The Love Theory - BookLife

Transcription

The Love TheoryFor the Symmetry of all Things1Conceived and Imagined by,Michael StansfieldThree as OneErgo the Preservation of Humanity1Romans 8:28 All things work together for good to those who love God (Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, etc.), each according to his call existing.

The Love Theory, April 28, 2009, Michael StansfieldISBN: 978-1-329-12000-6 NCB (New Canon Bible), 2009ISBN: 978-1-304-78296-0

TABLE OF CONTENTSThe Diversity of All Things .1(for Humanity a foundation)Part Ia: The Kingdom of Heaven (for the Moralist)Foundations of the Kingdom of Heaven . 6The Hope of Abraham . . .11The Curse of Canaan . . .17Esau and Jacob . . .20The Covenant Passed to Joseph . . .22Joseph Sold . . . .24Joseph from Captivity to Kings . .27Ephraim and Manasseh . . .30The True Sons of Canaan . . .31The King and the Kingdom . 36The Truth Will Set You Free . 38Allegorical Christianity of the Greeks .41Part Ib: The Royal Priesthood (for the Moralist)The Covenant Given to Aaron .44Like Mother, Like Daughter . .47How Did Things Come to This?.58The House of God of Jacob . . .62The Covenant of the Law and of Grace .71Be Grafted into Arabia . . .78The Image of God (the Trinity) . 82Part II: Direct Democracy (for the Humanist)The Day of Jezreel . . . .91To Whom Much Is Given . . . . .97The Failures of Ancient Democracies. .105Step 1: The Writing of Proposals . .107The Neutral Observer . . .112Debate the Details . 113Step 2: The Prioritizing of Proposals .116Institutions of Learning . . .118Creating Heroes (Judges) . 120Gathering Signatures . . . .121Step 3: Passage of Proposals into Law .123Foundational Element of Democracy .125Natural Limitations of Congress .128Committees . . .129Mergers and Modifications. . .133Governors and the Creation of Law . .143Is Unity at Odds with Representation?.147Collective Responsibility Laws . .150Party Politics .155Nation of Laws, Not Men . .157Constitutions . . . .161Inalienable Rights 167Part III: The Privatization of Government(for the Capitalist)People vs. Ideas 175Economics of City Government 177Macro-Economics.181Distribution of Wealth . . .185City Budgets . 190Reason Square . 197The Regional Ambassador . 200Servants of All, Masters of None .207The County Council . .209County Judges . .215Defining Terms. . .217County Manager . 219Department of Education . 221Testimony against Many Kings . . .224The Prince of the Covenant .226The National Council . .230National Projects . 233Political Appointments . 235National Elections . .236The Court System .241Law Enforcement Bureaus 247Military vs. Domestic Spending .251War . . .262Part IV: World Peace and Unity(for the Socialist)Responsibilities to Our Weakest . .268The Preservation of Cultural Identity.272Succession from the Union . 273Struggles with Nationalism . .276Growing Republics and Democracies.280The Golden Gate. . 283Globalization of Standards . .285Passing International Standards . .288Responsibilities of the Commissions .292Keeping the Inspectors Accountable.298Commission Hierarchy and Structure 304International Trade Agreements . .309Nation Earth . 313The Kingdom of Heaven . . .315The Symmetry of All Things .322(for Humanity a fulfillment)EpilogueRevolution . . . .333Revival . . 344My Story (Appendix A) . . A-1

