WIXLIB

2022 Federal Rules of Evidence(C) in a homicide case, the prosecutor may offerevidence of the alleged victim’s trait ofpeacefulness to rebut evidence that the victimwas the first aggressor.(3) Exceptions for a Witness. Evidence of a witness’scharacter may be admitted under Rules 607, 608,and 609.(b) Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts.(1)Prohibited Uses. Evidence of any other crime, wrong,or act is not admissible to prove a person’s characterin order to show that on a particular occasion theperson acted in accordance with the character.(2) Permitted Uses. This evidence may be admissible foranother purpose, such as proving motive, opportunity,intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absenceof mistake, or lack of accident.(3) Notice in a Criminal Case. In a criminal case, theprosecutor must:(A) provide reasonable notice of any such evidencethat the prosecutor intends to offer at trial, sothat the defendant has a fair opportunity to meetit;(B) articulate in the notice the permitted purpose forwhich the prosecutor intends to offer the evidenceand the reasoning that supports the purpose; and(C) do so in writing before trial—or in any form duringtrial if the court, for good cause, excuses lack ofpretrial notice.8

2022 Federal Rules of EvidenceRule 405. Methods of Proving Character(a) By Reputation or Opinion. When evidence of a person’scharacter or character trait is admissible, it may be provedby testimony about the person’s reputation or by testimonyin the form of an opinion. On cross-examination of thecharacter witness, the court may allow an inquiry intorelevant specific instances of the person’s conduct.(b) By Specific Instances of Conduct. When a person’scharacter or character trait is an essential element ofa charge, claim, or defense, the character or trait mayalso be proved by relevant specific instances of theperson’s conduct.Rule 406. Habit; Routine PracticeEvidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routinepractice may be admitted to prove that on a particularoccasion the person or organization acted in accordancewith the habit or routine practice. The court may admit thisevidence regardless of whether it is corroborated orwhether there was an eyewitness.Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial MeasuresWhen measures are taken that would have made an earlierinjury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of thesubsequent measures is not admissible to prove: 9negligence;culpable conduct;a defect in a product or its design; ora need for a warning or instruction.

Compliments ofBut the court may admit this evidence for another purpose,such as impeachment or — if disputed — proving ownership,control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures.Rule 408. Compromise Offers and Negotiations(a) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of the following is not admissible— on behalf of any party — either to prove or disprove thevalidity or amount of a disputed claim or to impeach by aprior inconsistent statement or a contradiction:(1)furnishing, promising, or offering — or accepting,promising to accept, or offering to accept — a valuableconsideration in compromising or attempting tocompromise the claim; and(2) conduct or a statement made during compromisenegotiations about the claim — except when offered ina criminal case and when the negotiations related to aclaim by a public office in the exercise of its regulatory,investigative, or enforcement authority.(b) Exceptions. The court may admit this evidence for anotherpurpose, such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice,negating a contention of undue delay, or proving an effortto obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.Rule 409. Offers to Pay Medical and Similar ExpensesEvidence of furnishing, promising to pay, or offering to paymedical, hospital, or similar expenses resulting from aninjury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.10

2022 Federal Rules of EvidenceRule 410. Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements(a) Prohibited Uses. In a civil or criminal case, evidence of thefollowing is not admissible against the defendant who madethe plea or participated in the plea discussions:(1)(2)(3)a guilty plea that was later withdrawn;a nolo contendere plea;a statement made during a proceeding on either ofthose pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure11 or a comparable state procedure; or(4) a statement made during plea discussions with anattorney for the prosecuting authority if thediscussions did not result in a guilty plea or theyresulted in a later withdrawn guilty plea.(b) Exceptions. The court may admit a statement described inRule 410(a)(3) or (4):(1)(2)in any proceeding in which another statement madeduring the same plea or plea discussions has beenintroduced, if in fairness the statements ought to beconsidered together; orin a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement,if the defendant made the statement under oath, onthe record, and with counsel present.Rule 411. Liability InsuranceEvidence that a person was or was not insured againstliability is not admissible to prove whether the person actednegligently or otherwise wrongfully. But the court mayadmit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving a11

