Spiritism And The Fallen Angels In The Light Of The Old .

Transcription

or

Spiritismand the Fallen Angels

—By—JAMES M. GRAY,D. D.Christian Workers Commentary on the Old and8vo, clothTestaments.The mature work of an experienced Bible teacher, whose" Synthetic Bible Studies" is well known in Bible Study circles.NewBible Problems Explained. i2mo, cloth,The same earnest, positive, evangelical spirit characterizesthese studies that has made Dean Gray's other books acceptable to so large abody of Christian students.Cloth,Salvation from Start to Finish."The earnest, positive, evangelical tone of the wholeseriesof expositions is decidedly refreshing in these days of uncertainAdvance.faith and of doubtful disputations."Great Epochs of Sacred History.i2mo, clothAndthe Shad-ows They Cast."Aseries ofters of Genesis.popular Bible Studies on the first twelve chapThis is a book well worth circulating."N. Y. Observer.—The Present DarknessSatan and the Saint.and the Coming Light.i6mo, cloth,"Will do much to clear away confusion created by some ofthe religious ohenomena of the present day."— Christian Intelligencer.The Antidote to Ch ristian Science.Cloth," The most reasonable, the fairest and the most practicallyuseful of all the writings against Christian Science which wehave seen." Watchman.Synthetic Bible Studies.8vo, cloth" We know of no similar work by which one canfactory and comprehensive a view of the Bible.".get so satis-— ChristianPrimers of the Faith.Christian Evidences."ABiblical IntroductionandClothbook that every Bible readerwillProgress in the Life to Come.APicture of the Resurrection.AText Book of Prophecy.Prophecy andWork.the Lord's Return.be better for having."— United Presbyterian.Boards.

Spiritism and the Fallen Angelsin the light of theNewOld andTestamentsByJAMES M. GRAY,Deanof theMoodyD.D.Bible Institute of ChicagoAuthor of "Synthetic Bible Studies" "The Christian Worker'sCommentary," "A Text Book on Prophecy" Come"Explained"New York"Progress"Bibleetc.ChicagoFleming H. Revell CompanyLondonandEdinburgh""I

NCopyright, 1920, byFLEMINGH.REVELL COMPANYART825926.TILDE'PrintedANDA.T10N1United States of Americain theNew rth Wabash Ave.PaternosterSquarePrincesStreet75

CONTENTSI.The New Attack of Spiritualism and How to Meet ItThe Modern History of IV.ItsAngels and Demons, Or Spiritism's PersonnelSpiritism Before the Flood"Sons of God" Marrying the"Daughters of Men"Abominations of the Canaan.,.VII.itesVIII.IX.X.and JudahEarly Christianity and theBlack ArtTeaching of the ApostolicSpiritism in .27102EpistlesXI.9Teaching of the Apocalypse.119135

THE NEW ATTACK OF SPIRITUALISMAND HOW TO MEET ITOFwriting books on Spiritualism in thesedays thereisno end. But with a singleex-and that rather inadequate in itstreatment of the subject, we have found none toput into the hands of a Christian desirous oflearning how to meet and deal with this errorfrom an all round Biblical point of view.Some were too technical, some too bulky andexpensive and some so mixed with other error asto be impossible to recommend.Not a few were written by those who were wellinformed on the scientific phases of Spiritualism,the findings of the Society of Psychical Researchor the doings of mediums and seances, but whoseauthors appeared either ignorant of or indifferentto the Bible, which to the Christian, of course,holds the first place and is of final authority.Some of the writers were of the novelist typelike Sir A. Conan Doyle, Basil King or BoothTarkington, and antagonistic to Christianity considering it a confirmed failure.These referredception,to the Bible to ridiculeits9teachings or to wrest

