Transcription
11/17/2014Sweetwater Union High School DistrictNovember 2014 Community meetingsMGT of America, Inc.November, 2014TONIGHT’S AGENDA Welcome Review of Last Spring’s Community Meetings Results of Facility Condition Assessments Results of Educational Suitability & TechnologyAssessments Breakout Sessions1
11/17/2014Community Engagement SummarySweetwater Union High School DistrictCommunity Input Meeting ScheduleMEETINGNO.DATEREGIONNUMBER OFPARTICIPANTS1March 10, 2014West Chula Vista132March 11, 2014South383March 12, 2014National City204March 13, 2014East Chula Vista30April 21 – 28, 2014Online Survey140OnlineTOTAL241Community Engagement SummaryMethodology InformationSession Large GroupSession (Clickers) SmallGroup Input OnlineSurvey2
11/17/2014Data GatheredOverall physical condition of SUHSD schoolsOverall safety and security in SUHSD schoolsQuality of technology provided for students and staff in SUHSD schoolsSite condition, parking, landscaping, etc.Athletic facilitiesFacility equity among SUHSD schoolsSupport the concept of magnet schoolsAppropriate science facilitiesAppropriate general classroom facilitiesAppropriate visual art program facilitiesAppropriate physical education facilitiesAppropriate performing arts program facilitiesAppropriate special education facilitiesAppropriate computer lab facilitiesAppropriate library/media center facilitiesAppropriate cafeteria facilitiesAppropriate parking and access for parents and busesMost important factor in making facility improvement decisionsInformation Available in the Small GroupDiscussions Results of each of the program areas surveyed(general classrooms, science, performing arts, athletics, etc.) Summary Resultsof issues identified by schoolof on‐site assessments63
11/17/2014Facility Condition AssessmentsInformation on the general health of the building: Architectural Mechanical Electrical Roofing Site SecurityFacility Condition AssessmentsDocumentation of current deficiencies: Existing conditions ProblemsCorrective actions Quantities Photos4
11/17/2014Facility Condition AssessmentsLife cycle cost Life cycle data predicts future facility costsbased on the expected remaining life ofindividual building systems (e.g., roofing,exterior, structural, interior, and more).Facility Condition Assessments90 Facility with excellent/good condition70 to89.9%Facility with average and below average conditionBelow70%Facility with poor and very poor condition, a candidate forreplacement5
11/17/2014Facility Condition AssessmentsEducational Suitability AssessmentsENVIRONMENTThe overall environment of the schools with respect to creating asafe and positive learning environment.CIRCULATIONPedestrian/vehicular circulation and the appropriateness of sitefacilities and signage.SUPPORT SPACEThe existence of facilities and spaces to support the educationalprogram being offered. These include general classrooms, speciallearning spaces (e.g. music rooms, libraries, science labs), andsupport spaces (e.g. administrative offices, counseling offices,reception areas, kitchens, health clinics).SIZEThe adequacy of the size of the program spaces.LOCATIONThe appropriateness of adjacencies (e.g., physical education spaceseparated from quiet spaces).STORAGE &FIXEDEQUIPMENTThe appropriateness of utilities, fixed equipment, storage, androom surfaces (e.g. flooring, ceiling materials, wall coverings).6
11/17/2014Suitability Score DefinitionsSuitability scores are interpreted as follows:Excellent: The facility is designed to provide for and support amajority of the educational program offered. It may have aminor suitability issues but overall it meets the needs of theeducational program.Good: The facility is designed to provide for and support theeducational program offered. It may have minor suitabilityissues but generally meets the needs of the educationalprogram.90 A80‐89B70‐79CFair: The facility has some problems meeting the needs of theeducational program and will require remodeling.60‐69DPoor: The facility has numerous problems meeting the needsof the educational program and needs significant remodeling,additions, or replacement.BELOW60FUnsatisfactory: The facility is unsuitable in support of theeducational program.Average Suitability Score by School TypeSUITABILITY SCORESMINMAXAVERAGEMiddle Schools67.40 D86.40 B75.84 CHigh Schools53.11 F90.90 A76.49 CAdult Schools69.45 D84.33 B78.36 C147
11/17/2014Technology Readiness Score DefinitionsThe BASYS technology readiness score measures the capability of the existinginfrastructure to support information technology. The score can be interpreted asfollows:90 AExcellent: The facility has excellent infrastructure tosupport information technology.80‐89BGood: The facility has the infrastructure to supportinformation technology.70‐79CFair: The facility is lacking in some infrastructure tosupport information technology.60‐69DPoor: The facility is lacking significant infrastructure tosupport information technology.BELOW60FUnsatisfactory: The facility has little or no infrastructureto support information technology.Average Technology Score by School TypeTECHNOLOGY SCORESMINMAXAVERAGEMiddle Schools76.70 C100.00 A89.10 BHigh Schools77.50 C100.00 A87.97 BAdult Schools82.50 B97.50 A90.63 A168
11/17/2014High School ScoresSITE NAMEBonita Vista HighCastle Park HighChula Vista HighEastlake HighHilltop HighMar Vista HighMontgomery HighOlympian HighOtay Ranch HighPalomar HighSan Ysidro HighSouthwest HighSweetwater HighHigh School DEDBDCDCBAAFBCCCTECH.GRADEBBCCBBAAAAABBB17Middle School ScoresSITE NAMEBonita Vista MiddleCastle Park MiddleChula Vista MiddleEastlake MiddleHilltop MiddleMar Vista MiddleMontgomery MiddleNational City MiddleRancho Del Rey MiddleSouthwest MiddleGranger Junior HighMiddle School BBAACAABCAAB189
11/17/2014Adult School ScoresSITE NAMEGRADESSUIT.GRADETECH.GRADEChula Vista AdultAdultDAImperial Beach AdultAdultCBNational City AdultAdultBASan Ysidro AdultAdultBBCAAdult School Average19Questions / Discussion10
4 March 13, 2014 East Chula Vista 30 Online April 21 - 28, 2014 Online Survey 140 TOTAL 241 Sweetwater Union High School District Community Input Meeting Schedule Community Engagement Summary Methodology . Adult Schools 69.45 D 84.33 B 78.36 C 14.
