WIXLIB

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2017-2020 - AMENDMENT 3WACO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONFY 2019TXDOT DISTRICT:WacoCITY:WacoPHASE:COUNTY:McLennanLIMITS FROM:N University Parks DriveYOE COST:HIGHWAY NUM:CS (Elm Ave) LIMITS TO:Forrest St / Garrison StCSJ:0909-22-182BP-001REVISION DATE:DESCRIPTION:Jan-18 PROJECT SPONSOR: City of WacoConstruct continuous sidewalks, bike lanes and streetscape improvementsREMARKS:Project Name: Waco - Historic Elm Ave Bike/Ped InfrastructureMPO PROJECT ID:C, E 3,105,000PROJECT HISTORY: TxDOT 2017 TASASelection; Funding award approved throughTransportation Commission minute order115076 - October 26, 2017CONTRACT CSJ:ANCESTORT CSJ:DESCENDENT CSJ:ROW/CON CSJ:Construction:Preliminary Engineering: 2,943,000 121,500AUTHORIZED FUNDING BY CATEGORY / SHAREFEDERALSTATELOCALOTHERTOTALRight of Way Acquisition: 0 9 - Trans Alternatives 2,484,000 0 621,000 0 3,105,000Bond Financing: 0 TOTAL 2,484,000 0 621,000 0 3,105,000Construction Engineering: 40,500Contingencies 100,000Indirect 100,000Other:Total: 0 3,305,000

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2017-2020 - AMENDMENT 3WACO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONFY 2019TXDOT DISTRICT:WacoCITY:WacoPHASE:COUNTY:McLennanLIMITS FROM:S 11th/S 12th - Garden DrYOE COST:C, E 593,170Gurley - S 10thHIGHWAY NUM:CSLIMITS TO:(Gurley Ln &S 11th/S 12th - Columbus AveGurley - S 27thS 11th/S 12th Sts)CSJ:0909-22-181REVISION DATE:DESCRIPTION:Oct-16 PROJECT SPONSOR: City of WacoConstruct continuous sidewalks along both roadways and bike lanes alongSouth 11th St / South 12th StMPO PROJECT ID:BP-002 & BP-003REMARKS:Project Name: Waco - 11th/12th St & Gurley Ln Bike/Ped InfrastructurePROJECT HISTORY: TxDOT 2017 TASASelection; Funding award approved throughTransportation Commission minute order115076 - October 26, 2017CONTRACT CSJ:ANCESTORT CSJ:DESCENDENT CSJ:ROW/CON CSJ:Construction: 562,222Preliminary Engineering: 23,211AUTHORIZED FUNDING BY CATEGORY / SHAREFEDERALSTATELOCALOTHERTOTALRight of Way Acquisition: 0 9 - Trans Alternatives 474,536 0 118,634 0 593,170Bond Financing: 0 TOTAL 474,536 0 118,634 0 593,170Construction Engineering: 7,737Contingencies 50,000Indirect 50,000Other:Total: 0 693,170

Waco MPOFY 2017 - 2020 Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment 3Highway Financial Summary - Year of Expenditure Costs2017 - 2020 STIPFunding by CategoryFY 2017Category12M or 2UDescriptionPreventive Maintenanceand RehabilitationUrban Area (Non- TMA)Corridor ProjectsFY 2018FY 2019FY 2020Total FY 2017 - ized 2,300,000 2,300,000 0 0 15,000,000 15,000,000 0 0 17,300,000 17,300,000 19,000,000 19,000,000 34,500,000 34,500,000 80,000,000 80,000,000 0 0 133,500,000 133,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 0 90,000,000 90,000,000 0 0 94,000,000 94,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04Non-Traditionally Funded TransportationProjectStatewide ConnectivityCorridor Projects5CMAQ6Structures7Metro Mobility & Rehab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 089Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Transportation Alternatives 0 0 0 0 3,698,170 3,699,000 0 0 3,698,170 3,699,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0District Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Strategic Priority 0 0 0 0 115,000,000 115,000,000 0 0 115,000,000 115,000,000Strategic Priority RECON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Strategic Priority RECON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,300,000 25,300,000 34,500,000 34,500,000 303,698,170 303,699,000 0 0 363,498,170 363,499,000FY 2017FY 2018FY 2019FY 2020TotalFederal 2,300,000 27,600,000 242,958,536 0 272,858,536State 23,000,000 6,900,000 60,000,000 0 89,900,000Local Match 0 0 739,634 0 739,634CAT 3 - Local Contributions 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Prop 12 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Prop 14 0 0 0 0 0Cat 3- Prop 14 SB 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Texas Mobility Fund 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Pass Thru Toll Revenue 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Regional Toll Revenue 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Match to Regional Toll Revenue 0 0 0 0 0CAT 3 - Unique Federal Program - Tiger II 0 0 0 0 0Other - Section 5306Other - Strategy PE Budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,300,000 34,500,000 303,698,170 0 363,498,170310111212C12SSBPESB 102Supplemental Transportation ProjectsStrategy Budget PE Strategy Budget PEStrategy 102TotalFunding Participation SourceSourceOther - Stragegy 102 BudgetTotal

