WIXLIB

FINAL WARNING: PrefaceHowever, I was able to document about 90% of what he said about theIlluminati.As I continued my research, the deeper I got, and the more disturbingit became. When I research something, I tend to have tunnel-vision sothat my focus is so much on the subject, that I am totally immersed init. This is very similar to what a Profiler does when they get into themind of the criminal. So, when I discovered that this thing had beendeveloping for so long, my initial reaction was to want to know why,and what the motive was. This would give me leads in any direction Ineeded to go to search for evidence.When I sat in church as a child, and would hear what the Bible had tosay about what was going to happen in the ‘last days,’ as outlined inDaniel, Ezekiel and Revelation, it was really hard to imagine how thatall could be possible. But, I began to realize that prophecies made over2,000 years ago were beginning to be fulfilled. I also realized that Icould not approach this research from a physical standpoint, becauseit went far beyond a natural understanding. When you consider thespiritual foundation, then you can begin to comprehend what is nowhappening all around us.For six years, I spent hundreds of hours into finding out all I couldconcerning the Illuminati. The result was a manuscript in 1984 titledThe Illuminati Conspiracy and the Coming One World Government. AChristian bookstore in the area agreed to sell copies of it as I began tocontact a few companies in the hopes of getting it published on alarger scale. There was nothing available at the time which pulledtogether all the different aspects into one reference source, so in thatregard, it was a ground-breaking work. But alas, a first book, by a noname writer, on a controversial subject, did not get any attention. Themanuscript was filed away in a box.Then, in 1990, during the Persian Gulf crisis, President George Bushbegan talking about a ‘New World Order.’ I immediately saw theconnection to the Illuminati front organizations, and I began reworkingthe manuscript. I remember my wife standing in the doorway of my densaying: “You have been working on this book ever since I met you.” Itwas self-published in 1994 as Final Warning, and sold in nearly all theChristian bookstores in eight central Pennsylvania counties, by mailhttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwpreface.htm (2 of 4)31-10-2004 06:25:05

FINAL WARNING: Prefaceorder, and through four national distributors.Again, I tried to get it published on a larger scale. I contacted over ahundred publishers, and even with proven sales in my target area,which projected into national sales of over 48,000, there was only onepublisher, Huntington House, who seriously considered it.After all the copies were sold, the manuscript was again filed away in abox.Between 1996 and 1998, I received some very profound spiritualrevelation in regard to my destiny, and my reason for being. I began tooperate and function with a new degree of insight and purpose.Early in 1998, I received a computer through Divine Providence, and onNovember 24, 1998 the book became available on my website, andsince then has been copied onto other websites, linked to,downloaded, and printed by thousands of people. However, in mid2003, many people began to request copies of the book.It is now 20 years since the initial ‘publication’ of Final Warning, andmany people have begun to see the many changes that have occurredin that time. The world is indeed a very dangerous place. But it is bydesign, and it is with purpose.I have corrected some statistics, and added some new information incertain sections; but because of the space constraints, I decided not tocompletely update the book. Since much of the research was donebetween 1978 and 1984, the book may come across as being dated.However, I would like to remind the reader that this is a history book,and its focus is the origin and development of the movement towardone-world government.In a sense, this book is a collection of files which provide a conciseoverview of the entire subject. Just as an attorney would do, I havetaken it, pulled it apart, examined every piece, then put it all backtogether. The purpose for this is to systematically and methodicallybuild my case, and produce the evidence that will prove my contention.In addition, please understand that this is a reference work. Onehttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwpreface.htm (3 of 4)31-10-2004 06:25:05

FINAL WARNING: Prefaceperson, when he took it with him on vacation, expecting an easy read,likened it to a college textbook. Although, in reworking it, I have triedto change some of the dry language, rearrange, and edit some of thetext, it is still a reference book. However, know that this incrediblecompilation of history and facts can not be found anywhere, in any onebook. The story that will unfold before your eyes will grab a hold ofyou and never let go.Come with me now on a trip to a not too distant past, and an uncertainfuture. It will be a journey of discovery and revelation.David Allen RiveraDecember, 2003ARE YOU INTERESTED IN PURCHASING A COPY OF THIS BOOK?CLICK ONTO THE LINK BELOW TO GO BACK TO THE MAIN PAGE,WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION ON THIS BOOK, ANDHOW YOU CAN ORDER YOUR OWN COPY.http://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwpreface.htm (4 of 4)31-10-2004 06:25:05

