Transcription
I1NT CA-SuirPn.ject:PIERT/CPN/1 r\1etlil(.)(!Is (i)fP1(s)ject MtiIenh1ei1tBy:Dirk B. SylvesterMay 14,1994Department of Computer Science And EngineeringSouthern Methodist UniversityProfessor Jose Dula1
Table of Contents.3. . .AbstractBackground and DescriptionInitial AnalysisTask AnalysisGantt Chart AnalysisPERT Chart AnalysisResource AnalysisConclusion.5.6.7less. . . 10AppendicesA.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.I.J.K.L.M.N.IBM CA-SuperProjectMicrosoft Project 3.0IBM CA-SuperProjectIBM CA-SuperProjectMicrosoft Project 3.0Microsoft Project 3.0IBM CA-SuperProjectMicrosoft Project 3.0IBM CA-SuperProjectMicrosoft Project 3.0IBM CA-SuperProjectMicrosoft Project 3.0IBM CA-SuperProjectMicrosoft Project 3.0-PATask ReportTask ReportGantt ChartCritical Path Gantt ChartGantt ChartCritical Path Gantt ChartPERT ChartPERT ChartResource ReportsResource ReportsDate Outline ReportProject SummaryCalendar ReportCalendar Report
AbstractCA-SuperProject is an IBM computer software packagedesigned to help project managers plan, organize, and manage tasks andresources to accomplish a defined objective. This report is designed togive an overview of CA-SuperProject and its capabilities as well as tocompare this software package to the Macintosh version of MicrosoftProject 3.0 in conjunction with the Moncrief Radiation Center ParkingGarage project. This report should also be considered as a complimentaryreport with the Microsoft Project 3.0 report written by Dirk Sylvester andJeff Thompson. The key difference associated between the two softwarepackages lies in the choice and preference of views and options accordingto a company's (or person's) computer system available.3
Background and DescriptionCA-SuperProject is designed to help project managers plan and carryout successful projects. SuperProject is very similar to Microsoft Project3.0 on the Macintosh but with a little more versatility in the graphical andtextual views. Most companies would base their decision between the twoon their existing computer system or on their preferences and needs.Critical Path Method (CPM, is the method of calculating the criticalpath, or the longest path through the project whereby the project's finishwill be delayed if any task along that path either slips or runs late.Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) shows the task dependencyrelationships for the project. Basically, the PERT chart is a network flowrepresentation linking tasks together and producing a critical path in boxstyle views.CA-SuperProject uses the Gantt Chart and the PERT chart as the twomain views along with other features to display graphics and charts forquick and easy project summaries to communicate a project's needs daily.4
Initial AnalysisThe primary step in evaluation of IBM's software package was toread the User's Guide and the Reference Manual. The interpretation andanalysis of CA-SuperProject with respect to the Moncrief Radiation CenterParking Garage could not be completely evaluated until the MicrosoftProject 3.0's version was understood. This may be cause for some biastoward one system over the other in certain aspects. The next stage was thedata entry followed by task linking and project datelines. The Gantt chartanalysis using IBM followed next with its unusual difference from theMacintosh version. Naturally, an analysis of the PERT chart followed withsome .added features on the IBM version compared to the Macintoshpackage. Project summaries and a variety of reports followed with aconclusion giving the basic differences and similarities between the twosoftware packages.5
