Bicycle And Marketing Strategy

Transcription

March 2012Bicycle and MarketingStrategyLandmark Towns of the D&L NHCNew Hope BoroughBristol BoroughMorrisville BoroughYardley Borough

March 2012Bicycle and Marketing StrategyFINAL PLANManagement PartnershipsLandmark TownsDelaware and Lehigh National Heritage CorridorDelaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC)Administered by New Hope BoroughBristol BoroughMorrisville BoroughYardley BoroughPrepared byCarter van Dyke AssociatesBrown Dog DesignIgnition MarketingRM Events, Inc.Campbell Thomas & Co.

Agency ContactsLandmark Towns Board of DirectorsLead ContactsBristol BoroughDonna M. Boone, Landmark Towns Coordinator,Landmark Towns of Bucks CountyDelaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, Inc.2 Canal's End Road, Suite 204CBristol PA 19007Local Elected Official: Robyn Trunell (Borough Council member)Local Appointed Official: Sally Bellaspica (Zoning Officer)Local Civic Leader: Mark Carter (Bristol Revitalization Task Force)Local Business Person: William Salerno (Solicitor)Alternate: Susan Atkinson (Bristol Riverside Theatre)John Burke, Borough Manager/SecretaryNew Hope Borough123 New StreetNew Hope PA 18938Lead Agency ContactElissa Garofalo , President and CEODelaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor2750 Hugh Moore Park RoadEaston, PA 18042PartnersThe Landmark Towns of Bucks County BicycleStrategy & Marketing Initiative could not have beencompleted without funding, support andcooperation from the following:Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission—TCDIDelaware &Lehigh National Heritage CorridorBristol BoroughMorrisville BoroughYardley BoroughNew Hope BoroughDepartment of Conservation and Natural Resources,Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaBucks County Conference and Visitors BureauUS Dept of the Interior National Park ServiceMorrisville BoroughLocal Elected Official: Nancy Sherlock (Morrisville BoroughCouncil member)Local Appointed Official: Tom H. Bates, Jr. (Borough Manager)Local Civic Leader: Pat SchellLocal Business Person: Steve Dacey (Dacey’s Pub)Alternate:New Hope BoroughLocal Elected Official: Sharyn Keiser (Borough Councilmember/Alternate)Local Appointed: John Burke (Borough Manager)Local Civic Leader: Dawn Ellery (Sweet Escape)Local Business Person: Louis Licitra (Rainbow Abstract)Alternate: Ed Duffy (Borough Council member)Yardley BoroughLocal Elected Official: Jean Schmidling (Borough Council member)Local Appointed OfficialL John Boyle (Borough Manager)Local Civic Leader: Mike RuttleLocal Business Person: Margaret Bork (Fun Matters)Ex-Officio MembersSusan Taylor (Board Member)Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, Inc.Jerry Lepping (Executive Director)Bucks County Conference & Visitors BureauThe statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations and other data in this report are solely those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of any of the funding agencies for this project.The project was funded by a Transportation Community Development Initiative grant from the Delaware ValleyRegional Planning Commission with additional funding provided by the Delaware & Lehigh National HeritageCorridor, Inc.iiLANDMARK TOWNS

Table of ContentsIntroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1Overall Landmark Towns bicycle strategy goals & objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Brief history of prior planning efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Public involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6Reviewing the Assets, Building upon the Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11Area attractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11Bicycle accessibility from regional transportation systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16Visitor support services/user amenities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26Marketing Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31Overall marketing strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31Description of recommended tactics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33Recommended event marketing tactics and budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36Calendar and marketing timelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38Branding of the D&L Landmark Towns Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40Overall Event Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45Town and trail bike/hike event . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47Event timeline/planning calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52General event logistics for any of the town and trail event options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54Event marketing and communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55Additional considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56Costs of events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61Sample budgets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61Sources of funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70Final recommendations for the event strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71Recommendations for Enhancing the Bicycle Trail Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73Develop an alternate safe bicycle road route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73Improve safety for on-road trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76Fill the trail gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77Develop wayfinding signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77Secure bicycle parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81Art bike rack program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81Fill other gaps in user amenities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85Landmark Towns Action Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87BICYCLE MARKETING STRATEGYiii