10Spiritism and the Fallen Angelstheirmeaningintoconformity with theirthemviews, being convinced, as one ofSpiritualismcomingWenew"not only aisreligion.ownsaid, thatreligion but the1 'intended to briefly analyze some of* thesebooks for the sake of the warning they contain,but this has been so well done by the SundaySchool Times in the case of Basil King's "TheAbolishing of Death," that we take the liberty toThequote.reviewercharacter of theconfesseswork andmasterfulthethe fact thatit intelli-gently recognizes the fundamentals of the Christian faith, but, as he adds,rejectsitjust as intelligentlythem:"The unique inspiration of the Bible is rejected.The finality of the Bible's message, as a complete revelation from God for all men for this life, is rejected.The unique deity of Christ is rejected.The necessity for the blood atonement of Christ is rejected.The existence and reality of sin are rejected.God's word that some men will be lost and some will besavedisrejected.The reality of deathThe need of faith ineternal lifeisis rejected.Christ as Saviour as a condition ofrejected.God's word as to hell, or the second death, is rejected.The lines between sin and holiness are obliterated.Andthe divinity ofallmen, which the Bible denies,isdeclared."IIItisastonishing and saddening too, to readsome of the arguments advancedinbooks and

NewAttack of Spiritualism11other writings on this subject, by Christian ministers, in their efforts to dissuade their flocks fromfollowing these false shepherds.One warns thembeware of the medieval system of demonology, which on further investigation turns out to mean really Bible demonology.He would have his ministerial brethren also denyabsolutely that a medium can receive communications from another world, because, he adds,"thiswould maketoitinconsistent to suggest thatcommunications were from evil spirits I" Itseems almost impossible that such a man evercould have consulted his Bible except as he goestheirbook of familiar quotations to select a text.That mediums can receive communications fromanother world there is no doubt, nor'is there anydoubt that their* communications are from evilto aspirits,Thatisfor the Bible confirms both propositions.not to say, however, thatallceive such communications, nor thatreceivesthemmediumsany mediumin every case, there are frauds per-petrated as every one knows; but in principleis as.foolish to deny this ashideitsheadre-in theit isitfor an ostrich tosand and suppose that iticannot be seen.Another expresses the opinion thatfectly natural to seekitisper-communion with those wehave loved and who have passed beyond, and thatthere is no reason why we should not talk withthem if they are near to us; but advises against

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels12itbecause "the means of communication and themachinery of contact is as yet so imperfect !" Inother words, as soon as scientists have perfectedthe apparatus, communications between the livingand the dead, may be popularized, not merelywithout harm to any but with positive benefit toIt is likeall.the aeroplane which will soon loseits interest forcomeacommonsportsmen andscientistsandbe-carrier.from a writerof the Evangelical type apparently, for he goes onto say that while such intercourse with the deadwould be a great comfort and a renewed assuranceStrange to say, this last opinionof the persistence ofallthatislifenot religion.isafter death, yet after"Religion," he truly wit-nesses, "is the consciousness ofGod, the sense ofredemption from sin through Jesus Christ, joyand peace in the Holy Ghost, service of the world,and love and tenderness for all mankind." Onewonders thatamanso intelligent in the Gospelcould possibly be led into folly of this kind andinto such gross contradiction of the Bible.Itmaybe natural enough for us to seek communion withour departed, but the reason we should refrainfrom it is because God has forbidden it. Whatfurther doPerhapswasawe need?as confusing asreview of fouranythingnew books,we haveinseenan Englishwhich the claims andteachings of Spiritualism were weighed in the balevangelical periodical,in

NewAttack of Spiritualism13ance and found wanting, and as to which the re-viewer said he heartily commended them all. Twoof these books were thoroughly sound and Biblicalin their contention, but one of the others was thatreferred to above as containing the theory thatmediums could have no intercourse with demons,and the fourth advocated, as an offset to Spiritualism, that Christians give more diligence in intercession of the saints and prayers for the dead!The reviewer would explain his inconsistencydoubtless, by the circumstance that all agreed inteaching that between Spiritualism and Christianitytherewas noaffinity.Nevertheless,lack of discrimination were everywhere,ifwesuchcouldwell appreciate the remark of another English-manthat "theword'Christianity' hassuch enlargement thatmeans whenIscarcelyundergoneknow whatitI see it."IllSpeaking further of the inability and lack ofBiblical knowledge in dealing with this subject onthe part of some who ought to be 'teachers inwhen Christian Science first raised its head as an avowed rival ofthe Church and when, as a result, the ministry wasrecalls the situationIsrael',itthrowninto a panic.by the way, the editor of Christian Workon his return from England not long since, reported that now one seldom heard Christian Sci-And