Task Entry AnalysisThe task entry forms for CA-SuperProject and Microsoft Project 3.0are similar in logic but different in format. See appendices A-i throughA-12 for IBM's version and B-i through B-4 for Macintosh's version.Each outline sheet printed tasks with only short abbreviations along withnumerically ordered task identifications. Scheduled and Finish dates werealso on the reports. However, on the IBM CA-SuperProject, nopredecessors were included but the program did have task status listings(appendix A-i through A-4) and space for detailed descriptions of the tasks(appendix A-9 through A-12). The linking of tasks is done by indicatingfinish-to-start, start-to-start, and finish-to-finish links which is a similarlinking process for both programs but is formatted differently for eachprogram.With a finish-to-start (FS) link, one task must finish before the nexttasks starts. In a start-to-start (SS) link, the successor task can start at thesame time or later than its predecessor, but not earlier. In a finish-tofinish (FF) link, a successor task can finish at the same time as itspredecessor or later, but not earlier. Microsoft's task report has a columnfor the predecessor links while IBM's task report does not include theselinks except for linking arrows on the Gantt chart (appendix C-i throughC-3), which can sometimes get confusing. Entering these task data valuesbecomes very confusing when switching from one package to the next.Microsoft Project 3.0 links by predecessors as if saying, "This predecessoris a finish-to-start link to that successor," while CA-SuperProject reversesthis procedure as if rewording the saying to "that successor is linked to thispredecessor by a finish-to-start." It was even difficult to sort out IBM'stask links with a copy of the task links given by Microsoft Project 3.0's taskreport.Ri
Gantt Chart AnalysisThe Gantt charts of both software programs were similar in logic,duration, and task linkage (see appendix C,D,E, & F). Both programsevaluated the same critical path of 114 days. On the CA-SuperProjectpackage, however, the first entry must be the complete project for whichall following tasks are associated. This entry will record a summary in barform of all associated tasks underneath it, adding up task durations as theyare entered giving the project duration a total of 114 days (appendix C-i:the top bar). The Gantt charts remained similar except for the task linkingarrows and the different task descriptions across the top. The IBMversion, however, seemed to be more readable in small print than theMacintosh version. See appendix C through appendix F for the differencesamong versions. Also included are the critical path Gantt charts(appendices D & F) which show the same similarities and differences as theregular Gantt charts.'4
PERT Chart AnalysisThe PERT charts of both the IBM CA-SuperProject and theMacintosh Microsoft Project 3.0 are similar in critical path but verydifferent in format (appendix G through H). The id boxes are automaticallyarranged on the IBM and cannot be repositioned for clarity like theMacintosh package does. Microsoft Project 3.0 will automatically calculatethe id boxes in numerical order the first time but will let the userreposition the boxes for better clarity (see appendix H-i). CASuperProject, unlike Microsoft Project 3.0, ties all tasks without successorsto a final project box, which is the project end (see appendix G-2). Thisbox is titled P3 which is the project end date, or it can be the start of a newproject that will not start until this project is completed. In both cases, thePERT philosophy remains the same except that IBM's PERT view seems toadhere to wall chart print outs only while the Macintosh's view is moreadaptable for quick, accessible print outs.8
Resource AnalysisBoth resource reports for the two software packages are fairly thesame with respect to graphic interpretation. See appendix I for IBM'sresource views and appendix J for Macintosh's resource views. Bothprograms illustrate resource allocations and alert users to resourceoverallocations. They both have similar responses to the compensation ofan overallocated resource. Microsoft Project 3.0's resource report seemsmore detailed than CA-SuperProject's resource report (see appendix J-1vs. Appendix I-i through 1-2). On IBM's report (appendix I-i), there is acolumn for priority level, which comes handy when assigning resourceneeds according to task importance. This feature has a level entry from 1to 999 to give greater importance to one task over another in the event aresource conflict arises. The higher the number, the more important atasks completion is. With this exception of priority leveling, bothprograms are basically similar in their resource reporting methods.