ivLANDMARK TOWNS

IntroductionThe object of this study is to prepare a comprehensive bicycle strategy andmarketing plan that will increase the number of bicycle-related tourists to thefour Landmark Towns of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor:New Hope, Yardley, Morrisville, and Bristol boroughs. The goal is to stimulateeconomic development, trail-related business attractions, and job creationthrough increased awareness and recreational use of the towns and trails by localresidents, and ultimately through regional and national tourism. Residents andvisitors to the Landmark Towns will be encouraged to celebrate bicycling and touse recreational trails and parks in the region. To achieve this goal, this studyhas two basic parts:More Americans participatein cycling than skiing, golf,and tennis combinedThe first part of the study includes an assessment of the existing assets thatmake a viable trail network linking the Landmark Towns along the DelawareRiver. The four towns have a rich inventory of cultural and historic assets,recreational amenities, lodging, compatible retail establishments, andrestaurants. A review of the assets also includes an evaluation of the conditionof the existing trail network that currently connects these four towns. While thetowns are all linked by the Delaware Canal, portions of the canal betweenMorrisville and Bristol Borough have been encroached upon by development.In order to complete the linkage between the four boroughs, recommendationshave been made for overcoming these gaps in the trail system to make acontinuous trail system.The second part of the study is an advertising and marketing campaign, with arecommended schedule of events that can be used to promote the fourLandmark Towns and the trail network as a local and regional destination. Toassist in developing an identity for bicycling in the Landmark Towns,recommended logotypes were developed to provide an exciting new brand forthe annual bike and hike event. The report identifies strategies to engage localstakeholders, such as businesses, elected officials, interested groups, and regionalstakeholders.BICYCLE MARKETING STRATEGY1

IntroductionWhy is this study important?This year more than 43 million Americans will participate in the sport ofbicycling, and 5.6 million of these enthusiasts will ride more than 110 days.Cycling has become the seventh most popular sporting activity in the nation,attracting a dedicated group of recreational and competitive participants. It hasblossomed into a 6.5 billion dollar industry. More Americans participate inbicycling than skiing, golf and tennis combined. This enthusiasm has spreadthrough all levels of competition and recreation.While cycling has become a sport that is accessible to all age groups and abilities,there are two distinct groups within the sport: competitive cyclists and avid orrecreational participants. This report is geared toward the recreational cyclists.Cyclists are educated, motivated, success-oriented individuals who typically workharder and longer than athletes in most other sports. Seventy percent of adultrecreational cyclists and 81% of competitive cyclists have earned a college degree.Cyclists are also strong influencers within their families and local communities.They are actively involved with community issues and organizations, and nearly65% have children at home. Additionally, 52% of cyclists rate their brand loyaltyas high, which makes their influential power even more attractive to marketers.(Source: 2007 Active Network Inc.)OverallLandmark Townsbicycle strategygoals & objectivesGoalStrengthen the Landmark Towns and Delaware & Lehigh National HeritageCorridor by linking the communities and economies via a bicycle strategy andmarketing planObjectivesn Increase profile/visibility of Landmark Towns through joint marketing effortsand special eventsn Increase use of trail systems by bicyclistsn Create awareness in the communities of the value of trail-related businessesand activities“When people arriving at astore by bicycle are treatedwith the same priority andrespect as people arrivingby car, that will translatedirectly to the bottom nomiccase-for-on-street-bike-parking/)2LANDMARK TOWNSn Create bicycle-friendly businesses and communitiesn Stimulate economic development related to the trail system (trail-relatedbusinesses & jobs)n Increase trail-based and recreational/heritage/cultural tourism in theLandmark Townsn Improve trail conditions and accessibilityn Reduce auto dependence, parking and congestion problemsn Improve overall quality of life in Landmark Towns