for HumanityThe Diversity of All ThingsIntroductionBefore one can truly comprehend the oneness of all creation, thought, and science one mustappreciate the diversity and unique beauty within all things. I have graphed and charted theintersecting lines within Humanity’s thoughts on an elementary level. This graphical chart I call theReason Square maps the intersections between the philosophies of logic and ethics. To keep onephilosophy from dominating the others the American political system has designed each philosophyto counterbalance the others so that each philosophy is restrained from reaching its pinnacle ShangriLa. Most of our political discussion will center on the American political system as it is consideredthe father of the Republic form of government, which dominates the global in the modern era. Usingthis counterbalance approach the dreams of each aspect of society has become as a donkey chasingthe carrot, never reaching, endlessly pursuing. The carrot becomes a fictional, unachievable, andimpossible destination. When a society by design takes away the hopes and dreams of its people,should anyone be surprised that the end-result is distrust, deceit, wars, and enviably death? Thegood book says love your neighbor, which begins with an understanding of what your neighbor’saspirations are, even if your neighbor is your political or religious enemy. Taken collectively, it is mycontention; if one truly and deeply understands all the political and religious dimensions that makeup the Reason Square, they will see that each philosophy is noble at heart. The book is divided intofour parts each part representing one of the four core philosophies from which all reasoning is bornwith the direct aim and goal of understanding what that philosophy’s impossible dream is and howin practical terms that dream can be realized all in the tone and voice of that philosophy. Finally, themost impossible reality of all that each of these impossible dreams can be practically and realisticallyachieved in harmony with the other philosophies so that one philosophy is not forced to compromisethe essence of who they are for the sake of another. Therefore, the Square will naturally evolve intothe Circle, as the rough edges of dissension are made smooth and seamless. Moreover, once one cantranscend the square the true symmetry of the Universe will be understood.What is the Reason Square?In a republic, political parties become necessary to get legislation passed if there are to be collective,cohesive political efforts in a legislature. However, collective, cohesive political efforts also limit the1 of our 360 Journey

The Diversity of All Things creativity of individuals by removing original new ideas for dealing with challenges and issues thatmay turn out to be against the party’s will as a whole or its organizational structure.The political party system is built and designed around the general framework of how a personthinks logically and ethically about any issue. Philosophy in its most elementary form falls into twocategories: logic and ethics. Ethics is divided by two opposing ideas. One is known as humanism ormoral relativism: that all things happen by chance, that their nature is determined by their context,and that observation changes and alters from one person’s perspective to the next. On the otherside of the square is moralism or moral absolutism. This is the belief that there is a preordained orderthrough a Creator, wherein each person has a destiny that he or she is meant to fulfill as part of someoverall intelligent design or plan. Moreover, behind the flux of change and circumstance thereremains one constant set of values that is true and right and others that are wrong, as markedlydeviating from the good, and these are usually outlined through traditional religious or philosophicaltexts.2Logic, in political terms, is divided into two general categories as well. The first, Darwinism a.k.a.Capitalism, is built on the principle that the value of each human life is determined through eachperson’s actions, with survival of the fittest, so that a criminal is valued less than a saint is.3 On theopposing side, there is socialism, which has as a core belief that all human lives are of equal value,that a person’s actions may be good, but that this in itself does not increase that person’s value as ahuman being because a person’s value or life is innate and sacred. Darwinism values competition,whereas socialism values unity. Darwinism emphasizes the individual, and socialism focuses more onthe community.With every political concept we come across, our minds naturally provide us with both an ethicaland a logical reason for the solution we determined. Reason is the place where ethics meets logic, aseach person’s political science reasoning is based on taking one ethical view and merging it with alogical view. When one takes capitalism a.k.a. Darwinism and merges it with moral absolutism, whatone comes back with is republican political philosophy. When one takes socialism and merges it withmoral relativism, one comes back with democratic political philosophy. When one takes capitalismand merges it with moral relativism, the result is the basis of libertarian political philosophy. Finally,when one takes moral absolutism and merges it with socialism, the result is the basis of communistpolitical philosophy. These differences exist not only internally, but globally as well when oneconsiders the cold war as a rivalry between Capitalism in the United States and Communism in theformer Soviet Union. This competition for power between these philosophies has led to a significantamount of bigotry throughout the country and the globe. Bigotry is the intolerance toward thosewho hold different opinions from oneself. Each political party in American Society tends to denounceits opponent as being either stupid or evil. However, it is the contention of this book that each oneof these philosophies in its own way is extremely intelligent, has added extreme benefits, andenhanced the value of humankind. It is also our contention that each one of these philosophies isneeded in society, as the yin and the yang, to reach a good social balance. In someproportion, humanity is made up of all of these groups. The political party system was designed tobuild collective efforts among people with the same political philosophies. Each person does nothave to be informed which party he or she should belong to; our political philosophy developsnaturally within each of us. Not only each one of us, but each society as well moves and shifts asevents affect our lives and we see the world from different angles. The graph, referred to as theReason Square, was developed to help show how these political philosophies relate to one another.The square is held together through the bonds between ethics and logic, and it is pulled apartthrough the conflicting and ultimately opposing directions within ethics and within logic, respectively.23A Purpose Driven Life, by Rick Warren (Zondervan Publishing)—“Your purpose is planned before your existence,” purposedrivenlife.com/ .Moral Justification of Capitalism, Ayn Rand, capitalism.org/ .2 of our 360 Journey