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels14ence referred to there.Thewar, he said, haddissipated all illusions as to the non-existence ofand to quote his words, "men who have beenburied under a shower of legs, arms, heads andmutilated trunks of human bodies falling all aboutthem do not make easy converts to that faith. Buteverybody is talking about Spiritualism," he wentevil,onto say,heldall"andspiritualisticmeetings are beingover the country, and there are seances onSo alarmed have the churches become that the preachers are delivering sermonsregarding it, and the religious press is printingweekly editorials."every street.was the same in this country and especiallyin and around Boston, where the present writerlived in the early eighties, which saw the rise andItdevelopment of Mrs. Eddy's delusion. Of courseit was the proper thing to deliver sermons andwrite editorials against it if only they aimedstraight and used the right ammunition; but pastors and church committees, not a few, were readyto capitulate or compromise after the first campaign, and to admit the validity of Christian Science as a church and grant letters dimissory to it.We remember that Dr. A. J. Gordon was proclaimed a saviour when, in an issue of the Congregationalist of April 1885, he contributed an article,by the thousands in leaflet form,entitled, "Christian Science Tested by Scripture."Everybody thought Scripture should be recognizedlater circulated

New Attackin theof Spiritualismpremises and thatitsdictum would15settle thematter at least for believers, but until Dr. Gordonrose up to say the word, no one else seemed ableor willing to go aboutHistorytheisit.repeatingHebrews with SaulJordanto the land ofbut whileitself,manyat Gilgal, are goingGad andlike"overGilead," not a feware remaining true and with trumpets of no uncertainsoundproclaiminga"ThussaiththeLord."Weare happy to join their number, and at therequest of our publisher, to dowhat we canin thechapters of this book to aid Christians in under-standing and meeting the error of Spiritualism fromthe Bible point of view.

IITHE MODERN HISTORY OFSPIRITUALISMatsourceitsSPIRITISMisolder thanman, but we have no intention of tracing itto its source just now, that will come later.Atmoment we wishtheto deal withthe period of time during whichbyitsyetpresentitsnameitualism"was usedreligiouslifeknownAt one timesubject to theof mystics likeHoly"Spir-andJacob Bohme andto designate the doctrinesMadame Guyon whoAshas beennot the best becauseishas too wide an application.Wordonly forpresent name.Andititittried to live consecrated livesSpirit,andinobedience to theof God.aFrench investigator putthe opposite of materialism.it,"spiritualismWhoeverisbelieves hehas something within him distinguished from matter is a spiritualist," in which sense, of course, alltrue Christians are spiritualists, though it does notfollow that theyspiritspracticeof an invisible world.16communications with

Modern HistoryTherefore to designateof Spiritism17this latter belief thewordweshall"Spiritism" has come to be used, whichemploy hereafter, meaning by it the idea of somepeople, that the living can and do communicatewith the spirits of the departed, and also includingthe various practices resorted to in that intercourse.IIwhich is also necromancy or the evocation of the dead, was a feature of that Gnosticismwhich assailed the Christian Church in the Apostolic era, and against which Paul, by the HolySpiritism,Spirit,inveighs particularly in his epistle to theColossians.Andwasformed athis, in turn, indicates that itnot a new thing even then, but thatitpart of the earlier pagan religions.Allusions toithave been foundinHomer, Strabopractice to the early Persians,ascribesTheodoretfindsitsitChaldea and Babylonia, and readers of the OldTestament recall Moses speaking of it as amongintheabominationsoftheXVIII) of which we speakCanaanites(Deut.in a later chapter.TheDelphic oracles (more than 600 B. C.)are claimed by Spiritists and we believe with goodand the same may be said of the lives ofseers and clairvoyants and the facts of witchcraftin all ages."Never would that oracle at Delphihave been so celebrated nor stored with so manygifts from all kinds of peoples and kings, unlessreason,