ConclusionBoth the IBM CA-SuperProject and the Macintosh Microsoft Project3.0 use similar functions in the project management business. Each havedifferent features in some sense but both logically reflect upon each other.(See appendices K,L,M,&N for differences and similarities in outlines,summaries, and calendar reports.) The major focus for decision betweenthe two would be the availability of the computer system. One importantadvantage with IBM is its worldwide compatibility and the wide range ofavailability of the IBM machines in printing and graphing shops.Macintosh is limited in its plotter capabilities whereas IBM has availableplotting in most all graphical printing companies. The IBM version alsoseems to allow more report views to choose from with options to includeor exclude certain details on different reports. IBM also has beginnermodes with beginner reports which are graphically easier to understand.Expert modes and views are also available.In conclusion, IBM CA-SuperProject and Macintosh MicrosoftProject 3.0 are equally comparable given all criteria. Personal choice isthe final judge in usage of one over the other. Someone may like the tasklinkage system of arrows on IBM's Gantt chart better than the predecessorcolumn on Macintosh's task report, or vice versa. All other applicationsand reporting procedures can also be compared with a company's specialneeds. Either way, project management is much more efficient and bettercommunicated or comprehended through the use of software packages likeCA-SuperProject and Microsoft Project 3.0.10
.S.SAPPENDICESA.IBM CA-SuperProject-Task ReportB.Microsoft Project 3.0-Task ReportC.IBM CA-SuperProject-Gantt ChartD.IBM CA-SuperProject-Critical Path Gantt ChartE.Microsoft Project 3.0-Gantt ChartF.Microsoft Project 3.0-Critical Path Gantt ChartG.IBM CA-SuperProject-PERT ChartH.Microsoft Project 3.0-PERT ChartI.IBM CA-SuperProject-Resource ReportsJ.Microsoft Project 3.0-Resource ReportsK.IBM CA-SuperProject-Date Outline ReportL.Microsoft Project 3.0-Project SummaryM.IBM CA-SuperProject-Calendar ReportN.Microsoft Project 3.0-Calendar Report.11
Compare Dates7:07p05-04-94Heading/TaskMD4.PJSite CompactConstruct Rebar PiersDRILL PIERS 'A'Drill Piers 11 13"Drill Piers ElectExcavate GB C-13-ADrill Piers "B"REB DEL GB13-19RD GB 23&25RD W13-W26RD W8-W10FOS GB14,15,23,25FOS GB13-16EXCAVATE GB GB 1-13-ARGB.14,15,23,25,13,16FOS W13-19DRILL PIERS 'C'CFGB14,15,23,25,13,16REBAR W13-W19SITE EXCAVATIONPGB 14,15,23,25,13,16EXCVT W8 THRU W10SITE COMP. B-A-1-6CF W13-W19RD W1-W7RD GB-20,21,22EXCVT W1-W7FOS W8-W10SITE FILL & COMP C-13REBAR W8-W10DRILL PIERS 'D'PF W13-W19COMP FILL SOG ELECT RADJUST FORMS ERPREBAR SOG ELECT RPOUR SOG ELECT RCF W8 THRU W10DRILL PIERS ELEVATORSET ELECT GEAR ERPOUR WALL W8-W10FOS Wi THRU W7DRILL ELEVATOR SHAFTRD BALANCE OF JOBREBAR WALLS W1-W7INSTALL MASONRY ERCLOSE WALL FORM W1-7INSTALL TEMP ROOF ERPOUR WALL W1-W7E R TO SUBCONTFOS W20-W26Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Task uledStart05-16-94 8:00a