Compliments ofwitness’s bias or prejudice or proving agency, ownership,or control.Rule 412. Sex-Offense Cases: The Victim’s SexualBehavior or Predisposition(a) Prohibited Uses. The following evidence is not admissiblein a civil or criminal proceeding involving alleged sexualmisconduct:(1)evidence offered to prove that a victim engaged inother sexual behavior; or(2) evidence offered to prove a victim’s sexualpredisposition.(b) Exceptions.(1)Criminal Cases. The court may admit the followingevidence in a criminal case:(A) evidence of specific instances of a victim’s sexualbehavior, if offered to prove that someone otherthan the defendant was the source of semen,injury, or other physical evidence;(B) evidence of specific instances of a victim’s sexualbehavior with respect to the person accused ofthe sexual misconduct, if offered by the defendantto prove consent or if offered by the prosecutor;and(C) evidence whose exclusion would violate thedefendant’s constitutional rights.(2) Civil Cases. In a civil case, the court may admitevidence offered to prove a victim’s sexual behavior orsexual predisposition if its probative value substantially12

2022 Federal Rules of Evidenceoutweighs the danger of harm to any victim and ofunfair prejudice to any party. The court may admitevidence of a victim’s reputation only if the victim hasplaced it in controversy.(c) Procedure to Determine Admissibility.(1)Motion. If a party intends to offer evidence under Rule412(b), the party must:(A) file a motion that specifically describes theevidence and states the purpose for which it is tobe offered;(B) do so at least 14 days before trial unless the court,for good cause, sets a different time;(C) serve the motion on all parties; and(D) notify the victim or, when appropriate, the victim’sguardian or representative.(2) Hearing. Before admitting evidence under this rule,the court must conduct an in camera hearing and givethe victim and parties a right to attend and be heard.Unless the court orders otherwise, the motion, relatedmaterials, and the record of the hearing must be andremain sealed.(d) Definition of “Victim.” In this rule, “victim” includes analleged victim.Rule 413. Similar Crimes in Sexual-Assault Cases(a) Permitted Uses. In a criminal case in which a defendant isaccused of a sexual assault, the court may admit evidencethat the defendant committed any other sexual assault.The evidence may be considered on any matter to whichit is relevant.13

Compliments of(b) Disclosure to the Defendant. If the prosecutor intends tooffer this evidence, the prosecutor must disclose it to thedefendant, including witnesses’ statements or a summary ofthe expected testimony. The prosecutor must do so at least15 days before trial or at a later time that the court allowsfor good cause.(c) Effect on Other Rules. This rule does not limit the admissionor consideration of evidence under any other rule.(d) Definition of “Sexual Assault.” In this rule and Rule 415,“sexual assault” means a crime under federal law or understate law (as “state” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 513) involving:(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)any conduct prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 109A;contact, without consent, between any part of thedefendant’s body — or an object — and anotherperson’s genitals or anus;contact, without consent, between the defendant’sgenitals or anus and any part of another person’s body;deriving sexual pleasure or gratification from inflictingdeath, bodily injury, or physical pain on anotherperson; oran attempt or conspiracy to engage in conductdescribed in subparagraphs (1) – (4).Rule 414. Similar Crimes in Child-Molestation Cases(a) Permitted Uses. In a criminal case in which a defendant isaccused of child molestation, the court may admit evidencethat the defendant committed any other child molestation.The evidence may be considered on any matter to whichit is relevant.14