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels18every age had experienced the truth ofances" (Cicero,DeDivinatione 19).come to the Christian period,ToChurchfathersassumeevil spirits in theshowingthemselvesTheChurchbythepagan oracles andrites,curesanddivinations,records of theRomanCatholicphenomena which bear a closepresent-day Spiritism. During theReformation Luther publishedwhomearlyalso speak ofresemblance to"Thetheunquestionableasagency ofdreams.its utter-a treatise againstCelestial Prophets", so-called, ofGermany,he charged with exercising the imitativepowers of Satan.There were occurrencesascribed to SpiritismWesley family(1716), and it is commonlymuchin theSwedenborg's allegedfull and open communication with the spirit world.In America, David Brainerd, in his work amongthe Indians, declared that one of his greatest diffi-believed to explaininwas the conviction they held that their diviners had supernatural power, a conviction hecultieshimself shared.In 1843, tne Shakers at New Lebanon, N. Y.,became the subjects of strange experiences, and influences purporting to be spiritswho hadlived inworld in different ages, took possession of theirbodies and spoke through their vocal organs.theinWhatisknownasthe"spirit-rapping"phe-

Modern Historyof Spiritism19nomenon began in March, 1848, in the family ofJohn D. Fox in Hydeville, N. Y., whose daughtersa few years afterwards began to give public heseyoung women became the subject of extensivenewspaper discussion with the result that "mediums", through whom they were said to occur,were multiplied in different parts of the countryby hundreds and thousands.The seances of the Fox girls before the CivilWar were attended by some of the most prominentmen of the country, and when they visited Europethey had the nobility and royalty for their audiSocieties were organized, and disciples andtors.imitators came forward in great numbers.IVThis brings us to theepoch in Spiritism, when such men as Sir William Crookes, theEnglish chemist and physicist, who died recently,becamescientificactively interested init.London Quarterly Journal of January,1874, he classified the phenomena under some tenIn theor a dozen heads, and also conducted exhibitionshisownhouse, mostly in the light,whenit isthat the existence of an unexplained forceaccurately tested byparatus.means of an ingeniousinsaidwasap-

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels20In other words, with Sir William Crookes'in-began to be felt that the phenomenaof Spiritism were not all fraud, and while thescientists were unable to explain the source ofvestigationsitsome of them, their ignorance in the premiseswent so far to confirm the teaching of the Biblethat the source was to be found in the super-humanSirrealm.Williamtestifiedthat "itwasacommonthing for seven or eight of us in the laboratory toMiss Cook (the medium) and 'Katie' (thespirit) at the same time under the full blaze of theseeOnelectric light."showedtheone occasion, the electricianto the satisfaction of the spectators thatmedium wasinside the cabinet while the sup-posed spirit form was visible and moving outside.Quoting Nelson's Encyclopaedia, it was the organization of the Society of Psychical Research(England,recent1882; America,interestinthe1888)doctrine.that revivedItswork hastended to put limits to the claims which have beenmade for communication with the discarnate,though it has at the same time strengthened theby giving it better scientific credentials.Reports on the remarkable case of Mrs. Piperwere published in five different volumes of theProceedings of this Society, and it is said that theyoffer the best mass of scientific evidence extant insupport of possible spirit communication.It was the evidence derived from this woman'sbelief init

Modern History ofcasewhen21Spiritismshe crossed the Atlantic in 1889, thatconvinced Sir Oliver Lodge that deceasedfinallymessages through her organism informing him both of known and unrelatives spoke or sentknownsubsequentlyfactswords, to quote him exactly,Inverified.itotherconvinced him "thatand organism of a living person mightbe utilized by deceased personalities whose ownbodies had ceased to work."the brainToavoid an erroneous supposition in the lightof some things whichwe have alreadysaid, let itbe stated clearly at this point that the Bibleagainst the conclusion of Sir Oliver.weisIt reveals, asshall subsequently discover, the possibility ofmaterializations, but not the actual talking withthe dead.Bymaterialization in this casethe assumption of a materialevil angelsor demonswhowe meanand bodily form bywickedly personate thedead and deceive the living, but nothing more.The proof of this will follow, but to avoid any possible misunderstanding at the outset, the fact itselfisTheisthere stated.current revival of Spiritism, or "the Spirit-intrusion",recent war, andas Lifecalledit,from theand earnestdateswas predicted by closestudents of the Bible.It is "due to the bereavements of the war and to the longing of broken