Page2 ( 1, 2)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Compare Dates7:07p05-04-94Task ReportHeading/TaskREBAR WALLS W20-26CLOSE WALLS W20-26POUR WALLS W20-26FOS GB4-GB1REBAR GB4-GB1CLOSE FORMS GB4-GB1ELECT UNDERGROUNDMECH UNDERGROUNDF R R UNDERGPOUR GB4 THRU GB1FOS GB23,24,20,21,22REB GB23,24,20,21,22CF GB23,24,20,21,22POUR GB23,24,20,21,22INS COMP FILL 1-6-A-BE F SOG 1-6-A-BREB SOG 1-6-A-BFOS GB5-GB13INS COMP FIL A-B-1-13POUR SOG 1-6-A-BREBAR GB5-GB13FORM ELEV SLAB P5REB PT ELEV SLAB P5CLOSE FORMS GB5-13E F SOG C-B-1-6MECH ROUGH P5FIRE R ROUGH P5ELECTR ROUGH P5INS COMP FIL A-B-13-6REBAR SOG C-B-1-6E F SOG C-B-6-10POUR SOG C-B-1-6REB SOG C-B-6-10POUR ELEV SLAB P5POUR GB5-GB13EDGE FORMS C-B-10-13REBAR C-B-10-13FOS ELEVATOR GRADEBAR WALS REB TIER/I1REB GB AT ELEVATORPOUR SOG C-B-6-10BAR WALS FORM TIER/I1BAR WALS POUR #1FORM ELEVATED P7REB&PT ELEVTD SLAB P7POUR C-B-10-13E F SOG B-A-13-6C GB F AT ELEVATORFIRE R ROUGH P#6ELECTR ROUGH P1/6F ELEVTD SLAB :00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a
Page3 ( 1, 3)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Compare Dates05-04-947:07pTask ReportHeading/TaskREB GB 16-17REB SOG B-A-13-6MECH ROUGH P#6REB&PT ELVTD SLAB P1/6POUR GB'S AT ELEVATORFOS GB16-GB17CLOSE GB16-GB17POUR SOG B-A-13-6FIRE R ROUGH P#7ELECTR ROUGH P#7POUR GB16-17MECH ROUGH P#7FIRE R ROUGH P#8ELECT ROUGH P#8MECH ROUGH P#8FORM ELEVTD SLAB P#9POUR ELEVATED P#7REB ELEVATED SLAB P#8POUR ELVATED SLAB P#8BAR WALS REB TIER #2BAR WALS FORM TIER #2BAR WALS REB TIER #3ELECTR ROUGH P#9BAR WALS POUR #2BAR WALS FORM TIER #3POUR BAR WALS P#3MECH ROUGH P#9FORM ELVTD SLAB P1/10REB&PT LVTD SLAB P1/10ELECT PERM POW SYS'SELECT: LIGHTS&T OUTPOUR ELVTD SLAB P#9ELECT ROUGH P#10MECH ROUGH P1/10FIRE R ROUGH P1/10REB BAR WALS TIER #4BAR WALS FORM TIER #4POUR BAR WALS #4ELVATR RAILS&DFRANESINSTALL ELEVATORSPOUR ELVTD SLAB P//laFORM STAIR 'A'REBAR STAIR 'A'MASSONRY ELVTR SHAFTFORM STAIR 'B'POUR STAIR 'A'REBAR STAIR 'B'HANDRAILS STAIR 'A'POUR STAIR 'B'REG DFRAMES FOR MASHANDRAILS STAIR 00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a8:00a
Page4 ( 1, 4)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Compare Dates05-04-947:07pTask ReportHeading/TaskFIRE RISER POUR #9ACRYLIC COADINGSROOFING SYSTEMSMECHANICAL PUMPSMECH TRIM OUT @ SYS.EXCES CONTRL'S GRPHCSSITE CONCRETESITE LANDSCAPEPROJECT PUNCH LISTPJ INSPCTION'S FINALSPROJECT :00a8:00a8:00a
