WIXLIB

in mid-1985, Hawking contracted pneumonia, which in his condition was life-threatening; he was so ill thatJane was asked if life support should be terminated. She refused but the consequence was a tracheotomy,which would require round-the-clock nursing care, and remove what remained of his speech.[55][56] TheNational Health Service would pay for a nursing home, but Jane was determined that he would live athome. The cost of the care was funded by an American foundation.[57][58] Nurses were hired for thethree shifts required to provide the round-the-clock support he required. One of those employed was ElaineMason, who was to become Hawking's second wife.Wow. It's all there, we only have to unwind it. First of all, if you have had ALS for 23 years and havepneumonia to the point that doctors are recommending life support be terminated, a tracheotomy isn'tgoing to cure you immediately. A tracheotomy is just the procedure of drilling a hole in your windpipeso you can breath through it instead of your nose or mouth. But the problems obviously went farbeyond that, or they wouldn't have been recommending life support termination. He was probablylosing control of his diaphragm, and couldn't fill his lungs on his own. That is what happens with ALS,you know: you lose control of parts of your body one by one, until you finally lose control of them all.We aren't told why a tracheotomy suddenly allowed him to go off the ventilator, for instance. So noneof this makes any sense. If you have any doctor friends, ask them what they think of this paragraph atWikipedia. They may tell you the truth.This makes the likely date of the switch 1985, which is three years before A Brief History of Time cameout. And it looks like Elaine Mason married the blonde impostor, not Hawking. Which brings us tothe next clue:By December 1977, [Hawking's first wife] Jane had met organist Jonathan Hellyer Jones when singing in achurch choir. Hellyer Jones became close to the Hawking family, and by the mid-1980s, he and Jane haddeveloped romantic feelings for each other.“By the mid-1980's.” That confirms the date of 1985 as the date of the switch. If Hawking died in1985, Jane would of course be free to move on to Jones. This would also absolve her of any taint ofadultery, so my reading is actually less sordid (and more believable) than the mainstream reading. Itexplains all the partner switches in the 1980's.To continue to pursue this line of reasoning, let us look at a clue hidden (probably on purpose) here.The cost of his care was funded by an American foundation. That probably didn't jump out at you,since it is written in a language to make it disappear for most people. But that very language acted as ared flag for me. So what American foundation funded this? It took some digging, but it is theMacArthur Foundation. This is a huge red flag, since John D. MacArthur was the owner of BankersLife and Casualty, one of the largest insurance firms. At the time of his death he was said to have beenone of the three richest men in the US. So we should look at his foundation like we look at theRockefeller Foundation or the Ford Foundation: that is to say, with high suspicion.MacArthur owned Bankers Life from 1935 to 1978. In that year, most of his wealth went into hisFoundation, we are told. Curiously, in the next year, 1979, a large financial services holding companycalled Conseco (now CNO) was born. It immediately began buying up insurance companies, includingBankers Life and Casualty. Get ready for this: it bought Bankers Life in 1986, the very same year theMacArthur Foundation began funding Hawking. Coincidence? We'll see.We are told CNO purchased Bankers Life for 118 million, which seems absurdly low for the companyof the 3rd richest man in the US. How did MacArthur become a multi-billionaire from such a measlycompany? These are the questions you should be asking.

Forbes listed CNO with a revenue of 4.5 billion in 2007. This despite the fact that CNO had gonethrough the third largest bankruptcy (after Enron and Worldcom) in US history in 2002. Also despitethe fact that CNO is listed with only four subsidiaries, including Bankers Life, Colonial Penn,Washington National, and 40/86. Something doesn't add up here.Neither does MacArthur's Wikipedia page, which is ridiculously short for someone who was recentlythe 3rd richest man in the US. In fact, if you Google John MacArthur without the middle initial, it takesyou to first to John F. MacArthur, a radio pastor. Yes, I am sure he is more important to US historythan the 3rd richest man in the US, with a Foundation endowed in the amount of 6 billion.But back to MacArthur's Wikipedia page. It says he was born a poor black child in rural Mississippi.Just kidding, that is a line from Steve Martin's The Jerk. But seriously, his official bio says he and hissiblings grew up in poverty, the children of an itinerant Baptist preacher. That is a bit hard to believe,considering that all his surviving brothers also became rich and/or famous. They admit that of his olderbrother Charles MacArthur, the famous playwright who was part of the Algonquin Round Table, datedDorothy Parker, and married Helen Hayes. But they forget to tell you of Alfred, who also made a mintin insurance; and Lawrence Telfer MacArthur, who was a publisher. So all four brothers just happenedto scratch their way out of crushing poverty into wealth and fame? Sure they did. Because America isjust that kind of place.A clue may be found by looking at Catherine T. MacArthur's family. Her family name was Hyland, andwe are told her father was part of the Irish Catholic political machine in South Chicago, holding severallocal and state positions. That should be another red flag, and may be a clue as to how the MacArthursadvanced. Chicago politics has long been famous for its corruption, and even Wikipedia says,The political environment in Chicago in the 1910s and 1920s let organized crime flourish to the point thatmany Chicago policemen earned more money from pay-offs than from the city.This is when Catherine MacArthur's father would have been rising in Chicago politics.We see similar fed flags when we return to John D. MacArthur's page. In addition to his insurancecompanies, he was also known as a Palm Beach, FL, real estate mogul, buying up large parts of PalmBeach and Sarasota in the 1960's. Even the PalmBeachPost admits their city has long been a bed fororganized crime, although they forget to tell you that organized crime was taken over by the Fedsdecades ago. Private mobsters no longer exist, having been absorbed by the more powerful familiesthat run the US government. As with all other business, the past 50 years has seen a monopolization ofall lucrative operations by “investment firms”, “holding companies” and of course banks. Since thesebanks and other huge companies are fronts for the same few families, there is no longer any room formobsters or any of the rest of those people. They went extinct some time in the 1960's. All theGodfather movies and Soprano shows are just misdirection to make you think organized crime stillexists in the old way. It doesn't. They have found ways to steal much larger sums of money withoutgetting their hands dirty or their names in the paper—with absolutely no risk of getting caught. Theydo it by stealing from you under the aegis of the Federal government.Anyway, so that is who funded the Hawking impostor after 1985. But why? Well, we have seen allsorts of weirdness afoot in physics and other science since then. I haven't made up this weirdness, youknow, I just circle it and comment on it. See my paper on Hawking's Brave New World, if you haven'talready. See my paper on Yuri Milner and the Fundamental Physics Prize. See my paper on the Higgs