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels22hearts to find out something concerning the destiny of thosewho have beentaken from them.'*Instead of turning "to the law and to themony"testi-have"that peep and that mutter"as the inspired prophet exhorts, theytaken up with spirits(Isaiah VIII. 19, 20)."There is hardly a home in England," we aretold, "from which some boy has not gone foreverduring these last two years. Can they be reached?Can one have communion with them? Can theybreak through the wall between their world andours?"Then, one by one, such men as Sir OliverLodge and Sir A. Conan Doyle published bookssaying, 'We have had communications from ourboys, and have spoken with them and with theircomrades who perished on the field of battle.'"Thousands of parents responded, 'If they, whyAndnot we?'the result has been an almost over-whelming rushtomediums, and longnow advertised in theThe Christian Work).ances aretorial inlistspapers."of se-(Edi-In our opinion the campaign of the powers ofdarkness gaineditsheadway up until thatfrom Mons to Ypres.greatestdate during the fightingReaders willrecallperiod published atpaper, and entitled,howafantasticstoryof thatLondon evening"The Bowman", which purfirstinaGeorge and the old Agincourt bowmen appeared during the retreat fromported totellSt.

Modern HistoryMons and23of Spiritismfought with the British against the foe.The authorfrankly declareditwas purefiction,but so heated was the British imagination at thetime and so psychologically ready for the recep-was not believed bytion of the occult, that hemany whoseriously entertained the opinion thatangels appeared to the soldiers.Nor werethese inallcases theintellectuallysome instances intelligent and educated men and women, including a Christian scholarwhom we personally know, and who is honoredweak, butinthroughout Christendom.Indeed an eminentclergyman of London is reported to have said thatsuch a case of spiritual intervention was "eminently creditable. Joan of Arc saved her countryowing to the vision of an angel, and why shouldnot the phenomenon be repeated in this case?"Immediately people began to hold intercoursewith their beloved dead, as was supposed. TheChristian scholar, in a private letter to the writer,"Mysaid:wife saw her boyItisthesame with many.the convincing ofthing,ismanybodyknow.in his spiritualWepermitted to come once to comfort her.This warisgiven forthat the future lifeand that God Himself speakstoisa realman. Thisthe one consolation that remains out of thishideous and horrible time oftrial.permitted to talk to her boy.Heradiant than inlife,Mywife waswas even morebut otherwise the same.told her of his deathand the manner ofit.HeWe

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels24Somelearned after a month that this was true.dream. I know it was a visiongranted to soothe her sorrow and her longing.This has nothing to do with magic. The spiritualeye saw the spiritual body."peoplecall it aVIwould not be the part of wisdom for thewriter to delay warning the unwary until our conItsideration of this subject approachedsion.Henceapauseismade hereitsconclu-to say that theexperiences above recorded are very different fromthose of Bible saints.Leta brief reference bewords (VIII. 19-22).madeHeagain to Isaiah'ssees Israel in the lat-ter days in great distress, doubtless faranythingknownin the latewar.Theybeyondare "hardlybestead and hungry", "behold trouble, darkness,dimness of anguish".Theyareseekinguuntothem that have familiar spirits and unto wizardsthat peep and that mutter", and he rebukes them,saying,On"Should nota people seek unto theirGod?behalf of the living should they seek unto thedead?Tolaw and to the testimony; if theyspeak not according to this word, it is because thereis no light in them."In other words, are not the Word and the Spiritof God the source, and the sufficient source, of theChristian's comfort in this age?Does he needthe