BackgroundBrief history ofprior planningeffortsThe concept of linking the Landmark Towns as a viable network for bicyclerelated recreational tourism is not new to the region. Trail signage was installedalong the trail corridor and dedicated on National Trails Day in 2008 toidentify the network that links the four Landmark Towns. The LandmarkTowns hosted the June 2009 "Town to Towpath Bike Hike" to encouragerecreational use of the trail and to celebrate National Trails Day. In Septemberof 2009 the Landmark Towns of Bucks County completed a StrategicWayfinding Plan, designed to make it easier for visitors to navigate to, from, andthrough the Landmark Towns, in an effort to increase the vitality, localeconomy and quality of life in the towns. This comprehensive plan includes astrategy for installation of gateway, directional, and interpretive signagedesigned to enhance visitor experiences in the four communities.In addition, the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, Inc. (D&LNHC) continues to work diligently, along with the PA Department ofConservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), to improve trail conditions andto provide greater trail signage and accessibility in the heritage corridor area.For example, a recent project in Morrisville included the installation of animportant stairway, where none previously existed, providing access from thecommercial downtown to the canal towpath. Previous efforts of the D&LNHC have also included installation of directional blade markers indicating thedistance between downtowns, as well as ongoing collaborations with theFriends of the Delaware Canal, whose mission is to preserve and improve theDelaware Canal. New Hope Borough partnered with the D&L NHC Inc. onthe Canal Walk Project, intended to improve an underused and blighted areaon the west side of the canal and to facilitate access to the central businessdistrict. This project was completed in 2010 using federal, state, and D&L grantfunds. The area along the trail was landscaped and equipped with lighting toconnect visitors from public parking facilities at the end of Hardy Bush Way atUnion Square to the New Hope & Ivyland Railroad and the downtownshopping district. Appropriate signage will be added as funding becomesavailable.BICYCLE MARKETING STRATEGY3

BackgroundNew Hope Borough and Bristol Borough are participants in the Delaware ValleyRegional Planning Commission’s (DVRPC) Classic Towns rpc). Both towns have agreed tomarket their communities as great places to live, work, play, and raise families.Yardley Borough has begun the process of completing the Afton AvenueStreetscape project, a project designed to link Lake Afton to the commercialdowntown with connecting paths to the Canal and Delaware riverfront.DVRPC Regional Trails NetworkThe trail system within the DVRPC nine-county region has been divided intothree categories: 1) trunk trails; 2) primary trails; and 3) secondary trailsdesignated on the Regional Trails Program Targeted Trails list. The categories arebased on length; how much is currently built or under public control (i.e.,feasible); connections to populated areas, major regional parks and other trails;ability to serve as a transportation asset; and on the number of organizations thatare actively working on and advocating for the trail.The Delaware and Lehigh Trail has been designated one of the four regionaltrunk trails in the area (including the Schuylkill River Trail, the East CoastGreenway, and the Copper River Trail/Camden Greenway).Greater priority may be given to funding trunk trails and primary trails. Projectsapplying for funding that are not listed on the network map are still eligible, butthey need to demonstrate a logical connection to an existing or planned networktrail. Such a “logical” connection can take into account future phases of traildevelopment along a known or viable right-of-way.Municipalities involvedThe study area comprises four Landmark Towns that lie along the Delaware Riverand are linked by the Delaware Canal. The canal includes a towpath that extendsfor approximately 24.6 miles from New Hope Borough in the north, throughboth Yardley and Morrisville borough, and ends in Bristol Borough in the south.Each municipality has independently been developing linkages to the DelawareCanal State Park in an effort to promote cultural tourism.The entire Delaware Canal Trail extends from Easton, PA in the north to BristolBorough and is approximately 60 miles long. It is not only multi-county, butthrough its linkages, multi-state as well.Other partnersThere are a number of partners who play an active role in the development of atrail system that serves these communities and who can contribute to the successof this program.Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, Inc. (D&L NHC) is a nonprofit organization that is responsible for the implementation of the NationalHeritage Corridor that includes the four Landmark Towns and the DelawareCanal that links them. The D&L NHC plays an active role in marketing the4LANDMARK TOWNS