Boson announcement, which I show was faked from the ground up. See my paper on Alan Guth andthe faked gravity wave research and promotion which preceded his 2014 Kavli Prize. Well, the reasonfor all this weirdness is the reason for all the other weirdnesses in the Modern world: money. Physicshas become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects.Hundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and theAmericas via these fake programs. And Hawking was an important PR personality in the early 1980's,one they didn't want to lose. He was a top salesman of their various boondoggles, and he became aneven better salesman once he was replaced by an impostor. Once he was replaced, his puppeteers hadcomplete control over the product they were creating, with no fear that the real Hawking might developscruples.Remember, this is exactly what they did in art in the 20th century. They got rid of all the real artists andreplaced them with impostors. The scheme was slightly different, in that they didn't replace Rodin andMonet and Whistler with look-alikes in 1900. Instead, they just replaced the entire field with theirown manufactured mannequins over a generation or two. But the Modern artists have been impostorsone way or the other. They certainly aren't artists by the old definitions, since they can't create anythingbeautiful or interesting. They are just PR personalities, the faces that front the fakery.In the very same way, physics has been taken over. Just as the Modern artists are incapable of real art,the Modern physicists are incapable of real physics. So instead they manufacture some huge pile ofequations that seems (to some gullible people) to resemble physics or math, and then sell it to Congressor Parliament as cutting-edge. The important thing is not that any physics or art gets done, but thatmoney flows from the treasury. It is all a colossal scam, of earth-shattering proportions. And I meanthat literally. All the societies of this Earth are being shattered by this rampant fakery. They arecoming apart at the seams. Not only are they being milked dry of all revenues—revenues that couldand should be going to real programs—but they are being milked dry of all inspiration, all creativity, allgood will, and all belief in humanity. Human potential is shriveling up like a spider on a hot sidewalkunder a magnifying glass, and these rich families are the magnifying glass.It has to stop. It has gotten so bad, the rich are actually undercutting themselves. For money to beworth anything there has to be something worth buying. The rich can no longer collect art, since theyhave destroyed it. They can no longer have the joy of underwriting real science, since they havedestroyed it. They can't collect books or poetry, since they have destroyed both literature and poetry.They can't enjoy the company of innocent youths, since they have destroyed the innocence of youth.They can't enjoy love, because they have destroyed it for profit. They can't enjoy beautifularchitecture, because they have destroyed it. And they can't enjoy the feeling of a day well spent,because their days aren't well spent. That is the thing about dirty money and a dirty conscience: nomatter how much you spend, you can't hire someone to clean it.[I am rushing this into print with only a few days research, since I predict they will announce his deathvery very soon.]Addendum, April 22, 2015: Two days after this paper went up, there was an internet death hoax forHawking. Someone got over a million hits at Facebook with this hoax. I read that two ways: 1) thewidely publicized hoax acts to cover this paper a bit, because some will dismiss my title withoutreading the paper, thinking it is linked to the hoax. For this reason, I assume the death hoax was startedby the same people that are behind the longterm Hawking hoax. 2) We have seen that these internetdeath hoaxes often now precede a real death announcement. See the strange goings-on before theannouncement of Robin Williams' death (which I assume was faked like the rest). This confusion is

created on purpose, because it prevents most people from making any sense of the news. Confusingnews prevents questions—perhaps surprisingly—because it causes most people's brains to shut down.You would think confusing news would create questions, and in a few people it still does. But in themajority of people, very confusing news acts as its own shield. If enough confusion is created, thereader or viewer will just see a tangled web he has no hope of unwinding, causing him to acceptwhatever he is told and “move on.” For this reason, I will double down on my prediction that the realdeath announcement of Hawking is coming soon. However, we know they are reading my papers, sothey may stall just for the purpose of nixing my prediction. At any rate, my intuition tells me theblonde impostor died recently and they are already stalling. Maybe they are looking for anotherreplacement, who knows. I think it will be hard to find someone who looked like the blonde impostordid at the end.Addendum, April 25 2015: We already have new evidence for my claim that the Hawking impostor isalso dead, in that his current appearances are via hologram. Last night he appeared in Sydney viahologram, but these 3D images cannot be confirmed to be live. Like any other images, holograms canbe taped and played back later. I will be told he responds to live questions, but that can be explained inany number of ways, included planted questions. But even if we assume or prove the questions are liveand not planted, the responses of Hawking all have to be interpreted, which allows for any amount oftrickery. From visual and aural clues alone, there is no way to tell what Hawking is responding to,which you will have to admit is convenient.There is now a follow-up to this paper from 2018. At that time, the Daily Mail in London published apiece based on my research here and admitted I was right. Two months later MI5/6 retired the project,with the announcement of Hawking's death. 33 years late.

return to updates Stephen Hawking died and has been replaced by Miles Mathis First published April 17, 2015 I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking, including a long one on his Brave New World series for the BBC.But this is my fir