Modern History25of Spiritismsuch visions to convince him of the futureand that God speakstomen?Therichlifemaninour Lord's story in Luke 16 thought well of thatkind of evidence, but"fatherwe remember howAbraham" thoughtitwouldfruitlessIf suchbe.things are the only, or the strongest, consolationremaining for God's peopleinsuch a time oftrial,what of the millions of them to whom they do notcome?Let the Christian ever keep in mind that thereare such beings as evil spirits, oflearn considerable bysiderinwhom weand by, andletshallhim con-further that fundamentally only these areevidence in thismodern outbreak ofSpirit-ism.In proof of thisitmaybe mentioned thatthe accounts of the angels atMonsin allwhich camewas Jesus Christ so muchas named.St. George was named, and Joan ofArc, and Socrates, and Swedenborg, and the VirginMary. God was referred to a few times, but ourLord and Saviour Jesus Christ never. Even theprivate correspondence mentioned above, and froma Christian source, alludes to Him but once, andthen indirectly, and by His human and familyname, Jesus."What place do you give to Christ in Spiritualism?" was asked of a votary by a London editor."Is He to you the Son of God, and do you worto our attention, not onceshipHimas such?"

26Spiritism and the Fallen Angels"Oh, no," came the reply. "He is to us simplythe Master Medium."In the words of the editor, (The Life of Faith,London), "that confession is fatal. No creed, nocult, no religion that dethrones our Lord andplaces Him on a level with men and mediums hasany right to claim a Christian connection. Andmen and women who profess to be followers ofChrist are putting Him to open shame when theyjoin hands with those who would, if they could,rob Him of His deity and His matchless glory."

IllSATAN—ORSPIRITISMATthe source ofSATANthe only placethe BibleITSSOURCEand sincewhich we canSpiritism,isisinlearn anything reliable about him,openitswe nowpages for that purpose.As weare writing for Christians chiefly,itisassumed that the Bible is the revelation of Godand not only credible as to its statements of factbut an inspired record of them. The evidence ofthis is convincing and never more so than in thetwentieth century, as could easily be demonstratedifcircumstances permitted or requiredEventhe casual reader of the Bible will recallwhen Satan appears onthe outstanding occasionsitsofit.First, as thescenes."serpent" in the GardenEden tempting and overcoming ourNewfirstparents,Testament the serpent isidentified with the devil and Satan (Rev. XII. 9;XX. 2). Next, in the history of Job (chaptersthen, later, in vision, in the Old TestaI and II)for twiceinthe;27

"Spiritism and the Fallen Angels28ment as the accuser of Israel after their returnfrom Babylon (Zech. III).In the New Testament he first comes before usas Christ's tempter in the wilderness (Matthew IVand its parallels) he entered into Judas to betray Christ (John XIII. 27), and into Ananiasand Sapphira to lie to the Holy Ghost (Acts V. 3).;Hehindered PaulII.18)seeking;heiswhomin hissaid tohemissionarywalk aboutmay devourwork(I Thess.as a roaring lionandpower to(I Pet. V. 8),end of this age he will give histhe Lawless one to deceive, if possible, the veryin the(Matthew XXIV. 24;electRev. XIII.1,Satan has2 Thess.II.8-10);2).many namesScripture,ineach ofwhich reveals some feature of his character."Satan" itself means the Adversary; "devil,(slanderer)"Apollyon," (destroyer)"Beelzebub," (prince of the demons) "Belial," (low, ab"the wicked one"; "the god of this world";ject)"the prince of darkness"; "the dragon," "tormentor," "accuser," "deceiver," "liar," "murderer," "he that hath the power of death."Thissufficiently reveals the kind of being he is and furnishes a reason why we should beware of him.;;;;IIAsto the origin of Satan, thosewhoclass thecherubim as angels, think he was one of them, and