Chalk BluffChina Spring(!35§ FY 20192490Spring 40AveDrnhingtoB77Avealle!6(EHwy 6ksStLaSthrPaDrir DeA84 17ivSUnlvdSRdeB ly Hillsd186077 3400434ayrWBagby AverdOlPaenthRddp3son rks DnCeTxwHe84 340S3Dr§ iv PalriaNew R43435S UnDrFetapeImDrDeAvnSaSpeerngS Valley MillsMemorialvilleRdN Valley Mills DrWoodwayLoaR1695HewittWaco Metropolitan Planning OrganizationRobinson35§ 2063RdiedchRitnreDisclaimer: This product is for informational purposes and may nothave been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, orsurveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey2188and representsonly the approximate relative location of propertyboundaries, if applicable.pDStthri ll cr es t !NStA rtNSpeeglevilleeor84 40rBellmeadp3rrDeD35§ vegArri nooHegJakth25LrkPaMacNovember, 2017Waco Urbanized Area2017 - 2020 Transportation Improvement ProgramProposed Amendment 3Bicycle & Pedestrian Construction ProjectsRNLakeWaco340EL1637(6!MilesosKi nML2DrElmssingr CroStRiveh1rezBrat190.5kLahoeSN03051iveSteinbeck Bend Dr18584 Airbase Rd 933F84 LacyeAvLakeviewCraven3434ve rChina31!(o16372417BrazProgramming Year(!lionMotghDr

Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy BoardMeeting Date: February 15,2018Agenda Item: Consideration and Action regarding approval of Resolution 2018-2: WacoMPO support of safety targets established by the Texas Department ofTransportation in accordance with requirements identified as part of theFixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) ActComments: The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act requires theMetropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program(TIP) to demonstrate a performance based decision process that ties back to regionalperformance targets. The FAST Act requires MPOs to establish regional performancestandards and to meet subsequent reporting requirements. These standards can be tosupport those adopted by either the State DOT or regional transit agencies, whicheveris applicable.The Safety Performance Rule establishes safety performance requirements to assessfatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. It also outlines the process for StateDOTs and MPOs to establish and report their safety targets, and the process that FHWAwill use to assess whether State DOTs and/or MPOs have met or made significantprogress toward meeting their safety targets.TxDOT adopted 2018 safety performance targets for Texas on Aug 31, 2017 for fivefederally required safety performance measures. These targets are applicable to allpublic roads in Texas regardless of ownership. The MPO can either adopt a separate setof targets for transit assets or support the targets approved by Waco Transit. Bysupporting TxDOT targets, the MPO would evaluate projects within the MTP and TIPbased on whether they assist TxDOT in achieving their safety targets. The FAST Actrequires MPO action regarding safety targets on or before February 27, 2018.The TxDOT targets were discussed during the October 26, 2017 Policy Board meeting.The MPO Technical Committee recommendation is to support the TxDOT targets.Subsequently MPO staff solicited public input into the Technical Committeerecommendation. MPO staff conducted a process consistent with Public ParticipationPlan requirements for an MTP amendment to solicit public input, no official commentswere received.Action Required:Motion By:Seconded:Content of Motion:Vote:1. Conduct Staff Presentation2. Conduct Public Hearing3. Approve or disapprove proposed Resolution 2018-2