for HumanityIn a republic, one philosophy is granted authority above the others, depending on which party holdsa majority in Congress, as well as who sits in the White House. The ultimate goal of this new world isto fulfill the square (by representing the square) with all of the philosophies in society, and to do soin harmony with the struggles of the age. Each aspect of this new world model was designed toamplify in its own way an individual piece of the square. The terms used in the square were derivedfrom what was viewed as their modern-day equivalents in society, but these terms will change,depending on their time in history and the particular society. The concepts, however, have remainedconstant and date back to the beginning.To accomplish this endeavor, the book has been divided into four parts each part presenting adifferent portion of the Reason Square. The tone of each philosophy is made to speak specifically tothat philosophy within the framework of that element’s natural philosophy, supported by the originsof that element. Such as the Moralist element is supported through a Biblical foundation, while theHumanist element is supported through the writings of Thomas Jefferson and the Bill of Rights, theCapitalist element through the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence, while the Socialistthrough Nobel Prize winners among other strong sources that carry a Socialist ideology. We beginwith a quick look at each of the core philosophies.Moralist: All of the philosophies in the square attempt in their own unique way to build up a person’sor a society’s pride and esteem, except the Moralist. The Moralist would say we are all sinners and aresaved not by our goodness, but rather through the grace of God in order to build humility, forgivenessand selflessness within society or a person. As this tone is strongly found within the Moralist Elementof the equation, I would fail the Moralist not to use this tone and method to achieve its impossibledreams through practical means. The ultimate dreams of the Moralist: To show how the sum-totalof human history is by and through divine design. To build a society and world upon the love of Godand the love of one another. The unification of the world under one God and one faith (Symmetry ofall faiths). (Christianity) The completion of the Global Great Commission. The acceptance oforiginal sin, a world born-again (the ways of the law is death, but through the sacrifice of love is eternallife), the redemption of Israel, and the message of the first witness. (Islam) The transform of theArabian Desert into Paradise, Eden restored, with rivers that flow in the land of the living through theliberation of the Palestinian people. Universal acceptance among (Jews and Christians specifically)that Islam is the resurrection of the ancient religion as prophesied throughout the Old Testament.(Judaism) The establishment of the priesthood of Aaron and the building of the Temple as outlinedby the prophet Ezekiel, the world celebrating one set of holidays as outlined in the Torah, the comingMessiah to save them from their enemies and bring peace to the Earth, and the fulfillment of theAbrahamic Covenant. We also will endeavor to provide universe acceptance of the primary preceptsof each of these faiths: (Christianity) Christ is the only Son of God. (Judaism) The Tanakh has notpassed away, is still relevant, and needed in our modern age. All of the Torah was put in place by Godand should be followed. (Islam) Mohammad is the final prophet of Allah (HaElohim), accomplishedall that Allah (the God) pre-destined him to do, and that both he and what he accomplished wereforetold through numerous prophets throughout the Tanakh (Old Testament) ahead of time.Furthermore, while the institutions of these faiths may be in continual struggle against one another,the religions themselves have a Divine universal and all-encompassing harmony and symmetrybetween them. The sole caveat being that to achieve the hopes and dreams of one faith is contingentupon achieving the hopes and dreams of all faiths.Humanist: The hope and dreams of the humanist, for a person or society, is self-realization throughcomplete intellectual freedom. The humanist is the only element in the Reason Square that does notattempt to change a society or a person. The humanist sees the beauty within a person or society asthey are. The humanist does not see one right or correct path, but rather sees the beauty in theuniqueness and creativity within each society and person. The humanist is not against change, butwants it through natural evolution only when a society or person is ready for and desires the changeto take place. You will hear this tone throughout the section on the humanist, because it is the voice3 of our 360 Journey