FINAL WARNING: IntroductionFINAL WARNING: A HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDERINTRODUCTIONSince the Persian Gulf War, the term ‘New World Order’ has becomewell known. However, there has never really been an explanation as towhat the term actually meant, only that it represented a new spirit ofcooperation among the nations of the world, in order to further thecause of peace. And peace is good, so therefore the New World Orderis good and should be accepted. Not so fast. Like the old saying, youcan’t tell a book by its cover, there is more here than meets the eye.In regard to the term, William Safire wrote in the New York Times inFebruary, 1991: “ it’s Bush’s baby, even if he shares itspopularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler ‘new order’ root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier.”The term ‘New World Order’ was actually first used many years ago.In an address delivered to the Union League of Philadelphia onNovember 27, 1915, Nicholas Murray Butler said: “The old world orderchanged when this war-storm broke. The old international orderpassed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if ithad been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by avolcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of thatday’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birthpangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could comeout of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.”In a 1919 subscription letter for the magazine InternationalConciliation, M. C. Alexander, the Executive Secretary of the AmericanAssociation for International Conciliation wrote: “The peaceconference has assembled. It will make the most momentousdecisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability ofthe new world order and the future peace of the world.”In August, 1927, Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, President of the Worldhttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwintro.htm (1 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25:21

FINAL WARNING: IntroductionFederation of Education Associations said:“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into anew world order, actuated by complete understanding andbrotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are everto approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effortof long duration. The present international situation of mistrustand fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status,continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts,until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds ofthe people of all lands.”Adolf Hitler said: “National Socialism will use its own revolution for theestablishing of a new world order.”In the 1932 book The New World Order, author F. S. Marvin said thatthe League of Nations was the first attempt at a New World Order, andsaid that “nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as awhole.”Edward VIII became King of England on January 20, 1936, but he wasforced to abdicate the throne eleven months later, when he married acommoner. He became the Duke of Windsor, and in July, 1940, becamethe governor of the Bahamas. He is on record as saying: “Whateverhappens, whatever the outcome, a new Order is going to come into theworld . It will be buttressed with police power . When peace comesthis time there is going to be a new Order of social justice. It cannot beanother Versailles.”In a New York Times article in October, 1940, called “New World OrderPledged to Jews,” comes the following excerpt: “In the first publicdeclaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war,Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British WarCabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory wasachieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based onthe ideals of ‘justice and peace’.”The “Declaration of the Federation of the World,” written by theCongress on World Federation, which was adopted by the Legislaturesof some states, including North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942),http://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwintro.htm (2 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25:21

FINAL WARNING: Introductionand Pennsylvania (1943), said: “If totalitarianism wins this conflict, theworld will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. Ifdemocracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in acommonwealth of free peoples; and individuals, wherever found, willbe the sovereign units of the new world order.”From an article in a June, 1942 edition of the Philadelphia Inquirer:“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the earlycreation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to controlthe world during the period between the armistice at the end of thepresent war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanentbasis.”According to a February, 1962 New York Times article called“Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to BuildNew World Order,” New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller told anaudience at Harvard University: “The United Nations has not beenable– nor can it be able– to shape a new world order which events socompellingly demand (The new world order that will answereconomic, military, and political problems) urgently requires, I believe,that the United States take the leadership among all the free peoples tomake the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereigntytruly meaningful through the federal approach.” The Associated Pressreported that on July 26, 1968, Governor Rockefeller said in a speechto the International Platform Association at the Sheraton Park Hotel inNew York, that “as President, he would work toward internationalcreation of a New World Order.”Richard Nixon wrote in the October, 1967 issue of the Council onForeign Relation’s (CFR) journal Foreign Affairs: “The developingcoherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition toconsider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolveregional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of anew world order.” In 1972, while in China, in a toast to Chinese PremierChou En-lai, Nixon expressed “the hope that each of us has to build anew world order.”Richard Gardner, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State forInternational Organizations under Kennedy and Johnson, and amember of the Trilateral Commission, wrote in the April, 1974 issue ofhttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwintro.htm (3 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25:21

FINAL WARNING: IntroductionForeign Affairs (pg. 558): “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will haveto be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It willlook like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’famous description of reality, but an end run around nationalsovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more thanthe old fashioned frontal assault.”Richard A. Falk, wrote in his article “Toward a New World Order:Modest Methods and Drastic Visions” (from the 1975 book On theCreation of a Just World Order): “The existing order is breaking downat a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind canexert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed toawait collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new world order willbe born no later than early in the next century and that the deaththroes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing timefor the human species.”In 1975, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives in Congress signed “ADeclaration of Interdependence” (written by the historian Henry SteeleCommager) which said that “we must join with others to bring forth anew world order Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not bepermitted to curtail that obligation.” Congresswoman Marjorie Holt,who refused to sign it, said: “It calls for the surrender of our nationalsovereignty to international organizations. It declares that oureconomy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposesthat we enter a ‘new world order’ that would redistribute the wealthcreated by the American people.”In an October, 1975 speech to the General Assembly of the UnitedNations, Henry Kissinger said: “My country’s history, Mr. President,tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity,that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests,and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace andjustice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Letus fashion together a new world order.”During the 1976 Presidential campaign, Jimmy Carter said: “We mustreplace balance of power politics with world order politics.” In aFebruary 14, 1977 speech, Carter said: “I want to assure you that therelations of the United States with the other countries and peoples ofhttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwintro.htm (4 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25:21