Page5 ( 2, 1)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Compare Dates05-04-947:07pTask ReportHeading/TaskMD4.PJSite CompactConstruct Rebar PiersDRILL ' PIERS 'A'Drill Piers 11 13"Drill Piers ElectExcavate GB C-13--ADrill Piers "B"REB DEL GB13-19RD GB 23&25RD W13-W26RD W8-W10FOS GB14,15,23,25FOS GB13-16EXCAVATE GB GB 1-13-ARCB.14,15,23,25,13,16FOS W13-19DRILL PIERS 'C'CFGB14,15,23,25,13,16REBAR W13-W19SITE EXCAVATIONPGB 14,15,23,25,13,16EXCVT W8 THRU WlOSITE COMP. B-A-1-6CF W13-W19RD Wl-W7RD GB-20,21,22EXCVT Wl-W7FOS W8-W10SITE FILL & COMP C-13REBAR W8-W10DRILL PIERS 'D'PF W13-W19COMP FILL SOG ELECT RADJUST FORMS ERPREBAR SOG ELECT RPOUR SOG ELECT RCF W8 THRU WlODRILL PIERS ELEVATORSET ELECT GEAR ERPOUR WALL W8-W10FOS Wl THRU W7DRILL ELEVATOR SHAFTRD BALANCE OF JOBREBAR WALLS W1-W7INSTALL MASONRY ERCLOSE WALL FORM W1-7INSTALL TEMP ROOF ERPOUR WALL W1-W7E R TO SUBCONTFOS 00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p
Compare Dates7:08p05-04-94Heading/TaskREBAR WALLS W20-26CLOSE WALLS W20-26POUR WALLS W20-26FOS GB4-GB1REBAR GB4-GB1CLOSE FORMS GB4-GB1ELECT UNDERGROUNDMECH UNDERGROUNDF R R UNDERGPOUR G54 THRU GB1FOS GB23,24,20,21,22REB GB23,24,20,21,22CF GB23,24,20,21,22POUR GB23,24,20,21,22INS COMP FILL 1-6-A-BE F SOG 1-6-A-BREB SOG 1-6-A-BFOS GB5-GB13INS COMP FIL A-B-1-13POUR SOG 1-6-A-BREBAR GB5-GB13FORM ELEV SLAB P5REB PT ELEV SLAB P5CLOSE FORMS GB5-13E F SOG C-B-1-6MECH ROUGH P5FIRE R ROUGH P5ELECTR ROUGH P5INS COMP FIL A-B-13-6REBAR SOG C-B-1-6E F SOG C-B-6-10POUR SOG C-B-1-6REB SOG C-B-6-10POUR ELEV SLAB P5POUR GB5-GB13EDGE FORMS C-B-10-13REBAR C-B-10-13FOS ELEVATOR GRADEBAR WALS REB TIER#1REB GB AT ELEVATORPOUR SOG C-B-6-10BAR WALS FORM TIER#iBAR WALS POUR #1FORM ELEVATED P7REB&PT ELEVTD SLAB P7POUR C-B-10-13E F SOG B-A-13-6C GB F AT ELEVATORFIRE R ROUGH P#6ELECTR ROUGH P#6F ELEVTD SLAB P#8Page6 ( 2, 2)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Task 0p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p
Page7 ( 2, 3)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10 Compare Dates7:08p05-04-94Task ReportHeading/Task REB GB 16-17REB SOG B-A-13-6MECH ROUGH P#6REB&PT ELVTD SLAB P#6POUR GB'S AT ELEVATORFOS GB16-GB17CLOSE GB16-GB17POUR SOG B-A-13-6FIRE R ROUGH P#7ELECTR ROUGH P#7POUR GB16-17MECH ROUGH P#7FIRE R ROUGH P#8ELECT ROUGH P#8NECH ROUGH P#8FORM ELEVTD SLAB P#9POUR ELEVATED P#7REB ELEVATED SLAB P#8POUR ELVATED SLAB P#8BAR WALS REB TIER #2BAR WALS FORM TIER #2BAR WALS REB TIER #3ELECTR ROUGH P#9BAR WALS POUR #2BAR WALS FORM TIER #3POUR BAR WALS P#3MECH ROUGH P#9FORM ELVTD SLAB P#10REB&PT LVTD SLAB P#10ELECT PERK POW SYS'SELECT: LIGHTS&T OUTPOUR ELVTD SLAB P#9ELECT ROUGH P1/10MECH ROUGH P#10FIRE R ROUGH P1/10REB BAR WALS TIER #4BAR WALS FORM TIER #4POUR BAR WALS #4ELVATR RAILS&DFRANESINSTALL ELEVATORSPOUR ELVTD SLAB P1/10FORM STAIR 'A'REBAR STAIR 'A'MASSONRY ELVTR SHAFTFORM STAIR 'B'POUR STAIR 'A'REBAR STAIR 'B'HANDRAILS STAIR 'A'POUR STAIR 'B'REG DFRAMES FOR MASHANDRAILS STAIR :00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p5:00p