The Diversity of All Things and ethics of the humanist. The impossible dream that I endeavor to achieve through practical meansfor the humanist is a directly democratic government. Not a government of the majority, but rathera government where each voice counts independently and each society can evolve and growdifferently, creatively and uniquely on its own. Designed for governments in the millions, billions,and trillions of people, to allow each voice to be heard, blossom, grow and evolve.Capitalist: The Capitalist hope and dreams are to maximum the efficiency, productivity, and growthwithin each person and society using competition and struggle. The Capitalist is the only element inthe Square to love hardship and adversity as tests to be overcome. This is the tone of the Capitalistsection of this work. The impossible dream of the Capitalist that I attempt to achieve through practicemeans is creating a form of government that exceeds the efficiency, competition, and productivity ofthe private sector. A form of privatization of the public sector, where taxation and governmentbudgets are all privatized. A government based on savings, rather than deficits, and a government thatdoes not place shackles on human achievement, creativity, and growth.Socialist: The Socialist hope and dreams are family, cooperation, and shared resources. The Socialistis the only element of the square to interpret his or her identity through society and nature holistically.For the socialist there really is no such thing as ownership. Ergo the socialist what is mine is yoursand what is yours is mine. The socialist ideal is where everyone pulls together to help everyone elsein what is best for the common good. The socialist has no rank or discrimination between people ornations. This is the tone of the Socialist in this work. The impossible dream of the Socialist that Iattempt to achieve through practical means is World Peace, a world without borders, united throughthe marriage of nations, free of poverty, disease, and war, a government of building bridges, grandprojects, and the creation of the one world global family.Today in our society each of these four philosophies are at all times endeavoring to meet their ownpolitical ends. They all have their own unique plans to achieve these ends. The problem is theyattempt to do so at the expense of the other philosophies and see the other philosophies as wrongor at least as less important than their own desires and needs. They are quick to find fault and onlysee evil intentions with the motivations of the other philosophies, but see their element as pure andnoble. The difficulty is to create a natural symmetry between these seemingly opposing philosophiesso that they can naturally work in harmony with each other. To these ends, each element I dedicatedfive years of my life to embrace and transform into each specific element to its fullest potential andsee its greatest inspirations so that essentially I became the Capitalist, the Humanist, the Socialist,and the Moralist. Four philosophies at five years each comes to a total of twenty years of my life.Each of these goals is considered impossible to achieve. By society’s standards, they are all consideredfantasy. The pages that follow turn these fantasies into the world of the practical and real. If yourgoal is to love your neighbor as yourself, the first step is to understand and relate to your neighbor.To put your neighbors dreams above your own. Each section while it may be an element in oppositionto your own element it is never the less also an opportunity to learn, understand and relate to thoseyou perhaps once saw as your enemy. Furthermore, while the tone for each element is of thatelement it is also designed to push that element to realizations about itself that it may not wish tosee or to come to grips with. Consider it a tough love from a friend. Prepare yourself, as eachelement, while working in harmony with the other philosophies will be as opening a door into adifferent world and different mentality.As children, we learn from our parents and those around us. During these earliest years, webelieved our parents had complete understanding of the universe and desired in all ways and thingsto be like them. As adults, many revert to this adolescent nature desiring unconditional love. Realizingour parents are inferior we place God in the shoes of our parental figure as adults to fulfill thisfundamental need. Many in our society turn to religion, attending some religious institution under apastor, rabbi, or imam to achieve truth and understanding. This god figure is not always of a religiousnature, but could take the form of science, politics, and other philosophies of all sorts. It is in our4 of our 360 Journey