Backgroundcorridor, in developing wayfinding signs, and in obtaining grants and fundingimprovements that will implement the viability of the Heritage Corridor.(http://www.delawareandlehigh.org/)The Delaware Canal and its towpath are a Pennsylvania State Park, a NationalHistoric Landmark, a National Recreation Trail, part of the Lower DelawareWild and Scenic River, and part of the East Coast indapark/delawarecanal/index.htm)Pennsbury Manor in Morrisville, administered by the Pennsylvania Historicaland Museum Commission and The Pennsbury Society, is the recreated countryhome of William Penn. Through tours, exhibits, and a full calendar of workshopsand special programs, Pennsbury Manor shares the colonial world of Penn withvisitors. (www.pennsburymanor.org/)The Friends of the Delaware Canal hosts several annual events, educationalseminars and clean ups designed to promote greater use of the trail and theDelaware Canal towpath. (http://www.fodc.org/)The Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (PADCNR) is responsible for the administration and maintenance of the DelawareCanal State Park that extends from the City of Easton in the north to BristolBorough in the south. PA DCNR maintains the towpaths, locks, and restrooms,as well as the canal water elevation. Since the canal is subject to damage byflooding of the Delaware River, maintenance is a continuing and costly problem.The East Coast Greenway (ECG), an urban trail system linking over 3000 milesin over 16 states and 25 major cities, has been working with the D&L NHC andBristol and Morrisville Boroughs to close gaps in the existing trail system betweenthese two communities, which includes the D&L Landmark Towns Trail. TheEast Coast Greenway has created marketing materials and a website designed todraw visitors to the trail system from Maine to Florida.(www.greenway.org/pa.aspx)The Pennsylvania Environmental Council, a non-profit organization that isresponsible for obtaining and administrating grants for the implementation oftrails and trail improvements, is currently involved with solving the problemsrelating to the existing trail gaps between Morrisville and Bristol boroughs as partof the Delaware Canal and East Coast Greenway work. (http://www.pecpa.org/)The Bucks County Bicycle Task Force is made up of local volunteers and isadministered by the Bucks County Planning Commission. It is currently in theprocess of developing a County Bicycle Master Plan program with a privateconsultant. The Task Force is well aware of the problems inherent with theexisting routes between Morrisville and Bristol Borough. They have targeted thisarea as a high priority for future sCountyBikePlanNewsletter.pdf )BICYCLE MARKETING STRATEGY5

BackgroundPublic involvementMeetingsTCDI Meeting 1A comprehensive public participation process was undertaken for this project inorder to engage interested parties and stakeholders. The meetings involvedongoing meetings with a steering committee, which for the purposes of this reportwas called the Transportation Community Development Initiative (TCDI)Subcommittee. This subcommittee was comprised of representatives from thefour Landmark Towns, the D&L, and the Friends of the Delaware Canal. TheBucks County Bicycle Task Force and the East Coast Greenway were representedby members of the CVDA Team. The initial meeting was undertaken to reviewthe overall scope of the project, review information that was available for theproject, and discuss current activities that would have an impact upon theplanning process.TCDI Meeting 2A second meeting of the TCDI Subcommittee was held to review the assessmentreport, which included a review of the existing trail systems and bicycle amenities,as well as identification of the gaps in the existing towpath trail. There wasdiscussion regarding how the trail system could be linked with the existing publictransportation. An important part of the assessment included a review of relatedbicycle programs and preliminary marketing programs. There was also abrainstorming session to develop a branding recommendation for the bicycle andhike event.Public Meeting 1A public meeting was held in Yardley Borough on April 14, 2011 to discussproject goals and objectives and probable actions. This meeting provided anopportunity to review the assessment of existing conditions and marketingopportunities. Branding alternatives and the needs of the business communitywere also discussed. Participants had an opportunity to visit information stationsset up within the room to discuss opportunities or concerns with members of theProject Team.A survey was handed out to all attendees to elicit information about the ridinghabits, destinations, and comments about current bicycle facilities in theLandmark Towns. It should be noted that there were only 8 responses and thatthese responses may be somewhat skewed because several respondents were activein bicycle advocacy. Nevertheless, some interesting points emerged. For example,there was a desire for more bicycle parking in shopping areas, although perhaps amore important factor in shopping by bike was the presence of dedicated bikelanes. Public restrooms were mentioned frequently as being important. Acomplete compilation of survey results is in the Appendix to this report (PublicInput Results from 4-27-11 Public Meeting).6LANDMARK TOWNS