Waco Metropolitan Planning OrganizationRESOLUTION 2018-2WHEREAS, the Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization was established to identifyand support the implementation of regionally significant transportation projects to addressfuture mobility needs of the Waco Region; and,WHEREAS, the Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board is composedof representatives appointed by the elected City Councils and Counties located within thejurisdiction of the MPO as well as the Texas Department of Transportation; and,WHEREAS, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST) requires theTexas Department of Transportation to establish safety targets for the following measuresbased on five year rolling averages:1.2.3.4.5.Number of Fatalities,Rate of Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT),Number of Serious Injuries,Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT, andNumber of Non- Motorized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serious Injuries, andWHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has officially adoptedthe safety targets in the Highway Safety Improvement Program annual report dated August31, 2017, and has adopted identical safety targets for number of fatalities, rate of fatalitiesand number of serious injuries as set forth in the Highway State Strategic Plan (HSSP), andWHEREAS, the FAST Act also requires each MPO to either support the safety targetsestablished by TxDOT or adopt a separate set of targets no later than 180 days after TxDOTadoption.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE POLICY BOARD OF THE WACO METROPOLITANPLANNING ORGANIZATION:That the Waco MPO Policy Board hereby agrees to adopt and support the TexasDepartment of Transportation 2018 safety targets for the five safety performance measuresattached herein.That the Waco MPO Policy Board further resolves that it will plan and programprojects that contribute to the accomplishment of said targets:P.O. Box 2570, Waco, TX 76702-2570(254) 750-5651www.waco-texas.com/cms-mpompo@wacotx.gov

2018 SafetyTargetsNumber ofFatalitiesFARS/CRIS/ARFDATARate ofFatalitiesFARS/CRIS/ARFDATANumber ofSerious InjuriesFARS/CRISDATASerious InjuryRateCRIS DATA20142015201620172018 Target2018 Target asa 5 657.056.626.716.686.646.74Total Number ofNon-MotorizedFatalities andSerious 1That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which thisresolution is passed is open to the public and that public notice of the time, place andpurpose of said meeting was given as required by law.That all public participation requirements identified within the Waco MPO PublicParticipation Plan related to this action by the Policy Board were met and completed.PASSED AND APPROVED this the 15th day of February, 2018.Dillon MeekCouncil Member – City of WacoChair – Waco MPO Policy BoardATTEST:Christopher Evilia, AICPDirectorP.O. Box 2570, Waco, TX 76702-2570(254) 750-5651www.waco-texas.com/cms-mpompo@wacotx.gov

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance MeasuresFact SheetSafety Performance MeasuresThe Safety Performance Management Measures regulation supports the Highway SafetyImprovement Program (HSIP) and requires State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and Metropolitan PlanningOrganizations (MPOs) to set HSIP targets for 5 safety performance measures. This document highlights therequirements specific to MPOs and provides a comparison of MPOand State DOT responsibilities.HSIP Safety Targets Established by MPOs1How do MPOs establish HSIP targets?Number of fatalitiesCoordination is the key for all stakeholders in setting HSIP targets.Stakeholders should work together to share data, review strategies2 Rate of fatalitiesand understand outcomes. MPOs must work with the State DOT.3 Number of serious injuriesMPOs should also coordinate with the State Highway Safety Office,transit operators, local governments, the FHWA Division Office,4 Rate of serious injuriesNational Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA)of non-motorized fatalities andRegional Office, law enforcement and emergency medical services5 Numbernon-motorized serious injuriesagencies, and others. By working together, considering andintegrating the plans and programs of various safety stakeholders, MPOs will be better able to understand impacts tosafety performance to establish appropriate HSIP targets. Coordination should start with the Strategic Highway SafetyPlan (SHSP). More information on the SHSP is available at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/shsp/.MPOs establish HSIP targets by either:1. agreeing to plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the accomplishment of the State DOTHSIP target or2. committing to a quantifiable HSIP target for the metropolitan planning area.To provide MPOs with flexibility, MPOs may support all the State HSIP targets, establish their own specific numericHSIP targets for all of the performance measures, or any combination. MPOs may support the State HSIP target forone or more individual performance measures and establish specific numeric targets for the other performancemeasures.If an MPO agrees to support a State HSIP target, theMPO would Work with the State and safety stakeholders to addressareas of concern for fatalities or serious injuries withinthe metropolitan planning area Coordinate with the State and include the safetyperformance measures and HSIP targets for all publicroads in the metropolitan area in the MTP (MetropolitanTransportation Plan) Integrate into the metropolitan transportation planningprocess, the safety goals, objectives, performancemeasures and targets described in other State safetytransportation plans and processes such as applicableportions of the HSIP, including the SHSP Include a description in the TIP (TransportationImprovement Program) of the anticipated effect of theTIP toward achieving HSIP targets in the MTP, linkinginvestment priorities in the TIP to those safety targetsIf an MPO establishes its own HSIP target, the MPOwould Establish HSIP targets for all public roads in themetropolitan planning area in coordination with the State Estimate vehicles miles traveled (VMT) for all publicroads within the metropolitan planning area for ratetargets Include safety (HSIP) performance measures and HSIPtargets in the MTP Integrate into the metropolitan transportation planningprocess, the safety goals, objectives, performancemeasures and targets described in other State safetytransportation plans and processes such as applicableportions of the HSIP, including the SHSP Include a description in the TIP of the anticipated effectof the TIP toward achieving HSIP targets in the MTP,linking investment priorities in the TIP to those safetytargetsFHWA-SA-16-084