for Humanitynature as human beings to believe our thoughts and ideas are superior to all others. It is a yearningto show the world that their ideas, voice, and soul matters, that it has innate value to the universeand if the universe could understand this it would love them unconditionally in the form of unlimitedfame, authority, power, wealth, etc. Nevertheless, this form of love and total freedom lacks sonder4and is selfish in that it also suppress the fame, authority, power, wealth, etc. of others, which in itsown way translates into a form of totalitarianism and control. Control is the denial of any portion ofone’s unique beauty, which is why the human subconscious, perhaps our soul, longs for liberty,because the soul yearns to be unconditionally loved.There is, however, evolution for humanity to see beyond this primitive conception of love. Thedeepest form of this bigotry is found in the religious institutions of our world, especially found inChristianity, Islam, and Judaism, which is why I have begun our journey with the Moralist. Note again,I am drawing a distinction between the religions themselves and the institutions that claim torepresent them. As Christianity is the largest of these institutions, the greatest attention has beenbrought to bear upon it. As each of these institutions could care less what I think, and consider theirown illusion of god to be greater than all others, I choose to talk to them through their own HolyBooks to reveal to them conclusively that each of these faiths are acting outside of the desires of theirown Divine. After all, if they will not listen to Him, what hope does creation have? For He declaredthat was before all things and all things (religions, philosophies, etc.) are held together through Him.5Moreover, not only were all things: religions, philosophies, you name it created by him, but they werealso created for Him (or Her),6 so that the fullness of all humanity and existence dwells within Him.7For the Divine states that to separate one’s self from this fullness is to alienate themselves from theDivine, becoming His enemy because of their own stereotypical mind.8 Ergo it is only through Him,the Fullness of his nature, that one may enter the Kingdom of Heaven.9As I am not divine, the hypothesis that has put forward is a working theory on my part byapplying the scientific method to philosophical concepts. Obviously if a person is closed to allpoints of view other than his or her own, than no opinion that differs from his or her perspectivewould be acceptable to that person. As is the essence of change, I am asking readers to put asidecertain concepts they have grown up with and to look at the Bible or other holy works from a differentviewpoint. When I obtained an understanding through religious texts, it will be documented in thereferences. Due to copy-write laws on existing Bibles within the Bible Version Industry the publicdomain NCB Translation was used. The point is to show that all groups of people (Christians, Jews,Muslims, etc.) fall short. Therefore, we have created a separation between a true person of faith andsomeone who allegorically uses faith to build up and esteem his religion above all others. Buddhism,Hinduism, and Taoism are also important faiths, however, by their ethical nature they do not existwithin one section of the square, but all sections as they transcend the square, therefore only at theend, once the square is completed can one truly understand these faiths. Therefore, while the firstsection is on Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, the entire book will encompass Buddhism, Hinduism,and Taoism, though these links will not be unveiled till the end. Our ultimate goal in the first sectionon Moralism is to create a harmony and unity between Islam, Christianity, and Judaism. Once theyare united as one, and the stubbornness of their hearts are circumcised10, as prophesied by their ownprophets, only then can the oneness of Buddhism, the diversity of Hinduism, and the singularity ofTaoism be understood. When you are ready to open the door, all you need do is turn the page.4Sonder: (n) the realization that each passerby has a life as vivid and complex as your own.Colossians 1:17,15Colossians 1:167Colossians 1:19-208 Colossians 1:16-219 John 10:9, 14:910Torah 163:16, 183:6– Traditional[Deuteronomy 10:16, 30:6]; Jeremiah 4:4565 of our 360 Journey