BackgroundA second survey involved responses to a variety of logo phrases andtaglines that might be used for marketing. The most popular ideas amongattendees included: Bucks Bikes, Ride Bucks, Ride the River, Bike the River,Bucks Bicycles Beauty History, Experience Bucks River Towns, 4Towns in 1 Trail, Bikeable Walkable Lovable, and Walk Bike Explore. These ideas were noted for possible incorporation into a logo forbiking events in the Landmark Towns., , ( ) ).% ' ' ' . *' 0 0 2'0 27/ 1 .% 0(# 01 # 1"0(! # !7 2' # 0 (&'5 7 #,(-(120 2(.%-% ' #6/ 0( -" # #3 2 -# 2 - & 0(# 01 5'. " - ./ 0 2 3-# 0 ,.12 20 %%(" ".-#(2(.-1.%(13 .0 - 5 #3 2 -# 2 - & 0(# 01 5'. 0 11 ".-%(# -2 .% 2' (0 !( (27 2. ./ 0 2 (- 20 %%(".%!(# 01 & 25 4 -# 3-# 0 5'.1 )3#&, -2 -# ,.2.0 1*( 1 0 12( 11 # 4 ./ #9 : 0(# 00 7.3 - 9 : 0(# 0) ) ,#( . * ' ,' . * '.00(14( #).%,( 1 5./ 0# 7TCDI Meeting 3! )' %,( 1 , " #. ) " ( . * ' ,.5 , -7 9 : 0(# 01 0 (- 7.30 % ,( 7#0(12. .0.3&',( 1,( 1.0 ,( 1,( 1.0 % ',A third TCDI Subcommittee meeting was held to review therecommendations and alternatives for two separate aspects of the study:first, the recommended enhancements to the trail system and second, therecommended marketing plan with suggestions for a calendar of eventsincluding strategies for implementation.' . * , #) ) ',( 1,( 1) ).% '20 ( ' ' . * / )' ! ' ' 0. #' . * '' . * , #) ) ) . )' . *' ' # ( #')!#) " ')%,(6 .% 20 ( -# 0. # 5' 2 / 0" -2 & 0 7.3 0. #) ,#( # ) ! ) ' " ')! ) '. 7.3 0(# .- 2.5- " -2 0 0. #1 13"' 1 --17 4 -(% 7 1 5'("' 0. #1(- 5 ./ 4 (-) ( #)! ' " !. , #) ) () # ) # ' . *'( . * ') 20 ( !'.(- 0. #1 13"' 1 0. #1 ! 25 - 2.5-1 . * '),#).5- 2. 2.5-# " ' ,#(' () ! ' *.00(14( '' ( !!( 2 (- 0(12. , %#(- 2 (-0# 7-#(- 2' ! .% 7 1 '.5 .%2 -3! (" 2(-&TCDI Meeting 4A fourth TCDI Sub Committee meeting was held in February 2012 toreview the draft report and make necessary changes before the plan waspresented to the public for their comments.Public Meeting 2A second public meeting was held in Yardley on March 27, 2012 to present andreceive comments on the draft document. A number of useful suggestions weremade concerning issues such as bicycle parking, especially security, and publicrestrooms. Following this meeting final comments were incorporated into thereport and the final report was presented at four additional public hearings—oneat each of the four Landmark Towns. At these meetings the report was presentedto the governing bodies of each community, which subsequently approvedand adopted the report.EY!SURVbetterUSER ns serve youdleyLIAl, YarTRrk TowHopeour traisdma risville Newne love tter?e LaneveryoorbeHelp thristol Borough M ey? We hearththe attrail serve youBrvguser su towns alona trailourWhy do t how canbutrail?on theu ridein?r do you liveHow fado yoityalipMunicWhate trail?ail?ong the the trwns alyou usthe toten doant inHow ofyou wdoicesl?of servtypesthe traiWhatalonge townst in the trail?u wanong thyowns ales dothe tosinesssses ins of bunepesityand buWhatationsdestinlturalosksout cuil on kiarn abthe Trat to leanngwloyou! AHow do?erthlai! O! E-micationl?e applthe traiu are on! Phonhen yowyt to buanwingdoke parkWhatns?ered bithe tow! Covld be ins shouielit?ere faciwhy?ks! Othbicycley andagesort of! RacYardlWhatute signope, oress rorkingNew HBusinsville,Bike pari!or!,Moroughsstol Be lanein Bri! Biknesseste busiess:favoriuryoail addrare?ur e-mWhattownside yothesese provsses inbusinens, pleawnttouekeqdmaryou fron Lanten dodatesHow ofmail uplike ewouldIf youTrail user surveyAn informal survey of trail riders was conducted on Saturday, October 14,2010 by Donna Boone of Landmark Towns and Andy Hamilton ofCVDA in Yardley, Bristol Borough, and Morrisville, and by AndyHamilton in New Hope. Bicycle riders and walkers responded to a signasking for their assistance in the survey. The survey form and answers, aswell as a complete compilation of responses, are included in theAppendix of this report.Fifty-seven surveys were completed. The majority of users camefrom Yardley, followed by Bristol and New Hope. The homemunicipalities of the users should not be considered especiallysignificant, since the surveyors did not spend equal amounts oftime in each location. The majority of respondents werefrequent users (daily or weekly) and most traveled under 10miles on the trail.BICYCLE MARKETING STRATEGY7