Spiritism atitsSource29anointed probably for a position of great authorThis authority may have been over primitiveity.heaven and earth as at first created,and before the earth became without form andvoid (Gen. I. i).He fell through pride (Isa. XIV. 12-14).Some think he was then cast out of heaven according to Christ's words in Luke X. 18, on which supposition, he then made the earth and the air thescene of his activity (Eph. II. 2; I. Pet. V. 8).scriptural basis for this conjecture is in Ezekcreation,i.e.,AielTheXXVIII. n-15.chapterisa rebuke ofnamedthe King of Tyre, but at the versesthe lan-guage goes beyond him to Satan describedin hisunfallen state.Ifthisteachesinterpretationmuch aboutiscorrect,Satan, whichDr. R. A. Torrey in"Whatisthechaptersummed up bythe Bible Teaches,"thus:1.2.He was the sum of created perfection, v. 12.He was in the garden of God, v. 13. Thismean the Eden of Adam, but an earlierThe Eden of Adam was remarkable fordoes notone.itsvegetable glory, but this forCf. Revelation3.mineral glory.10-21.Hev. 14.inXXI.itsthewas the anointed cherub that covereth,First, he was a "cherub", the highest rankangelic world.Second,"theanointed"one who was set apart for a formalwork. Third, the anointed cherub that "covereth."cherub,i.e.,

Spiritism and the Fallen Angels30The meaningof thiswordisnot given, thoughitExodus XXXVII. 9.He was upon the holy mountain of God,which may mean the place where God mani-suggests4.v. 14,fested His personal glory.Hewalked up and down in the midst of thestones of fire, v. 14. This suggests Exodus XXIV.10, 17, R.V., and Ezekiel I. 15, 22, 25, 26, R.V.In the former the seventy elders saw the Lord ofIsrael, and "there was under His feet as it were apaved walk of sapphire stone", and "the appearance of the glory of the Lord was like devouringThis may afford anfire on the top of the mount."idea of what the "stones of fire" were, and indicate how near Satan may have been to God.His heart was lifted up because of his6.5.beauty, v. 17.He7.wasCf.ITimothycast out of theIII.6 R.V.mountain of God,and destroyed from the midst of the stones offire,v.8.16.Heshall be cast to the eartha spectacle, vv. 17, 18.11. 8;and be madeCf. with 2 ThessaloniansRevelation XII. 9, 10, andXIX.20.inTogo alittlefurther into the nature and char-acter of Satan:(1)Heisaperson,i.e.,he possesses self-con-sciousness and free-will, because the facts stated in

.Spiritism atitsSource31the preceding paragraphs could not be predictedof an influence or a principle ofevil.He has great dignity, since he is styled(2)the "prince," "the god of this world," and "princeof the power of the air," andit issaid that Michaelthe Archangel "durst not bring againsting judgment," (John XII.II. 2;Jude8, 9,3152 Cor.hima rail-IV. 4; Eph.R.V.).He has great pozvcr, since he is able to(3)control the forces of nature, human property anddemons, the world-rulers of darkness, andthe whole world of men out of Christ, (Job I.10-12; Luke XL 14-1S; I John V. 19 R.V. ActsXXVI. 18; Eph. VI. 11, 12).He has great cunning and deceit, since he(4)transforms himself into an angel of light, useswiles and devices, signs and lying wonders (Matthew XXIV. 24; 2 Cor. II. 11; 2 Cor. XL 14;Eph. VI. 11, 12 R.V.; 2 Thess. II. 9, R.V.)life,;He(5)evil one,has great malignity, being called thea liar, a murderer,the beginningHehe willfleea sinnerfrom(Matthew V. 37; Luke VIII. 12;John VIII. 44;(6)and2 Cor. IV. 4; Ihas great fear, forJohnifIII. 8).weresisthimfrom us (James IV. 7)IVAsisto Satan's present locationandhiswork, hereferred to as being in the heavenly places, and

:;Spiritism and the Fallen Angels32also asgoing to and froin the earth.Asin theage to come, Christ and His Church, though abiding in the heavenly pla

CONTENTS I.TheNewAttackofSpiritual- ismandHowtoMeetIt. 9 II.TheModernHistoryofSpirit- ism 16 III.Satan,OrSpiritismatIts Source. 27 IV.AngelsandDemons,OrSpirit- ism'sPersonnel 39 V.SpiritismBeforetheFlood., 46 VI."SonsofGod"Marryingthe "DaughtersofMen". 57 VII.AbominationsoftheCanaan-