2022 Federal Rules of Evidence(b) Disclosure to the Defendant. If the prosecutor intends tooffer this evidence, the prosecutor must disclose it to thedefendant, including witnesses’ statements or a summary ofthe expected testimony. The prosecutor must do so at least15 days before trial or at a later time that the court allowsfor good cause.(c) Effect on Other Rules. This rule does not limit theadmission or consideration of evidence under any otherrule.(d) Definition of “Child” and “Child Molestation.” In this ruleand Rule 415:(1)(2)15“child” means a person below the age of 14; and“child molestation” means a crime under federal lawor under state law (as “state” is defined in 18 U.S.C. §513) involving:(A) any conduct prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 109Aand committed with a child;(B) any conduct prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 110;(C) contact between any part of the defendant’s body— or an object — and a child’s genitals or anus;(D) contact between the defendant’s genitals or anusand any part of a child’s body;(E) deriving sexual pleasure or gratification frominflicting death, bodily injury, or physical pain ona child; or(F) an attempt or conspiracy to engage in conductdescribed in subparagraphs (A) – (E).

Compliments ofRule 415. Similar Acts in Civil Cases Involving SexualAssault or Child Molestation(a) Permitted Uses. In a civil case involving a claim for reliefbased on a party’s alleged sexual assault or childmolestation, the court may admit evidence that the partycommitted any other sexual assault or child molestation.The evidence may be considered as provided in Rules 413and 414.(b) Disclosure to the Opponent. If a party intends to offer thisevidence, the party must disclose it to the party againstwhom it will be offered, including witnesses’ statements or asummary of the expected testimony. The party must do soat least 15 days before trial or at a later time that the courtallows for good cause.(c) Effect on Other Rules. This rule does not limit the admissionor consideration of evidence under any other rule.ARTICLE V. PRIVILEGESRule 501. Privilege in GeneralThe common law — as interpreted by United States courtsin the light of reason and experience — governs a claim ofprivilege unless any of the following provides otherwise: the United States Constitution;a federal statute; orrules prescribed by the Supreme Court.But in a civil case, state law governs privilege regardinga claim or defense for which state law supplies the ruleof decision.16

2022 Federal Rules of EvidenceRule 502. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product;Limitations on WaiverThe following provisions apply, in the circumstances set out,to disclosure of a communication or information covered bythe attorney-client privilege or work-product protection.(a) Disclosure Made in a Federal Proceeding or to a FederalOffice or Agency; Scope of a Waiver. When the disclosureis made in a federal proceeding or to a federal office oragency and waives the attorney-client privilege or workproduct protection, the waiver extends to an undisclosedcommunication or information in a federal or stateproceeding only if:(1)(2)the waiver is intentional;the disclosed and undisclosed communications orinformation concern the same subject matter; and(3) they ought in fairness to be considered together.(b) Inadvertent Disclosure. When made in a federal proceedingor to a federal office or agency, the disclosure does notoperate as a waiver in a federal or state proceeding if:(1)(2)the disclosure is inadvertent;the holder of the privilege or protection tookreasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and(3) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectifythe error, including (if applicable) following FederalRule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B).(c) Disclosure Made in a State Proceeding. When thedisclosure is made in a state proceeding and is not thesubject of a state-court order concerning waiver, the17

Compliments ofdisclosure does not operate as a waiver in a federalproceeding if the disclosure:(1)would not be a waiver under this rule if it had beenmade in a federal proceeding; or(2) is not a waiver under the law of the state where thedisclosure occurred.(d) Controlling Effect of a Court Order. A federal court mayorder that the privilege or protection is not waived bydisclosure connected with the litigation pending before thecourt — in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver inany other federal or state proceeding.(e) Controlling Effect of a Party Agreement. An agreement onthe effect of disclosure in a federal proceeding is bindingonly on the parties to the agreement, unless it isincorporated into a court order.(f) Controlling Effect of this Rule. Notwithstanding Rules 101and 1101, this rule applies to state proceedings and tofederal court-annexed and federal court-mandatedarbitration proceedings, in the circumstances set out in therule. And notwithstanding Rule 501, this rule applies even ifstate law provides the rule of decision.(g) Definitions. In this rule:(1)(2)“attorney-client privilege” means the protection thatapplicable law provides for confidential attorney-clientcommunications; and“work-product protection” means the protection thatapplicable law provides for tangible material (or itsintangible equivalent) prepared in anticipation oflitigation or for trial.18