ICompare Dates7:08p05-04-94Heading/TaskSFIRE RISER POUR #9ACRYLIC COADINGSROOFING SYSTEMSMECHANICAL PUMPSMECH TRIM OUT @ SYS.EXCES CONTRL'S GRPHCSSITE CONCRETESITE LANDSCAPEPROJECT PUNCH LISTPJ INSPCTION'S FINALSPROJECT TURNOVER8 ( 2, 4)PageProject: MD4.PJRevision: 10Task 0p5:00p5:00p5:00p
9 ( 3, 1)PageProject: MD4.PJRevision: 10DatesS Compare7:08p05-04-94Task ReportDescriptionHeading/TaskSMD4.PJSite CompactConstruct Rebar PiersDRILL PIERS 'A'Drill Piers 11 13"Drill Piers ElectExcavate GB C-13-ADrill Piers "B"REB DEL GB13-19RD GB 23&25RD W13-W26RD W8-W10FOS GB14,15,23,25FOS GB13-16EXCAVATE GB GB 1-13-ARGB.14,15,23,25,13,16FOS W13-19DRILL PIERS 'C'CFGB14,15,23,25,13,16REBAR W13-W19SITE EXCAVATIONPGB 14,15,23,25,13,16EXCVT W8 THRU WlOSITE' COMP. B-A-1-6CF W13-W19RD W1-W7RD GB-20,21,22EXCVT W1-W7FOS W8-W10SITE FILL & COMP C-13REBAR W8-W10DRILL PIERS 'D'PF W13-W19COMP FILL SOG ELECT RADJUST FORMS ERPREBAR SOG ELECT RPOUR SOG ELECT RCF W8 THRU WlODRILL PIERS ELEVATORSET ELECT GEAR ERPOUR WALL W8-W10FOS Wl THRU W7DRILL ELEVATOR SHAFTRD BALANCE OF JOBREBAR WALLS Wl-W7INSTALL MASONRY ERCLOSE WALL FORM W1-7INSTALL TEMP ROOF ERPOUR WALL Wl-W7E R TO SUBCONTFOS W20-W26The Moncrief Radiation Center Parking GarageSite Compaction A-B-6-13Construct rebar pier cagesDrill Piers "A" line 17 eachDrill Piers 11 13" line 6eachDrill piers elect room 2 eachexcavate grade beam C-13-Aline 13 eachRebar Delve GB13-GB19Reabr delv gb23&25rebar delve w13-w16rebar delve w8-w10FORM ONE SIDE GB14,15,23,25FORM ONE SIDE GB13-16REBARGB 14,15,23,25,13,16FORM ONE SIDE W13-W19DRILL PIERS 'C' LINE BEANCLOSE FORMSPOUR CONCRETEEXCAVATE W8 THROUGH WlOSITE COMPACTION B-A-1-6CLOSE FORMSREBAR DELVEREBAR DELVEEXCAVATEFORM ONE SIDE W8 THROUGH W10SITE FILL & COMPACTION C-13-ALINES 6 EACHPOUR FORMS W13 - W19COKMPACT FILL SLAB ON GROUND ELECTRICAL ROOMADJUST FORMS ELECT ROOM POURREBAR SLAB ON GROUND ELECTRICAL ROOMPOUR SLAB ON GROUND ELECTRICAL ROOMCLOSE FORMS W8 THROUGH WlO14 EACHSET ELECTRICAL GEAR ELECTRICAL ROOMFORM ONE SIDE Wl THROUGH W7REBAR DELVE BALANCE OF JOBINSTALL MASSONRY ELECTRICAL ROOMCLOSE WALL Wi THROUGH W7INSTALL TEMPORARY ROOF ELECTRICAL ROOMELECTRICAL ROOM TO SUBCONTRACTORFORM ONE SIDE W20 THROUGH W26A-9
Page 10 ( 3, 2)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10 Compare Dates7:08p05-04-94Task ReportDescriptionHeading/TaskSREBAR WALLS W20-26CLOSE WALLS W20-26POUR WALLS W20-26FOS GB4-GB1REBAR GB4-GB1CLOSE FORMS GB4-GB1ELECT UNDERGROUNDMECH UNDERGROUNDF R R UNDERGPOUR GB4 THRU ,20,21,22POUR GB23,24,20,21,22INS COMP FILL 1-6-A-BE F SOG 1-6-A-BREB SOG 1-6-A-BFOS GB5-GB13INS COMP FIL A-B-1-13POUR SOG 1-6-A-BREBAR GB5-GB13FORM ELEV SLAB PSR'EB PT ELEV SLAB