FINAL WARNING: Introductionthe world will be guided during my own Administration by our desire toshape a world order that is more responsive to human aspirations. TheUnited States will meet its obligation to help create a stable, just, andpeaceful world order.”Harvard professor Stanley Hoffman wrote in his book Primacy orWorld Order: “What will have to take place is a gradual adaptation ofthe social, economic and political system of the United States to theimperatives of world order.”Conservative author George Weigel, director of the Ethics and PublicPolicy Center in Washington, D.C. said: “If the United States does notunashamedly lay down the rules of world order and enforce them .then there is little reason to think that peace, security, freedom orprosperity will be served.”In a December, 1988 speech, Mikhail Gorbachev told the UnitedNations: “Further global progress is now possible only through aquest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new worldorder.”The man who put the New World Order in the limelight, and did morethan anyone to bring about its acceptance, was President GeorgeBush. In a February, 1990 fundraiser in San Francisco, Bush said:“Time and again in this century, the political map of the world wastransformed. And in each instance, a New World Order came aboutthrough the advent of a new tyrant or the outbreak of a bloody globalwar, or its end.”On Saturday, August 25, 1990, the United Nations Security Councilvoted unanimously to allow a joint military force to use whatevermeans necessary to enforce a UN blockade against the country of Iraq.That afternoon, Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, a CFR member and formeraide to Henry Kissinger, who was the National Security Advisor toBush, was interviewed by Charles Bierbauer of the Cable NewsNetwork (CNN) and used the term “a New World Order.” In August,1990, (According to an article in the Washington Post in May, 1991) hesaid: “We believe we are creating the beginning of a New World Ordercoming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms.” During aSeptember, 1990 speech at the United Nations, he announced that “wehttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwintro.htm (5 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25:21

FINAL WARNING: Introductionare moving to a New World Order.” Later, on the eve of the Gulf War,Scowcroft said: “A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New WorldOrder.” In the fall of 1990, on the way to Brussels, Belgium, Secretaryof State James Baker said: “If we really believe that there’s anopportunity here for a New World Order, and many of us believe that,we can’t start out by appeasing aggression.”In September, 1990, the Wall Street Journal quoted Rep. RichardGephardt as saying: “We can see beyond the present shadows of warin the Middle East to a New World Order where the strong worktogether to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely FranklinRoosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-warperiod.”In a September 11, 1990 televised address to a joint session ofCongress, Bush said:“A new partnership of nations has begun. We stand today at aunique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf,as grave as it is, offers a rare opportunity to move toward anhistoric period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, ourfifth objective– a New World Order– can emerge . When we aresuccessful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this NewWorld Order, an order in which a credible United Nations can useits peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of theUnited Nations’ founders.”The September 17, 1990 issue of Time magazine said that “the Bushadministration would like to make the United Nations a cornerstone ofits plans to construct a New World Order.”In a September 25, 1990 address to the UN, Soviet Foreign MinisterEduard Shevardnadze described Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as “an act ofterrorism (that) has been perpetrated against the emerging New WorldOrder.”In an October 1, 1990, UN address, President Bush talked about the “ collective strength of the world community expressed by the UN anhistoric movement towards a New World Order a new partnership ofnations a time when humankind came into its own to bring abouthttp://user.pa.net/ drivera/fwintro.htm (6 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25:21

FINAL WARNING: Introductiona revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a new age.” On October 30, 1990, Bush suggested that the UN couldhelp create “a New World Order and a long era of peace.”Jeanne Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, said that oneof the purposes for the Desert Storm operation, was to show to theworld how a “reinvigorated United Nations could serve as a globalpoliceman in the New World Order.”On December 31, 1990, Gorbachev said that the New World Orderwould be ushered in by the Gulf War.Prior to the Gulf War, on January 29, 1991, Bush told the nation in hisState of the Union address:“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea–a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in acommon cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind;peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a worldworthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future.” Healso said: “If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moralcompass and stand up for human life, th

the Illuminati, have been controlling world events since 1776. The Illuminati controls world leaders and the money that runs their countries. They can elect a President, and they can kill a President. They can shut-off the oil, and plunge the world into war. Even though they operate under the strictest secrecy, their