Volumes for HSIP Rate Targets: MPOs that establish fatality rate orserious injury rate HSIP targets must report the VMT estimate used for such targets, and the methodology used todevelop the estimate, to the State DOT. For more information on volumes for HSIP rate targets, s/technical guidance/index.cfm.Roads addressed by MPO HSIP Targets: HSIP targets cover all public roadways within the metropolitan planningarea boundary regardless of ownership or functional classification, just as State HSIP targets cover all public roads inthe State.How do MPOs with multi-State boundaries establish HSIP targets?MPOs with multi-State boundaries must coordinate with all States involved. If an MPO with multi-State boundarieschooses to support a State HSIP target, it must do so for each State. For example, an MPO that extends into twoStates would agree to plan and program projects to contribute to two separate sets of HSIP targets (one for eachState). If a multi-State MPO decides to establish its own HSIPtarget, the MPO would establish the target for the entireTop 5 Things to Know about MPO HSIP Safetymetropolitan planning area.Performance TargetsWhen do MPOs need to establish thesetargets?States establish HSIP targets and report them for theupcoming calendar year in their HSIP annual report that is dueAugust 31 each year. MPOs must establish HSIP targetswithin 180 days of the State establishing and reporting itsHSIP targets. Since FHWA deems the HSIP reports submittedon August 31, MPOs must establish HSIP targets no later thanFebruary 27 of each year. All MPOs must set a target for each of the 5 HSIPSafety Performance MeasuresMPOs may adopt and support the State’s HSIPtargets, develop their own HSIP targets, or use acombination of both MPOs must establish their HSIP targets by February27 of the calendar year for which they apply MPO HSIP targets are reported to the State DOT MPO HSIP targets are not annually assessed forsignificant progress toward meeting targets; StateHSIP targets are assessed annuallyWhere do MPOs report targets?While States report their HSIP targets to FHWA in their annual HSIP report, MPOs do not report their HSIP targetsdirectly to FHWA. Rather, the State(s) and MPO mutually agree on the manner in which the MPO reports the targets toits respective DOT(s). MPOs must include baseline safety performance, HSIP targets and progress toward achievingHSIP targets in the system performance report in the MTP.Whether an MPO agrees to support a State HSIP target or establishes its own HSIP target the MPO would include inthe MTP a systems performance report evaluating the condition and performance of the transportation system withrespect to the safety performance targets described in the MTP including progress achieved by the MPO in achievingsafety performance targetsAssessment of Significant ProgressWhile FHWA will determine whether a State DOT has met or made sign

Chairman Meek called the December 14, 2017 meeting of the MPO Policy Board to order at 2:02 p.m. Director Evilia stated meeting agendas were posted at the City of Waco and the McLennan County Courthouse on December 6, 2017. II. Approval of the October 26, 2017 meeting minutes. Chairman Meek