P5CLOSE FORMS GB5-13E F SOG C-B-1-6MECH ROUGH P5FIRE R ROUGH P5ELECTR ROUGH P5INS COMP FIL A-B-13-6REBAR SOG C-B-1-6E F SOG C-B-6-10POUR SOG C-B-1-6REB SOG C-B-6-10POUR ELEV SLAB P5POUR GB5-GB13EDGE FORMS C-B-10-13REBAR C-B-10-13FOS ELEVATOR GRADEBAR WALS REB TIER#1REB GB AT ELEVATORPOUR SOG C-B-6-10BAR WALS FORM TIER#1BAR WALS POUR #1FORM ELEVATED P7REB&PT ELEVTD SLAB P7POUR C-B-10-13E F SOG B-A-13-6C GB F AT ELEVATORFIRE R ROUGH P#6ELECTR ROUGH P#6F ELEVTD SLAB P#8FORM ONE SIDE GB4 THROUGH GB1ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUNDMECHANICAL UNDERGROUNDFIRE RISER ROUGH UNDERGROUNDFORM ONE SIDE GB23,24,20,21,22REBARGB23,24,20,21,22CLOSE FORMS GB23,24,20,21,22INSTALL COMPACT FILLEDGE FORMS SLAB ON GROUND 1-6-A-BREBAR SLAB ON GROUND 1-6-A-BFORM ONE SIDEINSTALL COMPACT FILLPOUR SLAB ON GROUNDFORM ELEVATED SLAB POUR #5REBAR PT ELEVATED SLAB POUR #5EDGE FORMS SLAB ON GROUNDMECHANICAL ROUGH POUR #5FIRE RISER ROUGH POUR #5ELECTRICAL ROUGH POUR #5INSTALL COMPACT FILLREBAR SLAB ON GROUNDEDGE FORMS SLAB ON GROUNDPOUR SLAB ON GROUNDREBAR SLAB ON GROUNDPOUR ELEVATED SLAB POUR #5FORM ONE SIDE ELEVATOR GRADEBARRIER WALLS REBAR TIER #1REBAR GRADE BEANS AT ELEVATORBARRIER WALLS FORM TIER #1EDGE FORMS SLAB ON GROUNDCLOSE GRADE BEAN FORMS AT ELEVATEORFORM ELEVATED SLAB POUR #8A-10
Page 11 ( 3, 3)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Compare Dates7:08p05-04-94Task ReportDescriptionHeading/TaskREB GB 16-17REB SOG B-A-13-6MECH ROUGH P#6REB&PT ELVTD SLAB P#6POUR GB'S AT ELEVATORFOS GB16-GB17CLOSE GB16-GB17POUR SOG B-A-13-6FIRE R ROUGH P#7ELECTR ROUGH P#7POUR GB16-17MECH ROUGH P#7FIRE R ROUGH P#8ELECT ROUGH P#8MECH ROUGH P#8FORM ELEVTD SLAB P#9POUR ELEVATED P#7REB ELEVATED SLAB P#8POUR ELVATED SLAB P#8BAR WALS REB TIER #2BAR WALS FORM TIER #2BAR WALS REB TIER #3ELECTR ROUGH P#9BAR WALS POUR #2BAR WALS FORM TIER #3POUR BAR WALS P#3MECH ROUGH P1/9FORM ELVTD SLAB P1/10REB&PT LVTD SLAB P#10ELECT PERM POW SYS'SELECT: LIGHTS&T OUTPOUR ELVTD SLAB P#9ELECT ROUGH P#10MECH ROUGH P#10FIRE R ROUGH P#10REB BAR WALS TIER #4BAR WALS FORM TIER #4POUR BAR WALS #4ELVATR RAILS&DFRANESINSTALL ELEVATORSPOUR ELVTD SLAB P#10FORM STAIR 'A'REBAR STAIR 'A'MASSONRY ELVTR SHAFTFORM STAIR 'B'POUR STAIR 'A'REBAR STAIR 'B'HANDRAILS STAIR 'A'POUR STAIR 'B'REG DFRANES FOR MASHANDRAILS STAIR 'B'REBAR & PT ELEVATED SLAB POUR #6FORM ONE SIDEBARRIER WALLS REBAR TIER #2REBAR & PT ELEVATED SLAB POUR #10ELECTRICAL PERMANENT POWER SYSTEM'SELECTRICAL: LIGHTS & TRIM OUTELEVATOR RAILS AND DOOR FRAMESREGULAR DOOR FRAMES FOR MASSONRYA-il
Compare Dates7:08p05-04-94Page 12 ( 3, 4)Project: MD4.PJRevision: 10Task ReportDescriptionHeading/TaskFIRE RISER POUR #9ACRYLIC COADINGSROOFING SYSTEMSMECHANICAL PUMPSMECH TRIM OUT @ SYS.EXCES CONTRL'S GRPHCSSITE CONCRETESITE LANDSCAPEPROJECT PUNCH LISTPJ INSPCTION'S FINALSPROJECT TURNOVEREXCESS CONTROL'S GRAPHICSPROJECT INSPECTION'S FINALSA-12
Appendix ATask Report: Moncrief Parking 62728293031323334353637383940414243444546Scheduled Start I Scheduled FinishNameDurationPredecessorsSITE COMPACTION A-B-6-11d5/16/94 5:00pm5/16/94 8:00amCONSTRUCT REBAR PIER C9d5/1 8/94 8:00am5/30/94 5:00pm 11 FS ldDRILLPIERS"ALINE l7ea6d i5/25/948:00am6/1/945:00pm 2SS 5dDRILLPIERS'13" LINE6eaid6/1/948:OOam6/1/945:00pm 3FFDRILL PIERS ELECT ROOM ;id6/2/94 8:00am6/2/94 5:00pm4EXCAVATE GRADE BEAM Cid6/2/94 8:00am6 /2/ 94 5:00pm 5SSDRILLPIERS'B'LINE l3ea5d6/2/948:00am6/8/945:00pm 3idREBAR DELV. GB13-GB196/6/94 8:00am6/6/94 5:00pm 6FS ldREBAR DELV. GB23 & 25 id6/8/94 8:00am6/8/94 5:00pm , 8SS 2dREBAR DELV. W13-W26id6/10/94 8:00am6/10/94 5:00pm 9FS 1dREBARDELV. W8-W10id6/10/94 8:00am6/10/94 5:00pm 11OSSGB'FORM ONE SIDEid6/10/94 8:00am6/10/94 5:00pm 8FS 1d,9F5 1dFORM ONE SIDE GB1 3-16Id i6/8/94 8:00am6/8/94 5:00pm 8FS 1 dEXCAVATE GRADE BEAM 13d6/10/94 8:00am6/14/94 5:00pm,6FS 3d,12SS,1:RE BAR GB14,1523,25,13,16id .6/13/94 8:00am6/13/94 5:00pm 12,13FORM ONE SIDE W 3-Wi g3d6/13/94 8:00am6/15/94 5:00pm 10DRILL PIERS "C" LINE BEAM5d6/9/94 8:00am6/15/94 5:00pm 7-.d. ?1!.!.:9.9 m.6/14/94 5:00pm i 15REBAR Wi 3-Wi 92d6/14/94 8:00am6/15/94 5:00pm 1 OFS 1 d,l 8SSSITE EXCAVATION3d6/14/94 8:00am6/1 6/94 5:00pm 18SSPOUR GB14,15,23,25,13,16id6/15/94 8:00am6/15/94 5:00pm 18EXCAVATE W8 THROUGH Vi2d i6/15/94 8:00am6/16/94 5:00pm 20SS 1d,11SS4SITE COMPACTION B-A-1-63d i6/15/94 8:00am6/17/94 5:00pm 22SSCLOSE FORMS W13-W193d6/16/94 8:00am6/20/94 5:00pm 19id .REBAR DELV. W1-W .76/17/94 8:00am6/17/94 5:00pm 22REBAR DELV. GB-20,21,22 :ld6/16/94 8:00am6/16/94 5:00pm i 8FS 5d,21EXCAVCATE W1-W72d6/17/94 8:00am6/20/94 5:00pm 25SSFORM ONE SIDE W8THROL,2d6/17/948:00am6/20/945:00pm 22SITE FILL AND COMPACTION3d6/17/94 8:00am6/21/94 5:00pm 28SSREBAR W8 THROUGH W102d 16/20/94 8:00am6/21/94 5:00pm 27SS 1d,22DRILL PIERS "D" LINES 6ea1d6/1 6/94 8:00am6/16/94 5:00pm 17POUR FORMS Wi 3-Wi gid6/21/94 8:00am6/21/94 5:00pm 24.COMPACT FILL 5:9id.29S5 3d.G.ELECidADJUST FORMS ELECT RO(6/22/94 8:00am6/22/94 5:00pm 33SSREBAR S.O.G. ELECT ROOI\id6/23/94 8:00am6/23/94 5:00pm 34,33POUR S.O.G. ELECT ROOM1d6/23/94 8:00am6/23/94 5:00pm 35SS33,34CLOSE FORMS W8 THROUC2d6/22/94 8:00am6/23/94 5:00pm 30DRILL PIERS ELEVATOR 14 13d6/17/94 8:00am6/21/94 5:00pm 31idSET ELECT. GEAR ELECT R6/24/94 8:00am6/24/94 5:
L. Microsoft Project 3.0-M. IBM CA-SuperProject-N. Microsoft Project 3.0-Task Report Task Report Gantt Chart Critical Path Gantt Chart Gantt Chart Critical Path Gantt Chart . project management is much more efficient and better communicated or comprehended through the use of software packages like CA-SuperProject and Microsoft Project 3.0. 10.