2022 Federal Rules of EvidenceARTICLE VI. WITNESSESRule 601. Competency to Testify in GeneralEvery person is competent to be a witness unless theserules provide otherwise. But in a civil case, state lawgoverns the witness’s competency regarding a claim ordefense for which state law supplies the rule of decision.Rule 602. Need for Personal KnowledgeA witness may testify to a matter only if evidence isintroduced sufficient to support a finding that the witnesshas personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to provepersonal knowledge may consist of the witness’s owntestimony. This rule does not apply to a witness’s experttestimony under Rule 703.Rule 603. Oath or Affirmation to Testify TruthfullyBefore testifying, a witness must give an oath or affirmationto testify truthfully. It must be in a form designed to impressthat duty on the witness’s conscience.Rule 604. InterpreterAn interpreter must be qualified and must give an oath oraffirmation to make a true translation.Rule 605. Judge’s Competency as a WitnessThe presiding judge may not testify as a witness at the trial.A party need not object to preserve the issue.19

Compliments ofRule 606. Juror’s Competency as a Witness(a) At the Trial. A juror may not testify as a witness before theother jurors at the trial. If a juror is called to testify, thecourt must give a party an opportunity to object outside thejury’s presence.(b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdictor Indictment.(1)Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. During aninquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, ajuror may not testify about any statement made orincident that occurred during the jury’s deliberations;the effect of anything on that juror’s or another juror’svote; or any juror’s mental processes concerning theverdict or indictment. The court may not receive ajuror’s affidavit or evidence of a juror’s statement onthese matters.(2) Exceptions. A juror may testify about whether:(A) extraneous prejudicial information was improperlybrought to the jury’s attention;(B) an outside influence was improperly brought tobear on any juror; or(C) a mistake was made in entering the verdict on theverdict form.Rule 607. Who May Impeach a WitnessAny party, including the party that called the witness, mayattack the witness’s credibility.20

2022 Federal Rules of EvidenceRule 608. A Witness’s Character for Truthfulnessor Untruthfulness(a) Reputation or Opinion Evidence. A witness’s credibilitymay be attacked or supported by testimony about thewitness’s reputation for having a character for truthfulnessor untruthfulness, or by testimony in the form of an opinionabout that character. But evidence of truthful character isadmissible only after the witness’s character fortruthfulness has been attacked.(b) Specific Instances of Conduct. Except for a criminalconviction under Rule 609, extrinsic evidence is notadmissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conductin order to attack or support the witness’s character fortruthfulness. But the court may, on cross-examination, allowthem to be inquired into if they are probative of thecharacter for truthfulness or untruthfulness of:(1)(2)the witness; oranother witness whose character the witness beingcross-examined has testified about. By testifying onanother matter, a witness does not waive any privilegeagainst self-incrimination for testimony that relatesonly to the witness’s character for truthfulness.Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of a CriminalConviction(a) In General. The following rules apply to attacking awitness’s character for truthfulness by evidence of acriminal conviction:21

Compliments of(1)for a crime that, in the convicting jurisdiction, waspunishable by death or by imprisonment for morethan one year, the evidence:(A) must be admitted, subject to Rule 403, in a civilcase or in a criminal case in which the witness isnot a defendant; and(B) must be admitted in a criminal case in which thewitness is a defendant, if the probative value ofthe evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect tothat defendant; and(2) for any crime regardless of the punishment, theevidence must be admitt

2022Federal Rules of Evidence 6 Rule 302. Applying State Law to Presumptions in Civil Cases In a civil case, state law governs the effect of a presumption regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision. ARTICLE IV. RELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: