environmental media at PORTS in asafe, efficient, and compliant manner, in accordance with approved regulatorydocuments and DOE directive requirements. State of Ohio Consent Decree; Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Federal Facilities ComplianceAgreement; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part B Storage Permit; Director’s Final Findings and Orders: OSWDF: ROD Comprehensive Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan D&D: ROD; Comprehensive Deactivation, Demolition, and Disposition RemedialDesign/Remedial Action (RD/RA) Work Plan for the Process Buildingsand Complex Facilities; Deferred Unit Decision Documentwww.energy.gov/EM39

C.3.1 CharacterizationComplete characterization of assignedfacilities/areas with approved documentation(e.g., data quality objectives [DQOs], samplingand analyses plans, quality assurance plan, andwaste handling plan pursuant to the OhioConsent Decree, D&D DFFO’s, and CERCLArequirements).www.energy.gov/EM40

C.3.2 Preparation for DemolitionPreparation for demolition work includes(not limited to): Removal of legacy material; Isolation of utility systems; Decontamination or stabilization ofsurface contaminants; Non-destructive assay (NDA)measurements as necessary to meetNuclear Criticality Safety (NCS)requirements; Disposition components that exceedOSWDF WAC criteria; Demolition Design Plan(s); Waste profileswww.energy.gov/EM41

PORTSX-333D&D ProcessX-330 ProcessBuildingBuilding Final gaseous diffusion process building to be deactivated anddemolished Currently being used to support X-326 and X-333 D&D workwww.energy.gov/EM42

C.3.3 DemolitionX-326X-330X-333Order of Demolition1. X-326 : 0.5 miles long; 30-acre roof; 2.6M sq. ft. of floor space2. X-333 : 0.25 miles long; 33-acre roof; 2.8M sq. ft. of floor space3. X-330 : 0.5 miles long; 33-acre roof; 2.8M sq. ft. of floor spacewww.energy.gov/EM43

C.3.3 DemolitionDemolition ofFacility/Building andLoading the Debris forDisposition in the OSWDFwww.energy.gov/EM44

C.3.4 Environmental RemediationScope includes consolidation of legacy landfills inside Perimeter Road andremediation of remaining groundwater plumes required to achieve a remedy ofMonitored Natural Attenuation to maximize the area within Perimeter Road forreindustrialization, and remediated soil/water that meets regulatory requirements.Soil is staged at the X-740 GroundwaterPlume Excavation Project for backfill at theOSWDFwww.energy.gov/EM45

Plume Excavation ExampleX-740 Plume Excavation (Underway) First plume to be excavated in support ofOSWDF waste placement Excavated volume: approximately 25,000 yds3 Trichloroethylene (TCE) is the contaminant ofconcernArea to be excavated: 4 acreswww.energy.gov/EM46

C.4 OSWDF Design and ConstructionComplete construction ofthe OSWDF designed toconsolidate debris andrubble from demolitionactivities.Capacity: 5MCubic YardsSize: 100 AcresEngineeredCapwww.energy.gov/EM47

C.4 OSWDF Design and Constructionwww.energy.gov/EM48

C.5 Mission Support ActivitiesMission Support Activities Surveillance and Maintenance of Facilities Operate and Maintain D&D Facilities Waste Operations Portsmouth Environmental Monitoring andReporting OSWDF Management, Waste Acceptance CriteriaAttainment, and Operationswww.energy.gov/EM49

C.5.2 Operate and Maintain D&DFacilitiesScope includes safe, reliable, and compliantoperation of facilities for the D&D project untilno longer needed. Includes facilitymanagement, operation, and maintenance tominimize long-term risk and ensure reliableoperation of essential systems and facilities.Facilities and maintenance responsibilitiesdetailed in Section J, Attachment J-7,Facilities/Areas Responsibility Matrix and SiteServices.www.energy.gov/EM50

C.5.2 Operate and Maintain tline andwith lightblue fill(someexceptionsapply), referto Section J,AttachmentJ-7. Mapincluded indocumentslibrary.www.energy.gov/EM51

C.5.3 Waste OperationsOperate and maintain the waste storage areas in X-330, X345, X-705, X-741, X-744L, X-747A, and X-747L.Legacy Waste Disposition (Section J, Attachment J-8.2,D&D Waste Inventory)www.energy.gov/EM52

C.5.4 Environmental Monitoringand ReportingCompliant performance of requiredenvironmental monitoring andsubmittal of information forenvironmental monitoring reports.www.energy.gov/EM53

C.5.5 Waste Management, WAC ,and OperationsContinuous, compliant, and cost-effective operation andmaintenance of the PORTS OSWDF.A grapple loads debris into anarticulating dump truck forplacement at a designated gridlocation in the OSWDF.Demolition debris beingdumped into the OSWDF.www.energy.gov/EM54

C.6 Core FunctionsProject Services scope includes but is not limited to the following: Project Support/Performance Reporting Health and Safety Radiation Protection Nuclear Safety Quality Environmental Protection Records Management Public Relations Legal Management Security, Cyber, IT Space Management Maintenance, Property, Training Reindustrialization Asset Recovery Emergency Management Technology Development Historic Preservation and Cultural Resource Management Analytical and Graphical Information System Services Waste Management Land Use Controls Natural Resource Damage Assessmentwww.energy.gov/EM55

Overview of Draft RFP SectionsL and M (pre-award)www.energy.gov/EM56

Source Selection Procedures The Vol. II technical evaluation will consider:1) Key Personnel (including Program Manager/D&D Manager Individual OralInterviews);2) Past Performance; and3) Management Approach.Key Personnel is more important than Past Performance.Past Performance is more important than Management Approach. The Vol. III cost and fee evaluation (Total Evaluated Price) will consider:1)2)3)4)Contract Transition Cost;Key Personnel Costs (one year);Proposed fee/profit (by Task Order type) for a one-year period; andFully burdened labor rates (excluding fee) for one-year (multiplied by DOEprovided Direct Productive Labor Hours)Basis for Award: Vol. II Technical Evaluation Factors, when combined, aresignificantly more important than Vol. III Total Evaluated Price.www.energy.gov/EM57

Vol II – Section L General InstructionsSection L.10 (a) - Definitions.Offeror. The term “Offeror,” as used in this Section L, refers to the single entity submittingthe proposal. The Offeror may be a single corporation or a “Contractor team arrangement”as defined in FAR 9.601(1), for example, a limited liability company (LLC), limited liabilitypartnership (LLP), joint venture (JV), or similar entity or arrangement. The Offeror may bean existing or newly formed business entity. The term “newly formed entity” refers to anybusiness entity (e.g., JV, LLP, LLC, or similar entity or arrangement) formed solely for thepurpose of submitting a proposal for this procurement. Such an entity may not have arecord of its own past performance due to the fact that it may have been formed recentlyby affiliated entities for the purpose of submitting a proposal for this procurement. If theOfferor is a newly formed entity, it must be legally established on or before the date forsubmission of proposals. (See Volume I instructions regarding any requirement for aperformance guarantee agreement.)Teaming Subcontractor. A “Teaming Subcontractor” is any subcontractor that will performwork that is incorporated into the Offeror’s Technical and Management Proposal and thatthe prime Offeror considers necessary to enhance its team’s Technical and ManagementProposal or ability to meet delivery requirements within the Master IDIQ PWS. SmallBusiness Teaming Subcontractors count toward fulfillment of the Section H Clause entitled,Subcontracted Work, requirement and other small business goals in this Contract. TeamingSubcontractors are evaluated consistent with the terms of this solicitation and thus are notsubject to post-award subcontract consent pursuant to FAR 52.244-2.www.energy.gov/EM58

Vol II – Factor 1, Key PersonnelKey PersonnelThe Key Personnel section shall not exceed five (5) pages, exclusive of resumes, Offeror’s proposedminimum qualifications, and letters of commitment. The key personnel resumes are limited tofour (4) pages for each required key personnel position resume. The Offeror’s proposed minimumqualifications are limited to one (1) page for each non-required key personnel position. Key PersonnelTwo required positions (Program Manager and D&D Manager) along with any additional keypersonnel positions proposed by the Offeror (limit of two additional). DOE’s evaluation of theProgram Manager will be the most important aspect of the evaluation of key personnel. ResumeKey personnel will be evaluated on the degree to which they are qualified and suitable for theproposed position in relation to the work for which they are proposed to perform and areasof responsibility. Non-Required Key PersonnelThe Offeror shall not propose named individuals to fill the non-required key personnelpositions at this time, as non-required key personnel positions will be filled during theContract Transition Task Order. The Offeror’s proposal shall provide minimum qualificationsfor each proposed non-required key personnel position, which will serve as minimumrequirements for the respective position throughout the life of the contract.www.energy.gov/EM59

Vol II – Factor 1, Key PersonnelKey Personnel Team The Offerors will be evaluated on the rationale for selecting theproposed non-required key personnel positions. DOE will evaluate theOfferor’s proposed minimum qualifications for the non-required keypersonnel positions. DOE’s evaluation of the Program Manager will bethe most important aspect of the evaluation of key personnel. DOE willalso evaluate whether the collective key personnel team make-up,considering both the Program Manager and Decontamination &Decommissioning Manager positions, as well as the non-required keypersonnel positions, demonstrates the appropriate mix of key personnelpositions.www.energy.gov/EM60

Vol II – Factor 1, Key Personnel Individual Oral interviews separately with Program Manager and D&DManagerDOE intends to conductindividual interviews withOfferor’s proposed requiredkey personnel utilizing virtualprocedures.www.energy.gov/EM61

Section H – Special Contract Requirements(Key Personnel)Section H Clauses:H.43 DOE-H-2070 Key Personnel – Alternate I (Oct 2014) (Revised)Key Personnel Team Requirements: All key personnel shall be assigned full-time to their respective positions and theirpermanent duty station located on the Portsmouth GDP site. The Program Managershall be employed by the Prime Contractor. All key personnel shall have an "L"clearance level (or equivalent) at the time of their effective employment date insupport of this Contract, or the ability to obtain such within 12 months of theireffective employment date in support of this Contract.Reductions for Changes to Key Personnel: Program Mana

EM Consolidated Business Center and Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office. January 4, 2022. . (CPCC), the Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP), SRS Integrated Mission Completion (SRS IMCC), . Management Approach, Small Business Participation, Inclusion of Improvements) Cost/Price