BackgroundNot surprisingly, the most frequently cited services and amenities needed on thetrail and in towns were bathrooms and places to eat or drink. This is consistentwith almost all surveys of travelers; restrooms, food/drink, and parking facilitiesare most desired. Car parking areas were not mentioned by respondents in thissurvey, but the need for bicycle parking was clear from the answers given. Themost requested types of businesses within towns were restaurants, specialty foodretail, and retail stores including clothing and souvenirs.Many of the “wish list” items are already found in the Landmark Towns:bookstores, antique and craft stores, and bike shops. This may indicate that thereis a market for these stores that can be well-served by better wayfinding andconnections from the trail to commercial areas. Some of the wish list items, likeantique stores, seem a little impractical for cyclists or hikers, unless they arethinking of these in terms of window shopping; again, this may point to thebenefit of getting trail users to explore the towns.E-mail and kiosks along the trail were the most frequently mentioned means oflearning about cultural destinations and businesses in the towns.8LANDMARK TOWNS

Reviewing the Assets,Building upon the PotentialArea attractionsThe Landmark Towns—linked by a common historyEach of the four Landmark Town shares a connection to the Delaware Riverand the role that the Delaware Canal had on their local economy. The historyof the towns is woven into that of early settlers in America, the RevolutionaryWar, and the Industrial Revolution. The historic and cultural resources of theLandmark Towns, including the Delaware Canal, are key area attractions fortourists.In Portland, OR, with itswell-established bikewaynetwork, a survey foundthat 78% of visitors saidthat the city’s bicyclefriendly reputation playeda role in their decision totravel tour-howbike-tourism-helps-local-economies/The same qua

BICYCLE MARKETING STRATEGY 1 The object of this study is to prepare a comprehensive bicycle strategy and marketing plan that will increase the number of bicycle-related tourists to the four Landmark Towns of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor: New Hope, Yardley, Morrisville, and Bristol boroughs. The goal is to stimulate