The Kingdom of Heaven The Kingdom of Heaven11Part Ia – (Dedicated to the Moralist Element of the Square)Foundations of the Kingdom of HeavenIn the beginning, there was a singularity without time, space, or matter, save but a few random quarksinfinitely smaller than the human eye could see. The quarks fused into matter and antimatter particles(atoms). The particles collided, a fusion reaction occurred, energy was released, in the form oflight, and the strings that made up the quarks begin to vibrate. A dimension of consciousness wasborn. As it is in the beginning of life the consciousness had no knowledge or wisdom, it just was. Theconsciousness’s only understanding was the strings that were contained in the quark. With time, theconsciousness learned that it had the ability to tune the harmonic vibrations of the strings and thuschanging the quark and fundamentally altering the atom. With time, the consciousness learned thatit had the ability to move the protons, the neutrons, and the electrons as it desired and thus it couldchange and alter the design of the atom. As the atom was compiled, the consciousness learned thatsome atoms had a natural bond while others by their nature would push apart. When the bond wascreated between two atoms, there was natural harmony, energy was released during the process,and the result was a new atom that was different from either of the two original atoms that previouslyexisted. The consciousness called this process ‘Life’ and it called the bonding process ‘Love.’ Theconsciousness was curious if new life was created by fusing two elements together what would bethe result from taking a single atom and dividing it? However, dividing the atom did not create twonew atoms, but destroyed the original atom. During the process energy was released, but the energywas not in harmony as it was before, but was chaos, damaging not only itself, but also elements nearit. The consciousness called this process ‘Death.’ As the consciousness began to have anunderstanding of life and death, it realized that it had the authority to create and to destroy. As thesource of this power to create, it gave itself a name, El (God of Life)12, that which gives life, and as thesource of the power to destroy, it gave itself a name, HaEl (God of Death)13, that which takes life away.Moreover, the consciousness saw that his experiments on death were damaging to his experimentson life. Therefore, he separated the place where he did his experiments on life from the place wherehe did his experiments on death. He called the dimension (brane) where he conducted hisexperiments on life; ‘Heaven’ and he called the dimension (brane) where he conducted hisexperiments on death, ‘Hell.’Both heaven and hell were empty space filled with atoms and simplistic elements. Theconsciousness had no concept of time. Eons upon eons passed and the simple elements grew incomplexity, shape, and form, until it happened, the creation of a living cell. The cell’s life was for thebriefest of moments and the cell died. The consciousness realized life was greater than death, for lifecould exist without death, but death could not exist without life. He memorialized the life of the cell,called that measurement of its life a ‘Second’, and thus gave birth to time for to the consciousnessthe foundation of time is the measurement of life.From cells, the consciousness evolved to creation of organisms and higher forms of life. Theconsciousness itself evolved having the ability to ponder and conduct multiple experimentssimultaneously analyzing each one from multiple angles and perspectives as if it was the onlyexperiment the consciousness was working on, thus the consciousness was many, Elohim, Gods of11Utopia, Shangri-La, Nirvana, and so on. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (Mission) – “I will fill the world with love and create Heaven on Earth.” (1959)Torah 14:22 – Traditional [Genesis 14:22]13Torah 163:17– Traditional [Deuteronomy 10:17]126 of our 360 Journey

for the MoralistLife14, and HaElohim, Gods of Death. 15 Yet the consciousness had no conflict between its thoughts,as two intellects would have, thus the consciousness was singular.16 As the consciousness and hiscreations evolved the place where the experiments were conducted also evolved so that Heavenevolved into a place of life and beauty, while Hell evolved into a place of death and destruction.Both Elohim and HaElohim grew in wisdom and knowledge. The organisms evolved in complexityand as they evolved Elohim saw the beauty in the preservation of life and called the preservation oflife ‘Good’. HaElohim in turn saw the depravity of death and called the depravity of death ‘Evil’. Withthe birth of ethics, the consciousness came to realize that neither life nor death wa

The Love Theory For the Symmetry of all Things 1 Conceived and Imagined by, Michael Stansfield Three as One Ergo the Preservation of Humanity 1 Romans 8:28 All things work together for good to those who love God (Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, Budd